Elevated oxidative stress in patients with congenital heart disease and the effect of cyanosis: a meta-analysis

Oxidative stress is an important pathophysiological mechanism in the development of numerous cardiovascular disorders. To improve therapy and preventive strategies, clinicians need a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of congenital heart diseases (CHD). The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine whether oxidative stress is elevated in patients with CHD compared to healthy controls, and to evaluate whether a difference in oxidative stress parameters can be observed between patients with cyanotic (cCHD) and acyanotic CHD (aCHD). Therefore, 21 studies investigating oxidative stress in peripheral blood of both children and adults with CHD were reviewed. Different methods to assess the oxidant status were compared and divided into three categories: pro-oxidative or anti-oxidative stress markers and the ratio of pro-to-anti oxidative stress markers. This meta-analysis showed elevated oxidative stress levels in patients with CHD, and more specifically in patients with cCHD. Moreover, this indicates that there could be potential in oxidative stress measurements as a new biomarker of disease severity. Further research will be needed to clarify the exact role of oxidative stress and its contributors in CHD in order to get a better and more in-depth understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of CHD, especially the higher susceptibility of the right ventricle (RV) to progress to heart failure (HF). This could facilitate the development of antioxidant treatments and RV-specific HF therapies, which are necessary to improve survival in these patients and could be of particular importance in cCHD.

Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 for Predicting the Severity of COVID-19: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequence Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to find the association between serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and the severity of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection.

DATA SOURCES

Databases of Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Google Scholar were searched for studies reporting KL-6 levels in COVID-19 patients, published between January 2020 and September 30 2022.

DATA SYNTHESIS

For comparison between the groups, standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed as the effect sizes. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were measured to assess the diagnostic power of KL-6. In addition, the summary receiver operating characteristics curve (sROC) was constructed to summarize the true positive (TP), and false positive (FP) rates. To validate the findings of meta-analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was conducted.

RESULTS

Altogether 497 severe COVID-19 patients and 934 non-severe (mild to moderate) COVID-19 patients were included. Pooling of 12 studies indicated that the serum KL-6 level had significant association with severity of COVID-19 infection: standard mean difference = 1.18 (95% CI: 0.93-1.43), p = 0.01; I²: 58.56%]. Pooled diagnostic parameters calculated from eight studies were: sensitivity 0.53 (95% CI: 0.47-0.59); specificity 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93); positive likelihood ratio 4.80 (95% CI: 3.53-6.53); negative likelihood ratio 0.46 (95% CI: 0.32-0.68); and area under curve: 0.8841. Additionally, TSA verified the adequacy of sample size and robustness of the meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Serum KL-6 level has a moderate degree of correlation with the severity of COVID-19 infection but has low sensitivity. So, it is not recommended as a screening test for severe COVID-19 infection.