Factors Associated With Same Day Discharge Post-Spinal Cord Stimulator Placement

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord stimulator (SCS) surgeries, whether performed using the open or percutaneous approach, are becoming increasingly common for a range of neuropathic pain conditions, including post-laminectomy syndrome and complex regional pain syndrome. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the factors linked to same-day discharge patterns following SCS.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with same-day discharge after SCS placement. The primary outcome was same-day discharge.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, cohort study using a nationwide database.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria included patients who underwent percutaneous or open SCS from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2021. Exclusion criteria included patients with missing data (n = 178) and those with SCS implants for unlisted indications (n = 1,817). A multivariable analysis was conducted on the outcome data and co-variates associated with same-day discharge after SCS.

RESULTS

After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 18,058 patients remained in the final data set, including 7,339 patients who underwent percutaneous SCS and 10,719 patients who underwent open SCS procedures. After analysis, factors associated with increased rates of same-day discharge after SCS included men (odds ratio [OR] 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09 -1.24;  P < 0.001), patients on Medicaid (OR 1.64; 95% CI, 0.1.34 - 2.01; P < 0.001), and hospitals in the US Midwest (OR 1.66; 95% CI, 1.45 - 1.90; P < 0.001) and hospitals in the US West (OR 1.32; 95% CI, 1.20 - 1.46; P < 0.001). Factors associated with decreased rates of same-day discharge after SCS included the open approach (OR 0.21; 95% CI, 0.19 - 0.23; P < 0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54 - 0.69; P < 0.001) and increased age (OR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98 - 0.99; P < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

Since our study is retrospective, the data are subject to various biases, including variable confounding, human error in data entry, and generalizability of the results.

CONCLUSION

These results can be used to help determine hospital bed needs post-SCS surgery. Future research should focus on identifying the specific reasons certain demographic and geographic factors might influence same-day discharge rates. Our study provides important insights into the factors associated with same-day discharge rates post open and percutaneous SCS implant and highlights the need for patient-centered, evidence-based approaches to health care delivery.

A Pilot Survey: Retention in Pain Medicine Among Fellowship Trained Anesthesiologists

BACKGROUND

We aim to explore the factors related to job satisfaction among pain physicians and identify the reasons why individuals minimize or stop practicing outpatient pain medicine.

OBJECTIVES/STUDY DESIGN

This is a survey-based study with the primary goal to identify factors determining job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among pain medicine fellowship graduates who continue to practice and those who are no longer practicing interventional pain. A secondary goal is to elucidate reasons for anesthesiologists trained in pain medicine to leave pain medicine, despite an additional year of training, and to work as general anesthesiologists.

METHODS

In this study, all 114 pain program directors listed on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) website, or their administrative assistants were directly contacted via email. All email addresses were obtained from the ACGME website. The survey opened in September 2021, with reminder emails sent before the closing of the survey in December 2021. A final reminder email was sent 4 weeks prior to the closing of the survey.

RESULTS

Of all the respondents, 79 (89.77%) were currently practicing pain medicine, and 9 (10.23%) were no longer practicing pain medicine.

LIMITATIONS

Our study has a major limitation as we are unable to determine the response rate and are limited in the data points gathered.

CONCLUSION

We hope this study will allow for pain medicine fellowship program directors to improve recruitment and retention of pain fellows in the field while addressing the pros and cons of future career aspirations with anesthesiology residents prior to fellowship selection. A larger, more thorough study with an exact response rate can compare the various outcomes based upon different types of settings, such as private practice, partnership, and academia, as well as geographical locations.

Painful Diabetic Neuropathy - Spinal Cord Stimulation, Peripheral Nerve Stimulation, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, and Scrambler Therapy: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

First-line medications for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) are associated with a substantial rate of discontinuation due to adverse effects or insufficient efficacy. Neuromodulation techniques have been used for PDN, but a comprehensive review of the literature that incorporates several distinct device categories has yet to be undertaken.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to summarize the evidence regarding 4 major types of neuromodulation devices for the treatment of PDN. We focused on spinal cord stimulators (SCS), peripheral nerve stimulators (PNS), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators (TENS), and scrambler therapy devices (ST) because they are often used for refractory neuropathic pain.

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative Review.

METHODS

A comprehensive and reproducible literature search was performed using PubMed with no search restrictions applied. The available Medical Subject Headings were used. Inclusion criteria included prospective studies, retrospective studies, case series, and case reports indexed from database inception to the search date (September 14, 2021).

RESULTS

Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria, 10 of which were regarding SCS. Only 3 of the 10 were randomized controlled trials. We found no studies assessing contemporary PNS. Four studies assessed TENS, but the devices varied widely in voltages and waveforms. Two case reports described ST.

LIMITATIONS

Potential selection bias due to the nature of a narrative review, although a reproducible search strategy was utilized. Several neuromodulation modalities have minimal published evidence available.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for neuromodulation devices for the treatment of PDN mostly comprises open-label prospective trials or case reports. SCS has the most volume of evidence for efficacy. Studies regarding TENS show mixed results, possibly due to numerous device varieties. PNS and ST may hold promise based on their proposed mechanisms of action, but prospective controlled trials are needed.

Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Applications in Chronic Pain Medicine: Establishing a Framework for Future Research - A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

During the last decades, platelet-rich plasma has been studied for the treatment of multiple chronic pain conditions, in addition to being employed in the enhancement of healing after tissue injury.

OBJECTIVE

To establish a framework for future research regarding the utilization of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of chronic tissue injuries.

METHODS

Preclinical and clinical studies from 2000-2020 relevant to applications of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of chronic pain conditions were extracted from PubMed and Medline databases. The studies were analyzed on the basis of the study population, type of intervention, method of platelet-rich plasma preparation, the number of treatments administered, the timeframe of injections, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Although several preclinical studies and double-blind, randomized trials have shown promising results in the application of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of multiple chronic pain conditions, various studies have also reported controversial results. Additionally, the methods employed for obtaining the platelet-rich plasma have not been standardized between studies, resulting in different concentrations of blood components between the preparations utilized. Moreover, differences between studies were also found regarding the number of injections administered per treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research addressing the utilization of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of chronic pain conditions should focus on shedding light on the following major questions: a) Is there a dose-effect relation between the platelet count and the clinical efficacy of the preparation?; b) What pathology determinants should be considered when selecting between leukocyte-enriched and leukocyte-depleted concentrates?; c) What is the role of platelet activation methods on the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma?; d) Is there an optimal number of injections and time frame for application of multiple injection treatment cycles?; e) Does the addition of local anesthetics affect the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma?; and f) Is there potential for future platelet-rich plasma applications for the treatment of neuropathic pain of peripheral origin?