Differences in aortic cusp coaptation between the reimplantation and the remodeling techniques of aortic valve-sparing surgery: an in vitro porcine model study

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the effects of the reimplantation type versus the remodeling type of aortic valve-sparing technique on the geometry of the same aortic root.

METHODS

Fifteen fresh isolated porcine hearts with normal aortic valves and a standard aortoventricular junction size of 23 mm were processed. An aortic valve-sparing replacement was performed by reimplanting the native aortic root inside a 28-mm Valsalva graft (Vascutek Ltd, Renfrewshire, UK). Hearts were subsequently implanted with instruments in a test circuit, and the aortic roots were pressurized at a fixed pressure of 100 mm Hg. Diameters of the aortoventricular junction, of the sinuses, and of the sinotubular junction, as well as effective height and coaptation height of aortic valve leaflets, were measured by echography. Transition from the reimplantation to the remodeling configuration was then achieved by longitudinally cutting the skirt of the graft from the annulus to the top of each commissure. The same measurements were then repeated.

RESULTS

After transition from the reimplantation to the remodeling configuration, significant increases in the sizes of the aortoventricular junction and of the sinuses were observed. Effective height and coaptation height significantly decreased, and the rounded cross-sectional profile of the aortic valve leaflets flattened.

CONCLUSIONS

In the same aortic root, transition from the reimplantation to the remodeling configuration of aortic valve-sparing surgery results in a significant increase in aortic root sizes and in a significant reduction of effective height and coaptation height, suggesting a less satisfactory result.

Aortic root conservative repair of acute type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root: fate of the aortic root and aortic valve function

OBJECTIVES

Despite many studies about aortic valve function and aortic root geometry after conservative aortic root repair of acute type A aortic dissection, the results are not always consistent or conclusive. This study aims to evaluate aortic root diameter and aortic valve function after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 196 consecutive patients (age, 56.9 ± 11.4 years; 96 men) who underwent conservative aortic root repair including sinotubular junction resuspension for the management of acute type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality rate was 5.1% (n = 10). During a median follow-up period of 45.3 ± 36.4 months, there were 28 deaths and 11 cases of aortic reoperation (proximal reoperation in 1 and distal reoperation in 10). Of the 6-month survivors (n = 177, 90.3%), echocardiography and computed tomography were performed in the late period (>6 months) on 115 (65.0%) and 138 (78.0%), respectively. Significant aortic regurgitation (greater than grade 2+) or root dilatation (>45 mm) was observed in 5 and 19 patients, respectively. Freedom from aortic regurgitation (greater than grade 2+) or root dilatation (>45 mm) at 5 years was 84.6% ± 3.9%. On the Cox regression analysis, the maximal aortic root diameter at initial presentation was the only significant predictor of aortic regurgitation and aortic root dilatation (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.19; P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative aortic root repair of acute type A aortic dissection demonstrates acceptable long-term clinical outcomes. However, more aggressive approaches should be considered for patients who have aortic root dilatation because of the risk of developing a root aneurysm after surgery.