Amini A, Morgan R, Meyer E, Fakhoury K, Ladbury C, Bickett T, McDermott JD, Stokes W, Karam SD. Outcomes between intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus 3D-conformal in early stage glottic cancer.
Head Neck 2021;
43:3393-3403. [PMID:
34382714 DOI:
10.1002/hed.26841]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study is to evaluate practice patterns and outcomes between intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 3D-conformal radiation (3D-CRT) in early stage glottic cancer.
METHODS
The linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database was used to identify and compare patient and disease profiles, mortality, and toxicity in patients with T1-2 larynx cancer undergoing definitive radiation (RT).
RESULTS
A total of 1520 patients underwent definitive radiation with 3D-CRT (n = 1309) or IMRT (n = 211). Non-white race, those with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2, T2 disease, and those treated at community practices were more likely to undergo IMRT. Rates of IMRT increased from 2006 to 2015, while relative rates of 3D-CRT decreased. Two-year CSS was superior with 3D-CRT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.65; p < 0.001). There was no difference in OS between 3D-CRT and IMRT (p = 0.119).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients receiving 3D-CRT had improved CSS compared to IMRT with no difference in OS.
Collapse