Suprafascial plane endoscopy versus open carpal tunnel release for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: Use of the Accordion Severity Grading System

This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of modified endoscopic technique with a single portal from an external carpal tunnel approach for surgical operations in a suprafascial plane superficial to the transverse carpal ligament. Reversible nerve injury risk is threefold greater with a conventional endoscopic method than with open carpal tunnel release (OCTR), and this suprafascial plane endoscopic release (SPER) should circumvent the problem of hardware in the carpal tunnel encountered with the conventional endoscopic method and liable to cause iatrogenic damage to the median nerve. However, the surgical consequences of the new technique have not been studied. To fill this gap, a retrospective therapeutic study was conducted to compare negative outcomes versus open surgery. The Accordion Severity Grading System was used to grade complications from 0 to 3 according to necessity of treatment. Sequela and failure rates were also compared between the SPER and OCTR groups. Eighty-eight cases in 72 patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (ICTS) met the inclusion criteria. SPER was performed in 28 hands in 27 patients, and OCTR in 60 hands in 49 patients. The results showed no significant difference in complication, sequela, or failure rates between groups (p > 0.05). Suprafascial plane endoscopic release, has certain advantages over the open method and was validated as a safe and effective method of treating ICTS.

Critical evaluation of quality of hepatopancreatic surgery in a medium-volume center in Finland using the Accordion Severity Grading System and the Postoperative Morbidity Index

Background

Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery is prone to complications. Methods are needed to monitor surgical outcomes and enable comparison between institutions.

Methods

Complications were collected prospectively and reviewed using the modified Accordion Severity Grading System (MASGS) and the Postoperative Morbidity Index (PMI).

Results

This study included 527 consecutive patients receiving either pancreatic or liver resection in 2000-2017 in Central Finland Central Hospital. The PMI was 0.177 for all patients, and 0.192, 0.094, 0.285, and 0.129 for patients receiving major pancreatic (n=218), minor pancreatic (n=93), major liver (n=73), and minor liver (n=143) resection, respectively. The rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomies (n=200) were 6.5% for grade B and 5.5% for grade C; rates for biliary leak were 1.0% (grade A), 2.5% (grade B), and 0.5% (grade C). Similarly, the rates for delayed gastric emptying (DGE) were 2.8% (grade A), 15.6% (grade B), and 3.7% (grade C). Postoperative hepatic dysfunction occurred in 2.3%, major surgical site bleeding in 2.3%, and biloma in 7.9% of patients after liver resection. Ninety-day mortality rates were 3.7% and 1.1% in major and minor pancreatic resections, and 8.2% and 0.7% in major and minor liver resections. Major complications occurred in 13.3% and 3.3% in pancreatic, and 19.2% and 6.3% in liver resections, respectively.

Conclusions

Major pancreatic and hepatic surgery are associated with significant morbidity and burden in our center, comparable with previous population-based studies. PMI is an informative way to monitor surgical outcomes and enable comparison between institutions.

Use of the Accordion Severity Grading System for negative outcomes of carpal tunnel syndrome

A universal classification of the negative outcomes of carpal tunnel release surgery does not, as yet, exist. In order to avoid the use of arbitrary factors we have applied the Accordion Severity Grading System, which uses rigorously defined qualitative terms to classify complications. It also provides a uniform manner for grading the severity of complications, enabling outcome comparisons between centres. We analysed the negative outcomes of 500 device-assisted carpal tunnel releases performed over a 2-year period in the author's department. In order to establish a standardised list of complications we used the terms employed within the guidelines of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Most of these terms were subsequently defined using the data variables and definitions taken from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program or the Medical Subject Headings of the National Library of Medicine. We also adopted the quantitative severity weighting, as proposed by the Accordion system, in order to determine the postoperative morbidity index for our assisted carpal tunnel releases. The most common complications were pain and reversible damage to peripheral nerves. Other common negative events, other than complications, included hand weakness, which we classified as a sequela of the procedure, and incomplete retinaculum release, which we classified as failure to cure. The overall postoperative morbidity index for complications was 0.014. Although the Accordion system was developed for more complex procedures, it may also be adopted for carpal tunnel release surgery where it provides an objective and universal method for the classification of complications.