1
|
Omura G, Yoshimoto S, Rikitake R, Eguchi K, Nakamizo M, Nibu KI. Comparison of survival outcomes between adolescent and young adults and older adults with tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a nationwide database study using the head and neck cancer registry of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:221-8. [PMID: 36520256 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02279-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic outcome for adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC). METHODS Data were obtained from the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan, and patients who were newly diagnosed with TSCC from 2011 to 2014 were extracted. We compared the clinical parameter and survival of the ≤ 39 years old (AYA) patient group with the 40-79 (non-AYA) group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used for survival analyses. RESULTS Our cohort included 2221 patients with TSCC. AYA and non-AYA groups consisted of 258 and 1963 patients, respectively. The AYA group has a larger proportion of females than the non-AYA group (P < 0.001). Following PSM, both overall and disease-specific survival of the AYA group was significantly longer than those of the non-AYA group (P = 0.009 and P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION We demonstrated the survival superiority of AYA patients with TSCC compared to older adult patients. Therefore, our study results may reduce this anxiety by providing patients with appropriate information of prognosis for AYA patients with TSCC.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ohara T, Kuji S, Takenaga T, Imai H, Endo H, Kanamori R, Takeuchi J, Nagasawa Y, Yokomichi N, Kondo H, Deura I, Tozawa A, Suzuki N. Current state of fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult patients with gynecological cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 27:25-34. [PMID: 34779961 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-02063-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Although the incidence of the various gynecological cancers has been increasing in recent years, long-term survival is now possible for many patients thanks to advances in multimodality treatment. When treating gynecological cancer in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients who desire future pregnancy, it is necessary to preserve the reproductive organs and their function to prevent loss of fertility. However, because treatment targets these organs, in the large majority of cases, patients must have these organs removed. In the subfield of oncofertility, treatment of the underlying disease takes priority, and the main principle is preventing delay in treatment. Close cooperation between obstetricians and gynecologists involved in reproductive medicine and oncologists involved in cancer treatment is necessary. In addition, it is important that clinicians work closely not only with other specialists but also with such medical professionals as nurses and counselors so that cancer patients of the AYA generation can be provided the support they need to fight their cancer with hope. Herein, we describe the current status of fertility-sparing therapy for AYA patients with gynecological cancer (cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, or ovarian cancer). In addition, we explain points to keep in mind during a patient's pregnancy after fertility preservation, the latest findings on assisted reproductive technology, and the challenges and prospects of fertility preservation therapy for patients with gynecologic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuru Ohara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Shiho Kuji
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Tomo Takenaga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Haruka Imai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Hiraku Endo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Ryo Kanamori
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Jun Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Yuko Nagasawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Yokomichi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Haruhiro Kondo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Imari Deura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Akiko Tozawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Nao Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akisada N, Monden N, Kishino T, Aoi J, Hayashi Y, Takahashi S, Nakamura M, Ishihara H, Nishizaki K. Otorhinolaryngologists/head and neck surgeons' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding fertility preservation in young cancer patients treated with chemotherapy: an anonymous questionnaire survey. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:1196-202. [PMID: 33956243 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01905-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is well known that chemotherapy for adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer can reduce fertility regardless of the regimen. A decline in fertility greatly affects the quality of life of cancer survivors in the AYA age group; however, few patients are thought to be receiving fertility preservation measures. METHODS A questionnaire survey was conducted to assess the current understanding and consideration of fertility among otorhinolaryngologists/head and neck surgeons who treat AYA patients with cancer, and to inform them of the guidelines for fertility preservation. A total of 275 otorhinolaryngologists/head and neck surgeons working at our hospital in Ehime, Japan, six neighboring universities, and their affiliated facilities were included in this study. The questionnaire was mailed and requested to be returned by fax. Twenty questions were asked about respondents' years of experience as physicians, specialties, experience in medical care and chemotherapy for AYA patients with cancer, and knowledge and experience in fertility reduction measures. RESULTS Although 58.7% of the physicians were aware that cryopreservation of eggs and sperm prior to chemotherapy was recommended, only 7 out of 40 physicians (17.5%) had referred AYA patients with cancer to an appropriate medical facility (department) after obtaining informed consent for chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Although fertility preservation has been discussed at professional conferences and seminars, consideration and actions in the field of otorhinolaryngology/head and neck surgery have not been sufficient. We hope that the results of this survey will help raise awareness of fertility preservation.
Collapse
|