Racial Differences in Cutaneous Events Among Patients Receiving Enfortumab Vedotin

INTRODUCTION

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved alone and in combination with pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial cancer (UC). EV-related-cutaneous-events (EVCEs) are common and rarely life-threatening. Black patients are frequently under-represented in oncology trials, and dermatologic conditions may vary with race.

METHODS

Therefore, this retrospective analysis investigated differences in EVCE frequency between Black and White patients in an urban cohort (Johns Hopkins [JH]) and a US-based, nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database (Flatiron Health [FH]) with sub-group analysis of those who had received prior pembrolizumab.

RESULTS

The study included 12 Black patients in the JH Cohort (17.1%) and 24 Black patients in the FH Cohort (7.6%). In both cohorts, the frequency of EVCEs among Black patients was higher compared to White patients (JH: 66.7% vs. 33.3%; FH: 25.0% vs. 15.8%), though not statistically significant. In the larger FH Cohort EVCEs were significantly more common among Black compared to White patients treated with prior pembrolizumab (Odds Ratio [OR]: 4.76 [95%CI: 1.42, 15.95]) and recent pembrolizumab (within 90 days of EV initiation) (OR 9.00 [95%CI: 1.94, 41.66]).

CONCLUSION

This hypothesis-generating retrospective study, comprising the largest population of EV-treated Black patients reported to date, emphasizes the importance of attentiveness to EVCEs among Black patients, particularly with receipt of pembrolizumab.

Efficacy and Safety of Disitamab Vedotin Combined with Programmed Death-1 Inhibitor for Advanced Urothelial Cancer: A Case-Series Study

INTRODUCTION

Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors play crucial roles in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer (aUC). Increasingly, combination treatment modalities are used in patients with aUC intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). However, clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of disitamab vedotin plus PD-1 inhibitors for aUC is limited. This case series aims to address this knowledge gap.

METHODS

Patients with aUC who were refractory or intolerant to PBC were included. All patients received combined treatment with disitamab vedotin (one of the ADC drugs) and PD-1 inhibitors for at least three cycles. The clinical characteristics of examination, histopathology, outcomes, and adverse events (AEs) were retrospectively collected.

RESULTS

Among this case series, eight patients received disitamab vedotin plus PD-1 inhibitors, of which three achieved a complete response (CR) and two had a partial response (PR). The most common AE was peripheral neuropathy (4/8); the remaining AEs were mostly of mild to moderate severity or unknown and were manageable by supportive care.

CONCLUSIONS

Disitamab vedotin combined with PD-1 inhibitors exhibits a favorable efficacy and safety profile, but subsequent larger cohort clinical studies are required to provide evidence-based medicine for the universal application of this regimen.

Treatment Patterns and Real-World Outcomes for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There are limited data on real-world outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) since immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became available. Our objective was to analyze outcomes for patients with mUC since ICIs became available.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 131 patients with mUC attending the outpatient clinic of a single tertiary care center who received systemic therapy between June 2017 and July 2021 with follow-up up to December 2022. Summary and descriptive statistics were calculated for categorical and continuous variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to calculate survival, and a Cox proportional-hazards model was used to explore associations between clinical variables and outcomes.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The median patient age was 68 yr (range 35-90). The first systemic therapy administered was platinum-based in 79% of cases and ICI-based in 21%. Some 61% of the cohort received a second systemic treatment, with 75% of these an ICI. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 24 mo (interquartile range 9-35). Patients on ICI therapy for ≥6 mo had median overall survival of 59 mo (95% confidence interval 39 mo-not reached). Metastatic sites on initiation of ICI therapy and C-reactive protein kinetics were prognostic in patients receiving ICIs. Limitations include the retrospective design and inherent selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

More than 60% of patients with mUC received second-line treatment, and 75% of these received an ICI. Patients staying on immunotherapy for more than 6 mo have substantially better outcomes in comparison to patients with less time on immunotherapy and historical cohorts.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We looked at the lines of therapy and outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer of the urinary tract, starting from when immunotherapy drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became available. We found that 60% of patients have received second-line therapy, which is a double the rate in comparison to historical groups of patients. Patients with long-term ICI therapy (>6 months) had significantly better outcomes, with a median survival of more than 3 years.

Enfortumab Vedotin-related Cutaneous Toxicity and Radiographic Response in Patients with Urothelial Cancer: A Single-center Experience and Review of the Literature

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of refractory advanced urothelial cancer. Cutaneous toxicity is well described but has not been correlated with response. In this retrospective single-center study, data from patients treated with more than one dose of EV between December 2017 and June 2022 were analyzed. Of 56 patients with a median age of 69 yr, 41 (73.2%) were male and 27 (48.2%) had any-grade skin toxicity. For all 51 patients evaluable by physician-assessed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, the response rate was 41.2%. For those with cutaneous toxicity, the response rate was 57.7%; for those without cutaneous toxicity, it was 24.0% (p = 0.0145). All three patients with complete response experienced cutaneous toxicity, and two of these responses remain durable 5 and 24 mo off EV. The median starting weight and body mass index (BMI) were, respectively, 80.86 kg and 26.53 kg/m² among patients with cutaneous toxicity, and 69.37 kg and 23.29 kg/m² in patients without (p = 0.0129 and 0.0014, respectively). In this small dataset, EV-related cutaneous toxicity was more common in patients with higher weight and BMI at baseline, and was associated with disease response. Confirmation in prospective trials may confirm this association and lead to an important clinical biomarker of response.

Patient summary

We evaluated patients with urothelial cancer who were treated at our institution with enfortumab vedotin (EV). We found that patients who experienced the common side effect of any type of skin toxicity, such as rash or itching, were more likely to have improvement in their cancer from EV treatment than those who did not experience skin toxicity. Patients with higher weight and body mass index when starting EV tended to have more skin toxicity. We conclude that presence of skin toxicity might help doctors make decisions about how to manage the care of patients with EV in the future.

Pembrolizumab Versus Combined Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel: A Comparative Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Platinum-refractory Advanced Urothelial Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

There are limited data on comprehensive assessments of several treatments as second-line therapy against advanced urothelial cancer (UC). The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between advanced UC patients receiving either pembrolizumab (Pem) or combined chemotherapy with gemcitabine and paclitaxel (GP) as second-line therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 89 patients with platinum-refractory advanced UC, consisting of 46 and 43 who received Pem and GP therapy, respectively, as second-line treatment.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in major clinicopathological parameters between Pem and GP groups. No significant difference in the objective response rate was noted between the two groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) in the Pem group was significantly longer than that in the GP group; however, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between them. Multivariate analyses identified performance status ≤2 and liver metastasis as independent factors associated with poor outcomes in both PFS and OS. The incidence of adverse events in the GP group was significantly higher than that in the Pem group.

CONCLUSION

Pem could be regarded as standard agent for platinum-refractory advanced UC patients.

Sequential therapies for advanced urothelial cancer: Hope meets new challenges

A dramatic change in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinomas (UC) occurred in the last 3 years, initially with the development of several check-point inhibitors, for second and first-line therapy. More recently, the approval of anti-FGFR (Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor) and anti-nectin-4 inhibitors based on phase 2 studies in refractory disease, and the preliminary results of 3 randomized phase 3 trials combining chemotherapy and immunotherapy in first-line as well as using maintenance immunotherapy after chemotherapy induction, created a new paradigm in the treatment of metastatic disease. In this review, we will explore the new classes of agents and how they could be incorporated in the clinical practice as well as the results of recently presented randomized studies, guiding oncologists on the possible sequences for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Programmed Death 1 and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Advanced and Recurrent Urothelial Carcinoma: Meta-analysis of Single-Agent Studies

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the response rates of patients with treatment-refractory urothelial carcinoma treated with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. We reviewed the literature for prospective studies evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in refractory urothelial carcinoma patients, which formed the basis for US Food and Drug Administration approval of 5 different antagonistic antibodies targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab). We considered studies examining PD-1/PD-L1-treated patients, which we identified using the following key terms in the Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrial.gov, and Cochrane Library databases. Eligible studies had ≥ 20 patients each and reported response rates, duration of response, and overall survival (OS). We performed fixed and random-effects meta-analyses to model the point estimates for objective response rate and complete response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS for studies reporting these statistics were evaluated. We found 10 eligible studies that met our inclusion criteria, providing extractable numerators and denominators for response rates, PFS, and OS for 1934 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The objective response rate was 18% (95% confidence interval, 15-22) for second-line or later therapies. The random-effects estimate for complete response was 4% (95% confidence interval, 3-5), including all disease locations and all PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. Median OS and PFS were < 13 months and 3 months, respectively, across all studies, irrespective of PD-L1 expression. We found that the estimated response rates of agents included in this meta-analysis seem to be more favorable than other salvage therapies.

Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in recurrent, advanced urothelial cancer in Japanese patients: a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial

Background

The open-label, randomized, active-controlled KEYNOTE-045 study (NCT02256436) showed that second-line pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) that progressed after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy, compared with standard chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine). Pembrolizumab is approved for patients with bladder cancer in Japan.

Patients and methods

Analysis was performed in the subgroup of Japanese patients enrolled in the KEYNOTE-045 study. Coprimary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS). Objective response rate (ORR) and safety were secondary end points.

Results

Fifty-two Japanese patients (pembrolizumab, n = 30; chemotherapy, n = 22) were followed up for a median of 26.1 months. Patients who received pembrolizumab compared with chemotherapy had a 19% lower risk for death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.44–1.50); after adjusting for baseline covariates, the HR for OS was 0.61 (95% CI 0.32–1.15). The 24-month OS rate was higher with pembrolizumab (26.9% vs 14.3%). PFS was 2.0 and 4.9 months for pembrolizumab and chemotherapy, respectively (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.95–3.08). ORR was similar for pembrolizumab and chemotherapy (20.0% vs 18.2%); durability of response was higher with pembrolizumab: 67% and 33% of patients, respectively, maintained a response for > 12 months. Treatment-related adverse events, including grade 3–5 events, occurred less frequently with pembrolizumab.

Conclusions

Pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced/metastatic UC that progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy in the overall population and in the Japanese subgroup; safety profile was consistent with that previously observed for pembrolizumab.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10147-019-01545-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors after platinum-based chemotherapy or in first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients: Dramatic improvement of prognosis and overall survival after decades of hopelessness in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer

Until recently, there were no true innovations in the management of locally advanced (aUC) and metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) in the last three decades. Vinflunine has been approved by the EMA (European Medicines Agency) with only limited improvement compared to best supportive care in second line treatment. In addition, gemcitabine/cisplatin has been established as an alternative to methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC). The advent of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) revolutionized the care of these patients, transforming a unanimously deadly disease into one with hope through sustained disease control. Five immune CPI have recently been approved for aUC/mUC by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) including atezolizumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab and avelumab. All five CPI are FDA-approved as second-line therapy with atezolizumab and pembrolizumab also being approved for first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients. The rapid acceptance in the treatment algorithm of UC is based on the impressive clinical efficacy of these agents in some patients, combined with their excellent safety profile. These new agents are indeed the most important advancement in UC care. However, the challenge in the age of precision medicine is to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from CPIs, as the majority of patients do not respond to CPI. Toward this goal, validation of clinical, molecular and imaging biomarkers that serve for prediction and monitoring of treatment response are of central necessity.

A Phase II Clinical Trial of TRC105 (Anti-Endoglin Antibody) in Adults With Advanced/Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In this trial we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of TRC105, a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets CD105 (endoglin) in patients with advanced, previously treated urothelial carcinoma (UC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received TRC105 15 mg/kg every 2 weeks on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Secondary end points included safety, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). CD105 expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a separate cohort of 50 UC patients. Biomarker studies included immune subsets, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating endothelial cells (CECs), circulating endothelial progenitor cells (CEPs), and osteopontin.

RESULTS

Of 13 patients enrolled, 12 were evaluable for OS and PFS. The 3-month PFS probability was 18.2% (median PFS, 1.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.8-2.1 months). This met the criterion for ending accrual on the basis of the 2-stage design. Median OS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 3.3-17.0 months). IHC for CD105 scores was not associated with T stage (P = .26) or presence of lymph nodes (P = .64). Baseline levels of regulatory T and B cells, CEPs, and changes in CEC level after TRC105 exhibited trends toward an association with PFS or OS. CTCs pre- and post-TRC105 were detected in 4 of 4 patients.

CONCLUSION

Although TRC105 was well tolerated, it did not improve 6-month PFS in heavily pretreated patients with advanced UC. CD105 staining was present in 50% of UC tumors at different intensities. Our observations on the pharmacodynamic significance of immune subsets, CECs, and CTCs warrant further study.

Utilization of Systemic Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective Collaborative Study by the Hellenic Genitourinary Cancer Group (HGUCG)

BACKGROUND

Advanced urothelial cancer (AUCa) is associated with poor long-term survival. Two major concerns are related to nonexposure to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and poor outcome after relapse. Our purpose was to record patterns of practice in AUCa in Greece, focusing on first-line treatment and management of relapsed disease.

METHODS

Patients with AUCa treated from 2011 to 2013 were included in the analysis. Fitness for cisplatin was assessed by recently established criteria.

RESULTS

Of 327 patients treated with first-line chemotherapy, 179 (55%) did not receive cisplatin. Criteria for unfitness for cisplatin were: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥ 2, 21%; creatinine clearance ≤ 60 mL/min, 55%; hearing impairment, 8%; neuropathy, 1%; and cardiac failure, 5%. Forty-six patients (27%) did not fulfill any criterion for unfitness for cisplatin. The main reasons for these deviations were comorbidities (28%) and advanced age (32%). Seventy-four (68%) of 109 patients who experienced a relapse received second-line chemotherapy. The most frequent reason for not offering second-line chemotherapy was poor PS or limited life expectancy (66%).

CONCLUSION

In line with international data, approximately 50% of Greek patients with AUCa do not receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, although 27% of them were suitable for such treatment. In addition, about one third of patients with relapse did not receive second-line chemotherapy because of poor PS or short life expectancy. Enforcing criteria for fitness for cisplatin and earlier diagnosis of relapse represent 2 targets for improvement in current treatment practice for AUCa.

Salvage systemic therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma: on the cusp of a sea change?

This commentary addresses salvage therapy of advanced urothelial carcinoma and the importance of prognostic classification. Patients should be referred to one of the important clinical trials of salvage therapy rather than treatment with marginally active chemotherapeutic agents.

Conditional survival of patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial cancer

BACKGROUND

Measures of prognosis for cancer patients are typically evaluated at the time of diagnosis. However, this study assessed the changes in 2-year CS rates after first-line chemotherapy for metastatic UC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Conditional overall survival and CPFS probability were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adjusted survival functions were stratified according to age groups (< 70 years vs. ≥ 70 years), sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS; ECOG PS ≤ 2 vs. ECOG PS > 2), pretreatment Hb levels (< 12 mg/dL vs. ≥ 12 mg/dL) and pretreatment NLR (< 3 vs. ≥ 3). Pairs of CS curves were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-eight patients were included in this analysis, 233 were male, and their median age was 69 years. First-line median overall survival and progression-free survival were 10.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6-12.6) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.5-7.1), respectively. CPFS and COS showed an increasing trend in the population considered (b = 0.35; P < .001 and b = 0.79; P < .001, respectively). A significant increase in terms of COS and CPFS trends was identified in patients with age < 70 years (P = .02 and P = .005, respectively) and pretreatment NLR ≤ 3 (P = .05 and P < .001, respectively). Patients with Hb levels < 12 g/dL showed a significantly poorer 2-year COS.

CONCLUSION

The conditional probability of survival at 2 years from the start of first-line chemotherapy for advanced UC changes over time according to clinical characteristics.