Robust caregiver-youth discrepancies in irritability ratings on the affective reactivity index: An investigation of its origins

OBJECTIVE

The Affective Reactivity Index (ARI) is widely used to assess young people's irritability symptoms, but youth and caregivers often diverge in their assessments. Such informant discrepancy might be rooted in poor psychometric properties, the differential conceptualization of irritability across informants, or reflect sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. We use an out-of-sample replication approach and leverage longitudinal data, available for a subset of the participants, to test these hypotheses.

METHOD

Across two independent samples (N_Cohort-1 = 765, 8-21 years; N_Cohort-2 = 1910, 6-21 years), we investigate the reliability and measurement invariance of the ARI, examine sociodemographic and clinical predictors of discrepant reporting and probe the utility of a bifactor model for cross-informant integration.

RESULTS

Despite good internal consistency and 6-week-retest-reliability of parent (Cohort-1: α = 0.92, ICC = 0.85; Cohort-2: α = 0.93) and youth forms (Cohort-1: α = 0.88, ICC = 0.78; Cohort-2: α = 0.82), we confirm substantial informant discrepancy in ARI ratings (3 points on a scale from 0 to 12), which is stable over six weeks (ICC = 0.53). Measurement invariance across informants was weak, indicating that parents and youth may interpret ARI items differently. Irritability severity and diagnostic status predicted informant-discrepancy, albeit in opposing directions: higher severity was linked to relative, higher irritability-ratings by youth (Cohort-1: β = -0.06, p < .001; Cohort-2: β = -0.06, p < .001), while diagnoses of Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (Cohort-1: β = 0.44, p < .001; Cohort-2: β = 0.84, p < .001) and Oppositional Defiant Disorder (Cohort-1: β = 0.41, p < .001; Cohort-2: β = 0.42, p < .001) predicted relative higher irritability-ratings by caregivers. In both datasets, a bifactor model parsing informant-specific from shared irritability-related variance fit the data well (CFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.05; N₂: CFI = 0.99; RMSEA = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Parent and youth ARI reports and their discrepancy are reliable and reflect different interpretations of the scale items; hence they should not be averaged. This finding also suggests that irritability is not a unitary construct. Future work should investigate and model how different aspects of irritability might differ in their impact on the responses of specific informants.

Perinatal and birth correlates of childhood irritability in Taiwan's national epidemiological study

BACKGROUND

Childhood irritability, characterized by low frustration tolerance and developmentally-inappropriate temper outbursts, is a transdiagnostic symptom in child psychiatry. Little is known regarding the influences of early experience and environmental exposure on irritability from a perinatal perspective. This study examined the associations between irritability and multiple perinatal and birth factors.

METHODS

Drawn Taiwan's National Epidemiological Study of Child Mental Disorders, 5124 children (2591 females) aged 7.7 to 14.6 years (mean 11.2 years) and their parents completed the Affective Reactivity Index, a well-established irritability measure. Parents completed a survey on parental, perinatal, and birth characteristics. Multiple linear regression models were performed to examine the associations between perinatal and birth characteristics and child irritability reported across informants.

RESULTS

Maternal smoking, vaginal bleeding, and pre-eclampsia during pregnancy and phototherapy for jaundice >3 days were associated with high irritability after adjusting for child's age, sex, and parental characteristics. Findings were consistent across parent- and child-rated irritability.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective assessment of early exposures may be subject to recall bias despite previously-established validity and reliability. Longitudinal research with prospective assessments of early life exposures is recommended to confirm our findings. This exploratory approach of multiple survey items also precludes more in-depth assessments of perinatal risks for developing irritability.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides novel evidence suggesting a perinatal link with irritability in a national sample of youths. Given that irritability predicts adverse mental health and life outcomes, identifying its perinatal and birth predictors may inform early etiology, guiding timely assessment and intervention.