1
|
Chauhan A, Chan K, Halfdanarson TR, Bellizzi AM, Rindi G, O'Toole D, Ge PS, Jain D, Dasari A, Anaya DA, Bergsland E, Mittra E, Wei AC, Hope TA, Kendi AT, Thomas SM, Flem S, Brierley J, Asare EA, Washington K, Shi C. Critical updates in neuroendocrine tumors: Version 9 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. CA Cancer J Clin 2024. [PMID: 38685134 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for all cancer sites, including gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), is meant to be dynamic, requiring periodic updates to optimize AJCC staging definitions. This entails the collaboration of experts charged with evaluating new evidence that supports changes to each staging system. GEP-NETs are the second most prevalent neoplasm of gastrointestinal origin after colorectal cancer. Since publication of the AJCC eighth edition, the World Health Organization has updated the classification and separates grade 3 GEP-NETs from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. In addition, because of major advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies for GEP-NETs, AJCC version 9 advocates against the use of serum chromogranin A for the diagnosis and monitoring of GEP-NETs. Furthermore, AJCC version 9 recognizes the increasing role of endoscopy and endoscopic resection in the diagnosis and management of NETs, particularly in the stomach, duodenum, and colorectum. Finally, T1NXM0 has been added to stage I in these disease sites as well as in the appendix.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aman Chauhan
- Department of Medicine, Neuroendocrine Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Kelley Chan
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Andrew M Bellizzi
- Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Guido Rindi
- Department of Life Sciences, Section of Anatomic Pathology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Department of Woman and Child Health Sciences and Public Health, Anatomic Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS and Roma-Gemelli European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy
| | - Dermot O'Toole
- National Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence (St Vincent's University Hospital) and St James Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Phillip S Ge
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dhanpat Jain
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Arvind Dasari
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel A Anaya
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology-Surgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Emily Bergsland
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Erik Mittra
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ayse T Kendi
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Samantha M Thomas
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sherlonda Flem
- Tumor Registrar, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - James Brierley
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elliot A Asare
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kay Washington
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Chanjuan Shi
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Janczewski LM, Faski J, Nelson H, Gollub MJ, Eng C, Brierley JD, Palefsky JM, Goldberg RM, Washington MK, Asare EA, Goodman KA. Survival outcomes used to generate version 9 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for anal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:516-523. [PMID: 37114458 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for all cancer sites, including anal cancer, is the standard for cancer staging in the United States. The AJCC staging criteria are dynamic, and periodic updates are conducted to optimize AJCC staging definitions through a panel of experts charged with evaluating new evidence to implement changes. With greater availability of large data sets, the AJCC has since restructured and updated its processes, incorporating prospectively collected data to validate stage group revisions in the version 9 AJCC staging system, including anal cancer. Survival analysis using AJCC eighth edition staging guidelines revealed a lack of hierarchical order in which stage IIIA anal cancer was associated with a better prognosis than stage IIB disease, suggesting that, for anal cancer, tumor (T) category has a greater effect on survival than lymph node (N) category. Accordingly, version 9 stage groups have been appropriately adjusted to reflect contemporary long-term outcomes. This article highlights the changes to the now published AJCC staging system for anal cancer, which: (1) redefined stage IIB as T1-T2N1M0 disease, (2) redefined stage IIIA as T3N0-N1M0 disease, and (3) eliminated stage 0 disease from its guidelines altogether.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M Janczewski
- Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Joseph Faski
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Heidi Nelson
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Cathy Eng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - James D Brierley
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joel M Palefsky
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - M Kay Washington
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Elliot A Asare
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|