2
|
Devos G, Vansevenant B, De Meerleer G, Clinckaert A, Devlies W, Claessens F, Graefen M, Steuber T, Briganti A, de la Taille A, Van Poppel H, Joniau S. Neoadjuvant treatment with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors prior to radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. World J Urol 2021. [PMID: 33580296 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03611-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT There is an urgent need to develop novel treatment strategies in patients with unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa) to optimize the outcome of these patients. Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) have demonstrated a survival benefit in metastatic hormonesensitive and castration-resistant PCa. A similar benefit might be expected in the localized setting. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review about the role of neoadjuvant ARSI in unfavorable intermediate and high-risk localized PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a systematic review of the following databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Publications of ASCO were consulted to identify meeting abstract with early results of ongoing trials. This systematic review was performed and reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant ARSI treatment was observed in 4%-13% of the patients. Minimal residual disease response ranged from 36% to 73.9% when defined as residual cancer burden < 0.25 cm3 at final pathology and from 8% to 20% when defined as the diameter of the remaining tumor < 5 mm. Despite intense neoadjuvant ARSI treatment, residual pT3 disease was observed in 48%-76% of the patients. In contrast, positive surgical margins (PSM) were present in only 5%-22%. Only one trial reported BCR following neoadjuvant ARSI therapy (44% BCR at a median follow-up of 4 years). CONCLUSION Despite intense neoadjuvant ARSI therapy, pCR is rarely attained and high proportions of pT3 disease are still observed at final pathology. In contrast, promising results are obtained in terms of PSMs. Long-term survival outcomes are eagerly awaited.
Collapse
|
3
|
Maillet D, Allioli N, Peron J, Plesa A, Decaussin-Petrucci M, Tartas S, Ruffion A, Crouzet S, Rimokh R, Gillet PG, Freyer G, Vlaeminck-Guillem V. Improved Androgen Receptor Splice Variant 7 Detection Using a Highly Sensitive Assay to Predict Resistance to Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients. Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 4:609-617. [PMID: 31676281 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) expression is associated with a low response to androgen receptor signaling (ARS) inhibitors such as abiraterone or enzalutamide. OBJECTIVE To perform a highly sensitive assay for detecting AR-V7 (hsAR-V7) in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and evaluate its ability to predict response to ARS inhibitors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS From 41 mCRPC patients, CTCs were prospectively enriched using AdnaTest platform and analyzed for AR-V7 with and without the highly sensitive assay. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The first objective of the study was to compare AR-V7 detection rates with and without the highly sensitive assay. Next, we investigated how AR-V7 (detected without the highly sensitive assay) and hsAR-V7 status influenced prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and long-term clinical outcomes (PSA progression-free survival [PFS] and radiological PFS) after ARS-inhibitor treatment. Finally, discriminatory abilities of the assays were assessed by C-index to compare their impact on long-term clinical outcomes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS AR-V7 detection rates increased from 22% to 56% when the highly sensitive assay was used. The discriminatory abilities of hsAR-V7 for PSA PFS (C-index, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.88) and radiological PFS (0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85) were higher than those of AR-V7 detected without the highly sensitive assay (0.60, 0.51-0.72, and 0.56, 0.44-0.67, respectively). After ARS-inhibitor treatment, PSA response was lower in hsAR-V7+ (53%) than in hsAR-V7- (93%) patients (p = 0.016). AR-V7+ patients had shorter median PSA PFS (3.0 vs 10.6 mo, p = 0.032) and nonsignificantly shorter median radiological PFS (6.0 vs 14.8 mo, p = 0.24) compared with AR-V7- patients. The hsAR-V7+ status was associated with shorter median PSA PFS (3.0 mo vs not reached, p = 0.0001) and radiological PFS (median, 6.0 mo vs not reached, p = 0.0026). CONCLUSIONS The hsAR-V7 assay achieved the highest AR-V7 detection rates among those reported in mCRPC. Discriminatory abilities for long-term clinical outcomes were better with hsAR-V7 assay. PATIENT SUMMARY We prospectively analyzed circulating tumor cells from men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer for androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) status using a highly sensitive assay. It yielded higher AR-V7 detection rates and predicted resistance to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors with better discriminatory abilities for long-term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Maillet
- Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM 1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Centre Léon Berard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Centre d'études, de Recherche et de Valorisation en Oncologie (CERVO), Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon Sud-Charles Mérieux, Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | - Nathalie Allioli
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM 1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Centre Léon Berard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Centre d'études, de Recherche et de Valorisation en Oncologie (CERVO), Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon Sud-Charles Mérieux, Pierre-Bénite, France; Institut des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Julien Peron
- Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Service de Biostatistique et Bioinformatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Equipe Biostatistique-Santé, CNRS UMR 5558, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Adriana Plesa
- Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Service d'Hématologie Biologique, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Myriam Decaussin-Petrucci
- Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM 1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Centre Léon Berard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon-Sud-Charles Mérieux, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Pierre-Bénite, France; Service d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Sophie Tartas
- Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM 1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Centre Léon Berard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Centre d'études, de Recherche et de Valorisation en Oncologie (CERVO), Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon Sud-Charles Mérieux, Pierre-Bénite, France; Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon-Sud-Charles Mérieux, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Pierre-Bénite, France; Service d'Urologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Sébatien Crouzet
- Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Ruth Rimokh
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM 1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Centre Léon Berard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre-Germain Gillet
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM 1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Centre Léon Berard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Centre d'études, de Recherche et de Valorisation en Oncologie (CERVO), Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon Sud-Charles Mérieux, Pierre-Bénite, France; Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon-Sud-Charles Mérieux, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Pierre-Bénite, France; Service d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Gilles Freyer
- Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon-Sud-Charles Mérieux, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Virginie Vlaeminck-Guillem
- Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM 1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Centre Léon Berard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Centre d'études, de Recherche et de Valorisation en Oncologie (CERVO), Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon Sud-Charles Mérieux, Pierre-Bénite, France; Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Service de Biochimie Biologie Moléculaire Sud, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France.
| |
Collapse
|