Assessing the impact of prophylactic anidulafungin during remission induction of acute myeloid leukemia - A propensity-score matching analysis

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal infection (IFI) accounts for substantial morbidity during the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults. Antifungal prophylaxis (AP) is needed during intensive chemotherapy, and posaconazole is not widely available. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of prophylactic anidulafungin during intensive AML remission induction.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort encompassing newly diagnosed AML adult patients. All subjects received intensive chemotherapy and were divided into three groups: patients who did not receive any AP and patients who received fluconazole (150-400 mg/day) or anidulafungin (100 mg/day).

RESULTS

During AML induction, 82 patients did not receive AP, 108 and 14 patients received anidulafungin and fluconazole, respectively. IFI incidence was 27%, classified as possible, probable, and proven in 65, 2 and 33%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that lower neutrophil counts are associated with IFI (OR = 2.8), whereas age, genetic classification, and lymphocyte counts were not. To examine the impact of anidulafungin in comparison with 'no AP', a propensity score matching analysis was performed. Use of anidulafungin was not related to less IFI during induction, while neutrophil counts remained significant. Patients under prophylactic anidulafungin received less amphotericin B (p < 0.001) but not voriconazole (p = 0.49).

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the role of anidulafungin during AML induction. Here, the incidence of mold infections did not decrease with AP, suggesting that in a setting with a high incidence of IFI, broad spectrum AP might be more suitable.

Antiviral activity and mechanism of the antifungal drug, anidulafungin, suggesting its potential to promote treatment of viral diseases

BACKGROUND

The severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome disease (SFTS), caused by the novel tick-borne SFTS virus (SFTSV), was listed among the top 10 priority infectious disease by World Health Organization due to the high fatality rate of 5-30% and the lack of effective antiviral drugs and vaccines and therefore raised the urgent need to develop effective anti-SFTSV drugs to improve disease treatment.

METHODS

The antiviral drugs to inhibit SFTSV infection were identified by screening the library containing 1340 FDA-approved drugs using the SFTSV infection assays in vitro. The inhibitory effect on virus entry and the process of clathrin-mediated endocytosis under different drug doses was evaluated based on infection assays by qRT-PCR to determine intracellular viral copies, by Western blot to characterize viral protein expression in cells, and by immunofluorescence assays (IFAs) to determine virus infection efficiencies. The therapeutic effect was investigated in type I interferon receptor defective A129 mice in vivo with SFTSV infection, from which lesions and infection in tissues caused by SFTSV infection were assessed by H&E staining and immunohistochemical analysis.

RESULTS

Six drugs were identified as exerting inhibitory effects against SFTSV infection, of which anidulafungin, an antifungal drug of the echinocandin family, has a strong inhibitory effect on SFTSV entry. It suppresses SFTSV internalization by impairing the late endosome maturation and decreasing virus fusion with the membrane. SFTSV-infected A129 mice had relieving symptoms, reduced tissue lesions, and improved disease outcomes following anidulafungin treatment. Moreover, anidulafungin exerts an antiviral effect in inhibiting the entry of other viruses including SARS-CoV-2, SFTSV-related Guertu virus and Heartland virus, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, Zika virus, and Herpes simplex virus 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated that the antifungal drug, anidulafungin, could effectively inhibit virus infection by interfering with virus entry, suggesting it may be utilized for the clinical treatment of infectious viral diseases, in addition to its FDA-approved use as an antifungal. The findings also suggested to further evaluate the anti-viral effects of echinocandins and their clinical importance for patients with infection of viruses, which may promote therapeutic strategies as well as treatments and improve outcomes pertaining to various viral and fungal diseases.

Echinocandins - structure, mechanism of action and use in antifungal therapy

With increasing number of immunocompromised patients as well as drug resistance in fungi, the risk of fatal fungal infections in humans increases as well. The action of echinocandins is based on the inhibition of β-(1,3)-d-glucan synthesis that builds the fungal cell wall. Caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin and rezafungin are semi-synthetic cyclic lipopeptides. Their specific chemical structure possess a potential to obtain novel derivatives with better pharmacological properties resulting in more effective treatment, especially in infections caused by Candida and Aspergillus species. In this review we summarise information about echinocandins with closer look on their chemical structure, mechanism of action, drug resistance and usage in clinical practice. We also introduce actual trends in modification of this antifungals as well as new methods of their administration, and additional use in viral and bacterial infections.

Anidulafungin versus fluconazole in the treatment of Candida albicans chorioretinitis

BACKGROUND

Candida albicans chorioretinitis is the most common cause of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis. Echinocandins are recommended as first-line therapy in the treatment of invasive candidiasis (IC), but in clinically stable patients with IC and endophthalmitis caused by Candida species susceptible to azole compounds these are the first-line treatment due to their better intraocular penetration.

CASE REPORT

A 42-year-old woman admitted to hospital for duodenal perforation after gastrointestinal surgery and treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics developed C. albicans candidemia. According to protocol, an antifungal treatment with anidulafungin was given. The patient presented no visual symptoms but on routinary ophthalmoscopic examination multiple bilateral chorioretinal lesions were observed. Systemic therapy was changed to fluconazole, with good systemic and ocular results.

CONCLUSIONS

Azole compounds are the first-line therapy for endophthalmitis associated with candidemia. However, clinical guidelines often propose echinocandins as the first option for IC. In some cases, C. albicans chorioretinitis will require a change in the systemic treatment to assure better intraocular penetration. According to the current evidence and our own experience, routine funduscopy is not necessary in all IC patients. However, we do recommend fundus examination in patients with visual symptoms or those unable to report them (paediatric patients and patients with an altered level of consciousness), and in those who are being treated with echinocandins in monotherapy.

Synergistic in-vitro antiviral effects of combination treatment using anidulafungin and T-1105 against Zika virus infection

Zika virus (ZIKV) has been the cause of some epidemics since 2007. The correlations of microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome with ZIKV have been noticed. Unfortunately, researchers have yet to develop an effective vaccine or drug approved for ZIKV infection. Anidulafungin is a member of echinocandins that is used to treat candida infections. This study assessed the antiviral capability of anidulafungin against ZIKV. Anidulafungin was shown to significantly decrease viral RNA levels, protein expression levels, viral yields, and the rate of infection. In time of addition assays, anidulafungin exhibited inhibitory activities in the early stages of ZIKV infection. In binding and entry assays, administering anidulafungin did not lead to a corresponding decrease in quantity of viral RNA, but a significant decrease in ZIKV infectivity was observed in virucidal assays. This indicated that anidulafungin interferes directly with virions. T-1105 is a viral polymerase inhibitor, which functions in the late stage of ZIKV infection. When anidulafungin was administered in combination with T-1105, an obvious synergistic effect was observed, resulting in a combination index (CI) value of 0.85 ± 0.13. Finally, we evaluated the effects of echinocandins in terms of half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀), calculation of cytotoxicity concentration 50% (CC₅₀), selectivity index (SI), and Patchdock score. Among the tests, anidulafungin bears the lowest IC₅₀ and highest Patchdock score. Although anidulafungin is classified as a pregnancy category C agent; however, combination therapy of anidulafungin with a viral RNA replication inhibitor could expand treatment options for ZIKV infection.

[Fungal keratitis associated with the use of contact lenses (clinical case)]

Currently, the number of keratomycoses and the interest of ophthalmologists to this type of keratitis have significantly increased due to the severity of the disease and non-satisfactory outcomes in some cases. According to published data, perforation of the cornea develops 6 times more often after keratomycosis than after keratitis of another etiology. The outcomes of keratoplasty in these patients are also not always satisfactory. The article presents a relatively rare clinical case of keratomycosis in a teenager caused by Arthrographis kalrae. The description of diseases caused by this microorganism is rarely found in literature. We have found only 4 cases describing keratomycosis caused by A. kalrae. The case presented here is associated with the use of contact lenses. The microorganism was identified from a container with contact lenses. Fungicidal drugs such as Anidulafungin, Voriconazole, as well as topical and systemical Amphotericin B were used in the treatment. The patient was discharged with a good functional result (best-corrected visual acuity of 0.7). This case indicates the possibility of a positive functional outcome in treating keratomycosis with present-day means.

Successfully treated bilateral renal fungal balls with continuous Anidulafulgin irrigation

A 73-year-old man with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, nephrolithiasis, and recurrent urinary tract infections caused by Candida glabrata was admitted to our hospital. Urosepsis was diagnosed and C. glabrata was isolated from urine and blood cultures. Computed tomography intravenous pyelography (CT-IVP) revealed bilateral filling defects caused by renal fungal balls. Treatment initially comprised intravenous anidulafungin coupled with continuous local anidulafungin irrigation via bilateral nephrostomy tubes, which was followed by high-dose oral fluconazole. This regimen successfully eradicated the C. glabrata in follow-up cultures.

•

Renal fungal balls are rare, especially when caused by C. glabrata.

•

Treatment usually consists of irrigation with amphotericin B or surgical removal.

•

Irrigation with anidulafungin may be a good alternative.

•

Keep fungal balls in mind when filling defects are combined with candiduria.

Anidulafungin Versus Micafungin in the Treatment of Candidemia in Adult Patients

Background

Echinocandins are recommended for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and candidemia. However, there are few studies comparing anidulafungin and micafungin in terms of efficacy and safety. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety between anidulafungin and micafungin treatment for adult patients with candidemia.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study performed on adult candidemia patients diagnosed from January 2006 through December 2018 at a tertiary medical center. The study subjects included adult patients ≥ 19 years with candidemia who were only treated with anidulafungin or micafungin for ≥ 3 days. Clinical characteristics were collected and analyzed. Hepatotoxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0.

Results

A total of 98 patients with candidemia were treated with anidulafungin (n = 52, 53.1%) or micafungin (n = 46, 46.9%). There were no significant differences in age, sex, source of candidemia, and comorbidities between the anidulafungin and micafungin groups. Although there were more patients with abnormal baseline liver function test (LFT) in the anidulafungin group, the rate of clinical response (51.9% vs. 46.7%), mycological response (76.9% vs. 67.4%), and mortality (30-day mortality 26.9% vs. 21.7% and 90-day mortality 78.8% vs. 73.9%) was similar between the anidulafungin and micafungin groups. Also, there was no significant difference in terms of hepatotoxicity, even among the patients with abnormal baseline LFT between the two groups.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that clinical efficacy and safety may be similar between anidulafungin and micafungin treatment for adult patients with candidemia.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11046-020-00471-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Azole-resistant Aspergillus and Echinocandin-resistant Candida - What are the treatment options?

Purpose of Review

This review summarizes current treatment options for echinocandin-resistant Candida spp. (ERC) and azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus (ARAF), emphasizing recent in vitro/in vivo data, clinical reports, and consensus statements.

Recent Findings

Advances in ERC and ARAF treatment are limited to specific antifungal combinations and dose optimization but remain reliant on amphotericin products. Although novel antifungals may provide breakthroughs in the treatment of resistant fungi, these agents are not yet available. Early identification and appropriate treatment remain a paramount, albeit elusive, task.

Summary

When either ERC or ARAF are suspected or proven, amphotericin products remain the cornerstone of initial therapy. For ERC, azoles are de-escalation options for susceptible isolates in stable patients to avoid amphotericin toxicities. Although combination echinocandin with high-dose salvage posaconazole or isavuconazole may be attempted in ARAF, it requires careful consideration following patient stabilization. Future research defining optimal therapies and early identification of ERC and ARAF is of extreme importance.

Antifungal treatment administered in OPAT programs is a safe and effective option in selected patients

INTRODUCTION

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has been recognised as a useful, cost-effective and safe alternative to inpatient treatment. Nevertheless, the most common antimicrobials used are antibiotics, and there is less information about the use of antifungal therapy (AT). The aim of this study is to analyse a cohort of patients treated with AT administered via OPAT and to compare them with patients from the rest of the cohort (RC) treated with antibiotics.

METHODS

Prospective observational study with post hoc (or retrospective) analysis of a cohort of patients treated in the OPAT program. We selected the patients treated with antifungals between July 2012 and December 2018. We recorded demographic and clinical data to analyse the validity of the treatment and to compare the differences between the AT and the RC.

RESULTS

Of the 1101 patients included in the OPAT program, 24 (2.18%) were treated with AT, 12 Liposomal Amphotericin B, 6 echinocandins and 6 fluconazole. This result is similar to other cohorts. There were differences between the AT vs RC in the number of patients with neoplasia (58.3% vs 28%; p=0.001), IC Charlson>2 (58.3% vs 38.8; p=0.053), duration of treatment (15 days vs 10.39 days; p=0.001) and patients with central catheters (54.2% vs 21.7%; p=0.0001). These differences are justified because there were more hematologic patients included in the AT group. Nevertheless, there were no differences in adverse reactions (25% vs 32.3%; p=0.45) or re-admissions (12.5% vs 10%; p=0.686) and OPAT with AT was successful in 21/24 patients (87.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

AT can be successfully administered in OPAT programs in selected patients, that are clinically stable and monitored by an infectious disease physician.

Extrapolating Antifungal Animal Data to Humans - Is it reliable?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aimed to review animal models of antifungals and identifies human literature to assess if the extrapolation of results is reliable.

RECENT FINDINGS

Animal studies have helped identify AUC/MIC targets for new drugs and formulations such as isavuconazole and delayed release posaconazole that have translated to successful outcomes in humans. Models have also been influential in the identification of possible combination therapies for the treatment of aspergillosis, such as voriconazole and echinocandins. However, challenges are endured with animal models when it comes to replicating the pharmacokinetics of humans which has been exemplified with the newest itraconazole formulation. Additionally, animal models have displayed a survival benefit with the use of iron chelators and amphotericin for mucormycosis which was not demonstrated in humans.

SUMMARY

Animal models have been a staple in the development and optimization of antifungal agents. They afford the ability to investigate uncommon diseases, such as invasive fungal infections, that would otherwise take years and many resources to complete. Although there are many benefits of animal models there are also shortcomings. This is why the reliability of extrapolating data from animal models to humans is often scrutinized.

Deacylation of Echinocandin B by Streptomyces species: a novel method for the production of Echinocandin B nucleus

Anidulafungin, a new class of antifungal agent used for the treatment of chronic fungal infections, is derived from Echinocandin B nucleus, an intermediate metabolite of Echinocandin B produced by Aspergillus nidulans. The enzyme acylase plays a key role in the bioconversion of Echinocandin B to Echinocandin B nucleus. In the present study, a rapid screening method was used to select an actinomycete capable of producing Echinocandin B acylase. Out of 140 actinomycetes screened for the production of acylase by preliminary qualitative plate assay, 53 were selected. The selected isolates were subjected to quantitative assay under submerged fermentation for the bioconversion of Echinocandin B to Echinocandin B nucleus. Among 53 strains of actinomycetes, two strains (BICC-8848 and BICC-8547) exhibited higher degree of acylase activity. Various physico-chemical parameters were optimised for maximum bioconversion of ECB to ECB nucleus. It was found that the conditions viz. pH 7.0, temperature 26 °C and substrate concentration of about 4 g/L supported higher degree of bioconversion. It was also observed that, as the medium volume increased to 500 mL, the conversion rate was also increased by more than two-folds.

Pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin in critically ill patients with Candida peritonitis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of anidulafungin and to evaluate its concentration in the peritoneal fluid (PF) of patients suspected of suffering from peritoneal infection undergoing abdominal surgery, in order to ensure that therapeutic levels are achieved within the peritoneal cavity.

METHODS

A descriptive, open, prospective, observational, multicentre and non-interventional study was performed. Anidulafungin was used at conventional doses. Blood and PF samples were obtained on day 2 of treatment or on any of the following days.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients in a serious clinical condition, as demonstrated by high mean clinical severity scale scores (APACHE II and SOFA scores), were included in the study. The mean area under the curve (AUC) in PF was 30% (31±19%) of that determined in the plasma and the maximum concentration (Cmax) reached in PF (mg/l) was close to 1 (0.9±0.5). No adverse effects were observed in any of the 31 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Anidulafungin at conventional doses reaches PF concentrations that exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration of the usual Candida spp, which explains the proven efficacy of this echinocandin in the treatment of Candida peritonitis in critically ill patients.

Evaluation of anidulafungin in the treatment of intra-abdominal candidiasis: a pooled analysis of patient-level data from 5 prospective studies

The incidence of nosocomial invasive fungal infections involving Candida spp. has increased markedly in recent years in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. This post hoc analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of anidulafungin treatment in patients with intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) from five prospective studies (one comparative and four open-label) of adult surgical patients with microbiologically confirmed Candida intra-abdominal infection. Patients received an intravenous (IV) loading dose of anidulafungin 200 mg, followed by a daily 100-mg maintenance dose. Per study protocols, some patients could be switched to an oral azole after ≥ 5 or ≥ 10 days of IV treatment. Antifungal treatment was maintained for ≥ 14 days after the last positive Candida culture and resolution of symptoms. The global response rate (GRR) at the end of IV treatment (EOIVT) was the primary endpoint. GRR at the end of therapy (EOT), all-cause mortality at days 14 and 28, and safety was also evaluated. Seventy-nine patients had IAC from peritoneal fluid or hepatobiliary tract. C. albicans (72.2%) and C. glabrata (32.9%) were the most common pathogens. Overall GRR was 73.4% and 67.1% at EOIVT and EOT, respectively. All-cause mortality was 17.7% at day 14 and 24.1% at day 28 in the modified intent-to-treat population. Anidulafungin was well tolerated in this population, with most adverse events mild or moderate in severity. In these patients with IAC, anidulafungin showed a GRR at EOIVT similar to the anidulafungin registrational trial, and the results of our analysis confirmed the known safety profile of anidulafungin. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00496197, registered July 3, 2007, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00496197 ; ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00548262, registered October 19, 2007, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT00548262 ; ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00537329, registered September 25, 2007, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT00537329 ; ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00689338, registered May 29, 2008, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00689338 ; ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00805740, registered November 26, 2008, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00805740.

Killing kinetics of anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin against Candida parapsilosis species complex: Evaluation of the fungicidal activity

BACKGROUND

Candida parapsilosis, Candida metapsilosis and Candida orthopsilosis are emerging as relevant causes of candidemia. Moreover, they show differences in their antifungal susceptibility and virulence. The echinocandins are different in terms of in vitro antifungal activity against Candida. Time-kill (TK) curves represent an excellent approach to evaluate the fungicidal activity of antifungal drugs.

AIMS

To compare the fungicidal activities of anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin against C. parapsilosis species complex by TK curves.

METHODS

Antifungal activities of three echinocandins against C. parapsilosis, C. metapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis were studied by TK curves. Drug concentrations assayed were 0.25, 2 and 8μg/ml. CFU/ml were determined at 0, 2, 4, 6, 24 and 48h.

RESULTS

Killing activities of echinocandins were species-, isolates- and concentration-dependent. Anidulafungin reached the fungicidad endpoint for 6 out of 7 isolates (86%); it required between 13.34 and 29.67h to reach this endpoint for the three species studied, but more than 48h were needed against one isolate of C. orthopsilosis (8μg/ml). Caspofungin fungicidal endpoint was only achieved with 8μg/ml against one isolate of C. metapsilosis after 30.12h (1 out of 7 isolates; 14%). Micafungin fungicidal endpoint was reached in 12.74-28.38h (8μg/ml) against one isolate each of C. parapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis, and against both C. metapsilosis isolates (4 out of 7 isolates; 57%).

CONCLUSIONS

C. metapsilosis was the most susceptible species to echinocandins, followed by C. orthopsilosis and C. parapsilosis. Anidulafungin was the most active echinocandin against C. parapsilosis complex.

Echinocandins: Their role in the management of Candida biofilms

The importance of antifungal agents and their clinical implications has received little attention in comparison to antibiotics, particularly in the health-care setting. However, apart from bacterial infections rising in hospitals, the incidences of fungal infections are growing with the development of resistance to conventional antifungal agents. Newer antifungal agents such as echinocandins (ECs) have been extensively studied over the past decade and are recognised as a superior treatment compared with prior antifungals as a first line of therapy in tertiary institutions. Caspofungin (CAS), micafungin (MICA) and anidulafungin (ANID) are the three most widely used EC antifungal agents. The treatment of biofilm-associated fungal infections affecting patients in tertiary health-care facilities has been identified as a challenge, particularly in Indian Intensive Care Unit (ICU) settings. With the rising number of critically ill patients requiring invasive devices such as central venous catheters for treatment, especially in ICUs, these devices serve as a potential source of nosocomial infections. Candida spp. colonisation is a major precursor of these infections and further complicates and prolongs treatment procedures, adding to increasing costs both for hospitals and the patient. Analysing studies involving the use of these agents can help in making critical decisions for antifungal therapy in the event of a fungal infection in the ICU. In addition, the development of resistance to antifungal agents is a crucial factor for assessing the appropriate antifungals that can be used for treatment. This review provides an overview of ANID in biofilms, along with CAS and MICA, in terms of clinical efficacy, resistance development and potency, primarily against Candida spp.

Retrospective cohort study comparing the risk of severe hepatotoxicity in hospitalized patients treated with echinocandins for invasive candidiasis in the presence of confounding by indication

Background

To compare the risk of severe hepatotoxicity with anidulafungin versus caspofungin and micafungin in hospitalized adults.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study combined data from two large US- based hospital electronic medical record databases. Severe hepatotoxicity was a Grade ≥ 3 liver function test (LFT) post-echinocandin initiation. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated for anidulafungin versus caspofungin and micafungin, overall and in patients with normal baseline LFT (Grade 0).

Results

Treatments included anidulafungin (n = 1700), caspofungin (n = 4431), or micafungin (n = 6547). The proportions with LFT Grade ≥ 3 pre-echinocandin initiation were: anidulafungin 40.4% versus caspofungin 25.9% (p <  0.001) and micafungin 25.6% (p <  0.001). Rates of severe underlying diseases or comorbidities were: critical care admissions: 75.3% versus 52.6 and 48.6%; and organ failures: 69.4% versus 46.7 and 51.5%. Adjusted IRRs of severe hepatotoxicity for anidulafungin versus caspofungin and micafungin were 1.43 (p = 0.002) and 1.19 (p = 0.183) overall, and 0.88 (P = 0.773) and 0.97 (P = 0.945) for normal baseline LFT, respectively.

Conclusions

Accounting for confounders, severe hepatotoxicity risk was not significantly different across echinocandins in this real-world head-to-head study. Anidulafungin was used more frequently in patients with more comorbidities. Those with normal baseline LFT (least susceptible to confounding by indication), showed no elevated hepatotoxicity risk for anidulafungin.

Accuracy of Sensititre YeastOne echinocandins epidemiological cut-off values for identification of FKS mutant Candida albicans and Candida glabrata: a ten year national survey of the Fungal Infection Network of Switzerland (FUNGINOS)

OBJECTIVES

Echinocandins represent the first-line treatment of candidaemia. Acquired echinocandin resistance is mainly observed among Candida albicans and Candida glabrata and is associated with FKS hotspot mutations. The commercial Sensititre YeastOne™ (SYO) kit is widely used for antifungal susceptibility testing, but interpretive clinical breakpoints are not well defined. We determined echinocandins epidemiological cut-off values (ECV) for C. albicans/glabrata tested by SYO and assessed their ability to identify FKS mutants in a national survey of candidaemia.

METHODS

Bloodstream isolates of C. albicans and C. glabrata were collected in 25 Swiss hospitals from 2004 to 2013 and tested by SYO. FKS hotspot sequencing was performed for isolates with an MIC≥ECV for any echinocandin.

RESULTS

In all, 1277 C. albicans and 347 C. glabrata were included. ECV 97.5% of caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin were 0.12, 0.06 and 0.03 μg/mL for C. albicans, and 0.25, 0.12 and 0.03 μg/mL for C. glabrata, respectively. FKS hotspot sequencing was performed for 70 isolates. No mutation was found in the 52 'limit wild-type' isolates (MIC=ECV for at least one echinocandin). Among the 18 'non-wild-type' isolates (MIC>ECV for at least one echinocandin), FKS mutations were recovered in the only two isolates with MIC>ECV for all three echinocandins, but not in those exhibiting a 'non-wild-type' phenotype for only one or two echinocandins.

CONCLUSION

This 10-year nationwide survey showed that the rate of echinocandin resistance among C. albicans and C. glabrata remains low in Switzerland despite increased echinocandin use. SYO-ECV could discriminate FKS mutants from wild-type isolates tested by SYO in this population.

Evaluation of the efficacy of a posaconazole and anidulafungin combination in a murine model of pulmonary aspergillosis due to infection with Aspergillus fumigatus

Posaconazole (PSC) in combination with anidulafungin (AFG) was evaluated in a murine model of pulmonary aspergillosis. Immunosuppressed animals were infected via the nasal cavity with 2 different A. fumigatus strains. The animals received PSC (oral, 20mg/kg per day) and/or AFG (i.p., 10mg/kg per day) for 7days. On Day 8, the mice were euthanized and fungal burdens were determined from the lungs. Survival curves were constructed for mortality analysis. Compared to untreated groups, groups singly treated with PSC or AFG showed a reduced fungal burden in the lungs (P=0.0001-0.006) and prevention of mortality (66.66-83.33% of survival). Combination treatment with PSC and AFG significantly reduced the fungal burden (or sterilized the lungs) compared to the findings in the untreated and monotherapy groups and improved the survival rate to 100%. The PSC and AFG combination therapy was highly effective and should be evaluated in larger-scale experiments.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of antifungal therapy for primary treatment of invasive candidiasis caused by Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species

BACKGROUND

Cost-effectiveness studies of echinocandins for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, including candidemia, are rare in Asia. No study has determined whether echinocandins are cost-effective for both Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species. There have been no economic evaluations that compare non-echinocandins with the three available echinocandins. This study was aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of individual echinocandins, namely caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin, versus non-echinocandins for C. albicans and non-albicans Candida species, respectively.

METHODS

A decision tree model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of echinocandins and non-echinocandins for invasive candidiasis. The probability of treatment success, mortality rate, and adverse drug events were extracted from published clinical trials. The cost variables (i.e., drug acquisition) were based on Taiwan's healthcare system from the perspective of a medical payer. One-way sensitivity analyses and probability sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

For treating invasive candidiasis (all species), as compared to fluconazole, micafungin and caspofungin are dominated (less effective, more expensive), whereas anidulafungin is cost-effective (more effective, more expensive), costing US$3666.09 for each life-year gained, which was below the implicit threshold of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in Taiwan. For C. albicans, echinocandins are cost-saving as compared to non-echinocandins. For non-albicans Candida species, echinocandins are cost-effective as compared to non-echinocandins, costing US$652 for each life-year gained. The results were robust over a wide range of sensitivity analyses and were most sensitive to the clinical efficacy of antifungal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Echinocandins, especially anidulafungin, appear to be cost-effective for invasive candidiasis caused by C. albicans and non-albicans Candida species in Taiwan.

Echinocandin Resistance in Candida Species: a Review of Recent Developments

The echinocandins are important agents for the treatment of invasive fungal infections, especially those caused by Candida species. However, as with other antimicrobial agents, microbiologic resistance to this class of antifungal agents has emerged and can result in clinical failure. Several studies have recently reported an increase in echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata isolates at various medical centers in different geographic regions of the USA. Recent studies have also reported that many of these isolates may also be fluconazole resistant, leaving few treatment options available for clinicians to use in patients with invasive candidiasis caused by this species. Our understanding of the clinical relevance of specific point mutations within the FKS genes that cause echinocandin resistance and risk factors for the development of microbiologic resistance and clinical failure have also increased. The purpose of this review is to discuss echinocandin resistance in Candida species and recent reports that have increased our understanding of this growing clinical problem.

Micafungin versus anidulafungin in critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis: a retrospective study

Background

In critically ill patients the incidence of invasive fungal infections caused by Candida spp. has increased remarkably. Echinocandins are recommended as initial treatment for invasive fungal infections. The safety and efficacy of micafungin compared to caspofungin is similar, but no comparison is made between anidulafungin and micafungin concerning safety and efficacy. We therefore performed a retrospective study to assess these aspects in critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis.

Methods

All patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with invasive candidiasis, who were only treated with anidulafungin or micafungin, between January 2012 and December 2014 were retrospectively included. Baseline demographic characteristics, infection characteristics and patient courses were assessed.

Results

A total of 63 patients received either anidulafungin (n = 30) or micafungin (n = 33) at the discretion of the attending intensivist. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, suggesting similar risk for developing invasive candidiasis. Patients with invasive candidiasis and liver failure were more often treated with anidulafungin than micafungin. Response rates were similar for both groups. No difference was observed in 28-day mortality, but 90-day mortality was higher in patients on anidulafungin. Multivariable cox regression analysis showed that age and serum bilirubin were the best parameters for the prediction of 90-day mortality, whereas APACHE II, Candida score and antifungal therapy did not contribute (P > 0.05). None of the patients developed impaired liver function related to antifungal use and no differences were seen in prothrombin time, serum transaminases and bilirubin levels between the groups, after exclusion of patients with liver injury or failure.

Conclusion

Micafungin can be safely and effectively used in critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis. The observed increased 90-day mortality with anidulafungin can be explained by intensivists unnecessarily avoiding micafungin in patients with liver injury and failure.

Discontinuation of echinocandin and azole treatments led to the disappearance of an FKS alteration but not azole resistance during clonal Candida glabrata persistent candidaemia

To give an indication of a fitness cost conferred by FKS mutation-associated echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata during human infection. Six C. glabrata clinical strains sequentially isolated from blood and a hepatic abscess in a solid organ transplant recipient were analysed. The patient had received long-term azole and echinocandin therapy for invasive aspergillosis and persistent candidaemia. Minimal inhibitory concentrations were determined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) broth microdilution method. Molecular mechanisms of antifungal resistance were determined by sequencing hot spots of the FKS. Strain relatedness was determined using a microsatellite-based typing method. Typing analysis revealed an identical microsatellite pattern for all isolates, supporting a close relation. The first C. glabrata isolate showed wild-type phenotype (i.e. susceptibility to echinocandins and low level of azole resistance). After voriconazole therapy, the C. glabrata quickly acquired pan-azole resistance. Later, echinocandin treatment led to the emergence of a FKS2 S663P alteration and echinocandin resistance. After disruption of both azole and echinocandin therapy in favour of liposomal amphotericin B, C. glabrata isolates regained full susceptibility to echinocandin and lost the FKS2 S663P alteration while nonetheless maintaining their pan-azole resistance. Our clinical report supports the potential existence of a fitness cost conferred by FKS mutation in C. glabrata, as disruption of treatment led to a rapid disappearance of the resistant clone. This suggests that a more restricted use and/or a discontinuous administration of echinocandins may limit the spread of clinical resistance to this class.

Azole-resistant Candida albicans prosthetic joint infection treated with prolonged administration of anidulafungin and two-stage exchange with implant of a mega-prosthesis

Fungal prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but severe complication of artroplasty. We report a case of PJI due to azole-resistant Candida albicans successfully treated with combination of prolonged administration of anidulafungin and two-stage joint exchange with insertion of a mega-prosthesis.

A Comparative Study of the Effects of Intravitreal Anidulafungin, Voriconazole, and Amphotericin B in an Experimental Candida Endophthalmitis Model

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficacy of intravitreal anidulafungin injection with voriconazole and amphotericin B (Amp B) in an experimental Candida endophthalmitis (CE) model.

METHODS

Intravitreal 1 × 10⁵ CFU/0.1 ml Candida albicans was injected into the right eyes of 24 New Zealand rabbits, which were divided into 4 groups. Voriconazole 50 μg/0.1 ml, Amp B 10 μg/0.1 ml, and Anidulafungin 50 μg/0.1 ml were injected by intravitreal injection 72 h after inoculation. The control group was injected with 0.1 ml 0.9% NaCl. Clinical scoring was performed by assessing the cornea, conjunctiva, iris, and vitreous on days 3 and 7 of therapy. At the end of the study, the right eyes of all rabbits were enucleated and histopathological evaluation was performed. Therapy groups were compared according to the clinical, histopathological, and microbiological analysis scores.

RESULTS

Total clinical scores were significantly different between treatment groups and the control group (p < 0.05). On day 7 of the therapy, clinical scores of the anidulafungin group were found to be significantly lower when compared with the other therapy groups, while a significant improvement was observed in the eyes of rabbits in the anidulafungin group (p < 0.05). Also, microbiological scores of the anidulafungin group were lower than those of the control group (p < 0.05). Histopathological scores of the anidulafungin treatment group were significantly better than the voriconazole and control groups. Inflammation was evidently suppressed and marked retinal toxicity was not observed with anidulafungin.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study comparing the efficacy of anidulafungin with other antifungal agents. In this CE model, an intravitreal single dose of anidulafungin was shown to be noninferior to voriconazole and Amp B. As an alternative to Amp B or voriconazole, intravitreal anidulafungin is suggested as an effective antifungal agent for the treatment of CE.

In vitro interactions between anidulafungin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on biofilms of Candida spp

Candida spp. are responsible for many biomaterial-related infections; they give rise to infective pathologies typically associated with biofilm formation. We recently reported that the echinocandin anidulafungin (ANF) showed a strong in vitro activity against both planktonic and biofilms cells. Herein, we report the antifungal activities of ANF alone and in association with some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) against nine Candida strain biofilms: four Candida albicans, two Candida glabrata and three Candida guilliermondii. The activity of ANF was assessed using an in vitro microbiological model relevant for clinical practice. ANF proved oneself to be active against biofilms cells, and a clear-cut synergism was found against Candida species biofilms when ANF was used in combination with three NSAIDs: aspirin, diclofenac, ibuprofen. The positive synergism against Candida spp. of ANF in association with aspirin or the other NSAIDs proved to be a very effective antifungal treatment (FICI<0.5). These results may provide the starting point for new combination therapies of ANF with NSAIDs against Candida biofilm pathologies.

Antifungal antibiotics modulate the pro-inflammatory cytokine production and phagocytic activity of human monocytes in an in vitro sepsis model

AIMS

The incidence of secondary systemic fungal infections has sharply increased in bacterial septic patients. Antimycotics exhibit immunomodulatory properties, yet these effects are incompletely understood in secondary systemic fungal infections following bacterial sepsis. We investigated a model of systemic inflammation to determine whether antimycotics (liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB), itraconazol (ITC), and anidulafungin (ANI)) modulate the gene and protein expression as well as the phagocytic activity of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated human monocytes.

MAIN METHODS

THP-1 monocytes were incubated with L-AMB, ITC or ANI and LPS. Gene expression levels of cytokines (TNF-<alpha>, IL-1<beta>, IL-6, and IL-10) were measured after 2h, 6h, and 24h. Cytokine protein levels were evaluated after 24h and phagocytic activity was determined following co-incubation with Escherichia coli.

KEY FINDINGS

All antimycotics differentially modulated the gene and protein expression of cytokines in sepsis-like conditions. In the presence of LPS, we identified L-AMB as immunosuppressive, whereas ITC demonstrated pro-inflammatory properties. Both compounds induced remarkably less phagocytosis.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our study suggests that antimycotics routinely used in septic patients alter the immune response in sepsis-like conditions by modulating cytokine gene and protein expression levels and phagocytic activity. Future treatment strategies should consider the immune status of the host and apply antimycotics accordingly in bacterial septic patients with secondary fungal infections.

Candida albicans bloodstream isolates in a German university hospital are genetically heterogenous and susceptible to commonly used antifungals

From an eight-year-span, 99 Candida bloodstream isolates were collected at the University Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany. In this study, all strains were analyzed using molecular and phenotypic typing methods. Confirmatory species identification revealed three isolates that were initially diagnosed as C. albicans to be actually C. dubliniensis. Two isolates contained a mixed culture of C. albicans and C. glabrata, in one of the specimens both species could be separated while it was not possible to recover C. albicans in the other sample. The remaining 95 C. albicans isolates were profiled by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Phylogenetic analyses showed a highly heterogenous collection of strains, associated with many different clades and constituting a set of new diploid sequence types (DST). For all strains with identical DST, patient data were reviewed for potential nosocomial transmission. In addition, all isolates were tested for their susceptibility to amphotericin B, caspofungin, fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole. No clinically relevant resistance could be detected. Furthermore, these data underline that correlation between minimal inhibitory concentrations for caspofungin and anidulafungin is low.

Treatment of invasive fungal disease using anidulafungin alone or in combination for hematologic patients with concomitant hepatic or renal impairment

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) treatment is challenging in hematologic patients due to drug interactions and toxicities that limit the use of the antifungal agents.

AIMS

To analyze retrospectively in terms of safety and potential efficacy anidulafungin therapy, alone or in combination.

METHODS

Our institutional guidelines recommended anidulafungin treatment in hematologic patients with suspected IFD and concomitant renal or liver impairment (to avoid drug interactions and preserve organ function).

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2013, 24 episodes of IFD occurring in 21 patients were classified as proven (4 cases), probable (15 cases) and possible (5 cases). Anidulafungin was administered alone (13%) or in combination (88%). Eight (33%) episodes were resolved, using monotherapy (1 out of 3, 33%) or a combined therapy (7 out of 21, 33%). Twelve cases (50%) were registered as failure (death due to IFD progression in 4 patients, and treatment change due to lack of efficacy in 8), and 4 cases (17%) were not evaluable (death unrelated to the IFD). Anidulafungin was not withdrawn in any case due to toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Anidulafungin therapy, alone or in combination, could be considered in hematologic patients with IFD and concomitant liver or renal impairment. Due to the low number of patients, we cannot draw any conclusion about efficacy.

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis post extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and literature review

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for reversible pulmonary failure in critically ill patients has increased over the last few decades. Nosocomial infections are a major complication of ECMO and fungi have been found to be a common cause. Herein, we describe a case of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis following ECMO, which was successfully treated with combination antifungal therapy and interferon-gamma.

Echinocandins: A ray of hope in antifungal drug therapy

Invasive fungal infections are on the rise. Amphotericin B and azole antifungals have been the mainstay of antifungal therapy so far. The high incidence of infusion related toxicity and nephrotoxicity with amphotericin B and the emergence of fluconazole resistant strains of Candida glabrata egged on the search for alternatives. Echinocandins are a new class of antifungal drugs that act by inhibition of β (1, 3)-D- glucan synthase, a key enzyme necessary for integrity of the fungal cell wall.

Caspofungin was the first drug in this class to be approved. It is indicated for esophageal candidiasis, candidemia, invasive candidiasis, empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia and invasive aspergillosis. Response rates are comparable to those of amphotericin B and fluconazole. Micafungin is presently approved for esophageal candidiasis, for prophylaxis of candida infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and in disseminated candidiasis and candidemia. The currently approved indications for anidulafungin are esophageal candidiasis, candidemia and invasive candidiasis.

The incidence of infusion related adverse effects and nephrotoxicity is much lower than with amphotericin B. The main adverse effect is hepatotoxicity and derangement of serum transaminases. Liver function may need to be monitored. They are, however, safer in renal impairment. Even though a better pharmacoeconomical choice than amphotericin B, the higher cost of these drugs in comparison to azole antifungals is likely to limit their use to azole resistant cases of candidial infections and as salvage therapy in invasive aspergillosis rather than as first line drugs.