How often do we identify fetal abnormalities during routine third-trimester ultrasound? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Routine third-trimester ultrasound is frequently offered to pregnant women to identify fetuses with abnormal growth. Infrequently, a congenital anomaly is incidentally detected.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the prevalence and type of fetal anomalies detected during routine third-trimester scans using a systematic review and meta-analysis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane library) from inception until August 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Population-based studies (randomised control trials, prospective and retrospective cohorts) reporting abnormalities detected at the routine third-trimester ultrasound performed in unselected populations with prior screening. Case reports, case series, case-control studies and reviews without original data were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Prevalence and type of anomalies detected in the third trimester. We calculated pooled prevalence as the number of anomalies per 1000 scans with 95% confidence intervals. Publication bias was assessed.

MAIN RESULTS

The literature search identified 9594 citations: 13 studies were eligible representing 141 717 women; 643 were diagnosed with an unexpected abnormality. The pooled prevalence of a new abnormality diagnosed was 3.68 per 1000 women scanned (95% CI 2.72-4.78). The largest groups of abnormalities were urogenital (55%), central nervous system abnormalities (18%) and cardiac abnormalities (14%).

CONCLUSION

Combining data from 13 studies and over 140 000 women, we show that during routine third-trimester ultrasound, an incidental fetal anomaly will be found in about 1 in 300 scanned women. This information should be taken into account when taking consent from women for third-trimester ultrasound and when designing and assessing cost of third-trimester ultrasound screening programmes.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

One in 300 women attending a third-trimester scan will have a finding of a fetal abnormality.

Termination of pregnancy due to fetal central nervous system abnormalities performed after 24 weeks' gestation: survey of 57 fetuses from a single medical center

PURPOSE

To assess fetal central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities presenting as major findings leading to late termination of pregnancy (late TOP) performed ≥ 24 weeks' gestation.

METHOD

The study population included 2789 pregnant women that underwent late TOP in our institute between the years 1998 and 2015.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven cases (2.0%) underwent late TOP because of fetal CNS indications and are the subjects of the current study. Those cases were subdivided into four categories (1) no routine prenatal screening with an incidental finding discovered ≥ 24 weeks' gestation (25 patients, 43.8%); (2) developmental or acquired findings detected during late second and third trimester (22 patients, 38.6%); (3) apparently normal routine screening with abnormal findings that could have been detected earlier (six patients, 10.6%); (4) routine prenatal care raised suspicion of abnormalities, and the final diagnosis was established only following additional tests (four patients, 7.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the two categories of CNS abnormalities, i.e., pregnant women who did not undergo any fetal evaluation (group 1) and those that could have been detected earlier (group 3) consists 54% from our cohort in which late TOP could have been avoided. On contrary, 39% fetuses from our study population had CNS developmental findings which could be detected only at advanced stage of gestation.

Early second trimester transvaginal ultrasound anomaly scan does not cause adverse perinatal outcome

OBJECTIVE

During an early second-trimester transvaginal ultrasound anomaly scan, pressure is applied to the uterus, and the fetus is often rotated manually to allow scanning of its various organs. This study was designed to determine if performing a transvaginal ultrasound anomaly scan during the early second trimester of pregnancy is associated with adverse perinatal outcome or cord entanglement.

METHODS

During the 4.5year study period we prospectively collected cases of routine ultrasound scans at 14-17weeks gestation performed as anomaly screening, together with perinatal outcome. The study population consisted of 164 women who underwent a transvaginal approach, and the control population consisted of 224 women in which a transabdominal approach was used. Data on perinatal parameters was collected from delivery charts from the four local hospitals.

RESULTS

There were more operative deliveries (vaginal or Cesarean) in the transvaginal scan group (32% vs. 23%, p=0.05). However, on multiple logistic regression analysis vaginal scans were not associated with increased operative delivery rates with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.47 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.85-2.54. There were no other clinically significant differences in perinatal outcomes, or in cord entanglement.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvaginal ultrasound anomaly scan conducted in the early second trimester of pregnancy is a safe procedure for the fetus.