BRCA1 deficiency enhances the aggressiveness of breast cancer cells expressing HPV16 oncoproteins

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The precise etiology of breast cancer is not completely understood, although women with BRCA1 gene mutations have a significantly increased risk of developing the disease. In addition, sporadic breast cancer is frequently associated with decreased BRCA1 gene expression. Growing evidence of Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) infections in breast tumors has raised the possibility of the involvement of HPVs in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. We investigated whether the effects of HPV oncoproteins E6 and E7 were influenced by the expression levels of BRCA1. HPV16E6E7 (prototype or E6D25E/E7N29S Asian variant type) were stably expressed in MDA-MB231 breast cancer cells, wild type for BRCA1, or with BRCA1 knocked down.

RESULTS

Expression of HPV16E6E7 oncogenes did not affect BRCA1 levels and the abundance of HPV16E6E7 was not altered by BRCA1 knockdown. BRCA1 levels did not alter HPV16E6E7-dependent degradation of G1-S cell cycle proteins p53 and pRb. However, we found that the expression of G2-M cell cycle protein cyclin B1 enhanced by HPV16E6E7 was impacted by BRCA1 levels. Especially, we found the correlation between BRCA1 and cyclin B1 expression and this was also confirmed in breast cancer samples from a Thai cohort. We further demonstrated that the combination of HPV oncoproteins and low levels of BRCA1 protein appears to enhance proliferation and invasion. Transactivation activities of HPV16E6E7 on genes regulating cell proliferation and invasion (TGF-β and vimentin) were significantly increased in BRCA1-deficient cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that a deficiency of BRCA1 promotes the transactivation activity of HPV16E6E7 leading to increase of cell proliferation and invasion.

SIGNIFICANCE

HPV infection appears to have the potential to enhance the aggressiveness of breast cancers, especially those deficient in BRCA1.

BRCA1 deficiency in triple-negative breast cancer: Protein stability as a basis for therapy

Mutations in breast cancer-associated 1 (BRCA1) increase the lifetime risk of developing breast cancer by up to 51% over the risk of the general population. Many aspects of this multifunctional protein have been revealed, including its essential role in homologous recombination repair, E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, transcriptional regulation, and apoptosis. Although most studies have focused on BRCA1 deficiency due to mutations, only a minority of patients carry BRCA1 mutations. A recent study has suggested an expanded definition of BRCA1 deficiency with reduced BRCA1 levels, which accounts for almost half of all triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Reduced BRCA1 levels can result from epigenetic modifications or increased proteasomal degradation. In this review, we discuss how this knowledge of BRCA1 function and regulation of BRCA1 protein stability can help overcome the challenges encountered in the clinic and advance current treatment strategies for BRCA1-related breast cancer patients, especially focusing on TNBC.

Selective progesterone receptor blockade prevents BRCA1-associated mouse mammary tumors through modulation of epithelial and stromal genes

Pharmacological approaches to breast cancer risk-reduction for BRCA1 mutation carriers would provide an alternative to mastectomy. BRCA1-deficiency dysregulates progesterone signaling, promoting tumorigenesis. Selective progesterone receptor (PR) modulators (SPRMs) are therefore candidate prevention agents. However, their efficacy varies in different BRCA1-deficient mouse models. We examined chemopreventive efficacy of telapristone acetate (TPA), ulipristal acetate (UPA) and mifepristone (MFP) in mice with a conditional knockout of the Brca1 C-terminal domain. The SPRMs displayed a spectrum of efficacy: UPA was most effective, TPA less, and MFP ineffective. Compared to no-treatment controls, UPA reduced tumorigenesis (p = 0.04), and increased tumor latency (p = 0.03). In benign mammary glands, UPA decreased Ki67 (p < 0.001) and increased PR expression (p < 0.0001). RNA sequencing analysis revealed distinct gene expression in response to UPA and MFP. UPA downregulated glycolysis and extracellular matrix-inflammation genes (Fn1, Ptgs2, Tgfb2, Tgfb3) whereas MFP downregulated claudin genes and upregulated amino acid metabolism and inflammation genes. The anti-glucocorticoid effects of MFP appeared not to be tumor-protective, while altering estrogen receptor signaling and NF-kB activation. Our study points to an important role of epithelial PR and its paracrine action on the microenvironment in BRCA1-deficient mammary tumorigenesis, and prevention.