1
|
Kurian SJ, Yolcu YU, Zreik J, Alvi MA, Freedman BA, Bydon M. Institutional databases may underestimate the risk factors for 30-day unplanned readmissions compared to national databases. J Neurosurg Spine 2020:1-9. [PMID: 32736365 DOI: 10.3171/2020.5.spine20395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and National Readmissions Database (NRD) are two widely used databases for research studies. However, they may not provide generalizable information in regard to individual institutions. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate 30-day readmissions following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) procedures by using these two national databases and an institutional cohort. METHODS The NSQIP and NRD were queried for patients undergoing elective ACDF and PLF, with the addition of an institutional cohort. The outcome of interest was 30-day readmissions following ACDF and PLF, which were unplanned and related to the index procedure. Subsequently, univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the predictors of 30-day readmissions by using both databases and the institutional cohort. RESULTS Among all identified risk factors, only hypertension was found to be a common risk factor between NRD and the institutional cohort following ACDF. NSQIP and the institutional cohort both showed length of hospital stay to be a significant predictor for 30-day related readmission following PLF. There were no overlapping variables among all 3 cohorts for either ACDF or PLF. Additionally, the national databases identified a greater number of risk factors for 30-day related readmissions than did the institutional cohort for both procedures. CONCLUSIONS Overall, significant differences were seen among all 3 cohorts with regard to top predictors of 30-day unplanned readmissions following ACDF and PLF. The higher quantity of significant predictors found in the national databases may suggest that looking at single-institution series for such analyses may result in underestimation of important variables affecting patient outcomes, and that big data may be helpful in addressing this concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shyam J Kurian
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery.,2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.,3Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine; and.,4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Yagiz Ugur Yolcu
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery.,2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic
| | - Jad Zreik
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery.,2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic
| | - Mohammed Ali Alvi
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery.,2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic
| | - Brett A Freedman
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery.,2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mouchtouris N, Al Saiegh F, Fitchett E, Andrews CE, Lang MJ, Ghosh R, Schmidt RF, Chalouhi N, Barros G, Zarzour H, Romo V, Herial N, Jabbour P, Tjoumakaris SI, Rosenwasser RH, Gooch MR. Revascularization and functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy: an update to key metrics. J Neurosurg 2019; 133:1-6. [PMID: 31518981 DOI: 10.3171/2019.6.jns183649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The advent of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become an effective option for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in addition to tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). With recent advances in device technology, MT has significantly altered the hospital course and functional outcomes of stroke patients. The authors' goal was to establish the most up-to-date reperfusion and functional outcomes with the evolution of MT technology. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective study of 403 patients who underwent MT for ischemic stroke at their institution from 2010 to 2017. They collected data on patient comorbidities, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on arrival, tPA administration, revascularization outcomes, and functional outcomes on discharge. RESULTS In 403 patients, the mean NIHSS score on presentation was 15.8 ± 6.6, with 195 (48.0%) of patients receiving tPA prior to MT. Successful reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score 2B or 3) was achieved in 84.4%. Hemorrhagic conversion with significant mass effect was noted in 9.9% of patients. The median lengths of ICU and hospital stay were 3.0 and 7.0 days, respectively. Functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) was noted in 125 (31.0%) patients, while inpatient mortality occurred in 43 (10.7%) patients. CONCLUSIONS As MT has established acute ischemic stroke as a neurosurgical disease, there is a pressing need to understand the hospital course, hospital- and procedure-related complications, and outcomes for this new patient population. The authors provide a detailed account of key metrics for MT with the latest device technology and identify the predictors of unfavorable outcomes and inpatient mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Mouchtouris
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Fadi Al Saiegh
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Evan Fitchett
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Carrie E Andrews
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Michael J Lang
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Ritam Ghosh
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Richard F Schmidt
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Nohra Chalouhi
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Guilherme Barros
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Hekmat Zarzour
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Victor Romo
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Nabeel Herial
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Pascal Jabbour
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Robert H Rosenwasser
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - M Reid Gooch
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khalid SI, Kelly R, Carlton A, Adogwa O, Kim P, Ranade A, Moreno J, Maasarani S, Wu R, Melville P, Citow J. Outpatient and inpatient readmission rates of 3- and 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 31:70-75. [PMID: 30925482 DOI: 10.3171/2019.1.spine181019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With the costs related to the United States medical system constantly rising, efforts are being made to turn traditional inpatient procedures into outpatient same-day surgeries. In this study the authors looked at the various comorbidities and perioperative complications and their impact on readmission rates of patients undergoing outpatient versus inpatient 3- and 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS This was a retrospective study of 337 3- and 4- level ACDF procedures in 332 patients (5 patients had both primary and revision surgeries that were included in this total of 337 procedures) between May 2012 and June 2017. In total, 331 procedures were analyzed, as 6 patients were lost to follow-up. Outpatient surgery was performed for 299 procedures (102 4-level procedures and 197 3-level procedures), and inpatient surgery was performed for 32 procedures (11 4-level procedures and 21 3-level procedures). Age, sex, comorbidities, number of fusion levels, pain level, and perioperative complications were compared between both cohorts. RESULTS Analysis was performed for 331 3- and 4-level ACDF procedures done at 6 different hospitals. The overall 30-day readmission rate was 1.2% (outpatient 3 [1.0%] vs inpatient 1 [3.1%], p = 0.847). Outpatients had increased readmission risk, with comorbidities of coronary artery disease (OR 1.058, p = 0.039), autoimmune disease (OR 1.142, p = 0.006), diabetes (OR 1.056, p = 0.001), and chronic kidney disease (OR 0.933, p = 0.035). Perioperative complications of delirium (OR 2.709, p < 0.001) and surgical site infection (OR 2.709, p < 0.001) were associated with increased risk of 30-day hospital readmission in outpatients compared to inpatients. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of 3- and 4-level ACDF surgery, although various comorbidities and perioperative complications may lead to higher readmission rates. Patient selection for outpatient 3- and 4-level ACDF cases might play a role in the safety of performing these procedures in the ambulatory setting, but further studies are needed to accurately identify which factors are most pertinent for appropriate selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed I Khalid
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago
- 2Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ryan Kelly
- 3Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; and
| | - Adam Carlton
- 2Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, Illinois
| | - Owoicho Adogwa
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago
| | - Patrick Kim
- 2Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, Illinois
| | - Arjun Ranade
- 2Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | - Rita Wu
- 2Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Jonathan Citow
- 2Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, Illinois
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Condell Medical Center, Libertyville, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Elsamadicy AA, Lubkin DT, Sergesketter AR, Adil SM, Charalambous LT, Drysdale N, Williamson T, Camara-Quintana J, Abd-El-Barr MM, Goodwin CR, Karikari IO. Rate of instrumentation changes on postoperative and follow-up radiographs after primary complex spinal fusion (five or more levels) for adult deformity correction. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 30:376-381. [PMID: 30641841 DOI: 10.3171/2018.9.spine18686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEIn the United States, healthcare expenditures have been soaring at a concerning rate. There has been an excessive use of postoperative radiographs after spine surgery and this has been a target for hospitals to reduce unnecessary costs. However, there are only limited data identifying the rate of instrumentation changes on radiographs after complex spine surgery involving ≥ 5-level fusions.METHODSThe medical records of 136 adult (≥ 18 years old) patients with spine deformity undergoing elective, primary complex spinal fusion (≥ 5 levels) for deformity correction at a major academic institution between 2010 and 2015 were reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and intra- and postoperative complication rates were collected for each patient. The authors reviewed the first 5 subsequent postoperative and follow-up radiographs, and determined whether revision of surgery was performed within 5 years postoperatively. The primary outcome investigated in this study was the rate of hardware changes on follow-up radiographs.RESULTSThe majority of patients were female, with a mean age of 53.8 ± 20.0 years and a body mass index of 27.3 ± 6.2 kg/m2 (parametric data are expressed as the mean ± SD). The median number of fusion levels was 9 (interquartile range 7-13), with a mean length of surgery of 327.8 ± 124.7 minutes and an estimated blood loss of 1312.1 ± 1269.2 ml. The mean length of hospital stay was 6.6 ± 3.9 days, with a 30-day readmission rate of 14.0%. Postoperative and follow-up change in stability on radiographs (days from operation) included: image 1 (4.6 ± 9.3 days) 0.0%; image 2 (51.7 ± 49.9 days) 3.0%; image 3 (142.1 ± 179.8 days) 5.6%; image 4 (277.3 ± 272.5 days) 11.3%; and image 5 (463.1 ± 525.9 days) 15.7%. The 3rd year after surgery had the highest rate of hardware revision (5.55%), followed by the 2nd year (4.68%), and the 1st year (4.54%).CONCLUSIONSThis study suggests that the rate of instrumentation changes on radiographs increases over time, with no changes occurring at the first postoperative image. In an era of cost-conscious healthcare, fewer orders for early radiographs after complex spinal fusions (≥ 5 levels) may not impact patient care and can reduce the overall use of healthcare resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aladine A Elsamadicy
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and
| | - David T Lubkin
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Syed M Adil
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lefko T Charalambous
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nicolas Drysdale
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Theresa Williamson
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Joaquin Camara-Quintana
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and
| | | | - C Rory Goodwin
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Isaac O Karikari
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen X, Lin CL, Su YC, Chen KF, Lai SW, Wei ST, Peng CT, Chiu CD, Shieh SH, Chen CC. Risk of subsequent stroke, with or without extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery: a nationwide, retrospective, population-based study. J Neurosurg 2018; 130:1-8. [PMID: 29999468 DOI: 10.3171/2017.12.jns172178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEAlthough no benefits of extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery in preventing secondary stroke have been identified previously, the outcomes of initial symptomatic ischemic stroke and stenosis and/or occlusion among the Asian population in patients with or without bypass intervention have yet to be discussed. The authors aimed to evaluate the subsequent risk of secondary vascular disease and cardiac events in patients with and without a history of this intervention.METHODSThis retrospective nationwide population-based Taiwanese registry study included 205,991 patients with initial symptomatic ischemic stroke and stenosis and/or occlusion, with imaging data obtained between 2001 and 2010. Patients who underwent EC-IC bypass (bypass group) were compared with those who had not undergone EC-IC bypass, carotid artery stenting, or carotid artery endarterectomy (nonbypass group). Patients with any previous diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, moyamoya disease, cancer, or trauma were all excluded.RESULTSThe risk of subsequent ischemic stroke events decreased by 41% in the bypass group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.46-0.76, p < 0.001) compared with the nonbypass group. The risk of subsequent hemorrhagic stroke events increased in the bypass group (adjusted HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.67-3.64, p < 0.001) compared with the nonbypass group.CONCLUSIONSBypass surgery does play an important role in revascularization of the ischemic brain, while also increasing the risk of hemorrhage in the early postoperative period. This study highlights the fact that the high risk of bypass surgery obscures the true benefit of revascularization of the ischemic brain and also emphasizes the importance of developing improved surgical technique to treat these high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- XianXiu Chen
- 1Department of Public Health, China Medical University
- 2Stroke Center, China Medical University Hospital
| | - Cheng-Li Lin
- 3College of Medicine, China Medical University
- 4Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital
| | - Yuan-Chih Su
- 3College of Medicine, China Medical University
- 4Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital
| | - Kuan-Fei Chen
- 5Department of Neurology, China Medical University Hospital
| | - Shih-Wei Lai
- 3College of Medicine, China Medical University
- 6Department of Family Medicine, China Medical University Hospital
| | - Sung-Tai Wei
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, China Medical University Hospital
| | - Ching-Tien Peng
- 8Department of Hemato-oncology, Children's Hospital, China Medical University
- 9Department of Biotechnology, Asia University
| | - Cheng-Di Chiu
- 2Stroke Center, China Medical University Hospital
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, China Medical University Hospital
- 10Graduate Institute of Basic Medical Science, China Medical University; and
| | - Shwn-Huey Shieh
- 11Department of Health Services Administration, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chung Chen
- 2Stroke Center, China Medical University Hospital
- 3College of Medicine, China Medical University
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, China Medical University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Franko LR, Sheehan KM, Roark CD, Joseph JR, Burke JF, Rajajee V, Williamson CA. A propensity score analysis of the impact of surgical intervention on unexpected 30-day readmission following admission for subdural hematoma. J Neurosurg 2017; 129:1008-1016. [PMID: 29271714 DOI: 10.3171/2017.6.jns17188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Subdural hematoma (SDH) is a common disease that is increasingly being managed nonoperatively. The all-cause readmission rate for SDH has not previously been described. This study seeks to describe the incidence of unexpected 30-day readmission in a cohort of patients admitted to an academic neurosurgical center. Additionally, the relationship between operative management, clinical outcome, and unexpected readmission is explored. METHODS This is an observational study of 200 consecutive adult patients with SDH admitted to the neurosurgical ICU of an academic medical center. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and treatment strategies were compared between readmitted and nonreadmitted patients. Multivariable logistic regression, weighted by the inverse probability of receiving surgery using propensity scores, was used to evaluate the association between operative management and unexpected readmission. RESULTS Of 200 total patients, 18 (9%) died during hospitalization and were not included in the analysis. Overall, 48 patients (26%) were unexpectedly readmitted within 30 days. Sixteen patients (33.3%) underwent SDH evacuation during their readmission. Factors significantly associated with unexpected readmission were nonoperative management (72.9% vs 54.5%, p = 0.03) and female sex (50.0% vs 32.1%, p = 0.03). In logistic regression analysis weighted by the inverse probability of treatment and including likely confounders, surgical management was not associated with likelihood of a good outcome at hospital discharge, but was associated with significantly reduced odds of unexpected readmission (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.49). CONCLUSIONS Over 25% of SDH patients admitted to an academic neurosurgical ICU were unexpectedly readmitted within 30 days. Nonoperative management does not affect outcome at hospital discharge but is significantly associated with readmission, even when accounting for the probability of treatment by propensity score weighted logistic regression. Additional research is needed to validate these results and to further characterize the impact of nonoperative management on long-term costs and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kyle M Sheehan
- Departments of2Neurosurgery and.,3Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | | | | | - James F Burke
- 3Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | - Venkatakrishna Rajajee
- Departments of2Neurosurgery and.,3Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | - Craig A Williamson
- Departments of2Neurosurgery and.,3Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Adogwa O, Elsamadicy AA, Vuong VD, Moreno J, Cheng J, Karikari IO, Bagley CA. Geriatric comanagement reduces perioperative complications and shortens duration of hospital stay after lumbar spine surgery: a prospective single-institution experience. J Neurosurg Spine 2017; 27:670-675. [PMID: 28960161 DOI: 10.3171/2017.5.spine17199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Geriatric patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery have unique needs due to the physiological changes of aging. They are at risk for adverse outcomes such as delirium, infection, and iatrogenic complications, and these complications, in turn, contribute to the risk of functional decline, nursing home admission, and death. Whether preoperative and perioperative comanagement by a geriatrician reduces the incidence of in-hospital complications and length of in-hospital stay after elective lumbar spine surgery remains unknown. METHODS A unique model of comanagement for elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery was implemented at a major academic medical center. The Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) program was launched with the aim of improving outcomes in elderly patients (> 65 years old) undergoing complex lumbar spine surgery. In this model, a geriatrician evaluates elderly patients preoperatively, in addition to performing routine preoperative anesthesia surgical screening, and comanages them daily throughout the course of their hospital stay to manage medical comorbid conditions and coordinate multidisciplinary rehabilitation along with the neurosurgical team. The first 100 cases were retrospectively reviewed after initiation of the POSH protocol and compared with the immediately preceding 25 cases to assess the incidence of perioperative complications and clinical outcomes. RESULTS One hundred twenty-five patients undergoing lumbar decompression and fusion were enrolled in this pilot program. Baseline characteristics were similar between both cohorts. The mean length of in-hospital stay was 30% shorter in the POSH cohort (6.13 vs 8.72 days; p = 0.06). The mean duration of time between surgery and patient mobilization was significantly shorter in the POSH cohort compared with the non-POSH cohort (1.57 days vs 2.77 days; p = 0.02), and the number of steps ambulated on day of discharge was 2-fold higher in the POSH cohort (p = 0.04). Compared with the non-POSH cohort, the majority of patients in the POSH cohort were discharged to home (24% vs 54%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Geriatric comanagement reduces the incidence of postoperative complications, shortens the duration of in-hospital stay, and contributes to improved perioperative functional status in elderly patients undergoing elective spinal surgery for the correction of adult degenerative scoliosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owoicho Adogwa
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Aladine A Elsamadicy
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Victoria D Vuong
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jessica Moreno
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Joseph Cheng
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; and
| | - Isaac O Karikari
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Carlos A Bagley
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Passias PG, Diebo BG, Marascalchi BJ, Jalai CM, Horn SR, Zhou PL, Paltoo K, Bono OJ, Worley N, Poorman GW, Challier V, Dixit A, Paulino C, Lafage V. A novel index for quantifying the risk of early complications for patients undergoing cervical spine surgeries. J Neurosurg Spine 2017; 27:501-507. [PMID: 28841106 DOI: 10.3171/2017.3.spine16887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is becoming increasingly necessary for surgeons to provide evidence supporting cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment for cervical spine pathology. Anticipating surgical risk is critical in accurately evaluating the risk/benefit balance of such treatment. Determining the risk and cost-effectiveness of surgery, complications, revision procedures, and mortality rates are the most significant limitations. The purpose of this study was to determine independent risk factors for medical complications (MCs), surgical complications (SCs), revisions, and mortality rates following surgery for patients with cervical spine pathology. The most relevant risk factors were used to structure an index that will help quantify risk and anticipate failure for such procedures. METHODS The authors of this study performed a retrospective review of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for patients treated surgically for cervical spine pathology between 2001 and 2010. Multivariate models were performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of the independent risk factors that led to MCs and repeated for SCs, revisions, and mortality. The models controlled for age (< and > 65 years old), sex, race, revision status (except for revision analysis), surgical approach, number of levels fused/re-fused (2-3, 4-8, ≥ 9), and osteotomy utilization. ORs were weighted based on their predictive category: 2 times for revision surgery predictors and 4 times for mortality predictors. Fifty points were distributed among the predictors based on their cumulative OR to establish a risk index. RESULTS Discharges for 362,989 patients with cervical spine pathology were identified. The mean age was 52.65 years, and 49.47% of patients were women. Independent risk factors included medical comorbidities, surgical parameters, and demographic factors. Medical comorbidities included the following: pulmonary circulation disorder, coagulopathy, metastatic cancer, renal failure, congestive heart failure, alcohol abuse, neurological disorder, nonmetastatic cancer, liver disease, rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseases, and chronic blood loss/anemia. Surgical parameters included posterior approach to fusion/re-fusion, ≥ 9 levels fused/re-fused, corpectomy, 4-8 levels fused/re-fused, and osteotomy; demographic variables included age ≥ 65 years. These factors increased the risk of at least 1 of MC, SC, revision, or mortality (risk of death). A total of 50 points were distributed among the factors based on the cumulative risk ratio of every factor in proportion to the total risk ratios. CONCLUSIONS This study proposed an index to quantify the potential risk of morbidity and mortality prior to surgical intervention for patients with cervical spine pathology. This index may be useful for surgeons in patient counseling efforts as well as for health insurance companies and future socioeconomics studies in assessing surgical risks and benefits for patients undergoing surgical treatment of the cervical spine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn
| | - Bryan J Marascalchi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland; and
| | - Cyrus M Jalai
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Samantha R Horn
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Peter L Zhou
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Karen Paltoo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn
| | - Olivia J Bono
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Nancy Worley
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Gregory W Poorman
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Vincent Challier
- Spine Unit 1, Orthopedic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anant Dixit
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn
| | - Carl Paulino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Elsamadicy AA, Adogwa O, Lydon E, Sergesketter A, Kaakati R, Mehta AI, Vasquez RA, Cheng J, Bagley CA, Karikari IO. Depression as an independent predictor of postoperative delirium in spine deformity patients undergoing elective spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2017; 27:209-214. [PMID: 28574333 DOI: 10.3171/2017.4.spine161012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Depression is the most prevalent affective disorder in the US, and patients with spinal deformity are at increased risk. Postoperative delirium has been associated with inferior surgical outcomes, including morbidity and mortality. The relationship between depression and postoperative delirium in patients undergoing spine surgery is relatively unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if depression is an independent risk factor for the development of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing decompression and fusion for deformity. METHODS The medical records of 923 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing elective spine surgery at a single major academic institution from 2005 through 2015 were reviewed. Of these patients, 255 (27.6%) patients had been diagnosed with depression by a board-certified psychiatrist and constituted the Depression group; the remaining 668 patients constituted the No-Depression group. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and intra- and postoperative complication rates were collected for each patient and compared between groups. The primary outcome investigated in this study was rate of postoperative delirium, according to DSM-V criteria, during initial hospital stay after surgery. The association between depression and postoperative delirium rate was assessed via multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Patient demographics and comorbidities other than depression were similar in the 2 groups. In the Depression group, 85.1% of the patients were taking an antidepressant prior to surgery. There were no significant between-group differences in intraoperative variables and rates of complications other than delirium. Postoperative complication rates were also similar between the cohorts, including rates of urinary tract infection, fever, deep and superficial surgical site infection, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, urinary retention, and proportion of patients transferred to the intensive care unit. In total, 66 patients (7.15%) had an episode of postoperative delirium, with depressed patients experiencing approximately a 2-fold higher rate of delirium (10.59% vs 5.84%). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, depression was an independent predictor of postoperative delirium after spine surgery in spinal deformity patients (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that depression is an independent risk factor for postoperative delirium after elective spine surgery. Further studies are necessary to understand the effects of affective disorders on postoperative delirium, in hopes to better identify patients at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aladine A Elsamadicy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Owoicho Adogwa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago
| | - Emily Lydon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Amanda Sergesketter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rayan Kaakati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ankit I Mehta
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois
| | - Raul A Vasquez
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Joseph Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; and
| | - Carlos A Bagley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas South Western, Dallas, Texas
| | - Isaac O Karikari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rinaldo L, McCutcheon BA, Murphy ME, Shepherd DL, Maloney PR, Kerezoudis P, Bydon M, Lanzino G. Quantitative analysis of the effect of institutional case volume on complications after surgical clipping of unruptured aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2017; 127:1297-1306. [PMID: 28059649 DOI: 10.3171/2016.9.jns161875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The mechanism by which greater institutional case volume translates into improved outcomes after surgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is not well established. The authors thus aimed to assess the effect of case volume on the rate of various types of complications after clipping of UIAs. METHODS Using information on the outcomes of inpatient admissions for surgical clipping of UIAs collected within a national database, the relationship of institutional case volume to the incidence of different types of complications after clipping was investigated. Complications were subdivided into different categories, which included all complications, ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, medical complications, infectious complications, complications related to anesthesia, and wound complications. The relationship of case volume to different types of complications was assessed using linear regression analysis. The relationships between case volume and overall complication and stroke rates were fit with both linear and quadratic equations. The numerical cutoff for institutional case volume above and below which the authors found the greatest differences in mean overall complication and stroke rate was determined using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. RESULTS Between October 2012 and September 2015, 125 health care institutions reported patient outcomes from a total of 6040 cases of clipping of UIAs. On linear regression analysis, increasing case volume was negatively correlated to both overall complications (r2 = 0.046, p = 0.0234) and stroke (r2 = 0.029, p = 0.0557) rate, although the relationship of case volume to the complication (r2 = 0.092) and stroke (r2 = 0.067) rate was better fit with a quadratic equation. On CART analysis, the cutoff for the case number that yielded the greatest difference in overall complications and stroke rate between higher- or lower-volume centers was 6 cases/year and 3 cases/year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although the authors confirm that increasing case volume is associated with reduced complications after clipping of UIAs, their results suggest that the relationship between case volume and complications is not necessarily linear. Moreover, these results indicate that the effect of case volume on outcome is most evident between very-low-volume centers relative to centers with a medium-to-high volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Lanzino
- Departments of1Neurosurgery and.,2Neurointerventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Murphy ME, Gilder H, Maloney PR, McCutcheon BA, Rinaldo L, Shepherd D, Kerezoudis P, Ubl DS, Crowson CS, Krauss WE, Habermann EB, Bydon M. Lumbar decompression in the elderly: increased age as a risk factor for complications and nonhome discharge. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 26:353-362. [PMID: 27858534 DOI: 10.3171/2016.8.spine16616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With improving medical therapies for chronic conditions, elderly patients increasingly present as candidates for operative intervention for degenerative diseases of the spine. To date, there is a paucity of studies examining complications in lumbar decompression, without fusion, that include patients older than 80 years. Using a multicenter national database, the authors of this study evaluated lumbar decompression in the elderly, including octogenarians, to evaluate for associations between age and patient outcomes. METHODS The 2011-2013 American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set was queried for patients 65 years and older with diagnosis and procedure codes inclusive of degenerative spine disease and lumbar decompression without fusion. Morbidity and mortality within the 30-day postoperative period were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes of interest included unplanned readmission within 30 days or discharge to a nonhome facility. Outcomes and operative characteristics were compared using chi-square tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS A total of 8744 patients were identified; of these patients 4573 (52.30%) were 65 years and older. Elderly patients were stratified into 3 age categories: 85 years or older (n = 314), 75-84 years (n = 1663), and 65-74 years (n = 2596). Univariate analysis showed that, compared with age younger than 65 years, increased age was associated with the number of levels (≥ 3), readmissions within 30 days, nonhome discharge, any complication, length of stay, and blood transfusion (all p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis and with younger than 65 years as the reference, increased age was associated with any minor complication (p < 0.001; ≥ 85 years: OR 3.47, 95% CI 1.69-7.13; 75-84 years: OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.45-3.78; and 65-74 years: OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.94-2.20), as well as discharge location other than home (p < 0.001; ≥ 85 years: OR 13.59, 95% CI 9.47-19.49; 75-84 years: OR 5.64, 95% CI 4.33-7.34; and 65-74 years: OR 2.61, 95% CI 2.05-3.32). CONCLUSIONS The authors' high-powered, multicenter analysis of lumbar decompression without fusion in the elderly, specifically including patients older than 80 years, demonstrates that increased age is associated with more extensive operations, resulting in longer hospital stays, increased rates of nonhome discharge, and minor complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan E Murphy
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.,Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory; and
| | - Hannah Gilder
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.,Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory; and
| | - Patrick R Maloney
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.,Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory; and
| | - Brandon A McCutcheon
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.,Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory; and
| | - Lorenzo Rinaldo
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.,Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory; and
| | - Daniel Shepherd
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.,Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory; and
| | - Panagiotis Kerezoudis
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.,Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory; and
| | - Daniel S Ubl
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Cynthia S Crowson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Mohamad Bydon
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.,Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory; and
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hetts SW, Moftakhar P, Maluste N, Fullerton HJ, Cooke DL, Amans MR, Dowd CF, Higashida RT, Halbach VV. Pediatric intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: age-related differences in clinical features, angioarchitecture, and treatment outcomes. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016; 18:602-610. [PMID: 27540826 DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.peds15740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are rare in children. This study sought to better characterize DAVF presentation, angioarchitecture, and treatment outcomes. METHODS Children with intracranial DAVFs between 1986 and 2013 were retrospectively identified from the neurointerventional database at the authors' institution. Demographics, clinical presentation, lesion angioarchitecture, treatment approaches, angiographic outcomes, and clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS DAVFs constituted 5.7% (22/423) of pediatric intracranial arteriovenous shunting lesions. Twelve boys and 10 girls presented between 1 day and 18 years of age; boys presented at a median of 1.3 years and girls presented at a median of 4.9 years. Four of 8 patients ≤ 1 year of age presented with congestive heart failure compared with 0/14 patients > 1 year of age (p = 0.01). Five of 8 patients ≤ 1 year old presented with respiratory distress compared with 0/14 patients > 1 year old (p = 0.0021). Ten of 14 patients > 1 year old presented with focal neurological deficits compared with 0/8 patients ≤ 1 year old (p = 0.0017). At initial angiography, 16 patients harbored a single intracranial DAVF and 6 patients had 2-6 DAVFs. Eight patients (38%) experienced DAVF obliteration by the end of treatment. Good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) was documented in 77% of patients > 1 year old at presentation compared with 57% of patients ≤ 1 year old at presentation. Six patients (27%) died. CONCLUSIONS Young children with DAVFs presented predominantly with cardiopulmonary symptoms, while older children presented with focal neurological deficits. Compared with other pediatric vascular shunts, DAVFs had lower rates of angiographic obliteration and poorer clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Neil Maluste
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | - Christopher F Dowd
- Departments of 1 Radiology and Biomedical Imaging.,Neurology.,Neurological Surgery, and.,Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco; and
| | - Randall T Higashida
- Departments of 1 Radiology and Biomedical Imaging.,Neurology.,Neurological Surgery, and.,Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco; and
| | - Van V Halbach
- Departments of 1 Radiology and Biomedical Imaging.,Neurology.,Neurological Surgery, and.,Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco; and
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The accuracy of public reporting in health care is an issue of debate. The authors investigated the association of patient satisfaction measures from a public reporting platform with objective outcomes for patients undergoing spine surgery. METHODS The authors performed a cohort study involving patients undergoing elective spine surgery from 2009 to 2013 who were registered in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. This cohort was merged with publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare website. A mixed-effects regression analysis, controlling for clustering at the hospital level, was used to investigate the association of patient satisfaction metrics with outcomes. RESULTS During the study period, 160,235 patients underwent spine surgery. Using a mixed-effects multivariable regression analysis, the authors demonstrated that undergoing elective spine surgery in hospitals with a higher percentage of patient-assigned high satisfaction scores was not associated with a decreased rate of discharge to rehabilitation (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57-1.06), mortality (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.90-1.01), or hospitalization charges (β 0.04, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.23). However, it was associated with decreased length of stay (LOS; β -0.19, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.05). Similar associations were identified for hospitals with a higher percentage of patients who claimed they would recommend these institutions to others. CONCLUSIONS Merging a comprehensive all-payer cohort of spine surgery patients in New York state with data from the CMS Hospital Compare website, the authors were not able to demonstrate an association of improved performance in patient satisfaction measures with decreased mortality, rate of discharge to rehabilitation, and hospitalization charges. Increased patient satisfaction was associated with decreased LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Symeon Missios
- Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana; and
| | - Kimon Bekelis
- Section of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jaja BNR, Lingsma H, Schweizer TA, Thorpe KE, Steyerberg EW, Macdonald RL. Prognostic value of premorbid hypertension and neurological status in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: pooled analyses of individual patient data in the SAHIT repository. J Neurosurg 2015; 122:644-52. [PMID: 25554825 DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.jns132694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT The literature has conflicting reports about the prognostic value of premorbid hypertension and neurological status in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of premorbid hypertension and neurological status in the SAH International Trialists repository. METHODS Patient-level meta-analyses were conducted to investigate univariate associations between premorbid hypertension (6 studies; n = 7249), admission neurological status measured on the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) scale (10 studies; n = 10,869), and 3-month Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score. Multivariable analyses were performed to sequentially adjust for the effects of age, CT clot burden, aneurysm location, aneurysm size, and modality of aneurysm repair. Prognostic associations were estimated across the ordered categories of the GOS using proportional odds models. Nagelkerke's R(2) statistic was used to quantify the added prognostic value of hypertension and neurological status beyond those of the adjustment factors. RESULTS Premorbid hypertension was independently associated with poor outcome, with an unadjusted pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50-2.00) and an adjusted OR of 1.38 (95% CI 1.25-1.53). Patients with a premorbid history of hypertension had higher rates of cardiovascular and renal comorbidities, poorer neurological status (p ≤ 0.001), and higher odds of neurological complications including cerebral infarctions, hydrocephalus, rebleeding, and delayed ischemic neurological deficits. Worsening neurological status was strongly independently associated with poor outcome, including WFNS Grades II (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.68-2.03), III (OR 3.85, 95% CI 3.32-4.47), IV (OR 5.58, 95% CI 4.91-6.35), and V (OR 14.18, 95% CI 12.20-16.49). Neurological status had substantial added predictive value greater than the combined value of other prognostic factors (R(2) increase > 10%), while the added predictive value of hypertension was marginal (R(2) increase < 0.5%). CONCLUSIONS This study confirmed the strong prognostic effect of neurological status as measured on the WFNS scale and the independent but weak prognostic effect of premorbid hypertension. The effect of premorbid hypertension could involve multifactorial mechanisms, including an increase in the severity of initial bleeding, the rate of comorbid events, and neurological complications.
Collapse
|