CRISPR-KRISPR: a method to identify on-target and random insertion of donor DNAs and their characterization in knock-in mice

CRISPR tools can generate knockout and knock-in animal models easily, but the models can contain off-target genomic lesions or random insertions of donor DNAs. Simpler methods to identify off-target lesions and random insertions, using tail or earpiece DNA, are unavailable. We develop CRISPR-KRISPR (CRISPR-Knock-ins and Random Inserts Searching PRotocol), a method to identify both off-target lesions and random insertions. CRISPR-KRISPR uses as little as 3.4 μg of genomic DNA; thus, it can be easily incorporated as an additional step to genotype founder animals for further breeding.

Evaluation of CRISPR gene-editing tools in zebrafish

BACKGROUND

Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher-throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. In particular, the use of G0 mosaic mutants has potential to increase throughput of functional studies significantly but may suffer from transient effects of introducing Cas9 via microinjection. Further, a large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods leaving uncertainty in choosing an optimal approach for zebrafish studies.

METHODS

To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on- and off-target gene editing, we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting 14 genes. We also investigate potential confounders of G0-based CRISPR screens by assaying control embryos for spurious mutations and altered gene expression.

RESULTS

We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by eight commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off-target mutations (predicted in silico and in vitro) found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies (< 1%). To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls (larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA) exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish, we generated an RNA-seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 days post fertilization. While we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae, we did identify several hundred differentially-expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially-expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways, and gene-ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization, highlighting a potentially lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation.

CONCLUSION

Overall, our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.

Off-Target Analysis in Gene Editing and Applications for Clinical Translation of CRISPR/Cas9 in HIV-1 Therapy

As genome-editing nucleases move toward broader clinical applications, the need to define the limits of their specificity and efficiency increases. A variety of approaches for nuclease cleavage detection have been developed, allowing a full-genome survey of the targeting landscape and the detection of a variety of repair outcomes for nuclease-induced double-strand breaks. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages relating to the means of target-site capture, target enrichment mechanism, cellular environment, false discovery, and validation of bona fide off-target cleavage sites in cells. This review examines the strengths, limitations, and origins of the different classes of off-target cleavage detection systems including anchored primer enrichment (GUIDE-seq), in situ detection (BLISS), in vitro selection libraries (CIRCLE-seq), chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) (DISCOVER-Seq), translocation sequencing (LAM PCR HTGTS), and in vitro genomic DNA digestion (Digenome-seq and SITE-Seq). Emphasis is placed on the specific modifications that give rise to the enhanced performance of contemporary techniques over their predecessors and the comparative performance of techniques for different applications. The clinical relevance of these techniques is discussed in the context of assessing the safety of novel CRISPR/Cas9 HIV-1 curative strategies. With the recent success of HIV-1 and SIV-1 viral suppression in humanized mice and non-human primates, respectively, using CRISPR/Cas9, rigorous exploration of potential off-target effects is of critical importance. Such analyses would benefit from the application of the techniques discussed in this review.

Therapeutic Gene Editing with CRISPR: A Laboratory Medicine Perspective

Therapeutic gene editing with the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas system offers significant improvements in specificity and programmability compared with previous methods. CRISPR editing strategies can be used ex vivo and in vivo with many theoretic disease applications. Off-target effects of CRISPR-mediated gene editing are an important outcome to be aware of, minimize, and detect. The current methods of regulatory approval for personalized therapies are complex and may be proved inefficient as these therapies are implemented more widely. The role of pathologists and laboratory medicine practitioners is vital to the clinical implementation of therapeutic gene editing.

Computational Analysis Concerning the Impact of DNA Accessibility on CRISPR-Cas9 Cleavage Efficiency

Defining the variables that impact the specificity of CRISPR/Cas9 has been a major research focus. Whereas sequence complementarity between guide RNA and target DNA substantially dictates cleavage efficiency, DNA accessibility of the targeted loci has also been hypothesized to be an important factor. In this study, functional data from two genome-wide assays, genome-wide, unbiased identification of DSBs enabled by sequencing (GUIDE-seq) and circularization for in vitro reporting of cleavage effects by sequencing (CIRCLE-seq), have been computationally analyzed in conjunction with DNA accessibility determined via DNase I-hypersensitive sequencing from the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) Database and transcriptome from the Sequence Read Archive to determine whether cellular factors influence CRISPR-induced cleavage efficiency. CIRCLE-seq and GUIDE-seq datasets were selected to represent the absence and presence of cellular factors, respectively. Data analysis revealed that correlations between sequence similarity and CRISPR-induced cleavage frequency were altered by the presence of cellular factors that modulated the level of DNA accessibility. The above-mentioned correlation was abolished when cleavage sites were located in less accessible regions. Furthermore, CRISPR-mediated edits were permissive even at regions that were insufficient for most endogenous genes to be expressed. These results provide a strong basis to dissect the contribution of local chromatin modulation markers on CRISPR-induced cleavage efficiency.

Activities and specificities of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases for targeted mutagenesis in maize

CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a (Cpf1) nucleases are two of the most powerful genome editing tools in plants. In this work, we compared their activities by targeting maize glossy2 gene coding region that has overlapping sequences recognized by both nucleases. We introduced constructs carrying SpCas9-guide RNA (gRNA) and LbCas12a-CRISPR RNA (crRNA) into maize inbred B104 embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. On-target mutation analysis showed that 90%-100% of the Cas9-edited T0 plants carried indel mutations and 63%-77% of them were homozygous or biallelic mutants. In contrast, 0%-60% of Cas12a-edited T0 plants had on-target mutations. We then conducted CIRCLE-seq analysis to identify genome-wide potential off-target sites for Cas9. A total of 18 and 67 potential off-targets were identified for the two gRNAs, respectively, with an average of five mismatches compared to the target sites. Sequencing analysis of a selected subset of the off-target sites revealed no detectable level of mutations in the T1 plants, which constitutively express Cas9 nuclease and gRNAs. In conclusion, our results suggest that the CRISPR/Cas9 system used in this study is highly efficient and specific for genome editing in maize, while CRISPR/Cas12a needs further optimization for improved editing efficiency.