Co-expression of cytokeratin and vimentin in colorectal cancer highlights a subset of tumor buds and an atypical cancer-associated stroma

Tumor buds in colorectal cancer are hypothesized to undergo a (partial) epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). If so, cytokeratin (CK) and vimentin (VIM) co-expression is expected. CK+/VIM+ can also be found in some stromal cells; however, their origin remains unclear. Here, we determine the frequency of CK+/VIM+ tumor cells and characterize the CK+/VIM+ stroma in colorectal cancer. Three cell populations (CK+, VIM+, CK+/VIM+) were sorted using DepArray and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Tumor areas were selected to include tumor center, stroma and tumor budding. Fluorescence microscopy was used to visualize co-expressing cells on whole slides. A next-generation tissue microarray (ngTMA) of matched Pan-CK-positive and -negative stroma was constructed and stained for E-cadherin, VIM, Snail1, Twist1, Zeb1 and Zeb2, COL11A1, SPARC, CD90, α-SMA, FAP and WT1. CK+/VIM+ co-expressing tumor cells were detected using all three methods. With DepArray, only tumor budding areas contained CK+/VIM+ cells. The proportion of CK+/VIM+ tumor cells was low (1.5%-22%). CK+ stroma was associated with aggressive tumor features like distant metastasis (P = .0003), lymphatic invasion (P = .0009) and tumor budding (P = .0084). CK+/VIM+ stroma was characterized by positive WT1 (P < .001), ZEB2 (P < .001), TWIST1 (P = .009), and FAP (P = .003). Our data suggest that CK+/VIM+ tumor cells exist, albeit in low numbers and could represent a subgroup of tumor buds in partial EMT. CK+/VIM+ stroma may be of mesothelial origin and shows features of mesenchymal cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts. These results, together with the association with metastasis point to cells in mesothelial-mesenchymal transition (MMT). This atypical stroma may be a potential target for therapy.

Suboptimal cytoreduction in ovarian carcinoma is associated with molecular pathways characteristic of increased stromal activation

OBJECTIVE

Suboptimal cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is associated with poor survival but it is unknown if poor outcome is due to the intrinsic biology of unresectable tumors or insufficient surgical effort resulting in residual tumor-sustaining clones. Our objective was to identify the potential molecular pathway(s) and cell type(s) that may be responsible for suboptimal surgical resection.

METHODS

By comparing gene expression in optimally and suboptimally cytoreduced patients, we identified a gene network associated with suboptimal cytoreduction and explored the biological processes and cell types associated with this gene network.

RESULTS

We show that primary tumors from suboptimally cytoreduced patients express molecular signatures that are typically present in a distinct molecular subtype of EOC characterized by increased stromal activation and lymphovascular invasion. Similar molecular pathways are present in EOC metastases, suggesting that primary tumors in suboptimally cytoreduced patients are biologically similar to metastatic tumors. We demonstrate that the suboptimal cytoreduction network genes are enriched in reactive tumor stroma cells rather than malignant tumor cells.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the success of cytoreductive surgery is dictated by tumor biology, such as extensive stromal reaction and increased invasiveness, which may hinder surgical resection and ultimately lead to poor survival.

Loss of primary cilia occurs early in breast cancer development

BACKGROUND

Primary cilia are microtubule-based organelles that protrude from the cell surface. Primary cilia play a critical role in development and disease through regulation of signaling pathways including the Hedgehog pathway. Recent mouse models have also linked ciliary dysfunction to cancer. However, little is known about the role of primary cilia in breast cancer development. Primary cilia expression was characterized in cancer cells as well as their surrounding stromal cells from 86 breast cancer patients by counting cilia and measuring cilia length. In addition, we examined cilia expression in normal epithelial and stromal cells from reduction mammoplasties as well as histologically normal adjacent tissue for comparison.

RESULTS

We observed a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of ciliated cells on both premalignant lesions as well as in invasive cancers. This loss of cilia does not correlate with increased proliferative index (Ki67-positive cells). However, we did detect rare ciliated cancer cells present in patients with invasive breast cancer and found that these express a marker of basaloid cancers that is associated with poor prognosis (Cytokeratin 5). Interestingly, the percentage of ciliated stromal cells associated with both premalignant and invasive cancers decreased when compared to stromal cells associated with normal tissue. To understand how cilia may be lost during cancer development we analyzed the expression of genes required for ciliogenesis and/or ciliary function and compared their expression in normal versus breast cancer samples. We found that expression of ciliary genes were frequently downregulated in human breast cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that primary cilia are lost early in breast cancer development on both the cancer cells and their surrounding stromal cells.