Real-world data of cardio-oncologic interventions for cardiovascular adverse events with oral oncolytics

BACKGROUND

Oral cancer therapy-related cardiovascular (CV) toxicity has a wide variety of presentations including arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, and myocardial infarction, but clinical evidence related to its management is limited. The purpose of this IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective, cohort study was to characterize cardio-oncologic interventions for CV adverse events related to oral oncolytics.

METHODS

The cohort included 67 patients who were admitted to a multi-hospital health system between June 1, 2016 and July 31, 2021, had at least one medical record order of oral oncolytics considered to have cardiotoxic potential, and had an ICD10 code for a cardiotoxic event added to their electronic medical records after initiation of oral oncolytics.

RESULTS

The majority (97%) had pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or a CV risk factor. The three most common classes of oral oncolytics were aromatase inhibitors (36%), BCR-ABL inhibitors (16%), and VEGFR inhibitors (13%). New-onset or worsening heart failure (HF) (n = 31), which occurred after a median of 148 days (Interquartile range (IQR) 43-476 days) was the most common cardiotoxic event. The most frequent interventions were pharmacological treatment of the CV adverse event (n = 44) and treatment interruption (n = 18), but guideline-directed medication therapy for HF could be further optimized.

CONCLUSION

Pre-existing CVD or CV risk factors predispose oncology patients to CV adverse events. Real-world practice reveals that CV adverse events require temporary interruption of treatment and initiation of pharmacologic treatment. A multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach that includes discussion of risks/benefits of treatment continuation, and initiation of guideline-directed treatment is recommended until high-quality, drug-specific data for monitoring and treatment become available.

Cardiovascular Events with the Use of Long-Acting Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists: An Analysis of the FAERS Database 2020-2023

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine reports of cardiovascular adverse events (CV AEs) observed in the real-world during treatment with aclidinium, tiotropium, glycopyrronium, and umeclidinium alone or in combination with a LABA and, in the context of triple therapy, with the addition of an ICS, and submitted to the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

METHODS

A retrospective disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing CV AE reports submitted to the FAERS from January 2020 to 30 September 2023. Disproportionality was measured by calculating the reporting odds ratio.

RESULTS

Compared with ipratropium, tiotropium was associated with fewer reports of CV AEs. Compared with tiotropium, other LAMAs were more likely to be associated with reports of CV AEs. Combinations of glycopyrronium with indacaterol or formoterol and umeclidinium with vilanterol significantly reduced reports of CV AEs compared with the respective LAMA. The addition of an ICS to these combinations further reduced the risk of CV AE reports.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that inhaled LAMAs are not free from cardiac AE risks. This risk may be more evident when the newer LAMAs are used, but it is generally significantly reduced when COPD patients are treated with dual bronchodilators or triple therapy. However, these results do not prove that LAMAs cause CV AEs, as FAERS data alone are not indicative of a drug's safety profile. Given the frequency with which COPD and cardiovascular disease co-exist, a large study in the general population could shed light on this very important issue.

Commentary: raised c-troponin levels as a sign of myocardial injury after COVID-19 vaccination in healthy individuals are worrying

BACKGROUND

Recently, Buergin et al. (Eur J Heart Fail 25(10):1871-1881, 2023 doi:10.1002/ejhf.2978) thoroughly measured a frequency of 2.8% elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels, a sign of myocardial damage, after mRNA-1273 (Moderna) booster vaccinations. In their discussion, they claim that before vaccinations were available, the incidence and extent of myocardial damage associated with COVID-19 infection would have been much higher. We here scrutinize this claim based on empirical data.

MAIN BODY

Burgin et al. have only cited papers in support of their claim which considered hospitalized COVID-19 patients. After extracting COVID-19 infection data from Germany and Switzerland and the expected frequency of elevated troponin levels after COVID-19 infection in both hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals, we find that the extent of myocardial damage after vaccinating a considerable proportion of the general population is expected to be much higher than after natural infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The claim that the extent of myocardial injury after COVID-19 infection would be higher than after vaccination is not supported by empirical evidence and therefore wrong. We conclude that cross-national systematic observational studies should be conducted that allow a more precise estimation of the risk-benefit ratio of COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations.

Cardiotoxicity with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 inhibitors in breast cancer: Disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

The cardiotoxicity induced by human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) inhibitors in patients with breast cancer has been reported widely. However, these data sources were largely limited to fewer patients in clinical trials and case reports, lacking more comprehensive analysis from real-world data.

METHODS

The cases diagnosed with breast cancer from January 2004 to December 2021 were extracted from the FDA adverse event database and further divided into 3 groups (the HER-2 inhibitor group, the positive control group, and the control group). The association between HER-2 inhibitors and cardiovascular adverse events was evaluated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), a disproportionality method.

RESULTS

A total of 167,639 breast cancer patients were included, including 18,615 cases in the HER-2 inhibitor drug group, 2568 cases in the positive control group, and 146,456 cases in the control group. A total of 2529 cases (13.5%) treated with HER-2 inhibitors experienced cardiovascular adverse events, mainly reported by health professionals (81.5%). The disproportionality analysis showed that cardiomyopathy was observed in all HER-2 inhibitors except trastuzumab deruxtecan. Trastuzumab-related CVAEs were most frequently reported (N =2075), and the median time was 80.50 days (IQR: 8.00 to 206.75 days).

CONCLUSION

Based on real-world data analysis, our study demonstrated a significant association between HER-2 inhibitors and cardiovascular toxicity. Cardiac function in patients with breast cancer should be monitored early during anti-HER therapy, especially within six months.

Current evidence of COVID-19 vaccination-related cardiovascular events

Currently, the world is recovering from the shock of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic; however, this situation is still fragile. Health authorities recommend administering COVID-19 vaccines as the safest and most reliable tool for eliminating COVID-19. Subsequent to the extensive administration of the COVID-19 vaccines, a series of cardiovascular adverse effects have been reported. This comprehensive review aimed to provide an update on the etiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, and management of the cardiovascular adverse events associated with COVID-19 vaccines, including myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmias, hypertension, and stress-induced cardiomyopathy. The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination far outweigh the reported adverse events. It would be clinically important to provide diagnostic scoring systems to differentiate COVID-19-related cardiovascular adverse events from other causes and develop therapeutic approaches for their management. Further evaluation of cardiovascular adverse events of the COVID-19 vaccines is crucial for implementing vaccination programs and developing safer and more reliable vaccines.

[2022 ESC guidelines on cardio-oncology : Understanding and treating cardiovascular side effects from cancer therapy]

The continuous improvement in cancer treatment leads to a growing number of long-term survivors. Arguably, the treatment of cardiovascular side effects from cancer therapy is therefore of major importance for the morbidity and mortality affected patients. The 2022 ESC guidelines on cardio-oncology of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) aim to improve the treatment of affected patients across the entire continuum of therapy and in the long term by establishing standardized procedures for prevention, diagnostics, and treatment of cardiovascular side effects. Suitable diagnostic and therapeutic measures for specific substance classes are defined on the basis of fundamental recommendations for cardio-oncological care in individual therapy phases. Furthermore, the guidelines provide a comprehensive focus on individual risk assessment before the start of therapy as the basis for determining the type and intensity of cardio-oncological care in the further course. In addition, the risk assessment serves as a basis for the initiation of suitable preventive measures to avoid or minimize the development of cardiovascular side effects during therapy. The present article provides an overview of the most important innovations of the 2022 ESC guidelines on cardio-oncology with respect to general definitions and recommendations as well as a summary of the most important recommendations for some specific forms of therapy with relevance for cardio-oncology in the future.

Risk of cardiovascular events according to the tricyclic antidepressant dosage in patients with chronic pain: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

We aimed to examine the risk of cardiovascular adverse events by tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) dosage among patients with chronic pain.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a nationwide sample cohort. Among patients aged ≥ 18 years with a chronic pain diagnosis and no history of cardiovascular events, we extracted users and non-users of TCAs through 1:1 propensity score matching. TCA users were categorized into three groups according to the mean defined daily dose (DDD): very low doses (< 0.15 DDD), low doses (0.15-0.34 DDD), and traditional doses (≥ 0.34 DDD). A 6-month follow-up was conducted with an intention-to-treat approach. We examined the hazard ratio of cardiovascular adverse events using Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 16,660 matched patients were followed up (8330 TCA users and 8330 non-users). TCA use did not significantly increase cardiovascular adverse events (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-1.33). Low-dose (0.15-0.34 DDD) TCAs (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.08-1.74), particularly low-dose (0.15-0.34 DDD) nortriptyline (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.44-3.08), was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events. Administration of TCAs at the traditional dose (≥ 0.34 DDD) increased the risk of ischemic stroke (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.11-3.88).

CONCLUSION

Close monitoring of patients on long-term, low-dose use of TCAs should be conducted to avoid an increase in the cumulative dose, which increases the risk of cardiovascular adverse events.

Pretreatment serum level of interleukin-6 predicts carfilzomib-induced hypertension in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Carfilzomib (CFZ) constitutes powerful combinatory therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM); however, cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) have been shown as major treatment obstacles with the use of CFZ. Along with our multi-institutional prospective observational study by the Kyoto Clinical Hematology Study Group on the efficacy and safety of CFZ-based treatments (UMIN000025108), we here performed an ad hoc analysis of CFZ-related CVAEs in 50 patients with RRMM. We analyzed the association between CFZ-related CVAEs and pre-planned examinations, including patients' background, electrocardiographic findings, echocardiographic findings, and serum/plasma levels of 18 potential candidate biomarkers. The common CVAEs were hypertension (42%), arrhythmia (14%), and prolongation of QT corrected interval (10%), whereas no serious CVAEs occurred. The pretreatment serum level of interleukin-6 was identified as a significant risk factor for CFZ-related hypertension. This study revealed hypertension as the most frequent CFZ-related CVAE and suggested that baseline serum interleukin-6 is a useful predictor for CFZ-induced hypertension.

Atherosclerosis and Atrial Fibrillation: Double Trouble

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to evaluate the major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) and antithrombotic approaches in concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and atherosclerosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

MACE in concomitant AF and atherosclerosis has been evaluated in recent studies. A recent retrospective study of 2670 patients with AF revealed that atherosclerosis burden with AF can be a marker of adverse vascular outcomes with extracranial atherosclerosis as a potent predictor of MACE. Trials to evaluate the antithrombotic approaches in concomitant atherosclerotic disease and AF has been mainly in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). AFIRE trial demonstrated that in patients with AF and stable CAD rivaroxaban alone is not inferior to rivaroxaban plus aspirin with better safety profile. Atherosclerosis is common in AF and poses additional risk to patients. Antithrombotic management of atherosclerosis in AF is not well investigated and needs further trial to identify the subgroups that benefit from more intensive antithrombotic measures.

Effects of Combined Lipid-Lowering Therapy on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Variability and Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the effect of combined lipid-lowering therapy on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) variability and cardiovascular adverse events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

A total of 200 patients with acute coronary syndrome, admitted to the first Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2018 to June 2019, were randomly divided into the observation group (100 cases were treated with combined lipid-lowering drugs, including 10 mg/day atorvastatin and 10 mg/day ezetimibe) and the control group (100 cases were given an intensive statin regimen, including 40 mg/day atorvastatin). The levels of blood lipids, creatine kinase (CK), alanine transaminase (ALT), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were observed and compared between the two groups. Focus was laid on the concentration of the above-mentioned parameters and follow-up results including the drug safety and incidence of cardiovascular adverse events.

RESULTS

Before treatment, there was no significant difference in total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), CK, ALT, MMP-9, hsCRP and LDL-C between the two groups (P > 0.05). After 6 months, 12 months and 24 months of treatment, TC, HDL-C, CK, ALT, MMP-9, hsCRP and LDL-C were improved in both groups, and TC, HDL-C, CK, ALT, MMP-9, hsCRP and LDL-C in the observation group elicited greater results than those in the control group with significant difference (P < 0.05). In the course of treatment, the drug safety of the two groups was compared (P > 0.05), and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (6.59% vs. 11.96%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with atorvastatin and ezetimibe potentially provides remarkable effects in terms of treating acute coronary syndrome, controlling the variation of LDL-C, alleviating the inflammatory state and reducing the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events with a safe profile. Combined lipid-lowering drugs are considered valid and alternative approaches for wide clinical practice.

Cardiac adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncology patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel therapeutic agents used for various types of cancer. ICIs have revolutionized cancer treatment and improved clinical outcomes among cancer patients. However, immune-related adverse effects of ICI therapy are common. Cardiovascular immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are rare but potentially life-threatening complications.

AIM

To estimate the incidence of cardiovascular irAEs among patients undergoing ICI therapy for various malignancies.

METHODS

We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases for relevant interventional trials reporting cardiovascular irAEs. We performed a single-arm meta-analysis using OpenMeta [Analyst] software of the following outcomes: Myocarditis, pericardial effusion, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrest. We assessed the heterogeneity using the I² test and managed to solve it with Cochrane’s leave-one-out method. The risk of bias was performed with the Cochrane’s risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies were included. The incidence of irAEs follows: Myocarditis: 0.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1%-0.9%]; Pericardial effusion: 0.5% (95%CI: 0.1%-1.0%); Heart failure: 0.3% (95%CI: 0.0%-0.5%); Cardiomyopathy: 0.3% (95%CI: -0.1%-0.6%); atrial fibrillation: 4.6% (95%CI: 1.0%-14.1%); Myocardial infarction: 0.4% (95%CI: 0.0%-0.7%); and Cardiac arrest: 0.4% (95%CI: 0.1%-0.8%).

CONCLUSION

The most common cardiovascular irAEs were atrial fibrillation, myocarditis, and pericardial effusion. Although rare, data from post market surveillance will provide estimates of the long-term prevalence and prognosis in patients with ICI-associated cardiovascular complications.

Duloxetine and cardiovascular adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Duloxetine has been increasingly administered, but the associated cardiovascular adverse event risk is not clearly understood. Therefore, we identified the association between duloxetine and cardiovascular adverse events through an analysis of heart rate and blood pressure change. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and psycINFO in June 2019. The title, abstract, and full text were checked in order to obtain articles. A meta-analysis was conducted with random effect model and quality of articles was evaluated using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0. The manuscript has been written according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) harm checklist. A total of 4009 studies were screened by the title and abstract. After reviewing 186 full texts, 17 studies were finally selected for the meta-analysis. Nine of the 17 studied duloxetine given for mood disorders and 8 for pain control. The duration of 14 studies was under 13 weeks. Cardiovascular adverse events (hypertension, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, tachycardia atrial fibrillation, and cerebrovascular accident) were reported. The meta-analysis demonstrated that duloxetine increased heart rate by 2.22 beats/min (95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 1.53, 2.91) and diastolic blood pressure by 0.82 mmHg (95% CI: 0.17, 1.47). Our findings may be the signal for the safety of cardiovascular disease for short-term use of duloxetine. Well-designed pharmaco-epidemiological studies evaluating the causal relationship between long-term use of duloxetine and cardiovascular disease is still necessary.

Electropharmacological Characterization of Aciclovir in the Halothane-Anesthetized Dogs: A Proposal of Evaluation Method for Cardiovascular Safety Pharmacology of Anti-virus Drugs

Given limited information regarding the pathophysiology underlying aciclovir-associated, clinically observed cardiovascular adverse events including chest pain, tachycardia, bradycardia, palpitation, arrhythmia, hypertension and hypotension, we investigated its electropharmacological effects using the halothane-anesthetized beagle dogs. Aciclovir in doses of 2 and 20 mg/kg was sequentially infused over 10 min with an interval of 20 min (n = 4), which would achieve sub-therapeutic to supra-therapeutic levels of plasma concentrations. Aciclovir decreased the total peripheral vascular resistance along with the blood pressure in a dose-related manner, which increased the heart rate, ventricular contraction and atrioventricular nodal conduction speed probably via a reflex-mediated increase of sympathetic tone. No significant change was detected in the intra-atrial or intra-ventricular conduction, indicating that aciclovir may not inhibit atrial or ventricular I_Na. Aciclovir prolonged the repolarization period in a dose-related as well as in a reverse frequency-dependent manners, indicating that aciclovir may inhibit I_Kr, which was supported by the T_peak - T_end prolongation. Aciclovir transiently prolonged the J - T_peakc possibly through a reflex-mediated increase of sympathetic tone, indicating an increase of net inward current in the early repolarization phase. Thus, aciclovir may directly inhibit I_Kr, and also have the potential to indirectly induce Ca²⁺ overload leading to early afterdepolarization. These in vivo electropharmacological profile of aciclovir would partly explain the onset mechanism of clinical adverse events.

Anagrelide treatment and cardiovascular monitoring in essential thrombocythemia. A prospective observational study

In this prospective observational single-center study, 55 patients with essential thrombocythemia who were candidates for second line treatment with anagrelide (ANA) received a preliminary cardiovascular (CV) clinical, instrumental and biochemical evaluation (CV history and symptoms, CV risk factors, blood pressure, heart rate, ECG and ECHO-cardio parameters, Troponin I, NT-proBNP). After this in-depth CV screening, 54 out of 55 patients were deemed to be fit for ANA treatment. Thirty-eight of the 55 patients received ANA treatment for a median of 36 months (range 3-48), and were monitored using the same CV evaluation. Fourteen of these 38 patients manifested CV adverse events (10 palpitation, 4 edema, 2 arterial hypertension, 2 acute myocardial infarction) that were not predicted by the in-depth CV evaluation, and that led to ANA withdrawal in only one case (non-cardiac refractory edema). In conclusion, the planned in-depth CV evaluation did not appear to be necessary in ET patients to evaluate their suitability for ANA treatment, and, moreover, was not able to predict the occurrence of CV adverse events during ANA treatment. Nevertheless, the CV adverse events (mostly palpitations and edema) were easily managed by the hematologists, and required the cardiologist involvement in very few selected cases.

Domestic versus imported drug-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

The application of coronary stents, especially drug-eluting stents (DESs), has made percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) one of important therapeutic methods for CHD. DES has reduced the in-stent restenosis to 5%-9% and significantly improved the long-term prognosis of patients with CHD. The study aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of domestic drug-eluting stents (DESs) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

All patients with ACS who had undergone successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from July 2009 to December 2010 were included in this study. Patients were excluded from the study if they were implanted with bare metal stents or different stents (domestic and imported DESs) simultaneously. The included patients were divided into two groups according to different stents implanted: domestic DESs and imported DESs.

RESULTS

In the 1 683 patients of this study, 1 558 (92.6%) patients were followed up successfully for an average of (29.1±5.9) months. 130 (8.3%) patients had major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including cardiac death in 32 (2.1%) patients, recurrent myocardial infarction in 16 (1%), and revascularization in 94 (6%). The rates of cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, revascularization, in-stent restenosis, stent thrombosis and other MACEs were not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.05). Multivarite logistic regression revealed that diabetes mellitus (OR=1.75, 95%CI: 1.09-2.82, P=0.021), vascular numbers of PCI (OR=2.16, 95%CI: 1.22-3.83, P=0.09) and PCI with left main lesion (OR=9.47, 95%CI: 2.96-30.26, P=0.01) were independent prognostic factors of MACEs. The Kaplan-Meier method revealed that there was no significant difference in cumulative survival rates and survival rates free from clinical events between the two groups (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidences of clinical events and cumulative survival rates are not statistically different between domestic DESs and imported DESs. Domestic DES is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with ACS.