Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of wood-based biorefineries for cellulosic ethanol production

Poplar is widely used in the paper industry and accompanied by abundant branches waste, which is potential feedstock for bioethanol production. Acid-chlorite pretreatment can selectively remove lignin, thereby significantly increasing enzymatic efficiency. Moreover, lignin residues valorization via gasification-syngas fermentation can achieve higher fuel yield. Herein, environmental and economic aspects were conducted to assess technological routes, which guides further process optimization. Life cycle assessment results show that wood-based biorefineries especially coupling scenarios have significant advantages in reducing global warming potential in contrast to fossil-based automotive fuels. Normalization results indicate that acidification potential surpasses other indicators as the primary impact category. In terms of economic feasibility, coupling scenarios present better investment prospects. Bioethanol yield is the most critical factor affecting market competitiveness. Minimum ethanol selling price below ethanol international market price is promising with higher-levels technology. Further work should be focused on technological breakthrough, consumable reduction or replacement.

Production of cellulosic ethanol from sugarcane bagasse by steam explosion: Effect of extractives content, acid catalysis and different fermentation technologies

The production of cellulosic ethanol was carried out using samples of native (NCB) and ethanol-extracted (EECB) sugarcane bagasse. Autohydrolysis (AH) exhibited the best glucose recovery from both samples, compared to the use of both H3PO4 and H2SO4 catalysis at the same pretreatment time and temperature. All water-insoluble steam-exploded materials (SEB-WI) resulted in high glucose yields by enzymatic hydrolysis. SHF (separate hydrolysis and fermentation) gave ethanol yields higher than those obtained by SSF (simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation) and pSSF (pre-hydrolysis followed by SSF). For instance, AH gave 25, 18 and 16 g L(-1) of ethanol by SHF, SSF and pSSF, respectively. However, when the total processing time was taken into account, pSSF provided the best overall ethanol volumetric productivity of 0.58 g L(-1) h(-1). Also, the removal of ethanol-extractable materials from cane bagasse had no influence on the cellulosic ethanol production of SEB-WI, regardless of the fermentation strategy used for conversion.