A systematic review of physical function tests as predictors of key clinical outcomes for adults with blood cancers

PURPOSE

To determine which standardized physical performance tests are being used specifically in the assessment of adult patients before, during, or after undergoing treatment for hematologic malignancy and which of these functional tests have been demonstrated to have a correlation with key objective clinical outcome measures including mortality, progression-free survival, complete remission, hospital readmissions, emergency department visits, and hospital length of stay.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE electronic databases were searched up to June 2021. Searches were restricted to English language. All resulting studies from the electronic database search were assessed by two reviewers for original research with physical performance data exclusive to patients with hematological malignancy. Studies with confounding intervention or the inclusion of pediatric patients were excluded. The quality of the remaining studies was assessed using PRISMA guidelines and Tooth Criteria by two reviewers, using a third reviewer to resolve any discrepancies. The main characteristics of each article, including sample size, population characteristics, physical performance testing methods, and significant and non-significant findings were extracted and compared. Additionally, one reviewer performed a literature review of the safety of physical performance testing.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred fifty-six screened database results resulted in 14 studies included in the systematic review. All studies scored ≥ 0.59 on the Tooth Criteria, indicating moderate to high quality of reporting. Our review found six recurring measures of objective physical function assessed for correlation with clinical outcomes, primarily morbidity and mortality. The heterogeneity of each study precluded aggregate data analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This review was a first step in evaluating which objective physical performance tests are best suited for identifying functional impairment before, during, and after oncologic treatment for adults with blood cancers. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal objective functional measures to use as a guide in clinical decision-making in the hematologic patient population.

Older Adults Across Two Nationally Representative Data Sets: NSHAP and NHATS

OBJECTIVES

Our primary objective was to examine the distribution of 3-m usual walk, five repeated chair stands, and three static balance stance performances among age and gender subgroups of adults at least 65 years in two national data sets. We secondarily determined whether demographic-function associations varied across data sets, birth cohorts, or models incorporating data from those "unable to do" tasks.

METHODS

Two nationally representative data sets were used to generate survey weight-adjusted performance distributions: the 2015-2016 National Social Life Health and Aging Project and the 2016 National Health and Aging Trends Study. We then regressed walk and chair stand performance on age, gender, and race/ethnicity, examining differences across data sets, birth cohorts (1920-1947, 1948-1965), and before/after incorporating the "unable to do" performers.

RESULTS

Findings confirmed the gradual decline in function with age and allowed estimation of "relative" performance within age/gender subgroups. Data set distribution differences were noted, possibly due to recruitment, eligibility, and protocol variations. Demographic associations were similar across data sets but generally weaker among the 1948-1965 cohort and in models including the sizable "unable to do" group.

DISCUSSION

We present the largest, most current Short Physical Performance Battery reference data in U.S. adults aged 65 or older. Findings support standardization of administration protocols in research and clinical care and differentiating absolute from relative performance.

Sleep and functional capacity in adults: Cross-sectional associations among self-report and objective assessments

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the relationship between self-reported and objectively measured sleep and functional capacity in adults.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

PARTICIPANTS

Data were from the Midlife in the United States study. The sample consisted of men and women (n = 664) aged 25-83 who completed telephone interviews, questionnaires, and an overnight clinic stay.

MEASUREMENTS

Sleep was assessed by self-report (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]) and by objective measures (sleep latency, duration, wake after sleep onset [WASO], and midpoint/midpoint variability) from 7 consecutive days of actigraphy. Functional capacity was assessed by self-report of limitations and measured gait speed, grip strength, and chair stands.

RESULTS

In linear regression models adjusting for demographic and health factors, better self-reported sleep quality predicted fewer reported limitations, stronger grip, quicker gait, and faster chair stands (all P< .01). Greater WASO predicted more self-report limitations and slower gait speed (P< .05). Long (>8 hours) sleep duration and a more variable sleep schedule predicted lower grip strength (p < .05). Finally, after adjustment for objective sleep measures, PSQI remained a significant predictor of functional measures (P< .05) and explained a significant amount of additional variance (change in R²: 0.01-0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that subjective and objective sleep measures capture distinct aspects of sleep that are independently related to functional capacity. The variance in functional measures explained by sleep variables, though small, was comparable to other risk factors for functional impairment (eg, obesity), underscoring the importance of associations between sleep and optimal function in adults.