Hatami-Marbini H, Emu ME. Effect of corneal collagen crosslinking on viscoelastic shear properties of the cornea.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2022;
133:105300. [PMID:
35749931 PMCID:
PMC10826593 DOI:
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105300]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The cornea is responsible for most of the refractive power in the eye and acts as a protective layer for internal contents of the eye. The cornea requires mechanical strength for maintaining its precise shape and for withstanding external and internal forces. Corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) is a treatment option to improve corneal mechanical properties. The primary objective of this study was to characterize CXL effects on viscoelastic shear properties of the porcine cornea as a function of compressive strain. For this purpose, corneal buttons were prepared and divided into three groups: control group (n = 5), pseudo-crosslinked group (n = 5), and crosslinked group (n = 5). A rheometer was used to perform dynamics torsional shear experiments on corneal disks at different levels of compressive strain (0%-40%). Specifically, strain sweep experiments and frequency sweep tests were done in order to determine the range of linear viscoelasticity and frequency dependent shear properties, respectively. It was found that the shear properties of all samples were dependent on the shear strain magnitude, loading frequency, and compressive strain. With increasing the applied shear strain, all samples showed a nonlinear viscoelastic response. Furthermore, the shear modulus of samples increased with increasing the frequency of the applied shear strain and/or increasing the compressive strain. Finally, the CXL treatment significantly increased the shear storage and loss moduli when the compressive strain was varied from 0% to 30% (p < 0.05); larger shear moduli were observed at compressive 40% strain but the difference was not significant (P = 0.12).
Collapse