Survival benefit and biomarker analysis of pyrotinib or pyrotinib plus capecitabine for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of two phase I studies

BACKGROUND

Pyrotinib, a novel irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated promising antitumor activity to improve the overall response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the survival data of pyrotinib or pyrotinib plus capecitabine in HER2-positive MBC remains scarce. Thus, we summarized the updated individual patient data from the phase I trials of pyrotinib or pyrotinib plus capecitabine, to provide a cumulative assessment on long-term outcomes and associated biomarker analysis of irreversible TKIs in HER2-positive MBC patients.

METHODS

We performed a pooled analysis of the phase I trials for pyrotinib or pyrotinib plus capecitabine based on the updated survival data from individual patients. Next-generation sequencing was performed on circulating tumor DNA for predictive biomarkers.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients were enrolled, including 38 patients from the phase Ib trial for pyrotinib and 28 patients from the phase Ic trial for pyrotinib plus capecitabine. The median follow-up duration was 84.2 months (95% CI: 74.7-93.7 months). The estimated median PFS in the entire cohort was 9.2 months (95% CI: 5.4-12.9 months) and median OS was 31.0 months (95% CI: 16.5-45.5 months). The median PFS was 8.2 months in the pyrotinib monotherapy cohort and 22.1 months in the pyrotinib plus capecitabine group, while the median OS was 27.1 months in the pyrotinib monotherapy group and 37.4 months in the pyrotinib plus capecitabine group. Biomarker analysis suggested that the patients harbored concomitant mutations from multiple pathways in HER2-related signaling network (HER2 bypass signaling pathways, PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and TP53) were observed with significantly poorer PFS and OS when compared to those with none or one genetic alteration (median PFS, 7.3 vs. 26.1 months, P = 0.003; median OS, 25.1 vs. 48.0 months, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The updated survival results based on individual patient data from the phase I trials of pyrotinib-based regimen revealed promising PFS and OS in HER2-positive MBC. Concomitant mutations from multiple pathways in HER2-related signaling network may be a potential efficacy and prognosis biomarker for pyrotinib in HER2-positive MBC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT01937689, NCT02361112).

Molecular determinants of clinical outcomes for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer in Chinese patients: A retrospective study

Gene complexity affects the clinical outcomes of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we reviewed the medical records of patients with NSCLC between September 2015 and December 2020 in a single institution. We examined the clinical and genomic predictors of these outcomes using multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Overall, 105 patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC were included. Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) was the predominant fusion partner (96.2%). Five patients (4.8%) had non-EML4 fusion partners; three had novel partners. EML4::ALK variant 3 (36.5%) was predominant. One patient had the following three subtypes: E13::A20, E6ins33::A20, and E20::A20. Median progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), was significantly different between patients with variants 3 and 1. TP53 was the most common concomitant mutation (21.4%). The presence of TP53 mutations was associated with shorter PFS among patients who received ALK-TKI. Patients with concomitant oncogene mutations presented significantly shorter OS and PFS than those with only ALK rearrangement. In a multivariate Cox regression model, concomitant oncogene mutations and variant 3 carrier status were prognostic factors for PFS, whereas baseline brain metastasis was a prognostic factor for OS.

ALK fusion variant 3a/b, concomitant mutations, and high PD-L1 expression were associated with unfavorable clinical response to second-generation ALK TKIs in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (GASTO 1061)

OBJECTIVES

Second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but clinical responses vary widely. In this study, the impacts of ALK fusion variants, concomitant mutations, and PD-L1 expression on the clinical response were evaluated in patients receiving second-generation ALK TKIs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 193 patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC who received second-generation ALK TKIs at Sun-yat Sen University Cancer Center from January 2015 to December 2020. The ALK fusion variants and concomitant mutations were identified with next-generation sequencing, while PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter for variant 3a/b than for other variants (9.93 months vs 16.97 months, HR 1.941, P = 0.0014). Baseline concomitant mutations were significantly associated with shorter PFS while on ALK TKIs (median PFS, 10.87 months vs 22.47 months, HR 1.984, P = 0.002). A subset of 68 patients was analyzed for PD-L1 expression: TPS 0% in 32.4% (22/68) of the patients, 1-49% in 30.9% (21/68) of the patients, and ≥ 50% in 36.7% (25/68) of the patients. Expression of PD-L1 was significantly associated with variant 3a/b and concomitant mutations. Median PFS was shorter in patients with high PD-L1 expression (median PFS in patients with PD-L1 TPS of 0% vs 1-49% vs ≥ 50% were 27.43 months vs 30.63 months vs 9.50 months, respectively, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 50%), concomitant mutations, and variant 3a/b remained negative prognostic factors for the clinical efficacy of second-generation ALK TKIs in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

ALK fusion variant 3a/b, concomitant mutations, and high PD-L1 expression were associated with unfavorable clinical response to second-generation TKIs in ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

Clinical and molecular factors that impact the efficacy of first-line crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer: a large multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

ROS1-rearranged lung cancers benefit from first-line crizotinib therapy; however, clinical and molecular factors that could affect crizotinib efficacy in ROS1-rearranged lung cancers are not yet well-elucidated. Our retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy and crizotinib in the first-line treatment of ROS1-rearranged advanced lung cancer and evaluate various clinical and molecular factors that might impact crizotinib efficacy in real-world practice.

METHODS

Treatment responses, survival outcomes, and patterns of disease progression were analyzed for 235 patients with locally advanced to advanced disease who received first-line chemotherapy (n = 67) or crizotinib (n = 168).

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 85.7% (144/168) for first-line crizotinib and 41.8% (28/67) for chemotherapy. Patients treated with first-line crizotinib (n = 168) had significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) than chemotherapy (n = 67) (18.0 months vs. 7.0 months, p < 0.001). Patients harboring single CD74-ROS1 (n = 90) had significantly shorter median PFS with crizotinib than those harboring non-CD74 ROS1 fusions (n = 69) (17.0 months vs. 21.0 months; p = 0.008). Patients with baseline brain metastasis (n = 45) had a significantly shorter PFS on first-line crizotinib than those without brain metastasis (n = 123) (16.0 months vs. 22.0 months; p = 0.03). At progression, intracranial-only progression (n = 40), with or without baseline CNS metastasis, was associated with longer median PFS than those with extracranial-only progression (n = 64) (19.0 months vs. 13.0 months, p < 0.001). TP53 mutations were the most common concomitant mutation, detected in 13.1% (7/54) of patients with CD74-ROS1 fusions, and 18.8% (6/32) with non-CD74 ROS1 fusions. Patients with concomitant TP53 mutations (n=13) had significantly shorter PFS than those who had wild-type TP53 (n = 81) (6.5 months vs. 21.0 months; p < 0.001). PFS was significantly shorter for the patients who harbored concomitant driver mutations (n = 9) (11.0 months vs 24.0 months; p = 0.0167) or concomitant tumor suppressor genes (i.e., TP53, RB1, or PTEN) (n = 25) (9.5 months vs 24.0 months; p < 0.001) as compared to patients without concomitant mutations (n = 58).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that baseline brain metastatic status and various molecular factors could contribute to distinct clinical outcomes from first-line crizotinib therapy of patients with ROS1-rearranged lung cancer.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

CORE, NCT03646994.

BRAF mutations in KIT/PDGFRA positive gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs): Is their frequency underestimated?

BRAF V600E mutations in GISTs are considered to be one of the mutational events in KIT/PDGFRA negative or positive GISTs, respectively. BRAF mutated GISTs usually do not respond to imatinib treatment, even more GISTs with imatinib sensitive KIT mutation. However, they are almost phenotypically and morphologically identical with KIT/PDGFRA positive GISTs. In general, due to the small number of BRAF mutations in GIST and because of the rarity of concomitant BRAF/KIT or BRAF/PDGFRA mutations, their frequency may be depreciated. The aim of this study was BRAF mutation detection in KIT/PDGFRA positive GISTs and their verification by other molecular methods. We applied the sensitive droplet digital PCR on 35 randomly selected KIT/PDGFRA positive GISTs to detect V600E mutations. We have established two criteria for the evaluation of samples: false positive rate (FPR) based on the negative controls; Limit of Detection (LoD) based on the serial dilution of positive control from RKO cell line harboring heterozygous V600E mutation in constant wild-type DNA background. Results from ddPCR were verified by other molecular methods: allele-specific PCR, dideoxysequencing, competitive allele-specific TaqMan PCR (castPCR). FPR was determined as 5 (∼4.4) positive droplets, and LoD was assessed to 3.4293 copies/μL what is the method sensitivity of 0.0162 %. We identified eight KIT/PDGFRA positive patients with concomitant V600E mutation. The five of them were in coexistence with KIT mutation and three with PDGFRA mutation. We also included the liver metastasis, but data from primary tumour were not available. We achieved the very high sensitivity of the ddPCR method for detecting BRAF mutation in GISTs to have importance from the point of view of therapy.

Clinico-pathological associations and concomitant mutations of the RAS/RAF pathway in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Over the past few years, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become reliable and cost-effective, and its use in clinical practice has become a reality. A relevant role for NGS is the prediction of response to anti-EGFR agents in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), where multiple exons from KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF must be sequenced simultaneously.

METHODS

We optimized a 14-amplicon NGS panel to assess, in a consecutive cohort of 219 patients affected by mCRC, the presence and clinico-pathological associations of mutations in the KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA genes from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens collected for diagnostics and research at the time of diagnosis.

RESULTS

We observed a statistically significant association of RAS mutations with sex, young age, and tumor site. We demonstrated that concomitant mutations in the RAS/RAF pathway are not infrequent in mCRC, and as anticipated by whole-genome studies, RAS and PIK3CA tend to be concurrently mutated. We corroborated the association of BRAF mutations in right mCRC tumors with microsatellite instability. We established tumor side as prognostic parameter independently of mutational status.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first monocentric, consecutively accrued clinical mCRC cancer cohort tested by NGS in a real-world context for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA. Our study has highlighted in clinical practice findings such as the concomitance of mutations in the RAS/RAF pathway, the presence of multiple mutations in single gene, the co-occurrence of RAS and PIK3CA mutations, the prognostic value of tumor side and possible associations of sex with specific mutations.

High Prevalence of Concomitant Oncogene Mutations in Prospectively Identified Patients with ROS1-Positive Metastatic Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Chromosomal rearrangements involving ROS1 define a rare entity of lung adenocarcinomas with exquisite sensitivity to molecularly targeted therapy. We report clinical outcomes and genomic findings of patients with ROS1-positive lung cancer who were prospectively identified within a multiplex biomarker profiling program at the West German Cancer Center.

METHODS

Standardized immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and hotspot mutation analyses were performed in 1345 patients with advanced cancer, including 805 patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Clinical and epidemiological data were retrieved from the institutional database.

RESULTS

ROS1 positivity by IHC analysis was detected in 25 patients with lung cancer (4.8% of lung adenocarcinomas), including 13 patients (2.5%) with ROS1 FISH positivity with a cutoff of at least 15% of events. Of the ROS1 IHC analysis-positive cases, 36% presented with concomitant oncogenic driver mutations involving EGFR (six cases, five of which were clinically validated by response to EGFR-targeting agents), KRAS (two cases), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha gene (PIK3CA), and BRAF. Three cases initially classified as ROS1 FISH-negative passed the threshold of 15% positive events when repeat biopsies were analyzed at progression. The median overall survival of the ROS1-positive patients (104 months) was significantly superior to that of the 261 patients with EGFR/anaplastic lymphoma kinase/ROS1-negative lung adenocarcinoma (24.4 months, p = 0.044). Interestingly, the overall survival of the 13 ROS1-positive patients with lung cancer from initiation of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy was significantly prolonged when compared with that of 169 pemetrexed-treated patients with EGFR/anaplastic lymphoma kinase/ROS1-negative adenocarcinoma (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

ROS1-positive metastatic lung adenocarcinomas frequently harbor concomitant oncogenic driver mutations. Levels of ROS1 FISH-positive events are variable over time. This heterogeneity provides additional therapeutic options if discovered by multiplex biomarker testing and repeat biopsies.