Harmonizing the definition of medication reviews for their collaborative implementation and documentation in electronic patient records: A Delphi consensus study

BACKGROUND

Medication review practices have evolved internationally in a direction in which not only physicians but also other healthcare professionals conduct medication reviews according to agreed practices. Collaborative practices have increasingly highlighted the need for electronic joint platforms where information on medication regimens and their implementation can be documented, kept updated, and shared.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to harmonize the definition of medication reviews and create a unified conceptual basis for their collaborative implementation and documentation in electronic patient records (definition appellation: collaborative medication review).

METHODS

The study was conducted using the Delphi consensus survey with three interprofessional expert panel rounds in September-December 2020. The consensus rate was set at 80%. Experts assessed the proposed definition of collaborative medication review based on an international and national inventory of medication review definitions. The expert panel (n = 41) involved 12 physicians, 13 pharmacists, 10 nurses, and six information management professionals. The range of response rates for the rounds was 63-88%.

RESULTS

The experts commented on which of the pre-selected items (n = 75) characterizing medication reviews should be included in the definition of collaborative medication review. The items were divided into the following five themes and 51 of them reached consensus: 1) Actions included in the collaborative medication review (n = 24/24), 2) Settings where the review should be conducted (n = 5/5), 3) Situations where the review should be considered as needed and carried out (n = 10/11), 4) Prioritization of top five benefits to be achieved by the review and 5) Prioritization of top five patient groups to whom the review should be targeted.

CONCLUSIONS

A strong interprofessional consensus was reached on the definition of collaborative medication review. The most challenging was to identify individual patient groups benefiting from the review.

Residual deformity versus recurrence following Dupuytren's palmar fasciectomy-a long term follow-up of 142 cases

INTRODUCTION

and background: Surgical options for Dupuytren's disease (DD) are multiple, and Dupuytren's palmar fasciectomy (PF) is a common surgical procedure performed for contractures that cause functional and cosmetic disability. The recurrence rate for PF has been reported to be very variable, ranging from 12 to 73%, according to various studies. One of the reasons for the varied range is the inconsistency in the method followed to define recurrence. Subsequently, a consensus-based definition was formulated in 2016, and we analysed the outcome in our series of patients treated with PF based on this standard definition. We also analysed the residual deformity associated in these cases.

METHOD

ology: Our study is a retrospective analysis of 142 consecutive cases of primary Dupuytren's palmar fasciectomy by a single surgeon in three different centres. We followed the international consensus definition for analysing recurrence in these cases, and we also analysed residual cases as a separate entity.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cases was 67.13 years and the mean follow-up period was 3.95 years. Alcoholism, smoking, diabetes and hypercholesterolemia were the commonest associated risk factors. The commonest affected finger and the finger with the maximum deformity were the little finger. The overall rate of recurrence of deformity was 3.5% and the rate of residual deformity was 30.3%. The overall complication rate was 11.9%.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence and residual deformity can be considered as separate entities. The term 'residual deformity' can be used to denote patients with persisting deformity or those who incur deformity within one year of the primary surgery.

Refractory fibromyalgia

In the medical literature, there are only a few references on refractory fibromyalgia and there is no consensus definition available on this concept. Some definitions of refractory fibromyalgia have been proposed based on the lack of response to a number of medications, and perhaps the most appropriate term is treatment-refractory fibromyalgia. To achieve the definition of treatment-refractory fibromyalgia, it is necessary to consider several previous steps, such as making sure the diagnosis has been made properly and a differential diagnosis with entities that can mimic fibromyalgia symptoms (including complete physical examination and laboratory test) has been made. The possibility that another factor that alters the response to treatment should be investigated, and in particular review all prescribed medication and search for some non-medical reasons that could mask the response to treatment (e.g., legal compensation). The definition of refractory fibromyalgia is complex and probably should include a lack of response to a specified number of drugs or to combination therapy with at least two non-pharmacological measures. In this article, it is not our purpose to present a formal definition, but to raise the possible bases for this purpose. We believe that it is a subject that must be discussed extensively before reaching a consensus definition. Key Points • There is no appropriate definition to classify fibromyalgia patients who do not respond to the usual pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures according to the national or international guidelines. • A consensus definition is required to classify these patients, which could help standardize future management strategies. In this article, we propose the bases on which refractory fibromyalgia could be defined.

International consensus definition of low anterior resection syndrome

AIM

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is pragmatically defined as disordered bowel function after rectal resection leading to a detriment in quality of life. This broad characterization does not allow for precise estimates of prevalence. The LARS score was designed as a simple tool for clinical evaluation of LARS. Although the LARS score has good clinical utility, it may not capture all important aspects that patients may experience. The aim of this collaboration was to develop an international consensus definition of LARS that encompasses all aspects of the condition and is informed by all stakeholders.

METHOD

This international patient-provider initiative used an online Delphi survey, regional patient consultation meetings, and an international consensus meeting. Three expert groups participated: patients, surgeons and other health professionals from five regions (Australasia, Denmark, Spain, Great Britain and Ireland, and North America) and in three languages (English, Spanish, and Danish). The primary outcome measured was the priorities for the definition of LARS.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-five participants (156 patients) registered. The response rates for successive rounds of the Delphi survey were 86%, 96% and 99%. Eighteen priorities emerged from the Delphi survey. Patient consultation and consensus meetings refined these priorities to eight symptoms and eight consequences that capture essential aspects of the syndrome. Sampling bias may have been present, in particular, in the patient panel because social media was used extensively in recruitment. There was also dominance of the surgical panel at the final consensus meeting despite attempts to mitigate this.

CONCLUSION

This is the first definition of LARS developed with direct input from a large international patient panel. The involvement of patients in all phases has ensured that the definition presented encompasses the vital aspects of the patient experience of LARS. The novel separation of symptoms and consequences may enable greater sensitivity to detect changes in LARS over time and with intervention.

Definition of Synchronous Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Consensus Report. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:2109-2119. [PMID: 31398540 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.07.025]

INTRODUCTION

Improved outcome has been shown in patients with synchronous oligometastatic (sOM) NSCLC when treated with radical intent. As a uniform definition of sOM NSCLC is lacking, we developed a definition and diagnostic criteria by a consensus process.

METHODS

A pan-European multidisciplinary consensus group was established. Consensus questions were built on the basis of current controversies, and definitions were extracted from a survey, cases and a systematic review. This statement was formulated during a consensus meeting.

RESULTS

It was determined that definition of sOM NSCLC is relevant when a radical treatment that may modify the disease course (leading to long-term disease control) is technically feasible for all tumor sites with acceptable toxicity. On the basis of the review, a maximum of five metastases and three organs was proposed. Mediastinal lymph node involvement was not counted as a metastatic site. Fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography-computed tomography and brain imaging were considered mandatory. A dedicated liver magnetic resonance imaging scan was advised for a solitary liver metastasis, and thoracoscopy and biopsies of distant ipsilateral pleural sites were recommended for a solitary pleural metastasis. For mediastinal staging, fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography-computed tomography was deemed the minimum requirement, with pathological confirmation recommended if this influences the treatment strategy. Biopsy of a solitary metastatic location was mandated unless the multidisciplinary team is of the opinion that the risks outweigh the benefits.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary consensus statement on the definition and staging of sOM NSCLC has been formulated. This statement will help to standardize inclusion criteria in future clinical trials.

Enhancing clinical decision making: development of a contiguous definition and conceptual framework

Clinical decision making is a term frequently used to describe the fundamental role of the nurse practitioner; however, other terms have been used interchangeably. The purpose of this article is to begin the process of developing a definition and framework of clinical decision making. The developed definition was "Clinical decision making is a contextual, continuous, and evolving process, where data are gathered, interpreted, and evaluated in order to select an evidence-based choice of action." A contiguous framework for clinical decision making specific for nurse practitioners is also proposed. Having a clear and unique understanding of clinical decision making will allow for consistent use of the term, which is relevant given the changing educational requirements for nurse practitioners and broadening scope of practice.