First description of Vibrio harveyi as the causative agent of morbidity and mortality in farmed flathead grey mullet Mugil cephalus

Flathead grey mullet Mugil cephalus is an important species in the aquaculture industry in the Mediterranean basin and throughout the world. During the last 10 yr, M. cephalus breeding stocks, larvae, and juveniles cultured in Eilat (Israel) have shown neurological signs such as uncoordinated circular swimming, while also presenting oral hemorrhages. Death follows days after the onset of the clinical signs, and mortality rates may reach 80% in some cases, causing high economical losses. Bacteriology isolations from different organs, including the brain, and a Koch's postulate experiment, confirmed Vibrio harveyi as the causative agent. Histological analyses showed the presence of the bacterium in different organs. However, in the brain, the bacterium was observed only within blood vessels and meninges. In some samples, mild to severe brain tissue damage was seen. In order to understand the virulence and lethality of V. harveyi, a median lethal dose was calculated, and the result was 106 colony-forming units fish-1. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that describes V. harveyi isolated from the brain of M. cephalus and validates it as an etiological agent causing neurological signs in this fish species.

Pathways to COVID-19 'community protection'

To date, no country has reached a natural COVID-19 epidemic peak and observed peaks essentially reflect the effectiveness of ‘lockdown’ measures. The major challenge is finding a responsible way out of ‘lockdown’, given that SARS- CoV-2 is now an established global pathogen. Acknowledging limitations in our knowledge regarding the sufficiency and durability of immune responses following natural SARS Cov-2 infection, we discuss three pathways to ‘community protection’. Uncontrolled epidemic spread (route 1; R₀ > 2) has been associated with overwhelmed health care systems and high death rates, especially in the vulnerable. Controlled epidemic spread (route 2; effective R₀ 1–2) can be achieved with limited or strict control of social mixing; strict control will be necessary to ensure that only low-risk individuals become infected, without spill-over to vulnerable groups during their period of infectiousness. It has been demonstrated that local epidemic elimination (route 3; effective R₀ < 1) can be achieved through prolonged ‘lock down’, supplemented by early active case finding with quarantine of close contacts to ensure rapid termination of transmission chains within the community. Although universal availability of a safe and effective vaccine remains the preferred ‘exit strategy’, this may be hard to achieve and alternative options must be considered with careful consideration of all adverse outcomes – including health, social and economic consequences.