CT pericoronary adipose tissue density predicts coronary allograft vasculopathy and adverse clinical outcomes after cardiac transplantation

AIMS

To assess pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) density on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) as a marker of inflammatory disease activity in coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV).

METHODS AND RESULTS

PCAT density, lesion volumes, and total vessel volume-to-myocardial mass ratio (V/M) were retrospectively measured in 126 CCTAs from 94 heart transplant patients (mean age 49 [SD 14.5] years, 40% female) who underwent imaging between 2010 to 2021; age and sex-matched controls; and patients with atherosclerosis. PCAT density was higher in transplant patients with CAV (n = 40; -73.0 HU [SD 9.3]) than without CAV (n = 86; -77.9 HU [SD 8.2]), and controls (n = 12; -86.2 HU [SD 5.4]), p < 0.01 for both. Unlike patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (n = 32), CAV lesions were predominantly non-calcified, comprised of mostly fibrous or fibrofatty tissue. V/M was lower in patients with CAV than without (32.4 mm3/g [SD 9.7] vs. 41.4 mm3/g [SD 12.3], p < 0.0001). PCAT density and V/M improved the ability to predict CAV from AUC 0.75 to 0.85 when added to donor age and donor hypertension status (p < 0.0001). PCAT density above -66 HU was associated with a greater incidence of all-cause mortality (OR 18.0 [95%CI 3.25-99.6], p < 0.01) and the composite endpoint of death, CAV progression, acute rejection, and coronary revascularization (OR 7.47 [95%CI 1.8-31.6], p = 0.01) over 5.3 (SD 2.1) years.

CONCLUSIONS

Heart transplant patients with CAV have higher PCAT density and lower V/M than those without. Increased PCAT density is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. These CCTA metrics could be useful for diagnosis and monitoring of CAV severity.

Dynamics and prognostic role of galectin-3 in patients with advanced heart failure, during left ventricular assist device support and following heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Galectin-3 is a marker of myocardial inflammation and fibrosis shown to correlate with morbidity and mortality in heart failure (HF). We examined the utility of galectin-3 as a marker of the severity of HF, the response of galectin-3 levels to ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation or heart transplantation (HTx), and its use as a prognostic indicator.

METHODS

Plasma galectin-3 was measured using a commercially available ELISA assay in patients with stable HF (n = 55), severe HF (n = 63), at 3 (n = 17) and 6 (n = 14) months post-LVAD and at LVAD explantation (n = 23), patients following HTx (n = 85) and healthy controls (n = 30).

RESULTS

Galectin-3 levels increase with the severity of HF (severe HF: 28.2 ± 14, stable HF: 19.7 ± 13, p = 0.001; controls: 13.2 ± 9 ng/ml, p = 0.02 versus stable HF). Following LVAD implantation, galectin-3 levels are initially lower (3 months: 23.7 ± 9, 6 months: 21.7 ± 9 versus 29.2 ± 14 ng/ml implantation; p = NS) but are higher at explantation (40.4 ± 19 ng/ml; p = 0.005 versus pre-LVAD). Galectin-3 levels >30 ng/ml are associated with lower survival post-LVAD placement (76.5 % versus 95.0 % at 2 years, p = 0.009). After HTx, galectin-3 levels are lower (17.8 ± 7.1 ng/ml post-HTx versus 28.2 ± 14 pre-HTx; p < 0.0001). Patients with coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) post-HTx showed higher galectin-3 levels (20.5 ± 8.8 ng/ml versus 16.8 ± 6.3, p = 0.1) and the degree of CAV correlated with levels of galectin-3 (r (2) = 0.17, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Galectin-3 is associated with the severity of HF, exhibits dynamic changes during mechanical unloading and predicts survival post-LVAD. Further, galectin-3 is associated with the development on CAV post-HTx. Galectin-3 might serve as a novel biomarker in patients with HF, during LVAD support and following HTx.