Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita with maxillofacial involvement: a case report

BACKGROUND

Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita is a rare condition that mainly involves the lower limbs, characterized by severe joint deformity and contracture, muscular atrophy, and functional impairment. Its clinical manifestations are heterogenous and may involve the maxillofacial district as well.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case report describes a 20-year-old patient with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita with skeletal crossbite, facial asymmetry, reduced mouth opening and absence of lateral mandibular movement on the left side. After clinical evaluation, the following exams were required: postero-anterior cephalometric tracing, head and neck electromyography, computerized axiography, computed tomography scan, and maxillofacial magnetic resonance imaging. Orthognathodontic evaluation indicated skeletal asymmetry, reduced condylar movements on the left side and abnormally low electromyography activity of the masticatory muscles on the left side. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed unilateral left mandibular hypoplasia, hypotrophy, and fatty infiltration of masticatory muscles on the left side, as well as immobility of the left condyle during mouth opening, and hypoplasia of the left articular disk, which was however not displaced. Surgery was not indicated and conservative orthognathodontic treatment with function generating bite was suggested to balance the occlusal plane, as well as stretching exercises.

CONCLUSIONS

A rare case of arthrogryposis multiplex congenita with maxillofacial involvement illustrates that a patient-centred, multidisciplinary approach with accurate diagnosis is required to formulate the best treatment plan. Because of the considerable damage to the masticatory muscles, conservative orthognathodontic therapy may be the best treatment option.

What factors predict craniomandibular disorders in severe COVID-19 survivors after prolonged intubation?

PURPOSES

To estimate and identify predictors of craniomandibular disorders (CMDs) in severe COVID-19 survivors after prolonged intubation ≥ 1 week (SCOVIDS-PI).

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled two cohorts of SCOVIDS-PIs with vs. without CMD during a one-year period. The predictor variables were demographic, dental, anesthetic, and laboratory parameters. The main outcome was presence of CMD until six post-PI months (yes/no). Appropriate statistics were computed with α = 95%.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 176 subjects aged 59.2 ± 17.2 years (range, 27-89; 11.9% with CMDs; 30.1% females). CMDs were significantly associated with (1) bilateral posterior tooth loss (P = 0; number needed to screen [NNS] = 1.6), (2) dentofacial skeletal class II/convex face (P = .01; NNS = 2.2), and (3) peak CRP during intensive care ≥ 40 mg/l (P = .01; NNS = 3.5). With combined predictors, NNS became 2 to 4.3.

CONCLUSIONS

Three predictors of CMDs in SCOVIDS-PIs: bilateral molar loss, convex face, and CRP ≥ 40 mg/l, indicate CMD screening and/or referral to a CMD specialist, regardless of patients' age, gender, underlying CMDs, or previous dental checkups. Screening ∼2 to 4 "SCOVIDS-PIs with ≥ one predictor" will identify one CMD events/patients during the first six post-PI months.

[Orofacial dysfunction and posttraumatic stress disorder : A context analysis of soldiers after military deployment]

BACKGROUND

In studies on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD, ICD 10: F43.1) and in clinical observation, the high proportion of soldiers with painful craniomandibular dysfunction (CMD) is conspicuous.

AIM

This study aimed to clarify if there is a connection between orofacial dysfunction, pain in this region, stress and PTSD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 36 inpatients (PTSD group) with specialist psychiatrically confirmed PTSD after up to 17 foreign deployments and 36 control subjects with 2-40 foreign deployments underwent a functional dental examination. All participants filled out a form for the gradation of chronic pain (GCP, degrees 0-4) as well as the depression, fear and stress scale (DFSS).

RESULTS

Soldiers with PTSD had significantly worse orofacial functional diagnoses and higher pain scores, although on average they had less combat deployments (PTSD: maximum mouth opening 31.4 ± 8.0 mm vs. 57 ± 6 mm, GCP 3.5 ± 1.0 vs. 0.5 ± 0.5).The PTSD group showed a depression score of 14.9 ± 4.2 vs. the control group 1.4 ± 2.1, a fear score of 13.7 ± 3.9 vs. 1.0 ± 1.5 and a stress score of 16.1 ± 3.4 vs. 3.3 ± 2.9.

CONCLUSION

The data from this pilot study show an obvious connection between PTSD and orofacial dysfunctions. Through further prospective studies it should be evaluated if there is a general vulnerability of those afflicted for pathological orofacial stress. This could be used for screening before combat deployment.

Evidence of Signs and Symptoms of Craniomandibular Disorders in Fibromyalgia Patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to highlight the evidence of signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders (CMD) in patients suffering from fibromyalgia.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

The study has been carried out from May 2011 to May 2015, recruiting a sample of fibromyalgia patients at the Department of Neurophysiopathology at the hospital Policlinico in Bari. Among the 150 examined patients, 60 of them have been diagnosed to suffer from fibromyalgia and 27 accepted to be investigated with a gnathologic examination at the Dental School at the University of Bari.

RESULTS

24 patients (88.9%) were women and 3 (11.1%) men; from 26 to 66 years old (average age, 39). 14 patients (51.9%) were affected by primary fibromyalgia, the remaining 13 (48.1%) by secondary fibromyalgia, mainly associated with hypothyroidism (29.6%). VAS average score was about 8 ± 1.85. The frequency of pain was daily in 15 patients (55.6%); twice a week in 10 patients (37.03%) and a few times a month in 2 patients (7.4%). 11 patients (40.7%) attributed the onset of fibromyalgia to a specific instigating event. In addition, from the gnathologic anamnesis, 11 patients (40,7%) reported a painful symptom in the head-neck region, especially in the frontal region, in the neck, in the masseter muscle and ATM. VAS average score was 3.4 ± 2.8, significantly lower than the one referring to the fibromyalgia pain. The gnathological examination found CMD signs and symptoms in 18 patients (66.7%). Concerning the prevalence of CMD, in type I fibromyalgia, myofascial pain was more frequent (5 patients), whereas in type II fibromyalgia, what was more frequent was a dislocation with reduction (3 patients).

CONCLUSION

Based on clinic experience, we can affirm that some patients with CMD report pain in other regions. It is difficult to distinguish the CMD forms directly correlated to fibromyalgia from those engendered by parafunctional activities; hence the need is to resolve the fibromyalgia syndrome adopting a multidisciplinary approach.

Cranial Treatment and Spinal Manipulation for a Patient With Low Back Pain: A Case Study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this case study is to present chiropractic management of a patient with chronic low back pain by focusing on the craniomandibular system.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 37-year-old man consulted a chiropractor for pain in the lumbosacral area with radiation down the anterolateral side of the upper left leg. The symptoms started after a fall the previous year. Examination showed a post-traumatic chronic L4-L5 facet dysfunction and left sacro-iliac joint dysfunction. Chiropractic spinal manipulation to the lumbar spine and pelvis gave only temporary relief from the pain.

INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME

A year later a bone scintigraphy was conducted, in which a lesion was found over the right sphenoid area. Cranial treatment of this area was added to the chiropractic treatment plan. After this treatment, the patient reported that he was pain free and could return to normal activities of daily living.

CONCLUSION

The clinical progress of this case suggests that for some patients, adding craniosacral therapy may be helpful in patients with low back symptoms.