Effect of 2 Heat-treated Nickel-Titanium Files on Enlargement and Deformation of the Apical Foramen in Curved Canals: A Scanning Electronic Microscopic Study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate under scanning electronic microscopy the enlargement and deformation of the apical foramen of curved mesiobuccal roots with both reciprocating and rotary single-file systems made of a newly heat-treated alloy through the use of Reciproc Blue (REC Blue; VDW, Munich, Germany) and XP-endo Shaper (XPS; FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland).

METHODS

Forty mesiobuccal roots of mandibular and maxillary molars presenting a curvature ranging from 20°-40° were used in this study. The apical foramens were initially scanned with a scanning electronic microscope under 200× magnification. Roots were divided into 2 groups (n = 20): the REC Blue group instrumented with the REC Blue system and the XPS group instrumented with the XPS system. Both groups were instrumented at the foramen. The apical foramens were scanned after root canal preparation. The area, circularity, and ratio of the Feret diameters were calculated from each image. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis (P ≤ .05).

RESULTS

The area of the foramen increased significantly after canal shaping with REC Blue and XPS. The variation of the area was significantly greater with XPS. However, there were no significant differences in circularity and the ratio of the Feret diameters with both instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

No transportation was found when using REC Blue and XPS. The newly heat-treated nickel-titanium alloy did not promote deformation of the apical foramen in curved canals.

Structural Characteristics and Torsional Resistance Evaluation of WaveOne and WaveOne Gold Instruments after Simulated Clinical Use

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare 2 reciprocating nickel-titanium systems with different manufacturing characteristics and to evaluate the influence of simulated clinical use on their torsional resistance.

METHODS

New 25/.08 WaveOne Primary (WO; Dentsply Sirona, York, PA) and 25/.07 WaveOne Gold Primary (Dentsply Sirona) files were used in this study. The diameter and cross-sectional area at 3 mm from the tip were measured using image analyses. The alloy microstructure was evaluated by X-ray diffraction and the phase transformation temperatures by differential scanning calorimetry analyses. Forty files were divided into 4 groups: control group 1 and control group 2, which were submitted to torsion tests until rupture, and experimental group 1 and experimental group 2, in which instruments were used to shape 2 mesial canals of an extracted mandibular molar and then submitted to torsion tests until rupture.

RESULTS

WO had higher values of diameter and area at 3 mm from the tip. X-ray diffraction analysis presented R-phase and austenite for both systems. Austenite finish temperatures, determined by differential scanning calorimetry, were above room temperature. WO showed higher values of torque until rupture, and WaveOne Gold showed higher values of angular deflexion (P > .05). No differences were found between the same type of instrument in the control and experimental groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher torsional resistance of WO can be attributed to geometric characteristics. The use in 1 tooth with curved canals is safe and does not affect the torsional resistance of the instruments analyzed.

Cleaning Effectiveness of a Reciprocating Single-file and a Conventional Rotary Instrumentation System

Objective:

To compare cleaning effectiveness by histological analysis of a reciprocating single-file system with ProTaper rotary instruments during the preparation of curved root canals in extracted teeth.

Methods:

A total of 40 root canals with curvatures ranging between 20 - 40 degrees were divided into two groups of 20 canals. Canals were prepared to the following apical sizes: Reciproc size 25 (n=20); ProTaper: F2 (n=20). The normal distribution of data was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the values obtained for the test (Mann-Whitney U test, P < .05) were statistically analyzed using the GraphPad InStat for the Mac OS software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results:

There were no significant differences in remaining debris (P > .05) between the two groups.

Conclusion:

The application of reciprocating motion during instrumentation did not result in increased debris when compared with continuous rotation motion, even in the apical part of curved canals. Both instruments resulted in debris in the canal lumen, irrespective of the movement kinematics applied.

A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the smear layer formed on root canal walls during canal preparation of extracted human teeth by Twisted, Mtwo, and ProTaper rotary nickel titanium instruments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty single rooted human premolar teeth with root curvature <25(0) were selected and randomly divided into three Groups (n= 20 teeth per Group). Three types of rotary nickel titanium instruments were used, Twisted (SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA), Mtwo (VDW, Munich, Germany) and ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) according to manufacturer's instructions to instrument the root canals. Irrigation for all groups was performed after each instrument change with 3ml of 3% sodium hypochlorite followed by Glyde (File Prep, Dentsply, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) as chelator paste and lubricant. Three different areas (coronal, middle and apical thirds) of the root canal were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The canal wall of each sample was assessed and compared using a predefined scale for the presence or absence of smear layer. Data were analysed statistically using ANOVA and Tukey HSD test Results: All three groups showed statistically significant more smear layer in the apical thirds of the canal as compared to the coronal and middle thirds (p<0.001). Mtwo rotary file system produced significantly less smear layer (p<0.001) compared to Twisted and ProTaper rotary instruments in the apical portion. Twisted Files resulted in less smear layer formation in the apical thirds of the canal compared to ProTaper rotary instruments but were statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSION

Completely clean root canals were not found after instrumentation with any of the three instruments. Under the confines of this study Mtwo instruments produced significantly cleaner dentin wall surfaces throughout the canal length in comparison to Twisted and ProTaper rotary files. Twisted Files proved to be comparable to ProTaper rotary instruments with respect to canal cleanliness in the apical thirds of the root canal.