Budgetary Impact of Including the Urinary Genomic Marker Cxbladder Detect in the Evaluation of Microhematuria Patients

INTRODUCTION

Current AUA guidelines mandate a risk-stratified approach for the evaluation of microhematuria. Urine genomic tests with high negative predictive value could further reduce unnecessary diagnostic testing and morbidity, but the economic impact is unknown. This study modeled the financial impact of Cxbladder Detect on microhematuria evaluations.

METHODS

A decision tree analysis was constructed by Coreva Scientific comparing 1-year costs of the standard microhematuria evaluation using the AUA guidelines vs an algorithm incorporating Cxbladder Detect. Cxbladder Detect-positive patients had cystoscopy and imaging, whereas patients with negative tests were reevaluated in 6 months. Patients with positive diagnostic testing underwent cystoscopy, and positive cystoscopies led to transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Test performance was based on published literature, and costs were based on Medicare allowable fees.

RESULTS

Using the decision tree model, the average savings of using Cxbladder Detect was $559 compared with the standard of care, with an average reduction of 0.38 procedures per patient. Probabilistic analysis showed statistical significance with a median reduction in the total cost of $498 per patient (95% CrI [-1356, -2]) and a significant median reduction in diagnostic procedures per patient of 0.36 (95% CrI [-0.52, -0.16]) without impact on the number of cancers diagnosed.

CONCLUSIONS

This model-based study demonstrates the potential economic value of using a Cxbladder-driven protocol for microhematuria evaluations.

Application of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to Evaluate New Laboratory Tests in a Health System: A Case Study of Bladder Cancer Testing

We describe the methods and decision from a health technology assessment of a new molecular test for bladder cancer (Cxbladder), which was proposed for adoption to our send-out test menu by urology providers. The Cxbladder health technology assessment report contained mixed evidence; predominant concerns were related to the test’s low specificity and high cost. The low specificity indicated a high false-positive rate, which our laboratory formulary committee concluded would result in unnecessary confirmatory testing and follow-up. Our committee voted unanimously to not adopt the test system-wide for use for the initial diagnosis of bladder cancer but supported a pilot study for bladder cancer recurrence surveillance. The pilot study used real-world data from patient management in the scenario in which a patient is evaluated for possible recurrent bladder cancer after a finding of atypical cytopathology in the urine. We evaluated the type and number of follow-up tests conducted including urine cytopathology, imaging studies, repeat cystoscopy evaluation, biopsy, and repeat Cxbladder and their test results. The pilot identified ordering challenges and suggested potential use cases in which the results of Cxbladder affected a change in management. Our health technology assessment provided an objective process to efficiently review test performance and guide new test adoption. Based on our pilot, there were real-world data indicating improved clinician decision-making among select patients who underwent Cxbladder testing.