Tuberculosis treatment delay and contributing factors within tuberculosis patients in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) is a significant public health disease and a major contributor to illness and death worldwide, including in Ethiopia. There are many information from first source which had inconclusive result in Ethiopia. Therefore, this review aimed to produce pooled evidence on the TB treatment delay and factors associated with it.

Methods

The absence of a similar study with a systematic review and meta-analysis was confirmed. Articles from online available and unpublished sources conducted within Ethiopia between 2002 and 2024, were thoroughly screened using electronic sources such as Medline, Embase, Hinari, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Data analysis was performed using STATA version 14. Heterogeneity was assessed using Inverse of Variance (I2) and Cochrane Q tests. The funnel plot was employed to rule existence of publications subjectively while bias was checked using Egger's statistical method to quantify the bias.

Result

Prevalence of TB treatment delay in Ethiopia was 50.42% at 95% (43.21, 57.64). Factors such as knowledge about TB, distance to health facilities less than 10 km, initial contact at a government service providing center for TB, having some educations, having pulmonary Tuberculosis, urban residency, were prtotective towards treatment delay. Female in gender, no chest pain symptom, disease severity with no restriction on daily activity, alcohol drinkers, and unmarried respondents were at higher risk to miss on time tuberculosis treatment.

Conclusion and recommendation

The tuberculosis treatment delay in Ethiopia was considerably unexpected and basic personal variables and facility related variables were statistically associated with treatment. Therefore, Ethiopian TB control programs have to recognize and tackle the problem, obstacles, and vulnerability across the continuum patient care taking down and connecting to treatment post-diagnosis. This can be achieved by capacitating both government and non-governmental service provision centers and minimizing unfilled difference across professional awareness and skill, which will contribute further to minimizing delay.

Psychological impact of suspension/postponement of fertility treatments on infertile women waiting during COVID pandemic

Objective

To assess the psychological impact of suspension/postponement of various fertility treatments on infertile women during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted as an online survey among infertile women consulting either through teleconsultation or physical consultation at a fertility clinic of a tertiary care referral unit. A validated questionnaire was given as a WhatsApp link to the women who were consulting for the resumption of services. Questions asked were based on their socio-demographic parameters, fertility treatment at the time of suspension, anxiety (self-reported) and stress (perceived stress scale-4, PSS-4) due to delay in treatment, psychosocial effect of pandemic, and wishes regarding the resumption of fertility services.

Results

Of 430 patients who received the questionnaire, 250 completed the survey (response rate: 58%). The mean age of participants was 29.26±4.18 years and the majority (70.4%) had lower socioeconomic status. The average PSS-4 score was 7.8±0.71, and the prevalence of self-reported anxiety was 72%. Those who suffered migration during the pandemic had significantly higher PSS-4 scores, and increasing age was associated with increased self-reported anxiety due to the suspension of fertility services. The top three priorities reported were infertility and treatment delay (48.4%), job loss (19.2%), and the risk of contracting COVID-19 infection (16%). The degree of spousal support was significantly correlated with lower PSS-4 scores (r=−0.30, P<0.01). On multivariate logistic analysis, duration of infertility, delay in treatment due to suspension of services, and fear of COVID-19 infection were significant predictors of stress and anxiety.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the need to investigate psychosocial health and to provide psychological support to this vulnerable population in addition to triaging fertility treatments in a phased manner.

Patients' perspective on emergency treatment of ophthalmologic diseases during the first phase of SARS-CoV2 pandemic in a tertiary referral center in Germany - the COVID-DETOUR questionnaire study

Background

During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the need of treatment of urgent ophthalmological diseases and the possible risk of a SARS-CoV-2 infection had to be weighed against each other. In this questionnaire study, we aimed to analyze potential barriers and patients’ health beliefs during and after the lockdown early 2020 in a tertiary referral center in Kiel, Germany.

Methods

Patients admitted for the treatment of urgent ophthalmic diseases between March 1st, 2020, and June 3rd, 2020, were asked to participate in a questionnaire study. After informed consent was obtained, patients were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire which addressed aspects of their medical history, their health beliefs concerning the COVID-19 pandemic and barriers on their way to the treatment center. The study group was subdivided into two subgroups, depending on the occurrence of their symptoms, before and after the lockdown was ended on April 20th, 2020.

Results

Ninety-three patients were included, 43 in subgroup A (before April 20th) and 50 in subgroup B (April 20th or later). Retinal disorders were the most common causes for admission (approximately 60%).. Only 8 patients (8.6%) experienced a delay between their decision to visit a doctor until the actual examination. Every fourth patient was afraid of a COVID-19 infection, and expected a higher likelihood for an infection at the hospital. Patients with comorbidities tended to be more likely to be afraid of an infection (correlation coefficient 0.183, p = 0.0785) and were significantly more likely to be concerned about problems with organizing follow-up care (corr. Coefficient 0.222, p = 0.0328). Higher age was negatively correlated with fear of infection (corr. Coefficient − 0.218, p-value 0.034).

Conclusion

In this questionnaire study, only a minority of patients indicated a delay in treatment, regardless of whether symptoms occurred before or after the lockdown before April 20th, 2020. While patients with comorbidities were more concerned about infection and problems during follow-up care, patients of higher age – who have a higher mortality – were less afraid. Protection of high-risk groups should be prioritized during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Trial registration

The study was registered as DRKS00021630 at the DRKS (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien) before the conduction of the study on May 5th, 2020.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-021-02054-7.

Symptoms to script: delays in tuberculosis treatment in the west of Ireland

BACKGROUND

The first pillar of the End-TB Strategy is "early diagnosis and prompt treatment". Nevertheless, long delays in starting tuberculosis (TB) treatment are reported. We aimed to describe the demographics and clinical features of TB in the west of Ireland and better understand the delays in treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with active TB who attended the Galway University Hospital (GUH) TB clinic from 2014 to 2018.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were diagnosed with TB and attended our clinic. Ten (12%) patients were receiving immunosuppressive therapy, 8 (9%) had drug resistance, and 41 (48%) had extra-pulmonary disease. Patients with extra-pulmonary disease had a longer length of stay before treatment (11 vs. 4 days; p = 0.006). Patients older than 55 had a longer length of stay before (16 vs. 5 days, p = 0.0001) and during (36 vs. 11 days, p = 0.004) treatment and were readmitted more frequently than younger patients. A total of 36% of patients were born outside Ireland. Non-Irish patients were younger (mean age 35 vs 48; p = 0.004) and more frequently had drug resistance (19% vs. 4%, p = 0.02). The median time from symptom onset to hospital presentation was 76 days (IQR 35-146 days) and the median time from first hospital presentation to TB treatment was 11 days (IQR 5-51 days).

CONCLUSION

TB patients experienced long symptom durations in the community prior to presentation. Many TB patients experienced delays in diagnosis and treatment following presentation. Both pre-hospital and in-hospital delays need to be addressed in order to 'End-TB'.

Socioeconomic and administrative factors associated with treatment delay of esophageal and gastric carcinoma: Prospective study from a tertiary care centre in a developing country

This study was aimed to analyze the spectrum of time intervals, from the onset of symptoms to the commencement of treatment in esophagogastric cancers. Factors influencing these time delays and correlation between these time points with variables including socioeconomic strata, educational level, histopathology, location of tumor and the initial modality of treatment were assessed.

STUDY SETTING AND METHODS

A prospective analysis of patients with esophagogastric cancer presenting to a single tertiary care unit over a period of 12 months was performed. Histopathology other than adenocarcinoma and squamous cell were excluded.

RESULTS

202 patients were enrolled in the study. Most patients presented with advanced disease, i.e. 91.5 % of esophageal and 90 % of gastric malignancies belonged to either stage 3 or stage 4 as per American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. The median delay from the appearance of the first symptoms to initiation of treatment was 15 weeks (range 4-64). Patient related factors contributed to a significant delay [median of 5 weeks (range 1-24)]. Administrative factors were responsible for median delay of 3 weeks (range 0.5-20). Curative multimodality treatment was administered in 62.5 % of patients. Significant longer delay was influenced by socioeconomic strata, educational level, evaluation by non-specialist (p < 0.05). No relationship was noted between histopathology, location of tumor or initial modality of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Delays in our setting is much more than that is seen in Western and even some Asian countries. An important component of delay is administrative related factors. These may be intervened at the hospital level compared to other factors which may need long term community oriented approaches.

Time to Surgery: a Misguided Quality Metric in Early Stage Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Longer time to surgery is associated with worse outcomes in several cancers. We sought to identify disparities in time from diagnosis to surgery in pancreatic cancer and whether delays to surgery correlated with worse survival.

METHODS

The US National Cancer Database (2003-2011) was reviewed for patients with clinical stages I-II pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Linear regression, Kaplan-Meier analyses, and Cox regression were performed as 3-month landmark analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 14,807 patients included, 37.8% underwent resection ≤ 1 week, 13.7% 1-2 weeks, 25.4% 2-4 weeks, 19.5% 4-8 weeks, and 3.7% 8-12 weeks. Older age, Medicare coverage, greater distance from hospital, treatment at an academic center, and greater comorbidities were associated with increased time. After excluding patients treated within 1 week of diagnosis and controlling for patient, disease, and treatment characteristics, greater time was not associated with worse survival (2-4, HR 1.03, P = 0.399; 4-8, HR 0.98, P = 0.529; 8-12, P = 0.123).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with stages I-II pancreatic adenocarcinoma, there are disparities in surgical wait times. However, earlier initiation of surgical resection within 12 weeks of diagnosis is not associated with a survival benefit. This suggests that allowing time for confirmatory testing and optimization in preparation for surgery may not negatively impact survival.

Prehospital and Intrahospital Temporal Intervals in Patients Requiring Emergent Trauma Craniotomy. A 6-Year Observational Study in a Level 1 Trauma Center

OBJECTIVE

According to level 2 evidence, earlier evacuation of acute subdural or epidural hematomas necessitating surgery is associated with better outcome. Hence, guidelines recommend performing these procedures immediately. Literature on the extent and causes of prehospital and intrahospital intervals in patients with trauma requiring emergent craniotomies is almost completely lacking. Studies delineating and refining the interval before thrombolytic agent administration in ischemic stroke have dramatically reduced the door-to-needle time. A similar exercise for trauma-to-decompression time might result in comparable reductions. We aim to map intervals in emergent trauma craniotomies in our level 1 trauma center, screen for associated factors, and propose possible ways to reduce these intervals.

METHODS

We analyzed patients who were primarily referred (1R; n = 45) and secondarily referred (after computed tomography imaging in a community hospital [2R; n = 22]) to our emergency department (ED) and underwent emergent trauma craniotomies between 2010 and 2016.

RESULTS

Median prehospital interval (between emergency call and arrival at the ED) was 42 minutes for 1R patients. Median intrahospital interval (between initial ED arrival and skin incision [SI]) was 140 minutes and 268 minutes for 1R and 2R patients, respectively. In 1R patients, ED-SI interval was positively correlated with Glasgow Coma Scale score (ρ=.49; P < 0.001), but not with age, time of ED arrival, or extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score at 6 months. Based on outlier analysis, we propose prehospital and intrahospital measures to improve performance.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report on emergency call-SI interval in emergent trauma craniotomy, with a median of 174 minutes and >297 minutes for 1R and 2R patients, respectively, in our center.