[Practical assessment of DSAEK in the management of endothelial decompensation following penetrating keratoplasty]

PURPOSE

To report our anatomical and functional results as well as possible complications of the first six Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasties (DSAEK) performed in our department for endothelial decompensation after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) METHODS: This was a retrospective and observational monocentric study of six patients with DSAEK after prior PK between January 2015 and July 2016. The data collected were: demographic characteristics (age, sex), ophthalmological comorbidities, initial indication for PK, delay between PK and DSAEK. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) preoperatively and at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively were collected in Monoyer's and Parinaud scale and converted to log MAR for statistical analysis. The central cornea and graft thickness measured on OCT as well as postoperative complications were also collected.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up duration was 7.2 months [3-10]. The average time after PK was 7.7 years. The mean age of the patients was 67.5 years [32-87]. The initial indication for PK was Fuchs dystrophy (3/6), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (1/6), corneal laceration (1/6) and other corneal dystrophy (1/6). The authors report one case a combined phaco-DSAEK surgery. The complications observed were: an early graft detachment treated by an additional air bubble injection (1/6) and cystoid macular edema in one other case. The average central corneal thickness decreased from 780μm at day 7 postoperatively to 656μm at 6 months. The average thickness of the graft decreased from 154μm at day 7 to 122μm at 6 months. The mean preoperative BCVA was 1.52 log MAR [1.0-1.7], compared to the mean postoperative BCVA which was 1.5 log MAR [1.1-2.3] at 1 month, 1.15 log MAR [0.5-1.7] at 3 months and 1.1 log MAR [0.7-1.7] at 6 months (data available for 4 patients at 6 months). The recovery of visual acuity was limited in 2 cases, despite corneal clarity restored in all our patients.

DISCUSSION

Our results can be compared to those described in literature. As more penetrating keratoplasty grafts reach the end of their lives, this will allow for more powerful studies.

CONCLUSION

DSAEK on eyes previously treated with PK is a good alternative to a new PK in the case of endothelial decompensation of the graft. The possibility of a posterior lamellar graft allows for faster visual recovery, with preservation of the anterior corneal power and a lower rate of complications.

[DSAEK after failed penetrating keratoplasty]

PURPOSE

To report the anatomic and functional outcomes of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in 32 eyes after failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-center observational study was performed on 32 eyes of 26 patients with failed PK grafts who underwent DSAEK between June 2009 and June 2013 at Clermont-Ferrand University Medical Center. Primary outcomes measured were: graft survival rates, functional improvement (visual acuity), and complications.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 16.45 months [6-36]. Graft survival at 12 months was 76.1 % [68.1-82.3]. PK grafts cleared in 75 % of cases. Eight primary DSAEKs detached and/or decentered early (prior to day 8, average 6.22 days): 3 underwent repeat DSAEK with a new graft, and 3 underwent conversion to PK. Results were available for 26 patients at 6 months. Mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR increased from 1.48 (counting fingers at 2 meters) to 0.996 logMAR (1/10) at 6 months. BCVA improved in 17 patients (68 %). BCVA improved an average of 5.2 lines (P=0.0006). Eight patients had a large number of comorbid conditions that limited final visual acuity.

DISCUSSION

Anatomic outcomes are similar to other studies. Final average BCVA was limited by severe comorbid conditions and performance of DSAEK solely for comfort. Many surgical strategies have been described to decrease graft dislocation and primary graft failure. Adapting graft trephine diameter to the host cornea as measured by AS-OCT, using a nomogram based on posterior corneal curvature obtained on AS-OCT, may be an interesting approach.

CONCLUSION

DSAEK allows for quick visual recovery by preserving the anterior corneal curvature. It is an essential option for restoring corneal clarity in PK failure due to endothelial decompensation. A longer follow-up would allow a comparison of graft survival for the two techniques in this context.