Choice of imaging modality for pre-treatment staging of head and neck cancer impacts TNM staging

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to determine whether there is a difference in the sensitivity of chest computed tomography (CT) versus ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with low-dose nonenhanced CT (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT or PET/CT) in the detection of distant metastases in head and neck cancer, within a tertiary care setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with head and neck cancer, and known distant metastases, who underwent both ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT with integrated low-dose nonenhanced CT and diagnostic chest CT prior to initiation of therapy from 2008 to 2017 were included. Two head and neck radiologists, blinded to all patient information and to each other's readings, reviewed the PET/CT or CT chest images for each patient and identified whether distant metastases were present. No radiologist read both modalities for a single patient. Concordance between imaging modalities was quantitatively analyzed using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

27 patients were included. McNemar's mid p-value analysis showed no significant difference in the detection of distant metastases (p = .6875). However, PET/CT detected distant metastases in three patients that chest CT did not, while chest CT identified distant metastatic disease in two patients that were negative on PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

While this study did not identify a statistically significant difference in sensitivity, five patients had distant metastases identified on only one of the two modalities. Use of a single modality would have resulted in inaccurate staging in 7-11% of patients in our study. The use of both modalities offers the greatest accuracy when providing stage-adapted oncologic treatment.