Dural Sac Cross-sectional area change from preoperatively and up to 2 years after decompressive surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis: investigation of operated levels, data from the NORDSTEN study

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate how canal area size changed from before surgery and up to 2 years after decompressive lumbar surgery lumbar spinal stenosis. Further, to investigate if an area change postoperatively (between 3 months to 2 years) was associated with any preoperative demographic, clinical or MRI variables or surgical method used.

METHODS

The present study is analysis of data from the NORDSTEN- SST trial where 437 patients were randomized to one of three mini-invasive surgical methods for lumbar spinal stenosis. The patients underwent MRI examination of the lumbar spine before surgery, and 3 and 24 months after surgery. For all operated segments the dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) was measured in mm2. Baseline factors collected included age, gender, BMI and smoking habits. Furthermore, surgical method, index level, number of levels operated, all levels operated on and baseline Schizas grade were also included in the analysis.

RESULTS

437 patients were enrolled in the NORDSTEN-SST trial, whereof 310 (71%) had MRI at 3 months and 2 years. Mean DSCA at index level was 52.0 mm2 (SD 21.2) at baseline, at 3 months it increased to 117.2 mm2 (SD 43.0) and after 2 years the area was 127.7 mm2 (SD 52.5). Surgical method, level operated on or Schizas did not influence change in DSCA from 3 to 24 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The spinal canal area after lumbar decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis increased from baseline to 3 months after surgery and remained thereafter unchanged 2 years postoperatively.

High prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in cases of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus affects improvements in gait disturbance after shunt operation

Objective

Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is characterized by symptoms of dementia, urinary incontinence, and gait disturbance; however, gait disturbance tends to persist after shunt surgery. Gait disturbance and urinary dysfunction are also major symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Currently, the epidemiology of the complications of LSS in iNPH is unclear. Here, we evaluated the coexistence rate of LSS in iNPH cases.

Methods

This was a retrospective case-control study. Between 2011 and 2017, 224 patients with a median age of 78 years, including 119 males, were diagnosed with iNPH and underwent lumboperitoneal shunts or ventriculoperitoneal shunts. LSS was diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging by two spine surgeons. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, and urinary dysfunction were examined. We compared the changes in these variables in the group of patients with iNPH without LSS versus those with both iNPH and LSS.

Results

Seventy-three iNPH patients (32.6%) with LSS had significantly higher age and BMI. The existence of LSS did not alter the postoperative improvement rates of MMSE and urinary dysfunction; however, TUG improvement was significantly impaired in the LSS-positive group.

Conclusions

LSS affects improvements in gait disturbance of iNPH patients after shunt operation. Because our results revealed that one-third of iNPH patients were associated with LSS, gait disturbance observed in iNPH patients should be considered a potential complication of LSS.

The reliability, correlation with clinical symptoms and surgical outcomes of dural sac cross-sectional area, nerve root sedimentation sign and morphological grade for lumbar spinal stenosis

BACKGROUND

No study had directly compared the reliability, correlation with clinical symptoms, and surgical outcomes of dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA), nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign), and morphological grade for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2020, 202 patients with LSS were retrospectively analyzed. The narrowest segments were assessed via T2-weighted cross-sectional images using DCSA, morphological grade, and SedSign by two independent observers. Three classifications' reliabilities were evaluated. Correlations between three classifications and between each of the classifications and symptoms or surgical outcomes 12 months postoperatively were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 144 males and 58 females; 23, 52, and 127 patients had the narrowest segment in L2-3, L3-4, and L4-5, respectively. The intra-observer reliability of DCSA ranged from 0.91 to 0.93, and the inter-observer reliability was 0.90. The intra-observer reliability of SedSign ranged from 0.83 to 0.85, and the inter-observer reliability was 0.75. The intra-observer reliability of morphological grade ranged from 0.72 to 0.78, and the inter-observer reliability was 0.61. Each of these classifications was correlated with the other two (P < 0.01). For preoperative symptoms, DCSA was correlated with leg pain (LP) (r =  - 0.14), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (r =  - 0.17), and claudication (r =  - 0.19). Morphological grade was correlated with LP (r = 0.19) and claudication (r = 0.27). SedSign was correlated with ODI (r = 0.23). For postoperative outcomes, morphological grade was correlated with LP (r =  - 0.14), and SedSign was correlated with ODI (r = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial to almost perfect intra and inter-observer reliabilities for the three classifications were found; however, these classifications had either weak correlations with symptoms and surgical outcomes or none at all. Based on our findings, using one of them without conducting other tests for LSS will have limited or uncertain value in surgical decision-making or evaluating the prognostic value.

Dural sac cross-sectional area is a highly effective parameter for spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective, double blinded, randomized study

Background

Spinal anesthesia is optimal choice for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), but the sensory block should not cross the T10 level. With advancing age, the sensory blockade level increases after spinal injection in some patients with spinal canal stenosis. We optimize the dose of spinal anesthesia according to the decreased ratio of the dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA), the purpose of this study is to hypothesis that if DSCSA is an effective parameter to modify the dosage of spinal anesthetics to achieve a T10 blockade in geriatric patients undergoing TURP.

Methods

Sixty geriatric patients schedule for TURP surgery were enrolled in this study. All subjects were randomized divided into two groups, the ultrasound (group U) and the control (group C) groups, patient receive either a dose of 2 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine in group C, or a modified dose of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine in group U. We measured the sagittal anteroposterior diameter (D) of the dural sac at the L3–4 level with ultrasound, and calculated the approximate DSCSA (A) according to the following formula: A = π(D/2)², ( π = 3.14). The modified dosage of bupivacaine was adjusted according to the decreased ratio of the DSCSA.

Results

The cephalad spread of the sensory blockade level was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in group U (T10, range T7–T12) compared with group C (T3, range T2–T9). The dosage of bupivacaine was significantly decreased in group U compared with group C (P < 0.001). The regression times of the two segments were delay in group U compared with group C (P < 0.001). The maximal decrease in MAP was significantly higher in the group C than in group U after spinal injection (P < 0.001), without any modifications HR in either group. Eight patients in group C and two patients in group U required ephedrine (P = 0.038).

Conclusions

The DSCSA is a highly effective parameter for spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing TURP, a modified dose of local anesthetic is a critical factor for controlling the sensory level.

Trial registration

This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR1800015566).on 8, April, 2018.

Dural sac cross-sectional area and morphological grade show significant associations with patient-rated outcome of surgery for lumbar central spinal stenosis

PURPOSE

Lumbar central spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common reasons for spine surgery in the elderly patient. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents the gold standard for the assessment of LSS and can be used to obtain quantitative measures of the dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA) or qualitative measures (morphological grades A-D) of the rootlet/cerebrospinal fluid ratio. This study investigated the intercorrelation between these two MRI evaluation methods and explored their respective relationships with the patient baseline clinical status and outcome 12 months after surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 157 patients (88 male, 69 female; age 72 ± 7 years) who were undergoing first-time surgery for LSS. Patients with foraminal or isolated lateral stenosis were excluded. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) was completed before and 12 months after surgery. Preoperative T2 axial MRIs were blinded and independently evaluated for DCSA and morphological grade. Spearman rank correlation coefficients described the relationship between the two MRI measures of stenosis severity and between each of these and the COMI baseline and change-scores (pre to 12 months' postop). Multiple logistic regression analysis (controlling for baseline COMI, age, gender, number of operated levels, health insurance status) was used to analyse the influence of stenosis severity on the achievement of the minimum clinically important change (MCIC) score for COMI and on global treatment outcome (GTO).

RESULTS

There was a correlation of ρ = -0.69 (p < 0.001) between DCSA and morphological grade. There was no significant correlation between COMI baseline scores and either DCSA or morphological grades (p > 0.85). However, logistic regression revealed significant (p < 0.05) associations between stenosis ratings and 12-month outcome, whereby patients with more severe stenosis (as measured using either of the methods) benefited more from the surgery. Patients with a DCSA <75 mm² or morphological grade D had a 4-13-fold greater odds of achieving the MCIC for COMI or a "good" GTO, compared with patients in the least severe categories of stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative outcome was clearly related to the degree of preoperative radiological LSS. The two MRI methods appeared to deliver similar information, as given by the relatively strong correlation between them and their comparable performance in relation to baseline and 12-month outcomes. However, the qualitative morphological grading can be performed in an instant, without measurement tools, and does not deliver less clinically useful information than the more complex and time-consuming measures; as such, it may represent the preferred method in the clinical routine for assessing the extent of radiological stenosis and the likelihood of a positive outcome after decompression.

A comparison of two methods to evaluate a narrow spinal canal: routine magnetic resonance imaging versus three-dimensional reconstruction

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

In routine clinical practice, the presence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is assessed on axial magnetic resonance images (MRI) typically acquired using a preselected spine sagittal angle. Given the natural lordosis of the lumbar spine, not all axial slices will be parallel to the disc and perpendicular to the spinal canal and, thus, are not optimal for the assessment of dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA).

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare DCSA measurements from routinely acquired clinical images with three-dimensional (3D)-reconstructed images.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The sample consists of 390 patients referred for lumbar imaging with some aspect of anatomical LSS found, with no prior back surgery, 40 years of age or older, and with available volumetric MR images to allow 3D reconstruction of the spine.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome of interest in this study was dural sac cross sectional area.

METHODS

Spine images were 3D reconstructed at the level of the disc, perpendicular to the spinal canal. Dural sac cross-sectional area was measured for both 3D-reconstructed and routinely acquired clinical images using the slice orientation captured.

RESULTS

Dural sac cross-sectional area for the lower lumbar levels (L4-L5 and L5-S1) was significantly different between routinely acquired clinical images and 3D-reconstructed images, with a standard error of measurement of 12.98 and 19.73 mm(2), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

When canal size is of interest, particularly when LSS affecting the lower lumbar levels is of concern, 3D reconstruction of clinical images should be considered.