Diagnostic value of liver stiffness measurement combined with risk scores for esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis

PURPOSE

To assess the predictive value of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and three bleeding risk scoring systems for esophagogastric varices bleeding (EGVB) in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis during hospitalization.

METHODS

In this study, 210 patients who had hepatitis B cirrhosis were selected as the subjects. They were categorized into two groups based on whether EGVB occurred during hospitalization: a bleeding group (70 cases) and a non-bleeding group (140 cases). Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors related to the occurrence of EGVB, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed between the two groups in systolic blood pressure, platelet count, albumin, urea nitrogen, LSM, pre-endoscopic Rockall score (PRS), Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), and AIMS65 score (P < 0.05). The correlation analysis showed that LSM had significant positive relationship with PRS, GBS and AIMS65 score. Logistic regression analysis revealed that LSM and GBS score were independent risk factors for EGVB occurrence during hospitalization. ROC curve analysis showed that the combined prediction model of LSM and GBS score had the best prediction performance for EGVB occurrence, with an ROC curve area of 0.811, which was significantly better than the three risk scoring systems (P < 0.05), but similar to the predicted value of LSM (P = 0.335).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of LSM and GBS score can significantly improve the predictive efficacy of EGVB occurrence in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis during hospitalization, which has important clinical significance for patients' prognosis.

Effect of endoscopic therapy and drug therapy on prognosis and rebleeding in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding

Esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EVB) is one of the common digestive system emergencies with poor prognosis and high rate of rebleeding after treatment. To explore the effects of endoscopic therapy and drug therapy on the prognosis and rebleeding of patients with EVB, and then select better treatment methods to effectively improve the prognosis. From January 2013 to December 2022, 965 patients with EVB who were hospitalized in gastroenterology Department of the 940 Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Forces of PLA were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into endoscopic treatment group (ET, n = 586) and drug treatment group (DT, n = 379). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed in both groups, and the general information, efficacy and length of hospital stay were recorded. The patients were followed up for 3 months after bleeding control to determine whether rebleeding occurred. There were 286 cases in each group after PSM. Compared with DT group, ET had higher treatment success rate (P < 0.001), lower rebleeding rate (P < 0.001), lower mortality rate within 3 months, and no significant difference in total hospital stay (P > 0.05). Compared with drug therapy, endoscopic treatment of EVB has short-term efficacy advantages, and can effectively reduce the incidence of rebleeding and mortality within 3 months.

Efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in treating cirrhotic esophageal-gastric variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Esophageal-gastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) represents a severe complication among patients with cirrhosis and often culminates in fatal outcomes. Interventional therapy, a rapidly developing treatment modality over the past few years, has found widespread application in clinical practice due to its minimally invasive characteristics. However, whether transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) treatment has an impact on patient prognosis remains controversial.

AIM

To probing the efficacy of TIPS for treating cirrhotic EGVB and its influence on the prognosis of patients afflicted by this disease.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on ninety-two patients presenting with cirrhotic EGVB who were admitted to our hospital between September 2020 and September 2022. Based on the different modes of treatment, the patients were assigned to the study group (TIPS received, n = 50) or the control group (percutaneous transhepatic varices embolization received, n = 42). Comparative analyses were performed between the two groups preoperatively and one month postoperatively for the following parameters: Varicosity status; hemodynamic parameters [portal vein flow velocity (PVV) and portal vein diameter (PVD); platelet count (PLT); red blood cell count; white blood cell count (WBC); and hepatic function [albumin (ALB), total bilirubin (TBIL), and aspartate transaminase (AST)]. The Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 was utilized to assess quality of life in the two groups, and the 1-year postoperative rebleeding and survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

Following surgical intervention, there was an improvement in the incidence of varicosity compared to the preoperative status in both cohorts. Notably, the study group exhibited more pronounced enhancements than did the control group (P < 0.05). PVV increased, and PVD decreased compared to the preoperative values, with the study cohort achieving better outcomes (P < 0.05). PLT and WBC counts were elevated postoperatively in the two groups, with the study cohort displaying higher PLT and WBC counts (P < 0.05). No differences were detected between the two groups in terms of serum ALB, TBIL, or AST levels either preoperatively or postoperatively (P < 0.05). Postoperative scores across all dimensions of life quality surpassed preoperative scores, with the study cohort achieving higher scores (P < 0.05). At 22.00%, the one-year postoperative rebleeding rate in the study cohort was significantly lower than that in the control group (42.86%; P < 0.05); conversely, no marked difference was observed in the 1-year postoperative survival rate between the two cohorts (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TIPS, which has demonstrated robust efficacy in managing cirrhotic EGVB, remarkably alleviates varicosity and improves hemodynamics in patients. This intervention not only results in a safer profile but also contributes significantly to a more favorable prognosis.

Guidelines for the Management of Esophagogastric Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension

To standardize the diagnosis, treatment, and management of esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EVB) in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension, the Chinese Society of Hepatology, the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, and the Chinese Society of Digestive Endoscopy of the Chinese Medical Association brought together relevant experts, reviewed the latest national and international progress in clinical research on EVB in cirrhotic portal hypertension, and followed evidence-based medicine to update the Guidelines on the Management of EVB in Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension. The guidelines provide recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of EVB in cirrhotic portal hypertension and with the aim to improve the level of clinical treatment of EVB in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.

Prognosis after splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization vs transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for esophagogastric variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Portal hypertension combined with esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) is a serious complication in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis in China. Splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization (SPD) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are effective treatments for EGVB. However, a comparison of the effectiveness and safety of those methods is lacking.

AIM

To compare the prognosis after SPD vs TIPS for acute EGVB after failure of endoscopic therapy or secondary prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding (VRB) in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis combined with portal hypertension.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 318 patients with HBV-related cirrhosis and EGVB who underwent SPD or TIPS at West China Hospital of Sichuan University during 2009-2013. Propensity score-matched analysis (PSM), the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to compare overall survival, VRB rate, liver function abnormality rate, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence between the two patient groups.

RESULTS

The median age was 45.0 years (n = 318; 226 (71.1%) males). During a median follow-up duration of 43.0 mo, 18 (11.1%) and 33 (21.2%) patients died in the SPD and TIPS groups, respectively. After PSM, SPD was significantly associated with better overall survival (OS) (P = 0.01), lower rates of abnormal liver function (P < 0.001), and a lower incidence of HCC (P = 0.02) than TIPS. The VRB rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

Compared with TIPS, SPD is associated with higher postoperative OS rates, lower rates of abnormal liver function and HCC, and better quality of survival as acute EGVB treatment after failed endoscopic therapy or as secondary prophylaxis of VRB in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis combined with portal hypertension. There is no significant between-group difference in VRB rates.

Hemostatic powder for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Recent research advances

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a clinically common emergency condition. The common causes of AUGIB are peptic ulcer and esophagogastric variceal bleeding. Despite continuous improvements in endoscopic hemostasis techniques, endoscopic treatment is still unsuccessful in 5%-15% of patients. Hemostatic powder, a new drug for endoscopic hemostasis that is sprayed on the bleeding site with the assistance of an air pump, can absorb water to promote clotting substance aggregation and then adhere over the lesion, forming a mechanical barrier and then achieving hemostasis. It is convenient to spray hemostatic powder under endoscopy, where precise positioning is not warranted. The immediate hemostasis rate of hemostatic powder is often high, and it can be used as a remedy after the failure of conventional hemostasis. However, until now, there have been no recommendations in China regarding the use of hemostatic powder for the treatment of AUGIB. This article summarizes the mechanism, clinical applicability, and side effects of five major types of hemostatic powder by reviewing the existing evidence, with an aim to strengthen endoscopists' understanding of this drug.

Modified 'sandwich' injection with or without ligation for variceal bleeding in patients with both esophageal and gastric varices: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) is a serious disease with high mortality. Endoscopic therapy has long been shown to be effective but the optimum technique is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety and predictive factors of 1-year rebleeding of modified 'sandwich' injection combined with esophageal variceal ligation (EVL) for treating EGVB.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 100 patients with EGVB who underwent modified 'sandwich' injection with or without EVL (EVL + and EVL - group). Patient follow-up was 1 year. Outcomes such as control of bleeding, rebleeding, complication rate and mortality were compared. Further, prognostic factors for rebleeding at one year were estimated.

RESULTS

No significant differences between two groups regarding initial bleeding control, complications, 6-week rebleeding or mortality in 1-year were observed. Rebleeding rate at 1-year of EVL - group was significantly higher than EVL + group (40 vs 20%, p = .029). Independent predictors of rebleeding at 1-year were gender, bilirubin and whether EVL was combined with injection.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this single-center retrospective study, both of the two kinds therapies appeared to have relatively favorable outcomes. With respect to the rebleeding rate at 1-year, modified 'sandwich' injection combined with EVL may be superior to modified 'sandwich' injection alone.

Esophagogastric variceal bleeding with leukemoid reaction: A case report

Leukemoid reaction is a defense reaction to severe bacterial or viral infection, tumor metastasis, massive hemorrhage, acute hemolysis, and some drugs. The mechanism of leukemoid reaction is still unclear. The majority of published cases of leukemoid reaction are related to infection or malignant tumor, and leukemoid reaction resulting from hemorrhage is rarely reported. Here we report a case of leukemoid reaction in a patient with esophageal variceal bleeding and decompensated liver cirrhosis. After hemorrhage was controlled, the patient's leukocyte count gradually returned to the normal level.

Value of FibroScan and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, alone or in combination, in predicting esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis

AIM

To investigate the value of FibroScan and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), alone or in combination, in predicting the risk of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

Two hundred and ten patients with posthepatitic cirrhosis were divided into a non-bleeding group (n = 153) and a bleeding group (n = 57) according to the presence of esophagogastric variceal bleeding or not. FibroScan values (LSM values) and APRI values were obtained within a week and compared between the two groups using t-tests. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to assess the accuracy of LSM alone, APRI alone, and LSM + APRI in predicting the risk of esophagogastric variceal bleeding.

RESULTS

The LSM values of the patients with and without bleeding were 28.49 kPa ± 9.46 kPa and 22.87 kPa ± 6.95 kPa, respectively, and the APRI values were 2.99 ± 1.11 and 2.13 ± 1.01, respectively, both of which showed a significant difference between the two groups. The AUCs of LSM alone, APRI alone, and LSM + APRI in predicting the risk of bleeding were 0.669, 0.727 and 0.722, respectively, suggesting that APRI alone and LSM + APRI had good diagnostic value in esophagogastric variceal bleeding.

CONCLUSION

APRI alone and FibroScan combined with APRI have good predictive value for the risk of esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Two surgical procedures for esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension

AIM: To determine the clinical value of a splenorenal shunt plus pericardial devascularization (PCVD) in portal hypertension (PHT) patients with variceal bleeding.

METHODS: From January 2008 to November 2012, 290 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension were treated surgically in our department for the prevention of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding: 207 patients received a routine PCVD procedure (PCVD group), and 83 patients received a PCVD plus a splenorenal shunt procedure (combined group). Changes in hemodynamic parameters, rebleeding, encephalopathy, portal vein thrombosis, and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS: The free portal pressure decreased to 21.43 ± 4.35 mmHg in the combined group compared with 24.61 ± 5.42 mmHg in the PCVD group (P < 0.05). The changes in hemodynamic parameters were more significant in the combined group (P < 0.05). The long-term rebleeding rate was 7.22% in the combined group, which was lower than that in the PCVD group (14.93%), (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Devascularization plus splenorenal shunt is an effective and safe strategy to control esophagogastric variceal bleeding in PHT. It should be recommended as a first-line treatment for preventing bleeding in PHT patients when surgical interventions are considered.

Combined treatment of modified Sengstaken-Blakemore tube inserted by guide wire and EIS for 89 patients with severe esophagogastric variceal bleeding

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of combined treatment of modified Sengstaken-Blakemore tube inserted by guide wire and EIS for patients with severe esophagogastric variceal bleeding.

METHODS: Modified Sengstaken-Blakemore tube inserted by guide wire was performed on 89 patients with severe esophagogastric variceal bleeding, and 5min after the insertion, 35 mL on average EIS of 5% sodium morrhuate were injected into patients with esophagogastric varices. Fasting for 24 h was advised to the patients, and blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate and bleeding recurrence were also observed. Besides, intravenous drop infusion of H2A, PPI and antibiotics were given to the patients.

RESULTS: The successful rate of modified Sengstaken-Blakemore tube insertion in patients with severe esophagogastric variceal bleeding was up to 100%. Bleeding site was confirmed in 88 patients in the first surgery. Severe esophagogastric variceal bleeding was alleviated in 87 patients by EIS administration (97.7%), of which, 17 were relieved with repeated EIS, and complications occurred in 7 cases (7.86%) and 1 case died in the study (1.1%).

CONCLUSION: Combined treatment of modified Sengstaken-Blakemore tube inserted by guide wire and EIS shows relatively safe and effective performance for patients with severe esophagogastric variceal bleeding.