Total knee arthroplasty for severe valgus deformity of the knee with extra-articular deformities of the femur and tibia using a 3-dimensional image matching software system

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Knee osteoarthritis with femoral and/or tibial extra-articular deformities makes total knee arthroplasty (TKA) technically difficult to perform, especially using intramedullary-based instrumentation systems. The Athena Knee 3-dimensional (3-D) image matching software is effective for TKA with an extra-articular deformity, especially in case of using a long-stem prosthesis or not available computer-assisted navigation systems.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 79-year-old woman presented with right knee pain secondary to a progressive valgus deformity and gait disturbance. She had experienced a supracondylar femoral fracture fifteen years ago, and a tibial shaft fracture ten years ago on the same side; both of fractures were treated surgically. She had a severe valgus knee deformity and extra-articular deformity of femur and tibia, and valgus stress test detected medial knee instability. The range of motion was 0° in extension and 75° in flexion. Severe medial knee laxity compelled us to use a constrained and long-stem prosthesis, resulting in the use of an intramedullary guided system. The 3-D software system helped us to determine the amount of bone to cut as well as the appropriate entry points for the intramedullary rods and mechanical axis restoration. At two years after surgery, knee range of motion improved to 90° in flexion, and walking ability had also advanced from the use of two crutches to that of a T cane.

CONCLUSION

The 3-D image matching software system for preoperative planning was useful for TKA with extra-articular deformity, especially in the case of a long-stem prosthesis without using a navigation system.

Valgus arthritic knees can be classified into nine phenotypes

PURPOSE

It is not shown whether anatomical variations exist in valgus arthritic limbs as to support individualized component and limb alignment. The null hypothesis was that there was no phenotypic variation of coronal femoro-tibial morphology in valgus knees. The aim was to determine whether distinct phenotypes of valgus knees could be identified to help surgical planning and classifying valgus knees for outcome studies.

METHODS

Full-leg weight-bearing radiographs of 233 knees (182 preoperative; 51 of contralateral arthritic knee) were measured for HKA (hip-knee-ankle angle), VCA (valgus correction angle), mLDFA (lateral mechanical distal femoral angle), aLDFA (lateral anatomical distal femoral angle), MPTA (medial proximal tibial angle), MNSA (medial neck shaft angle), TAMA (angle between tibial mechanical and anatomical axes), and TBA (tibial bowing angle).

RESULTS

Nine phenotypes were identified encompassing all 233 knees which could be clubbed into 4 broad types. Type 1 Neutral knees (12.5%) had almost normal values (mean VCA 5.3°, mLDFA 86.9°, aLDFA 81.1°). Type 2 'Intra-articular valgus' (22.7%) showed lateral compartment bone loss (mean mLDFA 83.9°; MPTA 90.2°). Type 3 'Extra-articular valgus' (35.2%) had extra-articular deformity: 3a showed valgus femoral bowing (mean VCA 2.7°); 3b valgus tibial bowing; 3c showed valgus tibial bowing with lateral femoral condyle wear (mean mLDFA 84.3°). Type 4 'Varus' type (29.6%) had features of varus knees: 4a had varus femoral bowing (VCA 8.3°); distal femur in 4b was akin to varus knees (mean mLDFA 89.3°) with lateral tibial bone loss (mean MPTA 91.2°). 4c had varus tibial bowing and deficient lateral femoral condyle (mLDFA 83.7°). 4d had varus tibial bowing and lateral tibial bone loss (mean MPTA 89.8°).

CONCLUSIONS

The study identified four broad groups of valgus arthritic knees with nine phenotypes based on coronal plane variations in femoro-tibial morphology. This study may be of value in planning and performing corrective osteotomies, and planning the optimal position of femoral and tibial components in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. The classification presented in this study may aid in categorizing valgus knees for outcome studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Seven phenotypes of varus osteoarthritic knees can be identified in the coronal plane

PURPOSE

Recommendations for resecting distal femur and proximal tibia in mechanical and anatomical alignment techniques are standardized. Kinematic alignment propagates individualizing resection planes. Whether significant variation exists, to warrant departure from standardized resection planes, has not been shown thus far in a large cohort of knees and with a wide range of varus deformity. The null hypothesis of this study was that there was no phenotypic variation in varus osteoarthritic knees. The aim of this paper was to determine whether distinct phenotypes could be identified, based on variations in coronal femoral and tibial morphology, which could aid in surgical planning and categorizing varus knees for future studies.

METHODS

2129 full-leg weightbearing radiographs were analyzed (1704 preoperative; 425 of contralateral arthritic knee). Measurements made were of HKA (hip-knee-ankle angle), VCA (valgus correction angle), mLDFA (lateral mechanical distal femoral angle), aLDFA (lateral anatomical distal femoral angle), MPTA (medial proximal tibial angle), MNSA (medial neck shaft angle), TAMA (angle between tibial mechanical and anatomical axes), and TPDR (percentage length of tibia proximal to extra-articular deformity).

RESULTS

Seven distinct types were identified covering 2021 knees, reducible to 4 broad phenotypes: 11% were Type 1 'Neutral' knees showing values close to reported normal knees (mean VCA 5.5°, mLDFA 87°, aLDFA 81°). 38% were Type 2 'Intra-articular varus' with medial intra-articular bone loss (mean mLDFA 90.9°, MPTA 85.4°, VCA of 5.7°). 41% were Type 3 'Extra-articular varus' with extra-articular deformity (EAD). Type 3a had proximal tibial EAD; Type 3b had tibial diaphyseal EAD; Type 3c had femoral EAD (mean VCA 8.7°, HKA 166°), and severe medial bone loss (mean mLDFA 92°, MPTA 83°). 9% were Type 4 'Valgoid type' with features of valgus knees: Type 4a had medial femoral bowing (mean VCA 2.9°); Type 4b had significant distal femoral valgus (mean mLDFA 85.3°, aLDFA 78.6°).

CONCLUSIONS

The null hypothesis that there was no phenotypic variation in varus osteoarthritic knees was rejected as considerable variation was found in coronal morphology of femur and tibia. Four broad phenotypic groups could be identified. Plane of the knee joint articular surface was quite variable. This has relevance to planning and performance of corrective osteotomies, unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Handheld computer-navigated constrained total knee arthroplasty for complex extra-articular deformities

INTRODUCTION

The present study aimed to assess the postoperative alignment and clinical outcomes of patients with complex extra-articular deformities (EADs) undergoing computer-assisted surgery (CAS) for constrained total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with modular stem extensions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From May 2015 to July 2018, ten patients with EADs scheduled for constrained TKA were enrolled retrospectively. The preoperative average deviation from neutral (= 180°) mechanical axis was 15.3° (range of coronal alignment: 150.9° varus-202.9° valgus). Alignment was assessed using an accelerometer-based handheld CAS system. On long-leg films, the positions of the components and possible stems were analysed and templated preoperatively. The average follow-up was 3.3 years (range: 2.0-4.6 years).

RESULTS

The postoperative mechanical axis was within ± 3.0° from neutral in nine patients. In all patients, the Knee Society score (KSS) and range of motion improved significantly. A constrained condylar and a rotating hinge prosthesis were used in five patients each. In eight patients, the 100-mm cementless stem that was preferred by the authors was found to be unusable for the femur or the tibia in the planning stage. For the femur, a cementless 100-mm stem was used in three, and a cemented 30-mm stem in five patients; a femoral stem was not usable in two patients. For the tibia, a cementless 100-mm stem was used in six, and a cemented 30-mm stem in two patients; a monoblock rotating hinge tibia was used in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex EADs were excellently managed during constrained TKA implantation using the handheld CAS system. Templating allowed the possible stem lengths to be identified and prevented anatomical conflict with the CAS-configured mechanical alignment. Limb alignment and function improved significantly after surgery. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective study.

Single-stage total knee arthroplasty and femoral osteotomy for osteoarthritis with severe supracondylar deformity

Background

Knee osteoarthritis associated with extra-articular deformity (EAD) can confront the arthroplasty surgeons with challenges of bone resection and soft tissue balancing. The aim of this study was to describe a single-stage procedure associating corrective osteotomy with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to determine the outcome at mid- to long-term follow-up.

Methods

A total of seven patients (seven knees) with knee osteoarthritis and supracondylar deformity were included in this study. Six patients were female, and one was male, with the median age of 62 years (range, 37-76 years). All patients were treated with single-stage TKA and femoral osteotomy. Osteotomy was fixed with long cemented stem. Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) scores, collateral ligament laxity, and range of motion (ROM) were clinically evaluated preoperatively and at each follow-up. Radiographic parameters including the mechanical axis deviation (MAD), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and joint line congruence angle (JLCA) were also measured. The occurrence of perioperative complications was recorded.

Results

The median follow-up time was 91 months (range, 38-104 months). At the last follow-up, all components were stable and no patients required revision. Nonunion of the osteotomy occurred in one patient. In all patients, the lower limb mechanical alignment improved greatly. The mean angle of MAD was restored from 10.49±6.05 cm preoperatively to 1.11±4.97 cm postoperatively. The 90° mLDFA was almost acquired in all cases, with the postoperative value of 90.79±2.40°. After operation, the mMPTA improved from 84.18±6.13° to 91.33±3.13°. The JLCA changed from 2.94±1.61° to −0.71±3.50°. The median HSS score improved from 45 (range, 34-56) preoperatively to 90 (range, 82-97) postoperatively, with the outcome of all patients rated good to excellent. The median ROM improved from 70° (range 0–110°) preoperatively to 105° (range 90–125°) postoperatively. No instability of knee joint was observed. Complications included an intraoperative split fracture of distal femur and one case of wound exudation resulting from fat liquefaction.

Conclusions

For knee osteoarthritis with femoral supracondylar deformity, single-stage TKA and corrective osteotomy was feasible but technically demanding. The use of long cemented stem for osteotomy fixation can provide reliable rotational control of the bone segments.

[Clinical effect of one-stage total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis with femoral extra-articular deformity]

Objective: To investigate the application and efficacy of the one-stage total knee arthroplasty (TKA) of intra-articular compensation osteotomy in knee osteoarthritis(KOA) patients with extra-articular deformity (EAD). Methods: A retrospective study of 9 patients with end-stage KOA and EAD undergoing one-stage TKA from January 2014 to December 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University was performed. There were 3 males and 6 females with an average age of 56 years(range, 19-77 years);5 cases of simple coronal deformity (varus 10°-27°, mean 18.2°), 3 cases of sagittal deformity (recurvatum15°-35°, mean 22.6°), 1 case combined with coronal and sagittal deformity (varus 16°, recurvatum 31°); hemophilia dysplasia in 1 case, fracture malformation in 8 cases. Main outcome measures included the mechanical axis, range of motion (ROM) and Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS). Results: The mean follow-up period was 33.2 months (range, 25-47 months). The mechanical axis angle was restored from 12.4°±4.1°to 1.4°±0.9°(t=7.954, P<0.01). The HSS was improved from 28±14 preoperatively to 87±7 postoperatively (t=-11.174, P=0.013). The ROM increased from 56°±22°to 99°±8° (t=-5.480, P=0.010). There was no complications such as joint instability, infection, fracture, common peroneal nerve injury and early prosthesis loosening. Conclusions: For KOA patients with femoral EAD, one-stage TKA with intra-articular compensatory osteotomy can effectively restore the mechanical axis and obtain satisfying joint function. Through a series of measures such as preoperative measurement, soft tissue evaluation and 3D printing, the accuracy of surgery can be improved and the difficulty of surgery can be reduced.

Deformity correction with total knee arthroplasty for severe knee osteoarthritis accompanying extra-articular femoral deformity: the results are promising

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate patients with severe degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee and extra-articular femoral deformities treated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and acute deformity correction.

METHODS

Ten patients with severe degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee and extra-articular femoral deformities were included, and the median age was 63 years (range 38-67). The etiology was post-traumatic malunion in four patients, rickets sequelae in four patients, and surgical sequelae due to multiple epiphyseal dysplasia in two patients. The severity of degenerative osteoarthritis and deformity analyses were assessed according to the Kellgren-Lawrence and Paley criteria, respectively. The median number of previous operations the patients had undergone was two (range 0-3), and the median Oxford Knee Society score was 9 (range 5-13) before treatment. All patients were treated with primary TKA and deformity correction in the same surgery. The TKA was completed first, followed by an osteotomy at the apex of the deformity. Finally, a retrograde intramedullary nail was inserted.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 44 (31-60) months. A stable and functional knee joint, a physiological mechanical axis, and solid osseous union were achieved in all patients. Late prosthetic failure was seen in one patient due to deep infection. The median Oxford Knee Society score was 42 (range 37-47) at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining several procedures in single setting for the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis accompanied by extra-articular deformity may eliminate the need for multiple surgeries. Furthermore, a proper physiological mechanical axis can be obtained without causing substantial bone loss.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Outcomes after knee arthroplasty in extra-articular deformity

PURPOSE

To assess functional outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without previous corrective osteotomy for treatment of knee osteoarthritis associated with extra-articular deformity.

METHODS

From January to December 2016, patients with knee osteoarthritis with extra-articular deformities who presented for preoperative assessment before TKA were evaluated prospectively. Physical and radiological characteristics were documented pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

TKA was performed in 33 knees; 25 were considered for analysis. The mean age was 65.2 years (range, 48-79 years). Sixteen deformities were secondary to fractures and nine to failed osteotomies. The mean Knee Society Score (KSS) improved from 27.1 pre-operatively to 68.7 post-operatively (p = 0.000). Pre-operative mechanical axis ranged from 32° varus (negative) to 26° valgus. After correction, 20 knees were within 3° (varus or valgus) of mechanical alignment.

CONCLUSION

In patients with extra-articular deformities, TKA with asymmetric intra-articular resection and ligament balancing can relieve pain and realign the mechanical axis of the lower limb.

Single-stage total knee arthroplasty and osteotomy as treatment of secondary osteoarthritis with severe coronal deviation of joint surface due to extra-articular deformity

PURPOSE

Severe extra-articular deformities can be treated with single-stage total knee replacement (TKA) and osteotomy. Aim of this study was to examine the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the complications after single-stage TKA and osteotomy. We hypothesized patients achieve good outcome after single-stage TKA and osteotomy, which is comparable to outcome after primary TKA without deformity.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with severe extra-articular deformity who underwent single-stage TKA and deformity-correcting osteotomy were reviewed and invited to fill in PROMs including the Oxford Knee Score, the Short Form-12, a Visual Analogue Scale for pain, and questions about satisfaction and quality of life.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 64 months. Ten patients were treated with TKA and supracondylar femoral osteotomy. Although PROMs showed good results (mean quality of life score was 85 out of 100), two patients had a revision of the osteotomy due to non-union. Eleven patients were treated with TKA and high tibial osteotomy. Patients were satisfied with the results (mean quality of life score was 81 out of 100). Two patients developed infection requiring debridement, resulting in one arthrodesis and one gastrocnemius transfer for wound closure.

CONCLUSION

In general, patients were satisfied with the postoperative result. Outcome was comparable to patients after primary TKA in the literature. However, serious complications need to be taken into account.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instruments improves function and restores limb alignment in patients with extra-articular deformity

BACKGROUND

Restoring function and alignment when treating knee arthritis with a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients who have an extra-articular deformity (EAD) from a malunion or with retained femoral hardware is a challenge. The normal anatomical landmarks are hard to find and difficult to use to obtain correct alignment. The procedure will be further challenged by angular deformity of the femur or tibia. A retrospective study was performed on a case series of patients with EAD or obliteration of the canal treated with patient-specific instruments (PSI).

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective review of 10 patients with multiplanar deformities in which the knee components were aligned with patient-specific instruments was performed. Outcome and alignment were studied.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 3.4years, function improved from preoperative as evidenced by a mean increase in the KS pain score of 53 points, KS function score of 48 points and Oxford Score of 28 points (P<0.05). Flexion improved from 94° +/- 11° to 112° +/- 15° (P<0.05). Limb alignment was restored with a mean Hip-Knee-Ankle angle of 179.3° +/- 1.3° (P<0.05). Maximum outliers were 177° to 181°. An average tourniquet time of 75 +/- 9minutes (range, 62-83min) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of patient-specific instrumentation systems to perform TKA in patients without access to the intramedullary canal because of EAD or fixation devices, improved function and restored limb alignment. Mechanical alignment can easily be obtained with this technique by intra-articular correction of deformities under 20°.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.