Psychometric properties of the Persian-version of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale and Fall Efficacy Scale-International in Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Balance impairment and fear of falling are two common risk factors for falls in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Clinicians should use valid, reliable, and responsive tools to assess these risk factors and identify individuals at increased risk for falls. So, this study aimed to examine psychometric properties of the Persian-version of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale and Fall Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) in Iranian PwMS.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-three PwMS completed the Persian versions of ABC, FES-I, Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in the first session. To assess the test-retest reliability, 50 PwMS filled out ABC, and FES-I in retest session with an interval of 2-7 days. Also, for evaluating responsiveness, 50 PwMS completed ABC and FES-I before and after a 4-week treatment.

RESULTS

Intra-class Correlation Coefficients were 0.96 and 0.93 and Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.96 and 0.99 for the ABC and FES-I, respectively. There were significant correlations (p < .001) between ABC and BBS (r = 0.55), FES-I and BBS (r = -0.56), ABC and MSWS-12 (r = -0.72), and FES-I and MSWS-12 (r = 0.76). No floor or ceiling effect was found. ABC and FES-I had acceptable responsiveness (AUC > 0.70), and their minimally important difference (MID) were 10.5 and 9.5 points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Persian-versions of ABC and FES-I are reliable, valid, and responsive measures to quantify balance confidence and fear of falling in PwMS at both clinical and research settings. The MID can help clinicians to make a decision based on the clinical significance of changes in patients' status.

Clinical assessment of fear of falling after stroke: validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Persian version of the Fall Efficacy Scale-International

BACKGROUND

Fear of falling may be related to falling during stroke onset. The Fall Efficacy ScaleInternational (FES-I) with excellent psychometric properties, is an instrument developed to assess patients' concerns about fallings. The aim of this study was to determine validation of this scale in Iranian patients with stroke.

METHODS

The "forward-backward" procedure was applied to translate the FES-I from English to Persian. One hundred-twenty patients who had suffered stroke, aged 40 to 80 years (55% male) completed the Persian FES-I, Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed up and Go (TUG) questionnaires. The interval time for the test-retest of the Persian scale was 7-14 days.

RESULTS

The test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities of the Persian FES-I were excellent (ICC2,1=0.98, p<0.001) and the internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha=0.78). Factor analysis of the 16 items in the Persian scale showed only one significant factor. The total Persian FES-I score had a significantly negative correlation (p<0.001) with the BBS, but it had significantly positive correlation with the TUG, GHQ-28, and GDS-15. The difference in responsiveness scores across fallers and non-fallers yielded a large effect size (0.46), which indicated a good discriminating validity.

CONCLUSION

The Persian FES-I proved to be an effective and valuable measurement tool to assess stroke patients' fear of falling in practice and research setting.