Collaborative Recognition of Wellbeing Needs: A Novel Approach to Universal Psychosocial Screening on the Neonatal Unit

Universal screening for the psychological needs of families in neonatal care is internationally recommended, but is not routinely practiced in the United Kingdom (UK). The present quality improvement project explores the clinical and operational feasibility of a novel approach to universal screening on a neonatal intensive care unit in the UK. The approach to screening taken adopts collaborative, strengths-based and dialogical methods for recognising the psychological needs of families whose baby is in hospital. A novel screening tool, developed through consultation with families, is described. Over one month, 42 out of 80 eligible families engaged with the screening protocol either at admission to the unit, transition to the special care nursery within the unit, or discharge home, with completion rates higher at admission than discharge. This led to an eightfold increase in the number of families accessing targeted or specialist psychological intervention compared to the period prior to this pilot. This project demonstrates the need for adequate capacity in the workforce to carry out a screening programme and to respond to the needs identified.

Knowledge translation strategies used for sustainability of an evidence-based intervention in child health: a multimethod qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Sustainability of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) is suboptimal in healthcare. Evidence on how knowledge translation (KT) strategies are used for the sustainability of EBIs in practice is lacking. This study examined what and how KT strategies were used to facilitate the sustainability of Alberta Family Integrated Care (FICare)™, a psychoeducational model of care scaled and spread across 14 neonatal intensive care units, in Alberta, Canada.

METHODS

First, we conducted an environmental scan of relevant documents to determine the use of KT strategies to support the sustainability of Alberta FICare™. Second, we conducted semi-structured interviews with decision makers and operational leaders to explore what and how KT strategies were used for the sustainability of Alberta FICare™, as well as barriers and facilitators to using the KT strategies for sustainability. We used the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) taxonomy to code the strategies. Lastly, we facilitated consultation meetings with the Alberta FICare™ leads to share and gain insights and clarification on our findings.

RESULTS

We identified nine KT strategies to facilitate the sustainability of Alberta FICare™: Conduct ongoing training; Identify and prepare local champions; Research co-production; Remind clinicians; Audit and provide feedback; Change record systems; Promote adaptability; Access new funding; and Involve patients/consumers and family members. A significant barrier to the sustainability of Alberta FICare™ was a lack of clarity on who was responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the intervention. A key facilitator to sustainability of Alberta FICare was its alignment with the Maternal, Newborn, Child & Youth Strategic Clinical Network (MNCY SCN) priorities. Co-production between researchers and health system partners in the design, implementation, and scale and spread of Alberta FICare™ was critical to sustainability.

CONCLUSION

This research highlights the importance of clearly articulating who is responsible for continued championing for the sustainability of EBIs. Additionally, our research demonstrates that the adaptation of interventions must be considered from the onset of implementation so interventions can be tailored to align with contextual barriers for sustainability. Clear guidance is needed to continually support researchers and health system leaders in co-producing strategies that facilitate the long-term sustainability of effective EBIs in practice.