A New Risk Prediction Model for Detecting Endoscopic Activity of Ulcerative Colitis

Background/Aims

: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an incurable, relapsing-remitting inflammatory disease that increases steadily. Mucosal healing has become the primary therapeutic objective for UC. Nevertheless, endoscopic assessments are invasive, expensive, time-consuming, and inconvenient. Therefore, it is crucial to develop a noninvasive predictive model to monitor endoscopic activity in patients with UC.

Methods

: Clinical data of 198 adult patients with UC were collected from January 2016 to August 2022 at Huadong Hospital, China.

Results

: Patients with UC were randomly divided into the training cohort (70%, n=138) and the validation cohort (30%, n=60). The receiver operating characteristic curve value for the training group was 0.858 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.781 to 0.936), whereas it was 0.845 (95% CI, 0.731 to 0.960) for the validation group. The calibration curve employed the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (p>0.05) to demonstrate the consistency between the predicted and the actual probabilities in the nomogram of these two groups. The decision curve analysis validated that the nomogram had clinical usefulness.

Conclusions

: The nomogram, which incorporated activated partial thromboplastin time, fecal occult blood test, β2-globulin level, and fibrinogen degradation products, served as a prospective tool for evaluating UC activity in clinical practices.

Correlation of Fecal Markers with Magnifying Endoscopic Stratification in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Who Are in Clinical Remission

BACKGROUND

Maintenance of mucosal healing is recommended during the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, symptoms of UC often do not reflect mucosal disease activity. Fecal markers such as calprotectin, lactoferrin, and hemoglobin have been reported to correlate well with the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) and are being considered alternative monitoring tools in endoscopy. Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) is a new and more detailed endoscopic scoring system compared to MES. Furthermore, magnifying endoscopic stratification (ME) based on alterations in the mucosal surface pit patterns is noted in UC. However, the association between fecal markers and UCIES and magnifying endoscopy is relatively unexplored.

SUMMARY

This study investigated the association between the aforementioned fecal markers and MES, UCEIS, and ME in patients with UC in clinical remission. This prospective study included 60 patients with UC in clinical remission who underwent colonoscopy at the Nagasaki University Hospital between June 2015 and November 2016. A significant correlation was observed between MES and all fecal markers. Notably, the fecal markers correlated well with UCEIS (calprotectin Spearman's correlation coefficient [r] = 0.54, p < 0.0001; lactoferrin r = 0.56, p < 0.0001; and hemoglobin r = 0.43, p < 0.001). Furthermore, ME findings correlated significantly with calprotectin (r = 0.50, p = 0.0002) and lactoferrin (r = 0.46, p = 0.0006) levels and slightly with hemoglobin (r = 0.28, p = 0.043) levels. Moreover, each cutoff level of fecal calprotectin, lactoferrin, or hemoglobin had a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of MES = 0, UCEIS = 0, ME = A, for predicting mucosa healing. Key Messages: Fecal markers correlated not only with MES but also with UCEIS and ME and should be useful for monitoring patients with UC in clinical remission.

Fecal fusobacterium nucleatum for detecting colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of fecal Fusobacterium nucleatum ( Fn) for detecting colorectal cancer. It is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to focus exclusively on fecal Fn for colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Comprehensive searches of several databases before January 2018 were conducted. Fecal Fn for detecting colorectal cancer was evaluated via pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve. Heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression and subgroup analyses. The publication bias and the overall quality of evidence were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Our analysis included six papers containing seven case-control studies in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64, 0.72) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.75, 0.81), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio in detecting colorectal cancer were 2.87 (95% CI 1.62, 5.10) and 0.40 (95% CI 0.30, 0.54) respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (OR) was 8.75 (95% CI 4.86, 15.78) and the area under the curve was 0.80. A subgroup analysis showed that in Asia, the colorectal cancer sample size ⩾50 had higher specificity (specificity 0.85, 95% CI 0.80, 0.88). No publication bias existed. The GRADEpro showed a moderate level of the available evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to other examinations, the fecal Fn test seems a good choice for detecting colorectal cancer. It also has better diagnostic performance in Asians. However, more clinical trials with large sample sizes and strict randomization are needed to further verify the evidence.

Fecal Calprotectin

Calprotectin is a 36kDa member of the S100 family of proteins. It is derived predominantly from neutrophils and has direct antimicrobial effects and a role within the innate immune response. Calprotectin is found in various body fluids in proportion to the degree of any existing inflammation and its concentration in feces is about six times that of plasma. Measurement of fecal calprotectin is a useful surrogate marker of gastrointestinal inflammation. It has a high negative predictive value in ruling out inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in undiagnosed, symptomatic patients and a high sensitivity for diagnosing the disease making it useful as a tool for prioritising endoscopy. In patients with known IBD, fecal calprotectin can be a useful tool to assist management, providing evidence of relapse or mucosal healing to enable therapy to be intensified or reduced. There are a number of commercial calprotectin assays with marked difference in performance as judged by external quality assessment and at present no standardised reference material exists. Various factors may affect results including age, medication and day to day variation. Laboratories should therefore be mindful of the characteristics of their own assay and factors that may affect results.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the anthropogenic marker isolithocholic acid in water

Bile acids are promising chemical markers to assess the pollution of water samples with fecal material. This study describes the optimization and validation of a direct competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the bile acid isolithocholic acid (ILA). The quantification range of the optimized assay was between 0.09 and 15 μg/L. The assay was applied to environmental water samples. Most studies until now were focused on bile acid fractions in the particulate phase of water samples. In order to avoid tedious sample preparation, we undertook to evaluate the dynamics and significance of ILA levels in the aqueous phase. Very low concentrations in tap and surface water samples made a pre-concentration step necessary for this matrix as well as for wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent. Mean recoveries for spiked water samples were between 97% and 109% for tap water and WWTP influent samples and between 102% and 136% for WWTP effluent samples. 90th percentiles of intra-plate and inter-plate coefficients of variation were below 10% for influents and below 20% for effluents and surface water. ILA concentrations were quantified in the range of 33-72 μg/L in influent, 21-49 ng/L in effluent and 18-48 ng/L in surface water samples. During wastewater treatment the ILA levels were reduced by more than 99%. ILA concentrations of influents determined by ELISA and LC-MS/MS were in good agreement. However, findings in LC-ELISA experiments suggest that the true ILA levels in concentrated samples are lower due to interfering effects of matrix compounds and/or cross-reactants. Yet, the ELISA will be a valuable tool for the performance check and comparison of WWTPs and the localization of fecal matter input into surface waters.

Fecal calprotectin one year after ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease--a comparison with findings at ileocolonoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease is commonly performed. The severity of endoscopic lesions in the anastomotic area one year postoperatively is considered to reflect the subsequent clinical course. Fecal calprotectin (FC) has been shown to correlate with the findings at ileocolonoscopy in Crohn's disease. The objectives of this study were to assess whether the concentration of FC reflects the endoscopic findings one year after ileocaecal resection and to evaluate the variation of FC in individual patients during 6months prior to the ileocolonoscopy.

METHODS

Thirty patients with Crohn's disease and ileocaecal resection performed within one year were included. Stool samples were delivered monthly until an ileocolonoscopy was performed one year postoperatively.

RESULTS

One year after surgery the median values of FC were not significantly different between the patients in endoscopic remission (n=17) and the patients with an endoscopic recurrence (189 (75-364) vs 227 (120-1066)μg/g; p=0.25). However, most patients with low values were in remission and all patients with high (>600μg/g) calprotectin values had recurrent disease. The variability of the FC concentration was most pronounced in patients with diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no statistical difference in the concentrations of calprotectin between patients in endoscopic remission and patients with a recurrent disease one year after ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease. However, among the minority of patients with low or high values, FC indicated remission and recurrence, respectively. There was significant variation of the fecal calprotectin concentrations over time, which affects the utility of calprotectin in clinical practice.