A fluorophotometric comparison of anterior chamber riboflavin delivery via corneal application and fornix instillation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether riboflavin self-administration by patients could be a feasible option for corneal cross-linking, given the considerable resources required to impregnate the cornea with riboflavin. We analysed whether administering riboflavin in the inferior fornix (the site of self-administration) results in non-inferior riboflavin concentrations as when applied directly on the cornea (the site of administration by medical personnel).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective study to evaluate riboflavin concentrations at six time-points (baseline, 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60min) in 18 healthy volunteers for each of two application sites: cornea and fornix. Anterior chamber riboflavin (Peschke® TE 0.25%) concentrations were measured by fluorophotometry (Fluorotron™ Master FM-2).

RESULTS

For the two application sites cornea and fornix, participants did not differ in terms of age and sex. At baseline, the autofluorescence in the anterior chamber was 16.7ng/mL (SD 5.5) and 14.6ng/mL (SD 4.6) (P=.221). After 30min, anterior chamber fluorescein concentrations had risen to 55.1ng/mL (SD 25.5) and 46.1ng/mL (SD 25.1) (P=.293) without a further relevant increase by 60min.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that applying riboflavin drops in the inferior fornix was non-inferior to applying it directly to the cornea, based on fluorophotometric measurements of anterior chamber riboflavin concentrations. This suggests that self-application of riboflavin is feasible in terms of corneal riboflavin impregnation.

Tear exchange and contact lenses: a review

Tear exchange beneath a contact lens facilitates ongoing fluid replenishment between the ocular surface and the lens. This exchange is considerably lower during the wear of soft lenses compared with rigid lenses. As a result, the accumulation of tear film debris and metabolic by-products between the cornea and a soft contact lens increases, potentially leading to complications. Lens design innovations have been proposed, but no substantial improvement in soft lens tear exchange has been reported. Researchers have determined post-lens tear exchange using several methods, notably fluorophotometry. However, due to technological limitations, little remains known about tear hydrodynamics around the lens and, to-date, true tear exchange with contact lenses has not been shown. Further knowledge regarding tear exchange could be vital in aiding better contact lens design, with the prospect of alleviating certain adverse ocular responses. This article reviews the literature to-date on the significance, implications and measurement of tear exchange with contact lenses.