1
|
Mulheron S, Leahy TP, McStravick M, Doran R, Delanty N. A comparison of cenobamate with other newer antiseizure medications for adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Seizure 2024; 118:80-90. [PMID: 38643679 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cenobamate with other newer anti-seizure medications (ASMs) including brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, perampanel, and zonisamide, approved for adjunctive treatment of drug-resistant focal-onset seizures (FOS) in adults with epilepsy. METHODS A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to obtain relevant efficacy, safety, and tolerability data for ASMs for the treatment of drug-resistant FOS. All studies were thoroughly assessed for potential sources of heterogeneity and analysed via Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs). Efficacy outcomes were ≥50 % responder rate and seizure freedom during the maintenance period, which were modelled simultaneously using a multinomial Bayesian NMA. Safety and tolerability outcomes were the proportion of patients who experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and the proportion who experienced at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation. RESULTS The SLR identified 76 studies, of which 23 were included in the Bayesian NMAs. Cenobamate was associated with statistically significant higher rates for the ≥50 % responder rate and seizure freedom outcomes compared with all ASMs analysed. The point estimates indicated that cenobamate was associated with higher rates of experiencing at least one TEAE and at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation compared with brivaracetam, lacosamide, and zonisamide; however, no results were statistically significant. CONCLUSION Cenobamate was associated with increased efficacy compared with all ASMs analysed. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety and tolerability outcomes. The results presented corroborate the conclusions drawn from previous published NMAs, which also highlight the notable efficacy of cenobamate in comparison with other ASMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Mulheron
- Angelini Pharma UK-I, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London WC1V 6AZ, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moseley B, Bourikas D, Dimova S, Elmoufti S, Borghs S. Efficacy and Tolerability of Adjunctive Brivaracetam in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures on Specific Concomitant Antiseizure Medications: Pooled Analysis of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials. Adv Ther 2024; 41:1746-1758. [PMID: 38356105 PMCID: PMC10960767 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02795-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This article aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in adults with focal-onset seizures on specific concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) taken as part of their treatment regimen. METHODS This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (N01252/NCT00490035, N01253/NCT00464269, and N01358/NCT01261325) in patients with uncontrolled focal-onset seizures randomized to BRV (50-200 mg/day) or placebo on the most common concomitant ASMs at trial initiation. RESULTS Nine concomitant ASMs were analyzed: carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), valproate (VPA), oxcarbazepine (OXC), topiramate (TPM), phenytoin (PHT), lacosamide (LCM), clobazam (CLB), and phenobarbital (PHB). Reduction over placebo in focal-onset seizure frequency per 28 days with BRV ranged from 11.7% (concomitant OXC) to 33.5% (concomitant PHB). The median percentage reduction from baseline in focal-onset seizure frequency per 28 days ranged from 25.5% to 42.8% in patients on BRV (placebo 4.4-21.2%); 50% responder rates ranged from 31.9% to 44.9% in patients on BRV (placebo 11.4-25.2%). In patients on BRV, seizure freedom ranged from 1.4% (concomitant PHT) to 12.5% (concomitant LCM); seizure freedom ranged from 0% to 1.2% in patients on placebo. All efficacy endpoints analyzed were consistently numerically higher in patients on BRV versus placebo. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was generally similar across subgroups by specific concomitant ASMs in patients on BRV (range 60.8-74.5%) or placebo (range 53.8-66.7%). Drug-related TEAEs were numerically higher across all subgroups by concomitant ASM in patients on BRV (range 35.2-48.3%) versus placebo (range 23.9-37.1%). Discontinuations due to TEAEs ranged from 2.9% to 13.3% in patients on BRV and was 0-5.7% for patients taking placebo across subgroups. CONCLUSION BRV was efficacious and well tolerated regardless of the specific concomitant ASMs used as part of their treatment regimen. These data show that in patients with focal-onset seizures, BRV provides additional efficacy to a broad range of ASMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Moseley
- UCB Pharma, 4000 Paramount Pkwy, Morrisville, NC, 27560, USA.
| | | | | | - Sami Elmoufti
- UCB Pharma, 4000 Paramount Pkwy, Morrisville, NC, 27560, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nishimoto S, Kitai Y, Hirai S, Hirotsune M, Okuyama N, Hirano S, Mogami Y, Arai H. Childhood-onset epilepsy in patients with dyskinetic cerebral palsy caused by basal ganglia and thalamic lesions. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2023; 47:41-46. [PMID: 37708783 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To elucidate the incidence and outcomes of childhood-onset epilepsy and associated factors in term-born patients with basal ganglia and thalamic lesion (BGTL)-induced dyskinetic cerebral palsy (DCP) caused by perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). METHODS We studied 104 term-born patients with BGTL-induced DCP (63 males and 41 females, aged 2-22 years) to investigate the incidence of epilepsy and the factors related to its development. We used multivariate analysis to assess perinatal factors, gross motor function, and the extent of brain lesions. We also investigated the seizure onset, clinical course, and electroencephalography (EEG) characteristics. RESULTS The cumulative epilepsy incidence was 36%. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that deep white matter lesions were the only independent risk factor for epilepsy. The confirmed seizure types included epileptic spasms (ES, n = 13), myoclonic seizures (MS, n = 6), and focal-onset seizures (FS, n = 24). Only patients with deep white matter lesions exhibited ES or MS. The symptoms of FS resembled those of self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes; however, only half of the patients reached remission by the time of investigation, and four patients had more than one seizure per month despite appropriate drug therapy. Focal spikes in the peri-rolandic area were detected not only in patients with FS but also in half of the patients without epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS One-third of term-born patients with BGTL-induced DCP caused by perinatal HIE develop epilepsy, and deep white matter lesions increase the likelihood of epilepsy. Preparation for early-onset ES, MS, and subsequent FS is beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shizuka Nishimoto
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Bobath Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Yukihiro Kitai
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Bobath Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Satori Hirai
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Bobath Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Mika Hirotsune
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Bobath Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Naomi Okuyama
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Bobath Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Shodo Hirano
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Bobath Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Yukiko Mogami
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Osaka Medical Center and Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Hiroshi Arai
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Bobath Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
TingtingYang, CuihuaYan, Han T, Huai kuanWu, JunjiHu, YujiaoWu, Jin Y, Jiang J, Xue wuLiu. Efficacy and safety of zonisamide as the first additional treatment in Chinese patients with focal or secondary bilateral tonic-clonic seizures: An observational ,prospective study. Heliyon 2023; 9:e17384. [PMID: 37539261 PMCID: PMC10395020 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the efficacy and safety of zonisamide (ZNS) as the first additional treatment for focal or secondarily bilateral tonic-clonic seizure (sBTCS). Methods A total of 118 patients between 18 and 75 years of age with focal or sBTCS were recruited from multiple hospitals in Shandong province between May 13, 2021, and February 16, 2022. All received ZNS as the first additional treatment after clinical judgment. Seizure frequency, retention, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed 2 and 5 months after the introduction of ZNS. Results Overall response rates at 2 and 5 months were 79.5% and 75.5%, respectively, whereas seizure-free rates at the same point were 53.6% and 51%, respectively. The review's retention rates at 2 and 5 months were 95% and 86%, respectively. The most common AEs were anorexia with weight loss (11.8%), dizziness (6.9%), and headache (3.9%). Conclusions Our real-world study confirmed the efficacy and safety of ZNS as a first-additional treatment for focal or sBTCS in Chinese patients, with a high short-term retention rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- TingtingYang
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, China
| | - CuihuaYan
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, China
| | - Tao Han
- Department of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, China
| | - Huai kuanWu
- Department of Interventional Medicine, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, China
| | - JunjiHu
- Department of Neurology, Zibo Changguo Hospital, Zibo Shandong, China
| | - YujiaoWu
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, China
| | - Yang Jin
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, China
| | - Jing Jiang
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, China
| | - Xue wuLiu
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, China
- Institute of Epilepsy, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lim SC, Lee WG, Kim DW, Kim KK, Shon YM, Park J, Lee Y, Seo DW. Safety and effectiveness of perampanel monotherapy after adjunctive therapy through retention rate in subjects with focal-onset seizures with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures: A multicenter retrospective study in Korea. Epilepsy Behav 2023; 145:109291. [PMID: 37336136 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel monotherapy following conversion from adjunctive therapy. METHODS This was a multicenter, retrospective, non-interventional study of Korean patients aged ≥12 years with focal-onset seizures (FOS) with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Data were extracted from electronic medical records of perampanel-treated patients from 1 February 2016 to 31 October 2020. Kaplan-Meier estimated retention rates, effectiveness, and safety were recorded. RESULTS Subjects (n = 66, mean age 46.2 years) were mostly male (68.2%) with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure (71.2%). Mean duration of illness was 86.3 months. Retention rates after conversion to perampanel monotherapy at 3, 6, and 12 months (primary outcome) were 96.0%, 96.0%, and 75.6%, respectively. Overall retention rates in patients receiving perampanel as adjunctive or monotherapy at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after perampanel add-on were 100%, 98.3%, 95.9%, 92.6%, and 92.6%, respectively. Mean retention duration was 41.2 months (overall perampanel administration) and 21.4 months (monotherapy). Mean seizure frequency/28 days in the Full Analysis Set (n = 61) was comparable for adjunctive and monotherapy (0.2 ± 0.79 vs 0.2 ± 0.64; change between adjunctive and monotherapy periods: 0.0 ± 0.59; p = 0.498). Perampanel was well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified. Dizziness (4.6%), only reported during adjunctive therapy, was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event. CONCLUSIONS Conversion to perampanel monotherapy from adjunctive therapy showed promising results in subjects with FOS with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures; further studies in a larger population are needed to confirm these encouraging data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Chul Lim
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Gu Lee
- Department of Neurology, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, University of Kosin College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Neurology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Ki Kim
- Department of Neurology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Min Shon
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Yoona Lee
- Eisai Korea Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae-Won Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Omatsu H, Watanabe T, Kira R, Ishiba K, Patten A, Takase T, Ngo LY. Open-label study to investigate the safety and efficacy of adjunctive perampanel in pediatric patients (aged 4 to <12 years) with inadequately controlled focal-onset seizures: Japanese subgroup analysis. Seizure 2023; 110:109-116. [PMID: 37336055 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel in a Japanese subpopulation of Study 311 (NCT02849626), which was a global, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of children (aged 4 to <12 years) with inadequately controlled focal-onset seizures (FOS), with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). METHODS Study 311 comprised a Core Study, Extension A, and Extension B; this report focuses on the Japanese patient subgroup in the Core Study only. In the Core Study, Japanese patients (FOS only) received adjunctive perampanel ≤12 mg/day in a 23-week Treatment Phase. Endpoints included safety/tolerability (primary) and median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline. Patients were stratified by age and concomitant enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medication (EIASM) use. RESULTS Of 65 enrolled Japanese patients, 56 completed the Core Study and nine withdrew. The most common reason for discontinuation was adverse events (AEs) (n = 4 [6.2%]). The mean (standard deviation) daily dose of perampanel in Japanese FOS patients was 5.8 (2.2) mg/day. During the Core Study, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported by 89% of Japanese patients, most commonly nasopharyngitis (28%) and somnolence (28%). The median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline was 37% and the lower limit of the 95% CI was greater than 10.5%, satisfying the pre-defined efficacy criteria. Perampanel was effective regardless of age or concomitant EIASM use. CONCLUSION Perampanel as adjunctive therapy is generally safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious in Japanese children aged 4 to <12 years with FOS (with/without FBTCS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirowo Omatsu
- National Epilepsy Center, NHO Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders, Shizuoka, Japan.
| | - Toshihide Watanabe
- Hokkaido Medical Center for Child Health and Rehabilitation, Hokkaido, Japan.
| | | | | | - Anna Patten
- Eisai Europe Ltd., Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Leock Y Ngo
- Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Villanueva V, Serratosa JM, Toledo M, Ángel Calleja M, Navarro A, Sabaniego J, Pérez-Domper P, Álvarez-Barón E, Subías S, Gil A. Number needed to treat and associated cost analysis of cenobamate versus third-generation anti-seizure medications for the treatment of focal-onset seizures in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in Spain. Epilepsy Behav 2023; 139:109054. [PMID: 36603345 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.109054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Epilepsy is a serious neurological disease, ranking high in the top causes of disability. The main goal of its treatment is to achieve seizure freedom without intolerable adverse effects. However, approximately 40% of patients suffer from Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (DRE) despite the availability of the latest options called third-generation Anti-Seizure Medications(ASMs). Cenobamate is the first ASM approved in Spain for the adjunctive treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures (FOS) in adult patients with DRE. The introduction of a new drug increases the number of therapeutic options available, making it important to compare it with existing alternatives in terms of clinical benefit and efficiency. PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the clinical benefit, in terms of the Number Needed to Treat (NNT), and the efficiency, in terms of Cost per NNT (CNT), associated with cenobamate versus third-generation ASMs used in Spain for the adjunctive treatment of FOS in patients with DRE. METHODS The Number Needed to Treat data was calculated based on the ≥50% responder rate and seizure freedom endpoints (defined as the percentage of patients achieving 50% and 100% reduction in seizure frequency, respectively), obtained from pivotal clinical trials performed with cenobamate, brivaracetam, perampanel, lacosamide, and eslicarbazepine acetate. The NNT was established as the inverse of the treatment responder rate minus the placebo responder rate and was calculated based on the minimum, mid-range Daily Defined Dose (DDD), and maximum doses studied in the pivotal clinical trials of each ASM. CNT was calculated by multiplying the annual treatment cost by NNT values for each treatment option. RESULTS In terms of NNT, cenobamate was the ASM associated with the lowest values at all doses for both ≥50% responder rate and seizure freedom compared with the alternatives. In terms of CNT, for ≥50% responder rate, cenobamate was the ASM associated with the lowest CNT values at DDD and lacosamide and eslicarbazepine acetate at the minimum and maximum dose, respectively. For seizure freedom, cenobamate was associated with the lowest CNT value at DDD and the maximum dose and lacosamide at the minimum dose. CONCLUSIONS Cenobamate could represent the most effective ASM in all doses studied compared to the third-generation ASMs and the most efficient option at DDD for both ≥50% responder rate and seizure freedom. This study could represent an important contribution towards informed decision-making regarding the selection of the most appropriate therapy for FOS in adult patients with DRE from a clinical and economical perspective in Spain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Manuel Toledo
- Hospital Universitari Vall d' Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Andrés Navarro
- Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Alicia Gil
- Omakase Consulting S.L., Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang Q, Xu Y, Chen Y, Wu X, Ge Y, Zhu G. Effectiveness and safety of perampanel as adjunctive therapy among Chinese patients with focal-onset epilepsy: A real-world prospective observational study. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 136:108937. [PMID: 36215830 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Perampanel (PER) has previously been shown to be effective and tolerable when used as an adjunctive therapy for patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of PER as adjunctive therapy for patients with FOS in the Chinese population under real-world conditions for 1 year. METHODS A prospective, single-center, 1-year observational study was conducted at Huashan Hospital, enrolling both under age (≥4 years old) and adult patients with FOS. Response to PER was assessed at 3-, 6-, and 12-month checkpoints by analyzing the 50 % responder rate, the seizure-free rate, and reduction in seizure frequency. RESULTS One hundred and eight patients (mean age: 26.6 years, 56.5 % males) with FOS were included, with seventy-six patients finishing the 1-year follow-up (retention rate: 70.4 %, mean PER dose: 4.3 mg/day). The seizure frequency was reduced significantly at 3, 6, and 12 months relative to baseline (p < 0.001 for each seizure type). At 12 months, the responder rate was 65.8 %, and the seizure-free rate was 39.5 %. A significantly higher responder rate was found in patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (p = 0.024), among which the percentage of patients with sleep-related epilepsy was significantly high (p = 0.045). Responders had a lower number of concomitant anti-seizure medications (ASMs) than the non-responders (p = 0.009). Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 37 % of patients, mostly mild or moderate, and the patients who experienced AEs had a higher daily dose of PER than those who did not (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION Perampanel, an add-on therapy for focal-onset seizures, was found to be effective and tolerable in Chinese patients at 12 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinyue Wang
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, China
| | - Ye Xu
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, China
| | - Yuncan Chen
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, China
| | - Xunyi Wu
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, China; National Center for Neurological Disorders, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yan Ge
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, China; National Center for Neurological Disorders, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoxing Zhu
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, China; National Center for Neurological Disorders, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Piña-Garza JE, Villanueva V, Rosenfeld W, Yoshinaga H, Patten A, Malhotra M. Assessment of the long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in adolescent patients with epilepsy: Post hoc analysis of open-label extension studies. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 135:108901. [PMID: 36122531 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This post hoc analysis of four open-label extension (OLEx) studies evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in adolescent patients (aged 12 to ≤17 years) with focal-onset seizures (FOS), with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). METHODS Patients who completed one of six double-blind, placebo-controlled studies could enter one of four OLEx studies comprising a blinded Conversion Period (6-16 weeks) followed by a Maintenance Phase (27 to ≤256 weeks; perampanel dose: ≤12 mg/day). Exposure, retention, seizure outcomes, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analyzed. Efficacy outcomes were analyzed using observed case and last observation carried forward (LOCF) approaches; the latter was used to account for early dropouts. RESULTS The Full Analysis Set comprised 309 adolescents with FOS (FBTCS, n = 109) and 19 with GTCS, and the Safety Analysis Set comprised 311 with FOS (FBTCS, n = 110) and 19 with GTCS. Mean (standard deviation) cumulative duration of perampanel exposure (weeks) was: FOS, 77.7 (58.7); FBTCS, 88.7 (63.8); and GTCS, 97.0 (35.5). Retention rates were maintained for ≤2 years (FOS, 50.0 %; FBTCS, 57.1 %; GTCS, 41.7 %). Seizure control (median percent reduction in seizure frequency/28 days) was sustained for up to 2 years; FOS (59.4 %, n = 113), FBTCS (64.6 %, n = 53), and GTCS (86.5 %, n = 17). At Year 2, 50 % responder rates were: FOS, 58.4 % (n = 66); FBTCS, 54.7 % (n = 29); and GTCS, 82.4 % (n = 14); seizure-freedom rates were: FOS, 5.3 % (n = 6); FBTCS, 24.5 % (n = 13); and GTCS, 35.3 % (n = 6). Long-term seizure control was observed even in LOCF analyses. The incidence of TEAEs was highest during Year 1 (FOS, n = 269 [86.5 %]; FBTCS, n = 95 [86.4 %]; GTCS, n = 15 [78.9 %]), compared with Years 2-4; the most common (≥10 % of patients) were dizziness, somnolence, and nasopharyngitis. No new safety signals emerged with long-term treatment. CONCLUSIONS This post hoc analysis suggests that long-term (≤2 years) adjunctive perampanel (≤12 mg/day) is efficacious and generally well tolerated in adolescent patients with FOS, with or without FBTCS, or GTCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Eric Piña-Garza
- The Children's Hospital at TriStar Centennial, 330 23rd Avenue North, Suite 580, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
| | - Vicente Villanueva
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
| | - William Rosenfeld
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Care Center for Children and Adults, 11134 Conway Road, St. Louis, MO 63131, USA.
| | - Harumi Yoshinaga
- National Hospital Organization, Minami-Okayama Medical Center, 4066 Hayashimacho Hayashima, Tsukubo-gun, Okayama 701-0304, Japan.
| | - Anna Patten
- Eisai Europe Ltd., Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9SN, UK.
| | - Manoj Malhotra
- Formerly: Eisai Inc., 200 Metro Blvd., Nutley, NJ 07110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Villanueva V, Carreño M, Gil-Nagel A, Serrano-Castro PJ, Serratosa JM, Toledo M, Álvarez-Barón E, Gil A, Subías-Labazuy S. Identifying key unmet needs and value drivers in the treatment of focal-onset seizures (FOS) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in Spain through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Epilepsy Behav 2021; 122:108222. [PMID: 34371462 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Epilepsy is a serious neurological disease, ranking high in the top causes of disability. Approximately 40% of patients with epilepsy are pharmacoresistant after their seizures failed at least two antiseizure medications (ASMs). Adult patients experiencing focal-onset seizures (FOS) account for approximately 60% of all patients with epilepsy and they are more likely to become drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) than those with generalized onset. Drug-resistant epilepsy is associated with mortality, morbidity, and reduced quality of life. The information available on the clinical management, health outcomes, and unmet needs of the disease within the Spanish healthcare environment is very limited. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) allows determination of what represents value in a given indication considering all relevant criteria for healthcare decision-making in a transparent and systematic manner and from the perspective of relevant stakeholders. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to identify the burden of DRE (clinical, quality of life, and economic) and the unmet needs in Spain and to determine what represents value in the treatment of FOS in DRE patients from the perspective of Spanish epileptologists. METHODS The steps taken to carry out the MCDA were based on previously published good methodological practices. A systematic literature review (combining biomedical databases and gray literature sources) was performed between March and April 2020. Results were reviewed and validated with three epileptologists in June 2020 and used to develop a MCDA value framework, adapted for FOS in DRE, composed of 12 quantitative criteria and 3 contextual criteria. A group of six Spanish epileptologists from four Spanish regions were trained in MCDA methodology before individually validating value criteria (and their definitions based on literature review findings) and assigned relative weights using an ordinal 6-points scale. Results were analyzed and discussed in a group meeting through reflective MCDA discussion methodology. RESULTS Drug-resistant epilepsy is considered a very severe health problem with important unmet needs affecting a considerably sized population. While safety and impact on quality of life of available ASMs are considered adequate, efficacy remains insufficient for patients to achieve seizure freedom and maintain it over time. Hence, the therapeutic benefit of pharmacological treatments currently used is regarded as suboptimal. Drug-resistant epilepsy management is associated with moderate pharmacological, relevant direct medical and high indirect costs. Quality of evidence available for current treatments is moderate. It is considered that DRE does not currently stand as a key priority for the Spanish healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS Drug-resistant epilepsy is considered a very severe health problem associated with relevant unmet needs. These include the lack of availability of specific treatment protocols, the need to improve early diagnosis by increasing the number of referrals to specialized epilepsy units and the availability of specific ASMs with improved efficacy and safety profiles, allowing to reach treatment objectives. Reflective MCDA provided a standardized, transparent approach to evaluate multiple criteria ascertaining what represents value from a holistic point of view and from the perspective of clinical experts, facilitating decision-making.
Collapse
|
11
|
Krauss GL, Ben-Menachem E, Wechsler RT, Patten A, Williams B, Laurenza A, Malhotra M. A multivariable prediction model of a major treatment response for focal-onset seizures: A post-hoc analysis of Phase III trials of perampanel. Epilepsy Res 2021; 174:106649. [PMID: 34022524 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although 50 % reduction in seizure frequency is a common efficacy endpoint in clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), 75 % or greater reductions may be required to improve patients' health-related quality of life. Identification of clinical factors that are associated with high responder rates may help to inform clinicians on which patients may optimally benefit from treatment. We evaluated potential predictive factors for achieving major treatment responses (≥75 % reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from study baseline) in patients with drug-resistant focal-onset seizures, with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (FBTC) seizures in perampanel trials designed for regulatory approval. METHODS Univariate analyses using logistic regression were performed using data from three double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III studies of adjunctive perampanel (Studies 304 [NCT00699972], 305 [NCT00699582], 306 [NCT00700310]), and their open-label extension study (OLEx; Study 307 [NCT00735397]). For the double-blind studies, baseline seizure frequency, number of baseline AEDs, baseline seizure type, baseline concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs (EIAEDs), baseline carbamazepine, lamotrigine, or valproic acid, age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, etiology, and perampanel plasma concentration were included individually with study treatment. The same factors were included for the OLEx analysis except for plasma concentration and treatment. Variables found to be significant predictors for a major treatment response in univariate analyses were subsequently included in multivariable analyses using backwards and forwards selection. RESULTS In the double-blind studies, 175/1374 patients had a major response to placebo (n = 25) or perampanel (n = 150). The best predictors of a major treatment response in multivariable models with forwards and backwards selection were: the presence of FBTC seizures during baseline (P = 0.0002), higher perampanel plasma concentration (P < 0.0001), older age at diagnosis (P = 0.0024 and 0.0045, respectively), and lower baseline seizure frequency (P = 0.0364 and 0.0127, respectively). In the OLEx, 217/1090 patients had a major treatment response. The best predictors of a major treatment response in the final multivariable model, regardless of backwards or forwards selection, were a lower baseline seizure frequency (P = 0.0022), the absence of focal impaired awareness seizures during baseline (P = 0.0011), the presence of FBTC seizures during baseline (P = 0.0164), lower number(s) of baseline AEDs (P = 0.0002), the absence of EIAEDs during baseline (P = 0.0059), an older age at diagnosis (P = 0.0054), and absence of structural etiologies (P = 0.0138). SIGNIFICANCE These analyses of placebo-controlled and long-term extension trial data identified a number of potential predictive factors for patients with focal-onset seizures achieving a major treatment response. These factors may help guide clinicians when predicting a patient's response to treatment and optimizing individual treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory L Krauss
- Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Elinor Ben-Menachem
- Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 3, 413 90, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Robert T Wechsler
- Idaho Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, 1499 West Hays Street, Boise, ID, 83702, USA.
| | - Anna Patten
- Eisai Ltd., Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9SN, UK.
| | - Betsy Williams
- Formerly: Eisai Inc., 100 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, 07677, USA.
| | - Antonio Laurenza
- Formerly: Eisai Inc., 100 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, 07677, USA.
| | - Manoj Malhotra
- Eisai Inc., 100 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, 07677, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sales F, Delanty N, Mecarelli O, Holtkamp M, McMurray R, Loureiro R, Fernandes H, Villanueva V. Predictors of seizure freedom, response and retention after 12 months of treatment with eslicarbazepine acetate: A post-hoc analysis of the Euro-Esli study. Epilepsy Res 2021; 174:106653. [PMID: 34049227 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily antiseizure medication (ASM) that is approved in Europe and the USA for the treatment of focal-onset seizures. The Euro-Esli study, which included over 2000 patients, investigated the real-world effectiveness, safety and tolerability of ESL when used in everyday clinical practice in Europe. This post-hoc analysis of Euro-Esli employed univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses to investigate the relationship between demographic and baseline characteristics (including epilepsy- and treatment-related factors) and the likelihood of seizure freedom, response and retention in adult patients with focal seizures after 12 months of ESL treatment in the real-world setting. Multivariate analysis revealed that the factors associated with seizure freedom and response at 12 months (N = 1054) were generally those characterising patients who were relatively early in their disease course and/or less refractory to treatment, such as older age at onset of epilepsy, absence of seizures at baseline and lower number of concomitant ASMs at baseline. Although it was not possible to construct a multivariate model to predict retention on ESL treatment at 12 months, when the univariate regression model was adjusted for age and epilepsy duration, the factors found to be significantly associated with retention at 12 months (N = 1559) comprised shorter duration of epilepsy, absence of any seizures at baseline, lower baseline seizure frequency (<5 vs. ≥ 5 seizures/month), lower number of previous ASMs, lower number of concomitant ASMs, and the absence of concomitant use of lamotrigine at baseline. These findings therefore identify baseline characteristics that are predictive of the effectiveness of ESL treatment in clinical practice, which may help clinicians choose appropriate ASM therapy for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Sales
- Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Norman Delanty
- Beaumont Hospital and School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, FutureNeuro Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Oriano Mecarelli
- Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Martin Holtkamp
- Epilepsy‑Center Berlin‑Brandenburg, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - Rui Loureiro
- Bial - Portela & Cª, S.A., Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
| | - Hélder Fernandes
- Bial - Portela & Cª, S.A., Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Elizebath R, Zhang E, Coe P, Gutierrez EG, Yang J, Krauss GL. Cenobamate treatment of focal-onset seizures: Quality of life and outcome during up to eight years of treatment. Epilepsy Behav 2021; 116:107796. [PMID: 33567400 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
A large proportion of patients with focal-onset epilepsy have frequent seizures despite treatment with newer anti-seizure medications (ASMs). We describe our experience optimizing cenobamate treatment for 49 patients treated at one center for up to eight years. We assessed the influence of treatment response on measurements of quality of life (QOLIE). Forty-nine patients were evaluated from three cenobamate regulatory trials: two open-label extensions of randomized placebo-controlled studies and one open-label safety study at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHU). Patients had focal-onset seizures despite treatment with one to three ASMs and were 18 years of age and older. Patients kept seizure diaries for the duration of the study and had tri-monthly evaluations. Seizure responder rates were determined, and patients with long-term seizure freedom (≥six months seizure free) were identified. Cenobamate doses were adjusted within the range of 100-400 mg/day. Johns Hopkins Hospital patients who were continuing treatment when the studies ended (n = 37) were administered the QOLIE-31 survey and a separate survey to assess changes in independence and epilepsy-linked disability at the end of the study at JHU. Thirty-seven of 49 (76%) patients continued treatment for three to eight years (median 5.6 years). In their final three months of treatment, 45% of patients achieved ≥75% seizure reduction, 29% had ≥90% reduction, and 16% were seizure free (responder rates computed with n = 49). Posttraumatic etiologies did not reduce treatment responses. Increased dosage of cenobamate across 150-400 mg/day range was significantly associated with higher responder rates (p < 0.001). High seizure responses-particularly ≥90% reduction-correlated with high QOLIE scores. Patients with drug-resistant focal-onset epilepsy had stable treatment responses during up to eight years of cenobamate treatment. Patients often tolerated high doses of cenobamate; high responders appeared to benefit with high QOLIE scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena Elizebath
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Emily Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Pamela Coe
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Erie G Gutierrez
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Jun Yang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Gregory L Krauss
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rodríguez-Osorio X, Lema-Facal T, Rubio-Nazábal E, Castro-Vilanova MD, Pato-Pato A, Abella-Corral J, Corredera E, López-Ferreiro A, Puy-Núñez A, López-González FJ. Perampanel effectiveness and safety as early add-on treatment for focal-onset seizures: PEREAGAL study. Epilepsy Res 2021; 172:106570. [PMID: 33621770 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perampanel (PER) is an effective adjunctive therapy for controlling focal-onset seizures (FOS), but few studies have examined its effects as an early add-on for the treatment of FOS in daily clinical practice. METHODS Our retrospective, multicenter, observational study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of PER as an early add-on in 77 patients with FOS, with and without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) after 3, 6 and 12 months in a real-world setting. RESULTS After 12 months of treatment (median dose 6 [4,8] mg/day), the retention rate was 79.2 % and 60 % of patients (39/65) experienced a ≥50 % reduction in seizure frequency relative to baseline. The seizure-free rate was 38.5 % for all seizures (25/65) and 60 % for FBTCS (12/20). The responder rate at 12 months was significantly higher when PER was given with one concomitant AED (72.2 %) compared to when PER was given with two concomitant AEDs (44.8 %). Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 40.3 % of patients, most of them being mild (64.2 %). Twelve patients (15.6 %) discontinued treatment because of AEs. CONCLUSIONS PER is an effective and safe early add-on for patients with refractory FOS, especially for those with FBTCS.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abril Jaramillo J, Estévez María JC, Girón Úbeda JM, Vega López Ó, Calzado Rivas ME, Pérez Díaz H, García Martín G, Vila Herrero E, Chamorro-Muñoz M, Vázquez F, De la Fuente C, Redondo L, Peláez N, Santágueda P, Rodríguez Uranga JJ. Effectiveness and safety of perampanel as early add-on treatment in patients with epilepsy and focal seizures in the routine clinical practice: Spain prospective study (PERADON). Epilepsy Behav 2020; 102:106655. [PMID: 31812902 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Perampanel (PER) has been shown to be effective as an adjunctive therapy for controlling refractory focal-onset seizures (FOS). However, the information as early add-on for the treatment of FOS in the clinical practice is still scarce and must be further assessed. METHODS An observational prospective study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of early add-on PER, assessed as 50% responders (seizure frequency reduced by at least 50% during the last 3 months as compared with baseline) rate at 6 and 12 months, in patients with FOS in the routine clinical practice of Spain. RESULTS One hundred and thirteen patients (mean age: 40.3 years, 51.3% male) with FOS received PER as early add-on (1st add-on: 37.2% and 2nd: 62.8%) for a mean exposure of 11 months (mean PER dose: 6.3 mg/day at month 12). At 6 months, 50.4% and 20.4% of the patients were responders and seizure-free (respectively) relative to baseline (3 months prior to PER initiation), and at 12 months, 68.1% and 26.5% of the patients were responders and seizure-free (respectively), relative to baseline (3 months prior to PER initiation). The retention rate at 6 and 12 months was 83.2% and 80.5%, respectively. The percentage of seizure-free patients at 12 months was significantly (p = 0.033) higher when PER was added as first vs. second add-on. The number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was significantly reduced from baseline to 6 and 12 months (p = 0.001). Treatment was simplified in 23.9% of patients at the end of the observation period. Drug-related adverse events (AEs), most mild or moderate, were reported in 30.1% of patients, with irritability (8%) and dizziness (7.1%) as the most frequent ones. CONCLUSIONS This is the first observational, prospective study to evaluate efficacy and safety of early adjunctive treatment with PER in patients with focal epilepsy at 12 months. Perampanel demonstrated a good efficacy and safety profile when used at a median dose of 6 mg/day, regardless of the combination with other AEDs. Adverse events were mild or moderate, with dizziness being the most frequent one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - F Vázquez
- Hospital de Torrecárdenas, Almería, Spain
| | | | | | - N Peláez
- Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shorvon SD, Trinka E, Steinhoff BJ, Holtkamp M, Villanueva V, Peltola J, Ben-Menachem E. Eslicarbazepine acetate: its effectiveness as adjunctive therapy in clinical trials and open studies. J Neurol 2017; 264:421-431. [PMID: 28101651 PMCID: PMC5336540 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-016-8338-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily antiepileptic drug that is approved as adjunctive therapy in adults with focal-onset seizures. Following oral administration, ESL is rapidly metabolized to its active metabolite, eslicarbazepine, which acts primarily by enhancing slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. The efficacy and safety/tolerability of ESL in the adjunctive setting were established in a comprehensive Phase III program (n = 1702 randomized patients) and this evidence has been supported by several open studies (n = 864). ESL treatment has demonstrated improvements in health-related quality of life, in both randomized clinical trials and open studies. ESL has also been shown to be usually well tolerated and efficacious when used in the adjunctive setting in elderly patients. The effectiveness of ESL as the only add-on to antiepileptic drug monotherapy has been demonstrated in a multinational study (n = 219), subgroup analyses of which have also shown it to be efficacious and generally well tolerated in patients who had previously not responded to carbamazepine therapy. Open studies have also demonstrated improvements in tolerability in patients switched overnight from oxcarbazepine to ESL. Due to differences in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and metabolism, there may be clinical situations in which it is appropriate to consider switching patients from oxcarbazepine or carbamazepine to ESL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S D Shorvon
- UCL Institute of Neurology, Box 5, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
| | - E Trinka
- Department of Neurology and Neuroscience Institute at Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Ignaz Harrerstrasse 79, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.,Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - B J Steinhoff
- Epilepsiezentrum Kork, Landstraße 1, 77694, Kehl-Kork, Germany
| | - M Holtkamp
- Epilepsy-Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - V Villanueva
- Multidisciplinary Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Service, Hospital Universitario y Polotécnico La Fe, Avda Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - J Peltola
- Department of Neurology, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 2000, 33521, Tampere, Finland
| | - E Ben-Menachem
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Göteborg, Box 430, SE-405 30, Göteborg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|