Pold4 subunit of replicative polymerase δ promotes fork slowing at broken templates

Single-strand breaks (SSBs) are the most frequent type of lesion, and replication across such lesions leads to double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs that arise during replication are repaired by homologous recombination (HR) and are suppressed by fork reversal. Poly[ADP-ribose] polymerase I (PARP1) and the proofreading exonuclease activity of replicative polymerase ε (Polε) are required for fork reversal when leading strand replication encounters SSBs. However, the mechanism underlying fork reversal at the SSB during lagging-strand replication remains elusive. We here demonstrate that the Pold4 subunit of replicative polymerase δ (Polδ) plays a role in promoting fork reversal during lagging strand replication on a broken template. POLD4-/- cells exhibited heightened sensitivity to camptothecin (CPT) but not to other DNA-damaging agents compared to wild-type cells. This selective CPT sensitivity in POLD4-/- cells suggests that Pold4 suppresses DSBs during replication, as CPT induces significant SSBs during replication, which subsequently lead to DSBs. To explore the functional interactions among Pold4, Polε exonuclease, and PARP1 in DSB suppression, we generated PARP1-/-, POLD4-/-, Polε exonuclease-deficient POLE1exo-/-, PARP1-/-/POLD4-/-, and POLD4-/-/POLE1exo-/- cells. These epistasis analyses showed that Pold4 is involved in the PARP1-Polε exonuclease-mediated fork reversal following CPT treatment. These results suggest that Pold4 aids in fork reversal when lagging strand replication stalls on a broken template. In conclusion, the Pold4 subunit of Polδ has roles in the PARP1-Polε exonuclease-mediated fork reversal, contributing to the suppression of DSBs.

A fork in the road: Where homologous recombination and stalled replication fork protection part ways

In response to replication hindrances, DNA replication forks frequently stall and are remodelled into a four-way junction. In such a structure the annealed nascent strand is thought to resemble a DNA double-strand break and remodelled forks are vulnerable to nuclease attack by MRE11 and DNA2. Proteins that promote the recruitment, loading and stabilisation of RAD51 onto single-stranded DNA for homology search and strand exchange in homologous recombination (HR) repair and inter-strand cross-link repair also act to set up RAD51-mediated protection of nascent DNA at stalled replication forks. However, despite the similarities of these pathways, several lines of evidence indicate that fork protection is not simply analogous to the RAD51 loading step of HR. Protection of stalled forks not only requires separate functions of a number of recombination proteins, but also utilises nucleases important for the resection steps of HR in alternative ways. Here we discuss how fork protection arises and how its differences with HR give insights into the differing contexts of these two pathways.

ATR Protects the Genome against R Loops through a MUS81-Triggered Feedback Loop

R loops arising during transcription induce genomic instability, but how cells respond to the R loop-associated genomic stress is still poorly understood. Here, we show that cells harboring high levels of R loops rely on the ATR kinase for survival. In response to aberrant R loop accumulation, the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR)-Chk1 pathway is activated by R loop-induced reversed replication forks. In contrast to the activation of ATR by replication inhibitors, R loop-induced ATR activation requires the MUS81 endonuclease. ATR protects the genome from R loops by suppressing transcription-replication collisions, promoting replication fork recovery, and enforcing a G2/M cell-cycle arrest. Furthermore, ATR prevents excessive cleavage of reversed forks by MUS81, revealing a MUS81-triggered and ATR-mediated feedback loop that fine-tunes MUS81 activity at replication forks. These results suggest that ATR is a key sensor and suppressor of R loop-induced genomic instability, uncovering a signaling circuitry that safeguards the genome against R loops.

Replication stress response in cancer stem cells as a target for chemotherapy

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are subpopulations of multipotent stem cells (SCs) responsible for the initiation, long-term clonal maintenance, growth and spreading of most human neoplasms. Reportedly, CSCs share a very robust DNA damage response (DDR) with embryonic and adult SCs, which allows them to survive endogenous and exogenous genotoxins. A range of experimental evidence indicates that CSCs have high but heterogeneous levels of replication stress (RS), arising from, and being boosted by, endogenous causes, such as specific genetic backgrounds (e.g., p53 deficiency) and/or aberrant karyotypes (e.g., supernumerary chromosomes). A multipronged RS response (RSR) is put in place by CSCs to limit and ensure tolerability to RS. The characteristics of such dedicated cascade have two opposite consequences, both relevant for cancer therapy. On the one hand, RSR efficiency often increases the reliance of CSCs on specific DDR components. On the other hand, the functional redundancy of pathways of the RSR can paradoxically promote the acquisition of resistance to RS- and/or DNA damage-inducing agents. Here, we provide an overview of the molecular mechanisms of the RSR in cancer cells and CSCs, focusing on the role of CHK1 and some emerging players, such as PARP1 and components of the homologous recombination repair, whose targeting can represent a long-term effective anti-CSC strategy.

Functions of SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, and HLTF in maintaining genome stability

A large number of SNF2 family, DNA and ATP-dependent motor proteins are needed during transcription, DNA replication, and DNA repair to manipulate protein-DNA interactions and change DNA structure. SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, and HLTF are three related members of this family with specialized functions that maintain genome stability during DNA replication. These proteins are recruited to replication forks through protein-protein interactions and bind DNA using both their motor and substrate recognition domains (SRDs). The SRD provides specificity to DNA structures like forks and junctions and confers DNA remodeling activity to the motor domains. Remodeling reactions include fork reversal and branch migration to promote fork stabilization, template switching, and repair. Regulation ensures these powerful activities remain controlled and restricted to damaged replication forks. Inherited mutations in SMARCAL1 cause a severe developmental disorder and mutations in ZRANB3 and HLTF are linked to cancer illustrating the importance of these enzymes in ensuring complete and accurate DNA replication. In this review, we examine how these proteins function, concentrating on their common and unique attributes and regulatory mechanisms.

DNA damage tolerance by recombination: Molecular pathways and DNA structures

Replication perturbations activate DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathways, which are crucial to promote replication completion and to prevent fork breakage, a leading cause of genome instability. One mode of DDT uses translesion synthesis polymerases, which however can also introduce mutations. The other DDT mode involves recombination-mediated mechanisms, which are generally accurate. DDT occurs prevalently postreplicatively, but in certain situations homologous recombination is needed to restart forks. Fork reversal can function to stabilize stalled forks, but may also promote error-prone outcome when used for fork restart. Recent years have witnessed important advances in our understanding of the mechanisms and DNA structures that mediate recombination-mediated damage-bypass and highlighted principles that regulate DDT pathway choice locally and temporally. In this review we summarize the current knowledge and paradoxes on recombination-mediated DDT pathways and their workings, discuss how the intermediate DNA structures may influence genome integrity, and outline key open questions for future research.

Metabolism of DNA secondary structures at the eukaryotic replication fork

DNA secondary structures are largely advantageous for numerous cellular processes but can pose specific threats to the progression of the replication machinery and therefore genome duplication and cell division. A number of specialized enzymes dismantle these structures to allow replication fork progression to proceed faithfully. In this review, we discuss the in vitro and in vivo data that has lead to the identification of these enzymes in eukaryotes, and the evidence that suggests that they act specifically at replication forks to resolve secondary structures. We focus on the role of helicases, which catalyze the dissociation of nucleotide complexes, and on the role of nucleases, which cleave secondary structures to allow replication fork progression at the expense of local rearrangements. Finally, we discuss outstanding questions in terms of dismantling DNA secondary structures, as well as the interplay between diverse enzymes that act upon specific types of structures.