1
|
Schwarz CG, Therneau TM, Weigand SD, Gunter JL, Lowe VJ, Przybelski SA, Senjem ML, Botha H, Vemuri P, Kantarci K, Boeve BF, Whitwell JL, Josephs KA, Petersen RC, Knopman DS, Jack CR. Selecting software pipelines for change in flortaucipir SUVR: Balancing repeatability and group separation. Neuroimage 2021; 238:118259. [PMID: 34118395 PMCID: PMC8407434 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Since tau PET tracers were introduced, investigators have quantified them using a wide variety of automated methods. As longitudinal cohort studies acquire second and third time points of serial within-person tau PET data, determining the best pipeline to measure change has become crucial. We compared a total of 415 different quantification methods (each a combination of multiple options) according to their effects on a) differences in annual SUVR change between clinical groups, and b) longitudinal measurement repeatability as measured by the error term from a linear mixed-effects model. Our comparisons used MRI and Flortaucipir scans of 97 Mayo Clinic study participants who clinically either: a) were cognitively unimpaired, or b) had cognitive impairments that were consistent with Alzheimer's disease pathology. Tested methods included cross-sectional and longitudinal variants of two overarching pipelines (FreeSurfer 6.0, and an in-house pipeline based on SPM12), three choices of target region (entorhinal, inferior temporal, and a temporal lobe meta-ROI), five types of partial volume correction (PVC) (none, two-compartment, three-compartment, geometric transfer matrix (GTM), and a tau-specific GTM variant), seven choices of reference region (cerebellar crus, cerebellar gray matter, whole cerebellum, pons, supratentorial white matter, eroded supratentorial WM, and a composite of eroded supratentorial WM, pons, and whole cerebellum), two choices of region masking (GM or GM and WM), and two choices of statistic (voxel-wise mean vs. median). Our strongest findings were: 1) larger temporal-lobe target regions greatly outperformed entorhinal cortex (median sample size estimates based on a hypothetical clinical trial were 520-526 vs. 1740); 2) longitudinal processing pipelines outperformed cross-sectional pipelines (median sample size estimates were 483 vs. 572); and 3) reference regions including supratentorial WM outperformed traditional cerebellar and pontine options (median sample size estimates were 370 vs. 559). Altogether, our results favored longitudinally SUVR methods and a temporal-lobe meta-ROI that includes adjacent (juxtacortical) WM, a composite reference region (eroded supratentorial WM + pons + whole cerebellum), 2-class voxel-based PVC, and median statistics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G Schwarz
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester 55905, MN, USA.
| | - Terry M Therneau
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Stephen D Weigand
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Gunter
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester 55905, MN, USA; Department of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Val J Lowe
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester 55905, MN, USA
| | - Scott A Przybelski
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew L Senjem
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester 55905, MN, USA; Department of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Hugo Botha
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Prashanthi Vemuri
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester 55905, MN, USA
| | - Kejal Kantarci
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester 55905, MN, USA
| | - Bradley F Boeve
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jennifer L Whitwell
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester 55905, MN, USA
| | - Keith A Josephs
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ronald C Petersen
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David S Knopman
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Clifford R Jack
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester 55905, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Evans E, Buonincontri G, Izquierdo D, Methner C, Hawkes RC, Ansorge RE, Krieg T, Carpenter TA, Sawiak SJ. Combining MRI with PET for partial volume correction improves image-derived input functions in mice. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2015; 62:628-633. [PMID: 26213413 PMCID: PMC4510926 DOI: 10.1109/tns.2015.2433897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Accurate kinetic modelling using dynamic PET requires knowledge of the tracer concentration in plasma, known as the arterial input function (AIF). AIFs are usually determined by invasive blood sampling, but this is prohibitive in murine studies due to low total blood volumes. As a result of the low spatial resolution of PET, image-derived input functions (IDIFs) must be extracted from left ventricular blood pool (LVBP) ROIs of the mouse heart. This is challenging because of partial volume and spillover effects between the LVBP and myocardium, contaminating IDIFs with tissue signal. We have applied the geometric transfer matrix (GTM) method of partial volume correction (PVC) to 12 mice injected with 18F-FDG affected by a Myocardial Infarction (MI), of which 6 were treated with a drug which reduced infarction size [1]. We utilised high resolution MRI to assist in segmenting mouse hearts into 5 classes: LVBP, infarcted myocardium, healthy myocardium, lungs/body and background. The signal contribution from these 5 classes was convolved with the point spread function (PSF) of the Cambridge split magnet PET scanner and a non-linear fit was performed on the 5 measured signal components. The corrected IDIF was taken as the fitted LVBP component. It was found that the GTM PVC method could recover an IDIF with less contamination from spillover than an IDIF extracted from PET data alone. More realistic values of Ki were achieved using GTM IDIFs, which were shown to be significantly different (p<0.05) between the treated and untreated groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Evans
- Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB2 0QQ ( )
| | - Guido Buonincontri
- Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre and the Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB2 0QQ ( )
| | - David Izquierdo
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, 149 Thirteenth Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129 ( )
| | - Carmen Methner
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge and is now at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239 ( )
| | - Rob C Hawkes
- Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB2 0QQ ( )
| | - Richard E Ansorge
- Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB3 0HE ( )
| | - Thomas Krieg
- Member of the Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB2 0QQ ( )
| | - T Adrian Carpenter
- Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB2 0QQ ( )
| | - Stephen J Sawiak
- Member of both the Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, and the Behavioural and Clinical Neurosciences Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB2 3EB ( )
| |
Collapse
|