A pediatric cerebral tumor with MN1 alteration and pathological features mimicking carcinoma metastasis: may the terminology "high grade neuroepithelial tumor with MN1 alteration" still be relevant?

INTRODUCTION

Astroblastoma, MN1-altered (old name: high-grade neuroepithelial tumor/HGNET with MN1 alteration) is a recently described central nervous system tumor mostly affecting pediatric patients and profoundly young girls. Differential pathological diagnoses of these tumors include ependymoma, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes, meningioma, and even glioblastoma. As the treatment approaches to these tumors differ, it is essential to increase the awareness about these tumors in the neurosurgical community.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 7-year-old female patient admitted with a 7-day history of headache, nausea, and vomiting. A contrasted MRI scan revealed a left parietal 4 × 4 × 5 cm mass with central necrosis and peripheral contrast enhancement. The tumor's histopathological findings were suggestive of a metastatic carcinoma with unknown primary, yet further genetic analysis revealed MN1 alteration. Peculiarly, the tumor pathomorphological features were not compatible with astroblastomas and exerted features strongly indicating a metastatic cancer; however, systemic PET and whole-body MRI failed to detect a primary malignancy.

OUTCOME AND CONCLUSIONS

Eighteen months after gross-total tumor resection, an in-field and out-field multifocal recurrence developed which required a second surgery and subsequent chemo-radiotherapy. The patient is doing well for 1 year after the second treatment regimen at the time of this report. Despite the final cIMPACT6 classification in 2020 advised to define all MN1 altered brain tumors as astroblastomas, there exist prognostic differences in MN1-altered tumors with and without morphological features of astroblastoma. Rare morphological variants of MN1-altered tumors shall be recognized for their future prognostic and clinical classification. HGNET with MN1 alteration seems still be a more proper definition of such malignancies as an umbrella term.

Central nervous system high-grade neuroepithelial tumor with BCOR alteration (CNS HGNET-BCOR)-case-based reviews

INTRODUCTION

High-grade neuroepithelial tumor with BCOR alteration (HGNET BCOR) has been recently classified as a new category of tumors among those previously known as PNET. They are molecularly characterized by the mutation of the BCOR gene, a corepressor of BCL6 a gene (which has an important role in immune responses). Only case reports and very small series have been published so far; therefore, their behavior and management are still under investigation. The goal of the present case-based review is to provide a summary about the state of the art on these tumors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The pertinent review has been reviewed, and an exemplary case has been reported (15-month-old boy with large HGNET BCOR of the left cerebellopontine angle). So far, 24 cases have been described, with a 5.5 mean age at diagnosis and a 1.4 male/female ratio. The cerebellar hemisphere is the more frequently involved region. No metastases are usually detected at diagnosis, though they are common in case of tumor recurrence. There are no specific radiological or pathological features to differentiate HGNET BCOR from other brain malignant neuroepithelial tumors so that the differential diagnosis is obtained by DNA methylation profiling. The management possibly relies on surgery and (high dose) chemotherapy and radiotherapy but without a dedicated protocol yet. The overall survival after 48-month follow-up is 50%. A gross total resection, which is mandatory for a better outcome, is achievable in the majority of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical research on HGNET BCOR is just at the beginning. New targets and wide-ranging clinical trials are needed to get an optimal management.

High-grade neuroepithelial tumor with BCOR exon 15 internal tandem duplication-a comprehensive clinical, radiographic, pathologic, and genomic analysis

High-grade neuroepithelial tumor with BCOR exon 15 internal tandem duplication (HGNET BCOR ex15 ITD) is a recently proposed tumor entity of the central nervous system (CNS) with a distinct methylation profile and characteristic genetic alteration. The complete spectrum of histologic features, accompanying genetic alterations, clinical outcomes, and optimal treatment for this new tumor entity are largely unknown. Here, we performed a comprehensive assessment of 10 new cases of HGNET BCOR ex15 ITD. The tumors mostly occurred in young children and were located in the cerebral or cerebellar hemispheres. On imaging all tumors were large, well-circumscribed, heterogeneous masses with variable enhancement and reduced diffusion. They were histologically characterized by predominantly solid growth, glioma-like fibrillarity, perivascular pseudorosettes, and palisading necrosis, but absence of microvascular proliferation. They demonstrated sparse to absent GFAP expression, no synaptophysin expression, variable OLIG2 and NeuN positivity, and diffuse strong BCOR nuclear positivity. While BCOR exon 15 internal tandem duplication was the solitary pathogenic alteration identified in six cases, four cases contained additional alterations including CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, TERT amplification or promoter hotspot mutation, and damaging mutations in TP53, BCORL1, EP300, SMARCA2 and STAG2. While the limited clinical follow-up in prior reports had indicated a uniformly dismal prognosis for this tumor entity, this cohort includes multiple long-term survivors. Our study further supports inclusion of HGNET BCOR ex15 ITD as a distinct CNS tumor entity and expands the known clinicopathologic, radiographic, and genetic features.

Diagnostics of pediatric supratentorial RELA ependymomas: integration of information from histopathology, genetics, DNA methylation and imaging

Ependymoma with RELA fusion has been defined as a novel entity of the revised World Health Organization 2016 classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by fusion transcripts of the RELA gene and consequent pathological activation of the NFkB pathway. These tumors represent the majority of supratentorial ependymomas in children. The validation of diagnostic tools to identify this clinically relevant ependymoma entity is essential. Here, we have used interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for C11orf95 and RELA, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for p65‐RelA and the recently developed DNA methylation‐based classification besides conventional histopathology, and compared the precision of the methods in 40 supratentorial pediatric brain tumors diagnosed as ependymomas in the past years. Reverse transcription PCR (RT‐PCR) and RNA sequencing were performed to explore discordant cases. Furthermore, we integrated imaging and clinical features as additional layers of information. The concordance between nuclear RelA expression by IHC and RELA FISH was 100%. Concordance between IHC and DNA methylation profiling, and between FISH and DNA methylation profiling was also high (96.4% and 95.2%, respectively). Thirty‐four out of 40 (85%) cases were confirmed by integrated diagnoses as ependymal tumors, including 22 RELA‐fused ependymomas (71% of ependymal tumors), two YAP1‐fused ependymomas (6%), six non‐RELA/non‐YAP1 ependymomas (18%) and four ependymal/subependymal mixed tumors (12%). Ependymal/subependymal mixed tumors had an excellent clinical outcome despite the presence of histopathological signs of malignancy, suggesting that these tumors should not be diagnosed as classic ependymomas. DNA methylation profiling helped in the differential diagnosis of RELA‐fused ependymomas. IHC and FISH, which are available in the majority of pathology laboratories, are valuable tools to identify RELA‐fused ependymomas.