Comparison of knee flexor strength recovery between semitendinosus alone versus semitendinosus with gracilis autograft for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether there is a difference in harvesting the semitendinosus tendon alone (S) or in combination with the gracilis tendon (SG) for the recovery of knee flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the recovery of knee flexor strength based on the autograft composition, S or SG autograft at 6, 12, and ≥ 24 months after ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed encompassing the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PEDRo and AMED databases from inception to January 2023. Inclusion criteria were human clinical trials published in English, comprised of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), longitudinal cohort-, cross-sectional and case-control studies that compared knee flexor strength recovery between S and SG autografts in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. Isokinetic peak torques were summarized for angular velocities of 60°/s, 180°/s, and across all angular velocities, assessed at 6, 12, and ≥ 24 months after ACL reconstruction. A random-effects model was used with standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed with the RoBANS for non-randomized studies and the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for RCTs. Certainty of evidence was appraised using the GRADE working group methodology.

RESULTS

Among the 1,227 patients from the 15 included studies, 604 patients received treatment with S autograft (49%), and 623 received SG autograft (51%). Patients treated with S autograft displayed lesser strength deficits at 6 months across all angular velocities d = -0.25, (95% CI -0.40; -0.10, p = 0.001). Beyond 6 months after ACL reconstruction, no significant difference was observed between autograft compositions.

CONCLUSION

The harvest of S autograft for ACL reconstruction yields superior knee flexor strength recovery compared to SG autograft 6 months after ACL reconstruction, irrespective of angular velocity at isokinetic testing. However, the clinical significance of the observed difference in knee flexor strength between autograft compositions at 6 months is questionable, given the very low certainty of evidence and small effect size. There was no significant difference in knee flexor strength recovery between autograft compositions beyond 6 months after ACL reconstruction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42022286773.

Restoring Knee Flexor Strength Symmetry Requires 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction, But Does It Matter for Second ACL Injuries? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether knee flexor strength recovers after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft and whether persistent knee flexor strength asymmetry is associated to a second ACL injury.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to systematically review (1) whether knee flexor strength recovers after ACL reconstruction with HT autografts, and (2) whether it influences the association with a second ACL injury. A third aim was to summarize the methodology used to assess knee flexor strength.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis reported according to PRISMA.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PEDRo, and AMED databases from inception to December 2021 and until completion in January 2023. Human clinical trials written in English and conducted as randomized controlled trials, longitudinal cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies on patients with index ACL reconstructions with HT autografts harvested from the ipsilateral side were considered. Knee flexor strength was measured isokinetically in both the reconstructed and uninjured limb to enable the calculation of the limb symmetry index (LSI). The Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-Randomized Studies was used to assess risk of bias for non-randomized studies and the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for randomized controlled trials. For the meta-analysis, the LSI (mean ± standard error) for concentric knee flexor strength at angular velocities of 60°/second (s) and 180°/s preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months were pooled as weighted means with standard errors.

RESULTS

The search yielded 64 studies with a total of 8378 patients, which were included for the assessment of recovery of knee flexor strength LSI, and a total of 610 patients from four studies that investigated the association between knee flexor strength and second ACL injuries. At 1 year after ACL reconstruction, the knee flexor strength LSI had recovered to 89.0% (95% CI 87.3; 90.7%) and 88.3% (95% CI 85.5; 91.1%) for the velocities of 60°/s and 180°/s, respectively. At 2 years, the LSI was 91.7% (95% CI 90.8; 92.6%) and 91.2% (95% CI 88.1; 94.2%), for velocities of 60°/s and 180°/s, respectively. For the association between knee flexor strength and second ACL injuries, there was insufficient and contradictory data.

CONCLUSIONS

There was low to very low certainty of evidence indicating that the recovery of knee flexor strength LSI, defined as ≥ 90% of the uninjured side, takes up to 2 years after ACL reconstruction with HT autografts. Whether knee flexor strength deficits influence the association of second ACL injuries is still uncertain. There was considerable heterogeneity in the methodology used for knee flexor strength assessment, which together with the low to very low certainty of evidence, warrants further caution in the interpretation of our results.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022286773.

Metal interference screw fixation combinations show high revision rates in primary hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Different fixation methods in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been associated with different revision rates, specifically in the early postoperative period. However, most previous research has either grouped together different fixation types or evaluated femoral-sided fixation or tibial-sided fixation separately. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine ACL revision rates for specific combinations of femoral and tibial fixation methods within 2 years of primary hamstring tendon autograft ACLR based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry (SNKLR).

METHODS

Patients that underwent primary hamstring tendon autograft ACLR between 2005 and 2018 in the SNKLR were included. The collected data included patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index [BMI]), activity at time of injury, surgical information (concomitant injuries, time from injury to surgery, fixation types at the femur and tibia), and subsequent revision ACLR. Revision rate within 2 years of the index procedure was chosen, as ACLR fixation is most likely to contribute to ACLR revision within the first 2 years, during graft maturation.

RESULTS

Of the 23,238 included patients undergoing primary hamstring ACLR, 581 (2.5%) underwent revision ACLR within 2 years of the index procedure. Among the combinations used for > 300 patients, the femoral metal interference screw/tibial metal interference screw fixation combination had the highest revision rate followed by metal interference screw/resorbable screw and Endobutton/AO screw fixation combinations, with respective revision rates of 4.0, 3.0, and 3.0%. The lowest revision rate within 2 years of ACLR was found in the Endobutton/metal interference screw with backup Osteosuture fixation combination, used in 433 cases, with a failure rate of 0.9%.

CONCLUSION

Different early ACL revision rates were found across different combinations of femoral and tibial fixation devices within 2 years of primary hamstring tendon autograft ACLR. Metal interference screw fixation, particularly when performed on both the femoral and tibial sides, most frequently resulted in revision ACLR. These findings may be helpful for surgeons in selecting appropriate fixation devices for hamstring ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Autograft patellar bone-tendon-bone use does not increase operative time in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common procedure that has been shown to have relatively good outcomes amongst various graft types. Operative time in ACLR has been found to influence outcomes and cost. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of operative time in primary arthroscopically performed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and graft type while controlling for confounders that influence time.

Methods

All patients who received ACLR between 2018 and 2022 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Exclusion criteria consisted of age (≤16 years), revisions, concomitant ligament reconstruction or tendon repairs, or other simultaneously performed procedures that could potentially add substantial variation in operative time. The primary outcome was operative time. Graft types included allograft, bone-tendon-bone (BTB) autograft, hamstring tendon (HS) autograft and quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft.

Results

A total of 1813 primary ACLRs were included. The average operative time was 98.9 ± 33.0 min. Graft utilization varies considerably among surgeons. The most used graft type was BTB autograft (42.6%) followed by HS autograft (32.3%) and allograft (21.4%). Only 68 cases (3.8%) used a QT autograft. Seven of the 15 included surgeons primarily used BTB autograft. One surgeon predominately used QT autograft. No difference in operative time was observed among the autograft types (p = 0.342). Allograft ACLR was significantly faster by 27-33 min compared to using BTB autograft, HS autograft, or QT autograft (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Operative time did not vary by type of autograft selected. Allograft ACLR was performed approximately 30 min faster than autograft ACLR. Further studies examining the effect on patient outcomes of reduced operative time and minimizing graft harvest morbidity in ACLR is important to more accurately determine the cost-effectiveness of allograft ACLR.

Is absolute or relative knee flexor strength related to patient-reported outcomes in patients treated with ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft? An analysis of eccentric Nordic hamstring strength and seated concentric isokinetic strength

BACKGROUND

There is a need for better understanding of how knee flexor strength influence patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between the eccentric NordBord test and the seated concentric Biodex test with PROs, during the first year of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon (HT) autograft.

METHODS

Patients with an index ACL reconstruction with an HT autograft participating in a rehabilitation registry were screened for inclusion. Outcomes of interest were the correlation between absolute (N/kg or Nm/kg) and relative (limb symmetry index) knee flexor strength measured in the NordBord and Biodex with the results of PROs. The significance level was set at p < 0.05 and Pearson's correlation coefficient was used.

RESULTS

137 patients were included (47% women) with a mean age of 24.8 ± 8.4 years. There were non-significant and weak correlations between relative strength for all PROs. Significant and weak correlations between absolute strength in the Biodex with the Knee Self-Efficacy Scale₁₈ (K-SES₁₈) present at 4 and 8 months, and for the ACL-Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI) at 12 months was observed, accounting for 8.4-15.7% of the variance. Significant and weak correlations between absolute strength in the Nordbord with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale subscale Sports and Recreation at 4 months, the K-SES₁₈ present and the ACL-RSI at 8 months were observed, accounting for 9.4-14.4% of the variance.

CONCLUSION

Absolute knee flexor strength relative to bodyweight for both the Biodex and NordBord test appeared to have a stronger relationship with perceived knee function than relative knee flexor strength, although the observed correlations were weak.

Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter using preoperative measurements with different cut-offs between genders

PURPOSE

Studies have suggested some predictors for hamstring tendon (HT) autograft diameter based on anthropometric factors and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with variable results. Some authors have attributed the variability to gender differences. This prospective cohort reports the sensitivity and specificity of anthropometric and MRI predictors in males and females separately to determine the difference.

METHODS

Forty-two eligible patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and MRI in our center were included. ACLR was performed by the senior surgeon using a 4-stranded HT autograft for all patients. A blinded musculoskeletal radiologist measured the cross-sectional area (CSA) of gracilis and semitendinosus tendons using the free-hand region of interest tool for all patients. An orthopaedic resident (PGY4) collected anthropometric factors and measured intraoperative autograft diameter.

RESULTS

Mean intraoperative autograft diameter was 8.0 mm. Females had a significantly lower autograft diameter (7.4 vs. 8.2, P < 0.001), smaller gracilis (6.9 vs. 7.9, P = 0.003) and semitendinosus CSA (11.5 vs. 12.8, P = 0.014) compared to males. ROC curve analysis resulted different cut-off values with high sensitivity and specificity for semitendinosus and combined CSA regarding gender.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, CSA of either isolated or combined HTs on preoperative axial MRI, height, and weight are the strongest predictors of intraoperative autograft diameter. It is suggested to consider different cut-offs for males and females to have a better clinical guide for surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Study with a Mean Follow-up of Two Years

BACKGROUND

Peroneus longus tendon can be a suitable alternative autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcome and donor site morbidity in ACLR using peroneus longus tendon autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft.

METHODS

In a comparative cross-sectional study, ACLR was performed with quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft in 65 patients between 2017 and 2018, and in another group, peroneus longus tendon autograft was used for ACLR in 65 patients between 2018 and 2019. The same surgical technique, fixation method, and postoperative protocol were used in both groups. The knee functional outcomes were assessed according to the Lysholm score and the International Knee Documentation Committee scale at preoperative and at the end of at least 2 years after the procedure. Moreover, graft diameter was measured intraoperatively. Thigh circumference, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), The Foot & Ankle Disability Index (FADI), and ankle range of motion (ROM) were used to evaluate ankle donor site morbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients (65 patients in each group) were evaluated with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (range 24-31 months). Both groups showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes and knee stability. The peroneus longus graft diameter was significantly larger than the hamstring diameter (P<0.001). Assessment of AOFAS, FADI, and ankle ROM showed no apparent ankle joint dysfunction in the peroneus longus tendon group.

CONCLUSION

Faster knee extensions, less anteromedial knee pain, and thigh hypotrophy were observed in peroneus longus tendon patients. Peroneus longus tendon autograft can be an appropriate autograft for ACLR due to its strength, larger graft diameter, and avoiding potential complications of hamstring autograft obtained from the knee region.

Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Patellar Tendon vs Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Mean Follow-up of 15 Years

BACKGROUND

The two most common surgical treatment modalities for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL), patellar tendon (PT) and hamstring tendon (HS) autografts, have been shown to have outcomes that are both similar and favorable; however, many of these are short or intermediate-term. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a minimum 10-year follow-up data to compare the long-term outcomes of ACL reconstructions performed using PT and HS autografts.

METHODS

This systematic review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A search of three databases (PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE) was performed to identify RCTs with a minimum of 10-year follow-up that compared clinical and/or functional outcomes between PT and HS autografts.

RESULTS

Four RCTs with a total of 299 patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up ranged from 10.2 to 17 years (mean, 14.79 years). No significant differences in knee laxity or clinical outcome scores were demonstrated in any of the studies. One study found that PT autografts were significantly more likely to have osteoarthritis identified by radiographic findings. Two studies found that patients with PT autografts reported increase kneeling pain, while none of the four studies reported a difference in anterior knee pain. There were no significant differences in graft failure rates.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrates no long-term difference in clinical or functional outcomes between PT and HS autografts. However, radiographic and subjective outcomes indicate that patients with PT autografts may experience greater kneeling pain and osteoarthritis. Therefore, orthopaedic surgeons should consider patient-centric factors when discussing graft options with patients.

Local variations in mechanical properties of human hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction do not translate to a mechanically inferior strand

A ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is often reconstructed with a multiple-strand autograft of a semitendinosus tendon alone or combined with a gracilis tendon. Up to 10% of patients experience graft rupture. This potentially results from excessive local tissue strains under physiological loading which could either result in direct mechanical failure of the graft or induce mechanobiological weakening. Since the original location in the hamstring tendon cannot be traced back from an autograft rupture site, this study explored whether clinical outcome could be further improved by avoiding specific locations or regions of human semitendinosus and/or gracilis tendons in ACL grafts due to potential mechanical or biochemical inferiority. Additionally, it examined numerically which clinically relevant graft configurations experience the lowest strains - and therefore the lowest rupture risk - when loaded with equal force. Remnant full-length gracilis tendons from human ACL reconstructions and full-length semitendinosus- and ipsilateral gracilis tendons of human cadaveric specimens were subjected to a stress-relaxation test. Locations at high risk of mechanical failure were identified using particle tracking to calculate local axial strains. As biochemical properties, the water-, collagen-, glycosaminoglycan- and DNA content per tissue region (representing graft strands) were determined. A viscoelastic lumped parameter model per tendon region was calculated. These models were applied in clinically relevant virtual graft configurations, which were exposed to physiological loading. Configurations that provided lower stiffness - i.e., experiencing higher strains under equal force - were assumed to be at higher risk of failure. Suitability of the gracilis tendon proper to replace semitendinosus muscle-tendon junction strands was examined. Deviations in local axial strains from the globally applied strain were of similar magnitude as the applied strain. Locations of maximum strains were uniformly distributed over tendon lengths. Biochemical compositions varied between tissue regions, but no trends were detected. Viscoelastic parameters were not significantly different between regions within a tendon, although semitendinosus tendons were stiffer than gracilis tendons. Virtual grafts with a full-length semitendinosus tendon alone or combined with a gracilis tendon displayed the lowest strains, whereas strains increased when gracilis tendon strands were tested for their suitability to replace semitendinosus muscle-tendon junction strands. Locations experiencing high local axial strains - which could increase risk of rupture - were present, but no specific region within any of the investigated graft configurations was found to be mechanically or biochemically deviant. Consequently, no specific tendon region could be indicated to provide a higher risk of rupture for mechanical or biochemical reasons. The semitendinosus tendon provided superior stiffness to a graft compared to the gracilis tendon. Therefore, based on our results it would be recommended to use the semitendinosus tendon, and use the gracilis tendon in cases where further reinforcement of the graft is needed to attain the desired length and cross-sectional area. All these data support current clinical standards.

Determinants of regeneration and strength of hamstrings after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-fate of hamstring tendon

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgical procedure using hamstring autograft is the most common surgery performed in the arena of sports medicine and arthroscopy. Most studies in literature are ambiguous regarding the fate of hamstrings based on function, regenerative potential, and cross-sectional area (CSA). The aim of this research study is analysis of the fate of hamstring tendons (both semitendinosus and gracilis) during the time course for determinants of regeneration and strength.

METHODS

Fifty patients who were operated for unilateral isolated ACL reconstruction from July 2015 to June 2018 were evaluated for the fate of harvested hamstring tendons which included the following: regeneration, cross-sectional area (CSA), strength, and insertion of regenerated hamstrings by isometric torque and isokinetic strength. MRI of knee was performed for both knees concerning the semitendinosus (ST), gracilis (G), Sartorius, biceps femoris, and medial head of gastrocnemius.

RESULTS

Eighty-four percent men and 16% women within a mean patient age of 34 ± 4.12 years were evaluated and all 50 (100%) patients demonstrated hamstring regeneration by the MRI measurements at six months and at one year post-ACL reconstruction. The torque of isometric knee flexion measured in 60° was found to be remarkably lower in the ACL-reconstructed lower extremity compared to that of the contralateral limb (87.13 ± 20.18% of BW), at 90° (49.17 ± 15.09% BW), and at 105° (43.91 ± 13.17% BW), respectively (p < 0.01). However, at 30° flexion and 45° flexion, the difference was insignificant (116.48 ± 21.07% BW for 30° and 100.16 ± 25.12% BW for 45°).

CONCLUSIONS

It was found that the properties of musculotendinous units of ST and G were significantly transformed after their harvesting for ACL reconstruction and these weaknesses contribute to the flexion deficit of knee in the deeper range of flexion in the operated limb. Therefore, approaches facilitating tendon regeneration and preservation must be warranted.

Quadriceps strength to body weight ratio is a significant indicator for initiating jogging after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Quadriceps strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an important criterion for progress in rehabilitation and return to sports. The purpose of this study was to determine whether quadriceps strength to body weight ratio (QS/BW) is a significant indicator for initiating jogging after ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Isokinetic quadriceps strength at 60°/s was measured and a jogging trial was completed 3 months after ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft in 83 patients (36 male, 47 female; mean age, 26.6 ± 12.4 years). Based on the jogging trial results, patients were assigned to either a successful jogging group (mean velocity ≥ 9 km/h) or an unsuccessful jogging group (mean velocity < 9 km/h). The association between QS/BW and successful jogging after surgery was investigated by multivariate logistic regression analysis and the cut-off value was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (53.0%) were assigned to the successful jogging group and 39 (47.0%) to the unsuccessful jogging group. QS/BW was independently associated with initiating jogging 3 months after surgery. The cut-off value of QS/BW for successful jogging was 1.45 Nm/kg (area under the curve = 0.94; sensitivity = 88.6%, specificity = 87.2%). All of the patients who initiated jogging with QS/BW of > 1.45 Nm/kg at 3 months returned to sports without recurrence or contralateral injury by 10 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

QS/BW is a significant indicator for safely initiating jogging 3 months after ACL reconstruction. The cut-off value of QS/BW for initiating jogging was 1.45 Nm/kg.

Identifying potential patient-specific predictors for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcome - a diagnostic in vitro tissue remodeling platform

Purpose

Upon anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, reconstruction is often required, with the hamstring tendon autograft as most widely used treatment. Post-operative autograft remodeling enhances graft rupture risk, which occurs in up to 10% of the patient population, increasing up to 30% of patients aged under 20 years. Therefore, this research aimed to identify potential biological predictors for graft rupture, derived from patient-specific tissue remodeling-related cell properties in an in vitro micro-tissue platform.

Methods

Hamstring tendon-derived cells were obtained from remnant autograft tissue after ACL reconstructions (36 patients, aged 12–55 years), and seeded in collagen I gels on a micro-tissue platform. Micro-tissue compaction over time – induced by altering the boundary constraints – was monitored. Pro-collagen I expression was assessed using ELISA, and protein expression of tenomodulin and α-smooth muscle actin were measured using Western blot. Expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinase 2 were determined using gelatin zymography.

Results

Only micro-tissues corresponding to younger patients occasionally released themselves from the constraining posts. Pro-collagen I expression was significantly higher in younger patients. Differences in α-smooth muscle actin and tenomodulin expression between patients were found, but these were age-independent. Active matrix metalloproteinase 2 expression was slightly more abundant in younger patients.

Conclusions

The presented micro-tissue platform exposed patient-specific remodeling-related differences between tendon-derived cells, with the micro-tissues that released from constraining posts and pro-collagen I expression best reflecting the clinical age-dependency of graft rupture. These properties can be the starting point in the quest for potential predictors for identifying individual patients at risk for graft rupture.

Factors that Predicts the Size of Autologous Hamstring Tendon Graft for Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effectiveness of demographic data and radiographic measurements for predicting the diameter and length of autologous semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (GR) graft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four cases were included to measure the size of 3 or 4 strands of ST and GR tendons retrospectively. The hamstring length on radiograph was defined as the length from the lowest point of ischial tuberosity to intercondylar notch of the femur. The linear and logistic regression analysis was used to assess the roles of the predictor variables, as demographic and radiologic data, in the outcome variables, as diameter of tendon grafts. The cross-validation with hold-out samples and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were also calculated.

RESULTS

The hamstring and leg length measurement and gender were associated with the diameter of 4-stranded ST tendon graft. The hamstring length measurement, age and BMI were the factors associated with the diameter of 3-stranded ST tendon graft. The hamstring length measurement was found as a common factor for predicting diameters of hamstring tendon with reliable predictability. Moreover, the equation of multivariate regression analysis for the diameter of 4-stranded ST tendon graft showed the most validated power of prediction. All of the cross-validated R ² values were calculated as similar results of multivariate model, but CCC between the measured diameter and estimated value on the predictive equation showed moderate agreement only (CCC = 0.694).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining radiographic length measurements with demographic data showed reliable prediction in identifying the risk of inappropriate graft diameters.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV retrospective cohort study.

Quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstructed subjects overshoot target knee extension angle during active proprioception testing

PURPOSE

To compare the active joint position sense (JPS), muscle strength, and knee functions in individuals who had anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft, hamstring tendon autograft, tibialis anterior allograft and healthy individuals. It was hypothesized that when compared to an age and gender-matched healthy control group, subjects who were post-ACL reconstruction would display impaired active joint position sense, knee extensor and flexor strength symmetry and knee function at 1 year post-surgery. A secondary hypothesis was that differences would exist between the quadriceps tendon autograft, hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft groups.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with ACL reconstruction and 20 healthy individuals were included. Active JPS reproduction was measured at 15°, 45° and 75° of knee flexion. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and one-leg hop test were used to assess the functional status of the patients.

RESULTS

The JPS detection was different at the 15° target angle between groups (F_3.86 = 24.56, p < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of quadriceps tendon autograft group patients failed to identify the 15° active JPS assessment position compared to the other groups (p < 0.0001). The quadriceps index was lower in patients compared to healthy individuals (p < 0.001), while the hamstring index was similar (n.s.). The knee functional outcomes were similar between ACL reconstructed groups and healthy controls (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Knee proprioception deficits and impaired muscle strength were evident among patients at a mean 13.5 months post-ACL reconstruction compared with healthy controls. Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon autograft may be more likely to actively over-estimate knee position near terminal extension. Physiotherapists may need to focus greater attention on terminal knee extension proprioceptive awareness among this patient group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

No difference in outcomes between femoral fixation methods with hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is mixed opinion regarding the optimal femoral fixation method for hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Currently, no study exists showing a superior method of femoral fixation, and thus the topic has remained controversial. The purpose of this study is to network meta-analyze the randomized control trials comparing cortical-button (CB), cross-pin (CP) and interference screws (IS) for femoral fixation with hamstring tendon autograft in ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

The literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized control trials comparing CB, CP and IS were included. Clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist approach to network meta-analysis, with all statistical analysis performed using R, with a p-value <0.05 being considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 11 studies included comparing; 194 patients with CB to 201 patients with CP (6 studies), 48 patients with CB to 50 patients with IS (1 study), and 172 patients with CP to 162 patients with IS (5 studies). One study compared all three groups, including 48 patients with CB, 50 patients with IS, and 52 with CP. There was a mean follow-up time of 26.4 months. No statistically significant difference was found between the fixation methods when evaluating knee stability, functional outcomes, graft failures, or revision procedures.

CONCLUSION

Using a network meta-analysis, our study found that, there was no difference in failure rate, knee stability, functional outcomes or incidence of revision procedures between CB, CP or IS femoral fixation techniques of hamstring tendon autografts in ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, network meta-analysis of Level I studies.

Graft failure is more frequent after hamstring than patellar tendon autograft

PURPOSE

The risk of graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions with hamstring or patellar tendon was evaluated in a French population of athletes.

METHODS

Athletes who had undergone ACL autograft reconstruction and who received rehabilitation care at the European Center for Sports Rehabilitation (CERS; Capbreton, France) were screened for this prospective cohort study. Eligibility criteria included a simple hamstring autograft or patellar tendon autograft surgical technique. Patients were contacted by phone to participate in follow-up during the second year after surgery. The primary endpoint was the graft failure frequency, evaluated with a multivariate logistic model with adjustment for baseline patient characteristics. The secondary endpoint was time to graft failure, analyzed by an adjusted Cox model.

RESULTS

A total of 2424 athletes were included after having a hamstring autograft (semitendinosus and gracilis) or a patellar tendon autograft between 2011 and 2014. Of the 988 athletes who responded to a follow-up phone call (40.7% response rate), 33 were excluded for new contralateral ACL rupture (3.3%), with 955 included for analysis (713 hamstring autografts; 242 patellar-tendon autografts). There were no significant differences between the baseline characteristics of the patients analyzed and the population which did not respond to the questionnaire. A significant difference in the frequency of graft failure was seen, 6.5% for hamstring autografts vs 2.1% for patellar-tendon autografts [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 3.64, 95% CI (1.55; 10.67); p = 0.007]. Mean time to graft failure was 10.7 vs 17.4 months for hamstring and patellar-tendon autografts respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 3.50, 95% CI (1.53; 10.11); p = 0.008]. Age less than 25 years significantly increased the frequency of graft failure [adjusted OR = 3.85 (1.89; 8.72); p < 0.001]. The rate of patients returning to competitive sport after the first graft was not significantly different for the two techniques: 70.8% for hamstring and 77.8% for patellar tendon [adjusted OR = 0.718; 95% CI (0.50; 1.02)].

CONCLUSIONS

Graft failure is significantly more frequent after hamstring than patellar tendon autografts in a French population, despite similar rates of return to competition. Athletes aged less than 25 years have a higher risk of failure than those aged ≥ 25 years. Our results are in accordance with recent Scandinavian studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Comparison of clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft versus soft-tissue allograft: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hamstring tendon autografts and soft-tissue allograft are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the clinical outcomes between these two grafts are controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to compare clinical outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts versus soft-tissue allografts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through 8 September 2017 to identify randomized controlled studies that compared hamstring tendon autografts with soft-tissue allografts for primary ACL reconstruction. Two authors independently graded the methodological quality of each eligible study using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and extracted relevant data. Statistical heterogeneity among the trials was evaluated with chi-square and I-square tests. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify potential differences according to type of reconstruction technique (single-bundle or double-bundle).

RESULTS

Eight studies with 785 combined patients (396 hamstring tendon autografts and 389 soft-tissue allografts) were included. Two studies had a high risk of bias. The other six studies had unclear risk of bias. There were significant differences between the groups in subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (mean difference [MD], 2.43; 95%CI, 0.69-4.18; p = 0.006), Tegner score (MD, 0.24; 95%CI, 0.03-0.45; p = 0.03), and side-to-side difference (MD, -1.37; 95%CI, -2.44 to -0.30; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the groups in Lysholm score, complications, pivot shift test, anterior drawer test, Lachman test, overall IKDC score, or range of motion. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that for primary ACL reconstruction using the single-bundle technique, soft-tissue allografts were inferior to hamstring tendon autografts in subjective IKDC score, anterior drawer test, and side-to-side difference.

CONCLUSION

Soft-tissue allografts are inferior to hamstring tendon autografts with respect to subjective patient evaluation and knee stability but superior in the complication of hypoesthesia for patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction.

Factors affecting quadriceps strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts in athletes

PURPOSE

Patients typically return to sports activities 6-12 months after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and quadriceps strength has been used as one of the criteria to return to sports activities. The purpose of this study is to identify the factors that affect quadriceps strength recovery after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft 6 months after surgery.

METHODS

Isokinetic quadriceps strength at 60°/s was measured preoperatively and 6 months after surgery in 193 athletes who underwent ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft. The quadriceps strength index was calculated by normalizing the peak torque of the involved leg with the uninvolved leg. The subjects were divided into two groups according to the quadriceps strength index 6 months after surgery: at least 85 % (n = 84) or less than 85 % (n = 109). Multivariate logistic regression analysis and a receiver operating curve analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The preoperative quadriceps strength index [odds ratio (OR) 1.02; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.03], age (OR 0.92; 95 % CI 0.86-0.98), sex (OR 2.45; 95 % CI 1.19-5.18), and knee pain (OR 0.17; 95 % CI 0.04-0.52) were independently associated with quadriceps strength recovery. The cut-off value of the preoperative quadriceps strength index was 70.2 % to obtain at least 85 % quadriceps strength index 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

To achieve sufficient quadriceps strength recovery at the timing of return to sports activities following ACL reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft, preoperative quadriceps strength, age, sex, and knee pain should be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Cross-sectional area of hamstring tendon autograft after anatomic triple-bundle ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the cross-sectional area changes in hamstring tendon autografts up to 5 years after the anatomic triple-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A total of 178 MRI scans from 139 patients (35 males, 104 females, mean age 30.4 years) with the anatomic triple-bundle ACL reconstructions were obtained to evaluate the cross-sectional area of the ACL grafts. They were classified into seven groups according to the period from reconstruction to MRI evaluation: Group -2 months (m.), Group 3-6 m., Group 7-12 m, Group 1-2 years (y.), Group 2-3 y., Group 3-4 y., and Group 4 y.-. Intra-operatively, the cross-sectional area of the graft was measured directly using a custom-made area micrometre. Post-operatively, the cross-sectional area of the grafts' mid-substance was measured with oblique axial MRI slices perpendicular to the long axis of the grafts using a digital radiology viewing program. The percent increase in the cross-sectional area was calculated by dividing the post-operative cross-sectional area by the intra-operative cross-sectional area.

RESULTS

The mean percent increase in the cross-sectional area in Groups -2 m., 3-6 m., 7-12 m., 1-2 y., 2-3 y., 3-4 y., and 4 y.- was 105.7 ± 14.0, 134.9 ± 20.0, 137.3 ± 27.8, 129.4 ± 22.2, 124.1 ± 20.4, 117.8 ± 16.9, and 117.1 ± 17.2 %, respectively. The percent increase in Groups 3-6 m., 7-12 m., and 1-2 y. was significantly greater than in Group -2 m., while that in Group 4 y.- was significantly less than in Group 7-12 m.

CONCLUSIONS

The cross-sectional area of the hamstring tendon autografts after the anatomic triple-bundle ACL reconstruction increases over time up to 1 year post-operatively, decreases gradually thereafter, and reaches plateau at around 3 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Comparison of hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft in arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes between hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft in arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients undergoing isolated single-bundle PCL reconstruction were enrolled in this study, and their data were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into group A [4-strand hamstring tendon autograft (4SHG), n = 18] and group B [2-strand tibialis anterior allograft (2STAG), n = 19] and followed up for 2 years at least. Several parameters including the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity rating and knee laxity arthrometer were evaluated, and physical examination was performed preoperatively and postoperatively, and postoperative complications were also observed in all patients. Meanwhile, the postoperative posterior instability was compared between the affected knee and the contra-lateral knee.

RESULTS

Compared with preoperative knee laxity and function, both groups had significant improvement postoperatively (P < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in knee laxity and function between both groups (n.s.). Compared with contra-lateral knee, the posterior stability was worse in the affected knee (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes were similar between 4SHG or 2STAG in PCL reconstruction. Compared with contra-lateral knees, the affected knees have slight residual knee laxity in both groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.