HLA-Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In the absence of an HLA-matched sibling donor, an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) is considered the leading candidate. However, in recent decades, the alternative donor pool has been extended to HLA-haploidentical donors, especially with the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). Comparative data for haploidentical and MUD allo-HCT in patients with MDS are scarce. We retrospectively analyzed 697 adult patients with MDS who underwent HLA-haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) with PTCy (n = 136), MUD bone marrow transplantation (MUD-BMT) (n = 465), or MUD peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (MUD-PBSCT) (n = 96) as their first allo-HCT between 2014 and 2020 using Japanese registry data. Multivariable analyses demonstrated faster neutrophil engraftment (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 2.90; P < .001) and platelet engraftment (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.72 to 3.10; P < 0001) in the MUD-PBSCT cohort compared with the haplo-PBSCT cohort. MUD-BMT was associated with a higher incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD than haplo-PBSCT (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.29; P = .048). Among patients without in vivo T cell depletion using antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (haplo-PBSCT, n = 136; MUD-BMT, n = 446; MUD-PBSCT, n = 65), MUD-PBSCT recipients experienced faster hematopoietic recovery, MUD-BMT recipients (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.32; P = .042) or MUD-PBSCT recipients (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.18; P = .03) had a higher incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD, and MUD-PBSCT recipients developed chronic GVHD more frequently than haplo-PBSCT recipients (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.89; P = .034). There were no significant differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, GVHD-free relapse-free survival, relapse, or nonrelapse mortality in the haplo-PBSCT cohort versus the MUD-BMT or MUD-PBSCT cohorts. In conclusion, despite differences in the incidences of hematopoietic engraftment and GVHD depending on graft type and ATG use in MUD transplant recipients, major transplantation outcomes were comparable between recipients of haplo-PBSCT using PTCy and recipients of MUD-BMT or MUD-PBSCT.

Comparison of Allogeneic Transplant Outcomes Between Matched Sibling Donors and Alternative Donors in Patients Over 50 Years of Age with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 8/8 Allele-Matched Unrelated Donors and Unrelated Cord Blood Provide Better Leukemia-Free Survival Compared with Matched Sibling Donors During Nonremission Status

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The increased availability of alternative donor sources has broadened donor types for older patients without HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD). It is uncertain if an MSD should be the first option for allogeneic HCT in patients with AML over 50 years of age. The objective of this study was to compare survival and other post-transplant outcomes between MSDs, 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donors (MUDs), 7/8 allele-MUDs, unrelated cord blood (UCB), and haploidentical donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. We conducted a retrospective study to compare outcomes in 5704 patients with AML over 50 years of age and receiving allogeneic HCT between 2013 and 2021, using either MSD, 8/8 allele-MUD, 7/8 allele-MUD, UCB, or haploidentical donors in Japan. Complete remission (CR) and nonremission at HCT were analyzed separately for all analyses. In total, 3041 patients were CR, and 2663 patients were nonremission at the time of HCT. In multivariate analysis, donor type did not determine overall survival, irrespective of disease status at HCT. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) was significantly better for 8/8 allele-MUD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.93; P = .005) and UCB (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.88; P < .001), but not for 7/8 allele-MUD (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.19; P = .794), and haploidentical donor (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.05; P = .146) compared to the MSD group in nonremission status. However, donor type did not determine LFS among CR status. Relapse rates were significantly lower for 8/8 allele-MUD and UCB, whereas nonrelapse mortality was higher for UCB compared to the MSD group among both CR and nonremission status. Our registry-based study demonstrated that MSDs do not lead to superior survival compared to alternative donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. Furthermore, 8/8 allele-MUDs and UCB provide better LFS compared with MSDs during nonremission status. Therefore, MSD is not necessarily the best donor option for allogeneic HCT in this population.

Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Post- Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from an Unrelated or Mismatched Related Donor: A Comparative Study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT (CMWP-EBMT)

Outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) using an unrelated donor (UD) or a mismatched related donor (MMRD) remain unknown. We report a retrospective comparison of PTCy-based allo-HCT from a UD, non-PTCy allo-HCT from a UD, and PTCy allo-HCT from an MMRD. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with CML undergoing first allo-HCT between 2012 and 2019 from a UD with either PTCy or non-PTCy graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis or from an MMRD using PTCy. The primary endpoint was GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). A total of 1341 patients were included (82% in the non-PTCy UD cohort). With a median follow-up of 34.9 months, the 3-year GRFS was 43% in the non-PTCy cohort, 37% in the PTCy-UD cohort, and 39% PTCy-MMRD cohort (P = .15). Multivariable analyses revealed no significant differences among the 3 cohorts in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, RI, and nonrelapse mortality. Factors independently associated with worse OS in the overall cohort were Karnofsky Performance Status <90 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41 to 2.45; P < .001), older age (HR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.38; P < .001), and disease stage (compared to chronic phase [CP] 1): blast phase (HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.60 to 3.16; P < .001), accelerated phase (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.54; P = .03), and CP >2 (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.17; P = .005). These results suggest that allo-HCT in patients with CML using either a UD or an MMRD with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis are feasible transplantation, platforms and that the disease stage at allo-HCT remains a major prognostic factor, highlighting the importance of closely monitoring CML patients and proposing transplantation when indicated when still in CP1.

Comparison of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Adult Patients with Aplastic Anemia

Aplastic anemia patients who are refractory to immunosuppressive therapy or with very low neutrophil counts require allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has been a treatment option when an HLA-matched donor is not available, and HSCT from a related haploidentical donor using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (PTCy-haplo) recently became another important approach. We aimed to compare the outcomes of PTCy-haplo and UCBT in adult patients with aplastic anemia to identify more effective and safer approaches for alternative donor transplantation. Data in a nationwide registry were analyzed retrospectively to assess the outcomes of aplastic anemia patients age ≥16 years who underwent PTCy-haplo or UCBT as their first HSCT between 2016 and 2020. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS) after HSCT. Secondary endpoints included 1-year failure-free survival (FFS), neutrophil and platelet engraftment, and acute and chronic GVHD. Eighty-three patients who underwent PTCy-haplo (n = 24) or UCBT (n = 59) were eligible. The 1-year OS rate was 78.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.7% to 90.5%) in the PTCy-haplo group and 77.5% (95% CI, 64.5% to 86.3%; P = .895) in the UCBT group. The 1-year FFS rate was 78.7% (95% CI, 56.1% to 90.6%) in the PTCy-haplo group and 62.2% (95% CI, 48.5% to 73.3%; P = .212) in the UCBT group. Among patients age <40 years, the PTCy-haplo group had a significantly higher FFS rate (92.9% [95% CI, 59.1% to 99.0%]) vs 63.9% [95% CI, 43.2% to 78.7%]; P = .047). Neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment rates were significantly higher in the PTCy-haplo group compared with the UCBT group: 95.8% (95% CI, 73.9% to 99.4%) vs 78.0% (95% CI, 65.1% to 86.6%, P < .001) and 83.3% (95% CI, 61.5% to 93.4%) vs 72.9% (95% CI, 59.6% to 82.4%; P = .025). No significant difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD between the 2 groups. Aplastic anemia patients achieved significantly higher neutrophil and platelet engraftment rates with PTCy-haplo than with UCBT. OS and the incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were similar between the 2 groups. In patients age <40 years, the FFS rate was higher in the PTCy-haplo group. PTCy-haplo is promising for alternative donor transplantation in adult patients with aplastic anemia.

Successful treatment of DOCK8 deficiency by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from alternative donors

Dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) deficiency is a rare autosomal recessive inborn error of immunity (IEI) characterized by eczematous dermatitis, elevated serum IgE, and recurrent infections, comprising a seemingly hyper-IgE syndrome (HIES). DOCK8 deficiency is only curable with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but the outcome of HCT from alternative donors is not fully understood. Here, we describe the cases of two Japanese patients with DOCK8 deficiency who were successfully treated by allogeneic HCT from alternative donors. Patient 1 underwent cord blood transplantation at the age of 16 years, and Patient 2 underwent haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide at the age of 22 years. Each patient received a fludarabine-based conditioning regimen. Their clinical manifestations, including refractory molluscum contagiosum, promptly improved post-HCT. They achieved successful engraftment and immune reconstitution without serious complications. Alternative donor sources such as cord blood and haploidentical donors can be options for allogeneic HCT for DOCK8 deficiency.

Haploidentical transplants deliver equal outcomes to matched sibling transplants: a propensity score-matched analysis

The success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for hematological malignancies is heavily dependent on the availability of suitable donors. Haploidentical donor (HID) and matched sibling donor (MSD) are two important donor options providing faster and easier sources of stem cells, however, due to confounding factors present in most retrospective studies, the validity of comparing outcomes between these two donor types remains uncertain. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of a prospective clinical trial (trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; #ChiCTR-OCH-12002490; registered 22 February 2012; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=7061 ) to compare outcomes of HID versus MSD peripheral blood stem cell-derived transplants in patients with hematologic malignancies between 2015 and 2022. All HID-receiving patients had antithymocyte globulin-based conditioning. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize potential confounding factors between the two cohorts. A total of 1060 patients were initially reviewed and then 663 patients were ultimately included in the analysis after propensity score matching. The overall survival, relapse-free survival, non-relapse mortality rate and cumulative incidence of relapse were similar between HID and MSD cohorts. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with positive measurable residual disease in first complete remission may have better overall survival with an HID transplant. The present demonstrated that haploidentical transplants can provide outcomes comparable to conventional MSD transplants, and HID should be recommended as one of the optimal donor choices for patients with positive measurable residual disease in first complete remission.

Effect of CD34+ Cell Dose on the Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide

The impact of infused CD34⁺ cell dose on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) using standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis remains controversial. Information on this subject is scarce for alloHSCT using high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We aimed to assess the effect of CD34⁺ cell dose in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts on the outcome of alloHSCT using PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis. To do so, we conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 221 consecutive adult patients who underwent PTCy alloHSCT from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSDs; n = 22), HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUDs; n = 83), mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs; n = 73), and haploidentical donors (n = 43). Based on the binary partitioning method, 5 × 10⁶/kg was used as the optimal cutoff for CD34⁺ cell dose. According to our institutional protocol, the maximum CD34⁺ cell dose was capped at 8 × 10⁶/kg. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups based on CD34⁺ cell dose: high dose (>5 to 8 × 10⁶/kg) and low dose (≤5 × 10⁶/kg). Patients receiving high-dose CD34⁺-containing grafts had significantly shorter median times to neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment compared to those who received low-dose CD34+ (19 days versus 21 days [P = .002] and 16 days versus 22 days [P = .04], respectively). There were no differences between the high-dose and low-dose groups in the cumulative incidence of day +100 acute GVHD (grade II-IV: 25% versus 23% [P = .7]; grade III-IV: 5% versus 4% [P = .4], respectively) or 2-year chronic GVHD (moderate/severe GVHD: 9% versus 6%; P = .5). There was no impact of CD34⁺ cell dose on survival outcomes with the use of MSDs, MUDs, or MMUDs. Recipients of haploidentical alloHSCT using low-dose CD34⁺ cells had significantly worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 6.01; P = .004) and relapse-free survival (HR, 4.57; P = .004). In recipients of PBSC PTCy alloHSCT, infused CD34⁺ cell doses >5 to 8 × 10⁶/kg were associated with faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment, independent of donor type. Our study suggests an impact of CD34⁺ cell dose on survival outcomes only with haploidentical donors, for whom the administration of a CD34⁺ cell dose ≤5 × 10⁶/kg significantly decreased survival outcomes.

Haploidentical Versus Matched Unrelated Donor Transplants Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Lymphomas

When using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for lymphoma patients, it is currently unknown whether a matched unrelated donor (MUD) or a haploidentical related donor is preferable if both are available. In this study we wanted to test whether using a haploidentical donor has the same results of a MUD. A total of 2140 adults (34% Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, 66% European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry) aged ≥18 years who received their first haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) or MUD-HCT (8/8 match at HLA-loci A, B, C, and DRB1) for lymphoma using PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis from 2010 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The majority of both MUD and haploidentical HCTs received reduced intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning (74% and 77%, respectively) and used a peripheral blood stem cell graft (91% and 60%, respectively) and a 3-drug GVHD prophylaxis (PTCy + calcineurin inhibitor + MMF in 54% and 90%, respectively). Haploidentical HCT has less favorable results versus MUD cohort in terms of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR= = 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-2.27; P < .001), progression-free survival (HR=1.39; 95% CI, 1.10-1.79; P = .008), nonrelapse mortality (HR = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.21-3.07; P = .006), platelet engraftment (HR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.80; P < .001), acute grade 2-4 GVHD incidence (HR = 1.65; 95% CI, 1.28-2.14; P < .001), and chronic GVHD (HR = 1.79; 95% CI, 1.30-2.48, P < .001). No significant differences were observed in terms of relapse and neutrophil engraftment. Adjusting for propensity score yielded similar results. Whenever MUD is available in a timely manner, it should be preferred over a haploidentical donor when using PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for patients with lymphoma.

Alternative Transplantation With Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Aplastic Anemia: A Retrospective Report From the BMF-WG of Hunan Province, China

Although the possibility of first-line hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from alternative donors in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients has been suggested recently, transplantation strategies are still being investigated. We established a novel post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based HCT protocol for patients with SAA in prior studies. We explores the effectiveness and safety of this HCT approach either as first-line or as salvage treatment in SAA patients. Outcomes of 71 consecutive young patients, who received HCT from unrelated or haploidentical donors, were retrospectively analyzed. According to their treatment before transplantation, the patients were classified into treatment-naive (TN) and relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients. The R/R patients were designated as such when a patient did not respond to previous immunosuppressive therapy or relapsed. We administered an antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-free, total body irradiation (TBI)-free conditioning regimen comprising cyclophosphamide, busulfan, and fludarabine, all in an intravenous formula. We used a thorough post-transplantation prophylaxis regimen for GVHD, including post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and short-term methotrexate and long-term cyclosporine A. The median age of the cohort was 16 (95% confidence interval, 12-20) years at transplantation. Most patients (61 of 71) received HCT from haploidentical donors, and the others received HCT from unrelated donors. TN patients (n = 38) were younger and had a shorter time-to-transplant and lower HCT-specific comorbidity index than patients with R/R diseases (n = 33). The frequencies of graft failure, grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and moderate-severe chronic GVHD were similar, at 5.3% versus 6.5% (P = .057), 8.3% versus 0% (P = .109), and 5.7% versus 0% (P = .199) between R/R and TN patients. With a median 42-month follow-up, the frequencies of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were higher in the TN group than in the R/R group (100% versus 84.8% [P = .013] and 86.8% versus 75.8% [P = .255], respectively). All patients who achieved successful engraftment showed full donor chimerism. Four patients, all in the R/R group, suffered from donor-type aplasia; of these, 2 died, 1 was salvaged with another transplantation, and the final one was still receiving transfusion at the last follow-up. Currently, 93.9% (62 of 66) of the patients are alive more than 12 months after transplantation; of these 93.5% (58 of 62) no longer receive immunosuppression, including 91.7% (33 of 34) of the TN group and 89.3% (25 of 28) in the R/R group. This novel TBI-free and ATG-free HCT protocol using a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen followed by modified PTCy achieved promising engraftment, minimal GVHD risk, and encouraging OS and EFS. Our study suggests that unrelated or haploidentical HCT with PTCy can be used as a first-line treatment for young patients with SAA. Nevertheless, further efforts are needed to explore possibilities for older patients and patients with a poor performance status.

[The impact of donor-to-recipient gender compatibility on outcomes of haploid hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological malignancies]

Objective: To investigate how gender differences between the donor and the recipient affect the effectiveness of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and pure peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) in the treatment of malignant hematological diseases. Methods: From February 2015 to September 2020, 648 hematological malignancies patients underwent myeloablative condition regimen haplo-HSCT treatment at the Bone Marrow Transplant Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. The median age was 32 (14-62) years, with 363 males (56.0% ) and 285 females (44.0% ) present. 242 cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (37.3% ) , 293 cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (45.2% ) , 56 cases of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (8.7% ) , 27 cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (4.2% ) , and 30 cases of other hematological malignancies (4.6% ) . Results: ① The 3-year overall survival (OS) , DFS, the incidence of Ⅱ-Ⅳ grade acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) , the incidence of Ⅲ-Ⅳ grade aGVHD, the 3-year incidence of moderate & severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) , severe cGVHD, the 3-year incidence of relapse, and NRM of the whole group were (73.10±1.90) % , (70.80±1.90) % , (33.96±1.87) % , (13.08±1.33) % , (35.10±2.14) % , (10.66±1.38) % , (19.43±1.67) % , and (9.80±1.24) % , respectively. ②There was no statistically significant difference between the donor-recipient gender match and donor-recipient gender mismatch groups in the 28-day cumulative neutrophil engraftment rate, 28-day cumulative platelet engraftment rate, the incidence of Ⅱ-Ⅳ grade aGVHD, the incidence of Ⅲ-Ⅳ grade aGVHD, 3-year OS, 3-year DFS, the cumulative incidence of relapse, NRM, and incidence of moderate & severe cGVHD, severe cGVHD. ③The 28-day cumulative neutrophil engraftment rate did not differ statistically between the male-female, female-female, male-male, and female-male groups (P=0.148) . The incidence of Ⅱ-Ⅳ grade aGVHD, the incidence of Ⅲ-Ⅳ grade aGVHD, 3-year OS, 3-year DFS, cumulative relapse rate, and NRM, and the incidence of cGVHD were not statistically different among the four groups (P>0.05) . The 28-day cumulative platelet engraftment rate of the female-male group was significantly lower than male-female group, and the female-female group [ (91.45±2.63) % vs. (94.77±1.75) % , P=0.004; (91.45±2.63) % vs. (95.54±2.05) % , P=0.005]. No significant difference existed in the 28-day cumulative platelet engraftment rate between the female-male group and the male-male group [ (91.45±2.63) % vs. (95.08±1.41) % , P=0.284]. ④Among patients ≤35 years old, the 3-year incidence of severe cGVHD patients receiving sister donors and sibling donors were (26.71±5.90) % and (10.33±4.43) % , respectively (P=0.054) . Patients accepting daughter donors and son donors had a 3-year incidence of moderate and severe cGVHD that was 40.07% vs. 27.41% , respectively, among those over 35 (40.07±6.65) % vs. (27.41±4.54) % (P=0.084) . ⑤Female donors to male recipients had a significantly lower 28-day cumulative platelet engraftment rate compared to the other groups [ (91.45±2.63) % vs. (95.08±0.95) % , P=0.037]. ⑥ Female donors to male recipients had a significantly lower 28-day cumulative platelet engraftment rate than the other groups in the ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F) 10 mg/kg group [ (89.29±4.29) % vs. (94.49±1.45) % , P=0.037]. But when compared to the other groups in the Rabbit Antihuman Thymocyte Immunoglobulin (rATG-T) 6 mg/kg group, the 28-day cumulative platelet implantation rate between female donors and male recipients was not significantly different [ (93.44±3.38) % vs. (95.62±1.26) % , P=0.404]. Conclusion: The main clinical outcomes of patients with malignant blood diseases following transplantation are unaffected by the gender combination of the donor and patient in the haplo-HSCT mode based on ATG and PBSC sources. Female donors to male recipients have a lower 28-day cumulative platelet engraftment rate and longer platelet engraftment times.

Comparisons of unmanipulated haploidentical donor, unrelated cord blood donor and matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric acquired severe aplastic anemia: a single center study

We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 240 pediatric SAA patients who underwent unmanipulated alternative HSCT between September 2012 and November 2020 at our center. The incidence of GF (PGF + SGF) was higher in the UCBD cohort compared to the MUD and HID cohorts [(13.5% ± 6.5%) vs (0%), and (1.6% ± 5.3%), respectively, p = .0001]. The incidence of platelet engraftment within 180 days post-HSCT was lower in the UCBD cohort (82.4% ± 2.3%) compared to the HID group (96.2% ± 1.3%) and the MUD group (97.4% ± 0.5%) (p = .020). the median duration time for platelet engraftment in the UCBD cohort was 29 days, longer than in HID cohort 14 days and the MUD cohort 13 days (p = .005). UCBD cohort had a lower 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) (70.5% ± 8.4%) compared to the HID cohort (81.1% ± 4.3%) and the MUD cohort (92.5% ± 3.1%) (p = .030) and lower 3-year GVHD/relapse free survival (GRFS) (63.3% ± 9.5.4%) compared to the HID cohort (75.5% ± 6.8%) and MUD cohort (87.9% ± 4.5%) (p = .002). UCBD-HSCT had inferior FFS and GRFS compared to an HSCT with an HID or MUD in pediatric patients with acquired SAA. A UCBD-HSCT had a higher GF and lower incidence of platelet engraftment and longer platelet engraftment time.

A comprehensive model to predict severe acute graft-versus-host disease in acute leukemia patients after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Background

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains the major cause of early mortality after haploidentical related donor (HID) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We aimed to establish a comprehensive model which could predict severe aGVHD after HID HSCT.

Methods

Consecutive 470 acute leukemia patients receiving HID HSCT according to the protocol registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03756675) were enrolled, 70% of them (n = 335) were randomly selected as training cohort and the remains 30% (n = 135) were used as validation cohort.

Results

The equation was as follows: Probability (grade III–IV aGVHD) = \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\frac{1}{{1 + \exp \left( { - \,{\text{Y}}} \right)}}$$\end{document}11+exp-Y, where Y = –0.0288 × (age) + 0.7965 × (gender) + 0.8371 × (CD3 + /CD14 + cells ratio in graft) + 0.5829 × (donor/recipient relation) − 0.0089 × (CD8 + cell counts in graft) − 2.9046. The threshold of probability was 0.057392 which helped separate patients into high- and low-risk groups. The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade III–IV aGVHD in the low- and high-risk groups was 4.1% (95% CI 1.9–6.3%) versus 12.8% (95% CI 7.4–18.2%) (P = 0.001), 3.2% (95% CI 1.2–5.1%) versus 10.6% (95% CI 4.7–16.5%) (P = 0.006), and 6.1% (95% CI 1.3–10.9%) versus 19.4% (95% CI 6.3–32.5%) (P = 0.017), respectively, in total, training, and validation cohort. The rates of grade III–IV skin and gut aGVHD in high-risk group were both significantly higher than those of low-risk group. This model could also predict grade II–IV and grade I–IV aGVHD.

Conclusions

We established a model which could predict the development of severe aGVHD in HID HSCT recipients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40164-022-00278-x.

Sub-myeloablative Second Transplantations with Haploidentical Donors and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide have limited Anti-Leukemic Effects in Pediatric Patients

Pediatric patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies who experience relapse after a prior allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) have an exceedingly poor prognosis. A second allogeneic HCT offers the potential for long-term cure but carries high risks of both subsequent relapse and HCT-related morbidity and mortality. Using haploidentical donors for HCT (haploHCT) can expand the donor pool and potentially enhance the graft-versus-leukemia effect but is accompanied by a risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The goal of this protocol was to intensify the antileukemia effect of haploHCT for pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies that relapsed after prior allogeneic HCT, while limiting regimen-associated toxicities. This phase II clinical trial evaluated a sub-myeloablative preparative regimen consisting of anti-thymocyte globulin, clofarabine, cytarabine, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide, in combination with plerixafor to sensitize leukemic blasts. Participants received a mobilized peripheral blood unmanipulated haploidentical donor graft with one dose of post-transplant cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis, followed by natural killer (NK) cell addback. Here we report the clinical outcomes and immune reconstitution of 17 participants treated on the study and 5 additional patients treated on similar single-patient treatment plans. Of the 22 participants analyzed, 12 (55%) had active disease at the time of HCT. The regimen provided robust immune reconstitution, with 21 participants (95%) experiencing neutrophil engraftment at a median of 14 days after HCT. In this high-risk population, the overall survival was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24%-64%), with a 12-month event-free survival of 31% (95% CI, 14%-51%) and cumulative incidence of relapse at 12 months of 50% (95% CI, 27%-69%). Four participants (18%) remain in remission at >5 years follow-up. Expected HCT-related organ-specific toxicities were observed, and 13 participants (59%) experienced acute or chronic GVHD. This intensified but sub-myeloablative regimen, followed by a high-dose unmanipulated haploidentical graft, post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, and NK cell infusion, resulted in adequate immune reconstitution but failed to overcome the elevated risks of relapse and treatment-related morbidity in this high-risk population.

Unmanipulated haploidentical donor and matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: a single-center study

We analyzed the outcomes of 32 patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) who underwent either a haploidentical donor (HID) or a matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Seventeen patients received an HSCT from an HID and 15 patients received an HSCT from an MUD. The median follow-up time of the surviving patients was 36 months (range: 12-96 months). No significant differences were observed in the 3-year overall survival (OS) between the HID and MUD cohorts (74.1%±11.4% vs. 93.3%±6.4%, respectively, p=.222) or in the 3-year failure-free survival (68.8%±11.8% vs. 86.7%±8.8%, respectively, p=.307). Treatment-related mortality occurred in five patients. A univariate analysis of risk factors revealed platelet engraftment failure negatively impacted OS and FFS. We conclude that HID and MUD-HSCT are feasible and can be effective options for those PNH patients with concomitant bone marrow failure, recurrent life-threatening thrombosis, and uncontrollable hemolysis.

Single Cord Blood Transplantation Versus Unmanipulated Haploidentical Transplantation for Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Complete Remission

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative post-remission therapy for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission (CR). The availability of alternative human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched donors, such as cord blood and haploidentical related donors, could allow patients to receive allogeneic HCT who are without an HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donor. The use of these alternative donors is preferable for patients with advanced disease due to the rapid availability. However, comparative data for cord blood transplantation (CBT) and haploidentical related donor transplantation (haplo-HCT) are limited for adult patients with AML in CR. We sought to compare overall survival (OS); leukemia-free survival (LFS); graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS); and chronic GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (CRFS) between single-unit CBT (SCBT) and haplo-HCT recipients for adult patients with intermediate- or poor-risk AML in CR. We retrospectively analyzed and compared the results of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in 1313 adult patients with intermediate- or poor-risk AML in CR who received either SCBT (n = 1102) or unmanipulated haplo-HCT (n = 211) between 2007 and 2018 in Japan. Among the whole cohort, the cumulative incidences of neutrophil and platelet recovery were significantly lower in SCBT recipients compared with those in haplo-HCT recipients (P < .001 for neutrophil, P < .001 for platelet). SCBT was significantly associated with a higher incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD and lower incidence of extensive chronic GVHD compared to haplo-HCT (P = .013 for grades II to IV acute GVHD; P = .006 for extensive chronic GVHD). Haplo-HCT recipients developed a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia compared to SCBT recipients (P = .004). In the multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences for grades III or IV acute GVHD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], .88 to 1.57; P = .26), relapse incidence (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, .76 to 1.58; P = .61), non-relapse mortality (HR, .83; 95% CI, .58 to 1.18; P = .32), OS (HR, .92; 95% CI, .70 to 1.20; P = .56), LFS (HR, .94; 95% CI, .73 to 1.21; P = .67), GRFS (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, .90 to 1.40; P = .27), or CRFS (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, .92 to 1.44; P = .19) between the two donor types. In the propensity score matching analysis, which identified 180 patients in each cohort, there were no significant differences in transplant outcomes between the two donor types, except for delayed neutrophil (P < .001) and platelet recovery (P < .001) and a higher incidence of grades II to IV acute GVHD (P = .052) in SCBT. SCBT and unmanipulated haplo-HCT had similar survival outcomes for adult patients with AML in CR despite the lower hematopoietic recovery and higher grade II to IV acute GVHD in SCBT recipients and the higher CMV antigenemia in haplo-HCT recipients.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia in the first remission: outcomes using haploidentical donors are similar to those using matched siblings

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an effective and curative treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We explored the outcome of haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation for intermediate-risk AML and compared to that of matched sibling donor (MSD) transplants. One hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients with intermediate-risk AML in the first complete remission (CR1) who underwent allo-HSCT between January 1, 2015, and August 1, 2016, were enrolled. Thirty-seven patients received MSD grafts, and 90 received HID grafts. The 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) of the HID group was comparable to that of the MSD group: 82.0% ± 4.1% versus 82.7% ± 6.4%, P = 0.457. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) were comparable between the HID and MSD groups (relapse, 4.5% ± 0.1%, versus 11.5% ± 0.3%, P = 0.550; TRM, 13.4% ± 0.1% vs. 5.8% ± 0.2%, P = 0.154). The HID recipients had a trend of a lower 2-year cumulative incidence of positive posttransplant flow cytometry (FCM+) and relapse than the MSD recipients (5.6% ± 0.1% vs. 19.9% ± 0.5%, P = 0.092). These results suggest that the outcomes of allo-HSCT with HIDs are comparable to those with MSDs in terms of LFS, TRM, and relapse for intermediate-risk AML in CR1. HIDs could be an alternative to MSDs for intermediate-risk AML.

Comparable outcomes among unmanipulated haploidentical, matched unrelated, and matched sibling donors in BU-based myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for intermediate and adverse risk acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission: a single-center study

There are a limited number of studies comparing outcomes of busulfan (BU)-based myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using unmanipulated haploidentical donors (HIDs), HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUDs), and HLA-matched sibling related donors (MSDs) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with complete remission (CR) status. With this background, we compared outcomes among 377 cases of CR following consecutive HID-HSCT for AML (CR) to 86 MUD and 92 MSD-HSCT cases. All patients received BU-based myeloablative conditioning and an unmanipulated graft within the same period. The median patient age was 23 years (range 1.1 to 65 years), and 230 patients (41.4%) were under age18. Among the 555 patients, 432 (77.8%) were of intermediate cytogenetic risk and 123 (22.2%) were of adverse risk. A total of 113 patients (20.5%) had FLT3-ITD+ AML, 425 patients (76.6%) were in first complete remission (CR1) post-transplant, and 130 (23.4%) patients were in second CR (CR2). GVHD prophylaxis included mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine-A (CSA) with short-term methotrexate (MTX) for HID, and MUD-HSCT. MMF is not used for MSD-HSCT. The median survival follow-up time was 42 months (range 18-91 months). The 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) among the HID, MUD, and MSD cohorts was 73.8% ± 4.8%, 66.4% ± 8.5%, 74.5% ± 2.4%, respectively (P = 0.637). Three-year overall survival (OS) was 74.9% ± 2.4%, 81.8% ± 4.3%, and 77.5% ± 4.5% among the HID, MUD, and MSD cohorts, respectively (P = 0.322). There were no difference among the relapse rate among the HID, MUD, and MSD donor cohorts (14.3% ± 4.0% vs 20.3% ± 6.4% vs 14.5% ± 2.2, respectively; P = 0.851) or the non-relapse mortality (NRM) (12.3% ± 3.5% vs 9.5% ± 3.2% vs 14.0% ± 1.8%, respectively; P = 0.441). Multivariate analyses showed that MRD-positive pre-HSCT was the only risk factor associated with a lower OS and LFS and higher risk of relapse among all 555 patients. Compared with the use of a MUD or MSD, an HID for HSCT had similar outcomes among AML patients with CR states who underwent an allo-HSCT with BU-based myeloablative conditioning. MFC-MRD-positive pre-HSCT was an independent negative factor impact on outcomes for AML patients in CR. We conclude that for AML patients who do not have a MSD or if an urgent transplant is required, HSCT from an HID is a valid option.

Nonmyeloablative Conditioning Regimen before T Cell Replete Haploidentical Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Advanced Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a valid option in patients with refractory lymphomas. HLA haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) expanded the accessibility to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The aims of study were to retrospectively assess the toxicity and efficacy of haplo-SCT using nonmyeloablative conditioning in patients with advanced lymphoma. In total, 147 patients with advanced lymphoma at 2 partner institutions were included. Patients received a uniform nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), GVHD, nonrelapse mortality, and GVHD, relapse-free survival (GRFS). Median follow-up was 39 months (range, 6 to 114 months). The median age was 46 years (range, 19 to 71 years). Sixty-five percent of patients were in complete remission (CR) at transplantation. Cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD was 30% (95% confidence interval [Cl], 23% to 38%). Two-year cumulative incidence of all grades of chronic GVHD was 13% (95% CI, 8% to 20%). Two-year cumulative incidence of disease relapse was 19% (95% CI, 14% to 27%), with a higher incidence in patients not being in CR at allo-HCT (CR versus not CR: 12% versus 33%, P = .006). Two-year PFS, OS, and GRFS were 66% (95% CI, 59-75), 73% (95% CI, 66-81), and 56% (95% CI, 48-65), respectively. Haplo-SCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide may be considered a valid option for patients with aggressive lymphoma and deserves further evaluation.

Comparison of outcomes of haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation supported by third-party cord blood with HLA-matched unrelated donor transplantation

Previous study indicated that co-infusion of cord blood cells may potentially improve the outcome of haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation. In this study, we analyzed the outcomes of patients who underwent HID transplantation supported by cord blood when compared with HLA-matched unrelated donor (URD) transplantation. Starting in 2015, 40 patients with hematopoietic malignancies underwent HID transplantation and 26 patients underwent URD transplantation. Hematopoietic recovery, the incidences of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD was comparable in the two groups. At two year, the relapse risk in HID group was significantly lower than in URD group (RR 4.630; 95%CI, 1.081-19.839; p = .039). Moreover, HID group have prolonged PFS (RR 2.642; 95%CI, 1.046-6.672; p = .040). In conclusion, HID transplantation supported by cord blood results in better outcomes compared with URD transplantation and it might be a favorable alternative to a HLA-matched URD transplantation.

Unmanipulated Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Achieved Outcomes Comparable With Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation in Young Acquired Severe Aplastic Anemia

Salvage haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) is considered in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) if a matched unrelated donor (MUD) is unavailable. However, studies on haplo- and MUD transplantation in SAA are lacking. The present study retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 89 young SAA patients who underwent unmanipulated alternative HSCT between September 2012 and September 2016 at our single center. Forty-one patients received haploidentical donors and forty-eight patients MUDs for HSCT. Most were heavily transfused and refractory to previous immunotherapy. The median durations for myeloid engraftment in the haplo- and MUD cohorts were 14 (range, 10 to 21) and 13 (range, 10 to 18) days, respectively. Compared with the MUD cohort, haplo-HSCT cohorts had an increased cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II to IV (43.9% ± 7.8% versus 12.5% ± 4.8%, P = .001) and grades III to IV (21.1% ± 6.7% versus 6.6% ± 3.7%, P = .045) and similar limited chronic GVHD (47.7% ± 8.5% versus 38.5% ± 7.3%, P = .129) and extensive chronic GVHD (12.1% ± 6.8% versus 9.1% ± 4.3%, P = .198). The median follow-up time of the surviving patients was 26 months (range, 6 to 45). No significant differences were observed between haplo-HSCT and MUD HSCT cohorts in 3-year overall survival (80.3% ± 5.1% versus 89.6% ± 7.0%, P = .210), disease-free survival (76.4% ± 5.1% versus 89.4% ± 7.7%, P = .127), and GVHD-free failure-free survival (79.0% ± 8.6% versus 71.6% ± 9.3%, P = .976). Thus, haplo-HSCT, as salvage therapy, achieved similar outcomes as MUD HSCT in young SAA patients, thereby rendering it as an effective and safe option for SAA.

[The clinical characteristics of adult hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis treated with haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics of adult patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) receiving haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). Method: We retrospectively reviewed 20 adult patients with HLH from August 2009 to August 2014.The clinical features and outcome were analyzed. Results: Conditioning regimens consisted of total body irradiation/etoposide/cyclophosphamide (TBI/VP-16/CTX) and busulfan (Bu)/VP-16/CTX in HLH with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) 8 mg/kg.The stem cells were mobilized from donors' peripheral blood.Median time to white blood cell engraftment was 13 (9-27) days.Median time to platelet engraftment was 14 (10-28) days.Mixed chimerism after transplantation developed in 4 patients and no patient presented graft failure.Eight patients developed grade Ⅱ to Ⅲ acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), while as chronic GVHD occurred in 9 patients.Among 12 patients with EB virus(EBV) reactivation, 2 patients developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), 7 were suspected as PTLD and 3 were considered as relapse of primary disease.With a median follow-up of 20 months (range: 0.5-108 months) after transplantation, the estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was (60.0±11.0)% in all patients.During the follow-up, 12 patients survived, 8 died including 5 within 100 days after HSCT.Among 5 non-remission patients before HSCT, 4 patients died within 100 days after HCT. Conclusions: HID HSCT is an effective treatment for adult patients with HLH to achieve remission and long-term survival. High proportion of mixed chimerism has been seen at early stage after transplantation.EBV reactivation and early transplant-related mortality are common.

Alternative Donor/Unrelated Donor Transplants for the β-Thalassemia and Sickle Cell Disease

Considerable progress with respect to donor source has been achieved in allogeneic stem cell transplant for patients with hemoglobin disorders, with matched sibling donors in the 1980s, matched unrelated donors and cord blood sources in the 1990s, and haploidentical donors in the 2000s. Many studies have solidified hematopoietic progenitors from matched sibling marrow, cord blood, or mobilized peripheral blood as the best source-with the lowest graft rejection and graft versus host disease (GvHD), and highest disease-free survival rates. For patients without HLA-matched sibling donors, but who are otherwise eligible for transplant, fully allelic matched unrelated donor (8/8 HLA-A, B, C, DRB1) appears to be the next best option, though an ongoing study in patients with sickle cell disease will provide data that are currently lacking. There are high GvHD rates and low engraftment rates in some of the unrelated cord transplant studies. Haploidentical donors have emerged in the last decade to have less GvHD; however, improvements are needed to increase the engraftment rate. Thus the decision to use unrelated cord blood units or haploidentical donors may depend on the institutional expertise; there is no clear preferred choice over the other. Active research is ongoing in expanding cord blood progenitor cells to overcome the limitation of cell dose, including the options of small molecule inhibitor compounds added to ex vivo culture or co-culture with supportive cell lines. There are inconsistent data from using 7/8 or lower matched unrelated donors. Before routine use of these less matched donor sources, work is needed to improve patient selection, conditioning regimen, GvHD prophylaxis, and/or other strategies.

Overview of the progress on haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) remains the only potentially curative option for variety of hematologic disorders. Lack of a suitable fully HLA-matched donor limits this option for many patients. Without a suitable related or unrelated HLA-matched donor, umbilical cord blood and haploidentical family members provide a potential source of stem cells. Timely donor availability makes haploidentical donors an attractive alternative donor source. Initial attempts at haploidentical HSCT was associated with significantly increased mortality owing to high rates of graft rejection and severe graft-versus-host disease caused by major donor-recipient HLA-disparity. However, over the past decade, outcomes of haploidentical HSCT have improved significantly. Here, we review the advantages and challenges of haploidentical transplantation. We also discuss new developments to attempt to overcome the challenges to a successful haploidentical transplantation.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with sickle cell disease: progress and future directions

Research has solidified matched sibling marrow, cord blood, or mobilized peripheral blood as the best source for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with sickle cell disease, with low graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and high disease-free survival rates. Fully allelic matched unrelated donor is an option for transplant-eligible patients without HLA-matched sibling donors. Unrelated cord transplant studies reported high GVHD and low engraftment rates. Haploidentical transplants have less GVHD, but improvements are needed to increase the low engraftment rate. The decision to use unrelated cord blood units or haploidentical donors depends on institutional expertise.