Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Non-Myeloablative Conditioning and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Prophylaxis in Patients with Reduced Systolic Function

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has become standard of care for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), allowing for expanded donor options. However, there is scant literature examining outcomes of patients with reduced systolic function receiving PTCy. The present study aimed to describe our experience in performing alloHCT in patients with reduced systolic function, including their nonrelapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of early cardiac events (ECEs). We performed a retrospective descriptive analysis using the Johns Hopkins Hematologic Malignancy database. From 2017 through 2021, 1118 consecutive patients underwent alloHCT with nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning and PTCy. Forty-three of those patients had a pretransplantation left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45% measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Patients whose LVEF improved on treatment prior to transplantation were also included. These 2 cohorts were stratified into 2 groups-heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF)-and subgroup analyses compared NRM, OS, and cumulative incidence of ECEs, including arrhythmia, coronary artery disease, reduction in LVEF, and pericardial effusion, within 100 days post-transplantation. The median LVEF was 40% to 45% (range, 30% to 45%) for the 31 patients undergoing transplantation with HFrEF and 35% to 40% (range, 20% to 45%) for the 12 patients with HFrecEF. The NRM for all 43 patients was 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5% to 27%) at 100 days and 23% (95% CI, 11% to 36%) at 2 years. The NRM was 23% (95% CI, 8% to 38%) at 100 days and 26% (95% CI, 10% to 42%) at 2 years for the HFrEF cohort and 0 at 100 days and 18% (95% CI, 0 to 41%) at 2 years for the HFrecEf cohort. The OS at 3 years was 41% (95% CI, 26% to 62%), 40% (95% CI, 25% to 65%) and 38% (95% CI, 14% to 100%) in the combined, HFrEF, and HFrecEF cohorts, respectively. The cumulative incidence of any ECE was 37.2% (95% CI, 22% to 51.9%), including 39% of HFrEF subjects and 33% of HFrecEF subjects. Grade ≥3 toxicities were seen in 56% of patients. Reduced ejection fraction was the most common ECE. One death was attributable to a cardiac etiology. Cardiac toxicities seemed to be more frequent and severe in patients with a history of systolic dysfunction, but this did not lead to worse survival outcomes. This study adds to and extends the existing literature supporting the use of NMA conditioning and PTCy in patients with systolic dysfunction.

Therapies for patients with coexisting heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are two common comorbidities that share similar pathophysiological mechanisms. There is a growing interest in the potential of targeted therapies to improve outcomes in patients with coexisting HFrEF and NAFLD. This manuscript reviews current and potential therapies for patients with coexisting HFrEF and NAFLD. Pharmacological therapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoids receptor antagonist, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, have been shown to reduce fibrosis and fat deposits in the liver. However, there are currently no data showing the beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan, ivabradine, hydralazine, isosorbide nitrates, digoxin, or beta blockers on NAFLD in patients with HFrEF. This study highlights the importance of considering HFrEF and NAFLD when developing treatment plans for patients with these comorbidities. Further research is needed in patients with coexisting HFrEF and NAFLD, with an emphasis on novel therapies and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for managing these complex comorbidities.

Defining the gap in heart failure treatment in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

BACKGROUND

The use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is poorly described in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

OBJECTIVE

To define the eligibility, uptake, dose, contraindications, and barriers to uptake of contemporary medical therapy in this population.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive adults with ICD and/or CRT attending two Canadian tertiary centre device clinics between 1 March and 31 May 2021.

RESULTS

From 1005 device clinic consultations, 227 (22.6%) patients with HFrEF and CRT and/or ICD were included. GDMT eligibility was high: beta-blockers (99.6%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) (89.0%), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) (84.6%), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) (87.7%). Contraindications were rare: beta-blockers (0.4%), MRA (11.0%), ARNI (15.4%), and SGLT2I (12.3%). Uptake of GDMT was high for beta-blockers (97.4%) but low for other medications: MRA (63.0%), ARNI (46.7%), SGLT2I (22.9%). Except for SGLT2I (84.6%) and beta-blockers (57.9%), less than one-half of patients were prescribed target-doses of MRA (10.5%), and ARNI (47.7%). Of the visits, GDMT was already optimal in 16%, electrophysiologists acted in 33% (21% prescribed, 7% ordered investigations, 5% referred to heart function services), and in the remaining visits, optimization was either deferred to another cardiologist (20%) or no plan was mentioned (25%), besides other reasons (4%).

CONCLUSION

Despite broad eligibility for GDMT in patients with HFrEF and ICD/CRT, significant gaps in prescription and titration exist. Our results highlight the need to embed quality assurance initiatives in cardiac device clinics to improve HFrEF care.

Clinical outcomes and 30-day readmissions for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with cardiorenal syndrome: A National Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Literature regarding outcomes of cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) among heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical outcomes and 30-day readmission rates of CRS patients with HFrEF.

METHODS

Data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) that constitutes 49.1% of the stratified sample of all hospitals in the United States (US), representing >95% of the national population, was analyzed for the CRS with HFrEF visits from 2018 to 2019. CRS was defined by the ICD-10 codes.

RESULTS

Out of the 1,530,749 index CRS-related hospitalizations (mean age:64.37 ± 13.30 years; 38.6%females) 73,126 (6.0%) CKD I-II, 883,119 (72.6%) CKD III-IV, and 258,835 (21.3%) CKD V-and-more related encounters were recorded. Mortality was higher among CKD stage V-and-more in comparison to other subgroups(7.6%vs5.73%;p < 0.001). AKI with underlying CKD was more common among stage III-IV compared to other subgroups (55.9%vs43.7%;p < 0.001). Respiratory failure, the second major complication, was more common among stage V-and-more compared to other subgroups (32.5%vs30%;p < 0.001). The overall CRS-related 30-day readmission rate was 22.7%, with CKD V-and-more accounting for highest rates(29.89%), followed by CKD stage III-IV(20.05%) and CKD I-II(12.99%). The primary etiology for 30-day readmission was cardiovascular among all subgroups (54.2%, 54.6%, and 41.80%, which corresponds to CKD I-II, CKD III-IV and CKD V-and-more, respectively).

CONCLUSION

CRS among HFrEF accounts for substantial healthcare burden with high 30-day readmission rates. Higher all-cause mortality and 30-day readmissions were associated with worse renal disease. This would suggest that more vigilance is needed by physicians for discharge planning among this patient population.

Use of disease-modifying drugs in diabetic patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure are closely related, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a higher risk of developing heart failure, and those with heart failure are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Although no specific randomized clinical trials have been conducted to test the effect of cardiovascular therapies (drugs and/or devices) in diabetic patients with heart failure, a lot of evidence shows that all interventions effective in improving prognosis in patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction are equally beneficial in patients with and without diabetes. However, the use of disease-modifying drugs in patients with diabetes and heart failure reduced ejection fraction is a clinical challenge due to the increased risk of adverse effects. For example, β-blockers are underutilized in diabetic patients due to the theoretical unfavorable effects on glucose metabolism as well as the use of drugs that interact with the renin-angiotensin system can be challenged in patients with diabetic nephropathy because of the risk of hyperkalemia. This review outlines the current use of disease-modifying drugs in diabetic patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction. In addition, the role of novel pharmacologic agents as type 2 sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors (SGLT2ii) is discussed.

Association between sacubitril/valsartan initiation and real-world health status trajectories over 18 months in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Aims

Improving the health status (symptoms, function, and quality of life) of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a primary treatment goal. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) improve short‐term health status in clinical practice, but the sustainability of these improvements is unknown.

Methods and results

In CHAMP‐HF, a multicentre observational study of outpatients with HFrEF, patients initiated on ARNI were propensity score matched 1:2 to patients not using ARNI with Cox regression modelling time to ARNI initiation, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical variables, medical history, medications, and baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores. Repeated measures models for the overall KCCQ score and each domain compared the health status trajectories of patients initiated on ARNI vs. not. Among 3930 participants, 746 (19.0%) began ARNI, of whom 576 were matched to 1152 non‐ARNI patients. Prior to matching, participants initiated on ARNI were younger, non‐Hispanic, had lower EFs, more commonly had a history of ventricular arrhythmia, were less likely to be taking an ACEI/ARB, and more likely to be treated with beta‐blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. There were no differences after matching. In the matched cohort, participants initiated on ARNI experienced improved health status by 3 months that persisted through 12 months [KCCQ Overall Summary Score (OSS) = 73.4 vs. 70.8; P < 0.001], with the largest benefit observed in the KCCQ Quality of Life domain (68.7 vs. 64.7; P < 0.001). Similar health status benefits were noted through 18 months (KCCQ‐OSS = 73.9 vs. 71.3; P < 0.001). A responder analysis showed that 12 patients would need to be initiated on ARNI for one to experience at least a large improvement (≥10 points) in health status benefit at 12 months.

Conclusions

In outpatient practice, ARNI therapy was associated with improved health status by 3 months and continued to 18 months after initiating therapy.

Exaggerated sympathetic and cardiovascular responses to dynamic mechanoreflex activation in rats with heart failure: Role of endoperoxide 4 and thromboxane A2 receptors

The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine the role played by endoperoxide 4 receptors (EP4-R) and thromboxane A₂ receptors (TxA₂-R) during isolated dynamic muscle mechanoreflex activation in rats with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF-rEF) and sham-operated healthy controls. We found that injection of the EP4-R antagonist L-161,982 (1 μg) into the arterial supply of the hindlimb had no effect on the peak pressor response to dynamic hindlimb muscle stretch in HF-rEF (n = 6, peak ∆MAP pre: 27 ± 7; post: 27 ± 4 mm Hg; P = 0.99) or sham (n = 6, peak ∆MAP pre: 15 ± 3; post: 13 ± 3 mm Hg; P = 0.67) rats. In contrast, injection of the TxA₂-R antagonist daltroban (80 μg) into the arterial supply of the hindlimb reduced the pressor response to dynamic hindlimb muscle stretch in HF-rEF (n = 11, peak ∆MAP pre: 28 ± 4; post: 16 ± 2 mm Hg; P = 0.02) but not sham (n = 8, peak ∆MAP pre: 17 ± 3; post: 16 ± 3; P = 0.84) rats. Our data suggest that TxA₂-Rs on thin fibre muscle afferents contribute to the exaggerated mechanoreflex in HF-rEF.

Acute pulmonary pressure change after transition to sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction

Aims

Sacubitril/valsartan combines renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibition with amplification of natriuretic peptides. In addition to well‐described effects, natriuretic peptides exert direct effects on pulmonary vasculature. The effect of sacubitril/valsartan on pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) has not been fully defined.

Methods and results

This was a retrospective case‐series of PAP changes following transition from angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) to sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction and a previously implanted CardioMEMS™ sensor. Pre‐sacubitril/valsartan and post‐sacubitril/valsartan PAPs were compared for each patient by examining averaged consecutive daily pressure readings from 1 to 5 days before and after sacubitril/valsartan exposure. PAP changes were also compared between patients based on elevated trans‐pulmonary gradients (trans‐pulmonary gradient ≥ 12 mmHg) at time of CardioMEMS™ sensor implantation. The cohort included 18 patients, 72% male, mean age 60.1 ± 13.6 years. There was a significant decrease in PAPs associated with transition from ACEI/ARB to sacubitril/valsartan. The median (interquartile range) pre‐treatment and post‐treatment change in mean, systolic and diastolic PAPs were −3.6 (−9.8, −0.7) mmHg (P < 0.001), −6.5 (−15.0, −2.0) mmHg (P = 0.001), and −2.5 (−5.7, −0.7) (P = 0.001), respectively. The decrease in PAPs was independent of trans‐pulmonary gradient (F(1,16) = 0.49, P = 0.49).

Conclusions

In this retrospective case series, transition from ACEI/ARB to sacubitril/valsartan was associated with an early and significant decrease in PAPs.

Changes in QRS Duration Are Associated with a Therapeutic Response to Sacubitril-valsartan in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated that angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) can reverse the cardiac remodeling effects that occur in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). These studies have also suggested that ARNIs have favorable effects on ventricular dyssynchrony. We assessed the changes in QRS duration associated with ARNIs in patients with HFrEF.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated patients with HFrEF (defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤ 35%) who were treated with ARNIs for at least six months. We divided the patients into QRS shortening and non-QRS shortening groups according to their electrocardiogram (ECG) findings. We also compared changes in echocardiographic parameters between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients with HFrEF were included (mean age: 62.5 years, 74.6% male). Twenty-one patients had significant ischemic heart disease (IHD). Thirty-five patients exhibited QRS-duration shortening on follow-up ECGs (mean change: −7.8 msec), and 33 patients showed no changes or increased QRS duration (mean change: 5.1 msec). The QRS shortening group exhibited significant improvement in LVEF (12.5 ± 15.3% vs. 1.7 ± 9.5%; p < 0.001) when compared with the non-QRS shortening group. The QRS shortening group also had significantly lower LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), LV end-systolic dimension (LVESD) and LV mass index (LVMI) than did the non-QRS shortening group. The change in QRS duration was significantly correlated with the change in LVEF (r = -0.329, p = 0.011) and LVESD (r = 0.298, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with HFrEF treated with ARNIs, the QRS shortening group showed favorable LV systolic function recovery, and reversal of cardiac remodeling compared to those of the non-QRS shortening group. Change in the QRS duration, which reflects LV synchrony, may be associated with response to ARNIs in patients with HFrEF.

Ventricular arrhythmias and ARNI: is it time to reappraise their management in the light of new evidence?

The remarkable scientific progress in the treatment of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has more than halved the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in this setting. However, SCD remains one of the major causes of death in this patient population. Beyond the acknowledged role of beta blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), a new class of drugs, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), proved to reduce the overall cardiovascular mortality and, more specifically, the risk of SCD in HFrEF patients. The mechanism by which ARNI may reduce the mortality connected with harmful ventricular arrhythmias is not utterly clear. A variety of direct and indirect mechanisms have been suggested, but a favorable left ventricular reverse remodeling seems to play a key role in this setting. Furthermore, the well-known protective effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been debated in HFrEF patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) arguing against the role of primary prevention ICD in this setting, particularly when ARNI therapy is considered. The purpose of this review was to provide insights into the SCD mechanisms involved in HFrEF patients together with the current role of electrical therapies and new drug agents in this setting. Graphical abstract.

Load-independent effects of empagliflozin contribute to improved cardiac function in experimental heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sodium-glucose linked cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the likelihood of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death in both diabetic and non-diabetic individuals with reduced ejection fraction heart failure. Because SGLT2 inhibitors lead to volume contraction with reductions in both preload and afterload, these load-dependent factors are thought to be major contributors to the cardioprotective effects of the drug class. Beyond these effects, we hypothesized that SGLT2 inhibitors may also improve intrinsic cardiac function, independent of loading conditions.

METHODS

Pressure-volume (P-V) relationship analysis was used to elucidate changes in intrinsic cardiac function, independent of alterations in loading conditions in animals with experimental myocardial infarction, a well-established model of HFrEF. Ten-week old, non-diabetic Fischer F344 rats underwent ligation of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery to induce myocardial infarction (MI) of the left ventricle (LV). Following confirmation of infarct size with echocardiography 1-week post MI, animals were randomized to receive vehicle, or the SGLT2 inhibitor, empagliflozin. Cardiac function was assessed by conductance catheterization just prior to termination 6 weeks later.

RESULTS

The circumferential extent of MI in animals that were subsequently randomized to vehicle or empagliflozin groups was similar. Empagliflozin did not affect fractional shortening (FS) as assessed by echocardiography. In contrast, load-insensitive measures of cardiac function were substantially improved with empagliflozin. Load-independent measures of cardiac contractility, preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW) and end-systolic pressure volume relationship (ESPVR) were higher in rats that had received empagliflozin. Consistent with enhanced cardiac performance in the heart failure setting, systolic blood pressure (SBP) was higher in rats that had received empagliflozin despite its diuretic effects. A trend to improved diastolic function, as evidenced by reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was also seen with empagliflozin. MI animals treated with vehicle demonstrated myocyte hypertrophy, interstitial fibrosis and evidence for changes in key calcium handling proteins (all p < 0.05) that were not affected by empagliflozin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Empagliflozin therapy improves cardiac function independent of loading conditions. These findings suggest that its salutary effects are, at least in part, due to actions beyond a direct effect of reduced preload and afterload.

Systolic function recovery in Heart Failure: Frequency, prognostic impact and predictors

BACKGROUND

Systolic function recovery in patients with Heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF) is well recognized but not completely understood. We aimed to characterize HF patients with systolic function recovery, its prognostic impact and predictors.

METHODS

We analysed patients followed in a HF clinic (2006-2015) with 2 echocardiograms performed. Partial recovery: EF recovery without attaining EF ≥ 50%; total recovery: patients reached EF ≥ 50%. Median follow-up from first echocardiogram: 69 months. Multivariate logistic regression models to determine recovery predictors.

RESULTS

We analysed 304 patients with at least mild left ventricular dysfunction. During a median 34 months between echocardiogram re-evaluation 150 (49.3%) patients showed no EF recovery; 55 (18.1%) had partial recovery and 99 (32.6%) totally recovered. Mean patients age: 66; 71.1% men, high comorbidity burden; ischemic HF: 35.5%. Non-recovered patients were mostly men (80.7% vs 61.8% in partially; 61.6% in fully-recovered) with ischemic HF (46.0% vs 32.5% in partially; 21.2% in fully-recovered). Comorbidity burden, NYHA class and therapy were similar. During follow-up, 156 patients (46.7%) died. Patients with total recovery had a multivariate-adjusted 54% lower risk of dying when compared to non-recovered. Partially-recovered patients showed a non-significant adjusted 8% mortality reduction. Independent predictors of systolic function recovery were female gender(OR: 2.17, 95% CI 1.11-4.35), non-ischemic aetiology (OR: 2.78, 95% CI 1.35-5.56), and end diastolic left ventricular diameter < 60 mm (OR: 3.12, 95% CI 1.56-6.25).

CONCLUSIONS

HF-recovered patients were mainly women with non-ischemic HF and smaller left ventricles. These patients had significantly better prognosis than those with persistently reduced EF.

Assessing Guideline-Directed Medication Therapy for Heart Failure in End-Stage Renal Disease

BACKGROUND

Treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) requires guideline-directed medication therapy (GDMT) consisting of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker in combination with an indicated beta-blocker. There is concern that end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are not being prescribed GDMT. The study aim was to determine whether outcomes differ for patients with HFrEF and ESRD receiving GDMT compared to those not receiving GDMT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with ESRD and HFrEF admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital over a 2-year period were included. Patients were categorized into GDMT or non-GDMT groups based on their home medications. The length of stay (LOS), mortality, and 30-day hospital readmissions were compared between groups. The incidence of hyperkalemia, hypotension and bradycardia were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients were included: 88% African-American, 61% males, median age 63 (28-93) years with 25 in the GDMT group and 84 in the non-GDMT group. The LOS did not differ between the GDMT (5 days; 3-14) compared to the non-GDMT group (7 days; 3-28), P = 0.14. Thirty-day hospital readmission and in-hospital mortality were also similar. Hypotension occurred less frequently in the GDMT group compared to the non-GDMT group, 4% versus 27% (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were no differences in the primary outcomes, the shorter LOS in the GDMT group may be clinically significant. The fact that most patients with ESRD and HFrEF were not receiving GDMT is a finding that requires further evaluation.

Management of Bradyarrhythmias in Heart Failure: A Tailored Approach

Patients with heart failure (HF) may develop a range of bradyarrhythmias including sinus node dysfunction, various degrees of atrioventricular block, and ventricular conduction delay. Device implantation has been recommended in these patients, but the specific etiology should be sought as it may influence the choice of the type of device required (pacemaker vs. implantable cardiac defibrillator). Also, pacing mode must be carefully set in patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.In this chapter, we summarize the knowledge required for a tailored approach to bradyarrhythmias in patients with heart failure.

Galectin 3: association to neurohumoral activity, echocardiographic parameters and renal function in outpatients with heart failure

Background

Galectin 3 (Gal-3) reflects cardiac fibrosis in heart failure HF, but has also been associated to renal fibrosis and impaired renal function. Previous research has suggested that Gal-3 could be a cardio-renal biomarker, but it has never been tested simultaneous in a single study whether Gal-3 reflects echocardiographic measures, neurohumoral activity and renal function.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between plasma concentrations of Gal-3 and neurohumoral activity, myocardial and renal function in patients with HF, including advanced echocardiographic measures and 24-h urinary albumin excretion (albuminuria).

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 132 patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) referred to an outpatient HF clinic. The patients had a median age of 70 years (interquartile rage: 64–75), 26.5 % were female, median LVEF was 33 % (27–39 %) and 30 % were in NYHA class III-IV.

Results

Patients with plasma concentrations of Gal-3 above the median had significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and this association remained significant in multivariate regression analysis (β: −0.010; 95 % CI −0.012–-0.008; P < 0.001), adjusted for age, gender, medical treatment. Plasma concentrations of Gal-3 were not associated with albuminuria (Beta: 0.008; 95 % CI:-0.028–0.045; P = 0.652). There were no association between plasma concentrations of Gal-3 and myocardial function or structure estimated by LVEF, LVmassIndex, LVIDd, E/é or LV global longitudinal strain (P > 0.05 for all). In multivariate analyses plasma concentrations of Gal-3 were significantly associated with the cardiac biomarkers: NT-proBNP (β: 0.047; 95 % CI: 0.008–0.086; P = 0.020), proANP (β: 0.137; 95 % CI: 0.067–0.207; P < 0.001), chromogranin A (β: 0.123; 95 % CI: 0.052–0.194; P < 0.001) and Copeptin (β: 0.080; 95 % CI: 0.000–0.160; P = 0.049). Multivariate analysis was adjusted for eGFR, age, gender and medical treatment.

Conclusions

Increased plasma concentrations of Gal-3 are associated with reduced eGFR and increased plasma concentrations of NT-proBNP, proANP, chromogranin A and Copeptin, but not with echocardiographic parameters reflecting myocardial function. These results suggest that Gal-3 reflects both increased neurohumoral activity and reduced eGFR, but not myocardial function in patients with systolic HF.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-016-0290-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.