A comparative analysis of high-flux and low-flux dialysis in cervical cancer patients with obstructive renal failure showing no significantly improved renal function after catheterisation

Objective:

This study aims to compare the clinical application value of high-flux dialysis with low-flux dialysis in patients without significantly improved renal function after cervical cancer and obstructive renal failure catheterisation.

Methods:

This prospective randomised study was conducted from January 2018 to December 2019. Eighty cervical cancer patients with obstructive renal failure who showed no significant renal function improvement after catheterisation were randomised into two groups (n = 40 in each group) in the Second People’s Hospital of Yibin City. High-flux and low-flux dialysis were employed in the experimental group and the control group, respectively. Treatments in both groups were provided every other day, with the whole course lasting one week. Data were recorded before and after dialysis included inflammatory factors such as IL-6, CRP and TNF-a, large and moderate molecular toxins (e.g., β2 micro-globulin, parathyrin (PTH) and cysteine protease inhibitor). Renal function changes during the dialysis were also recorded. Afterwards, the two groups were compared regarding the overall efficacy.

Results:

Both the experimental group and the control group experienced a significant decrease in IL-6, CRP, TNF-a, β2 micro-globulin, PTH and cysteine protease inhibitor, with the decrease in the experimental group being more evident (p < 0.05). After dialysis was completed, the experimental group restored renal function indicators such as Cre, CysC and serum K+ levels more quickly than the control group (p < 0.05). The effective rate was 100% for the experimental group and 87.5% for the control group. The intragroup difference in the efficacy.was significant.

Conclusions:

High-flux dialysis appears to be more beneficial for cervical cancer patients with obstructive renal failure, showing no significant improvement in renal function after catheterisation. It restored renal function more quickly, had more radical draining of inflammatory factors and large and moderate molecular toxins, and had a higher overall effective rate.

Efficacy of Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer and Comparison with Standard High-Flux Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

A new medium cut-off (MCO) membranes has been designed to achieve better removal capacities for middle and large middle molecules in hemodialysis (HD) treatment.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the removal efficacy of Theranova® in standard HD in comparison with standard high-flux HD.

METHODS

Four HD patients (M/F 1/4) were included in 12-week observational pilot study in HD with Theranova® 400 and Theranova® 500 dialyzers. Each patient was assessed 4 times, T0 with high-flux dialyzers, T1 at 1 month, T2 at second month, and T3 at third month, by measuring pre- and post-HD samples of urea, Cr, β2-microglobilin (β2M), myoglobin, albumin, free light chains kappa (FLC-k), and free light chains lambda (FLC-λ).

RESULTS

The data showed a higher average removal rate for all the uremic toxins with Theranova® dialyzers for β2M, myoglobin, FLC-k, and FLC-λ (62.7, 56.9, 63.5, and 54.6%, respectively) during the 3 months. Albumin retention was observed and did not change between T0 and T3 (p = 0.379).

CONCLUSION

Compared to high-flux membranes, MCO membranes show greater permeability for middle molecules in midterm report.

Feasibility of Online Haemodiafiltration in Sleep Apnoea: A Randomized Crossover Study

BACKGROUND

Sleep apnoea is prevalent in dialysis patients. Previous studies identified excessive inflammation in -patients with sleep apnoea. Online haemodiafiltration -(OL-HDF) may reduce systematic inflammation through better clearance of middle molecules. We aimed to determine the feasibility of OL-HDF in sleep apnoea management.

METHODS

Eligible dialysis patients were screened for risk of sleep apnoea by nocturnal oximetry followed by a diagnostic sleep study to assess apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI). Patients with AHI ≥15/h were invited to a randomized crossover trial. The intervention was 2-month high-flux haemodialysis (HF-HD) followed by 2-month OL-HDF or vice versa with 1-month washout via HF-HD. Feasibility was assessed by patient recruitment and the primary outcome, severity of sleep apnoea (AHI). Secondary outcomes were pro-inflammatory cytokines, patient-reported daytime sleepiness, quality of sleep and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

Of 65 participants at risk of sleep apnoea, only 15 were consented and randomized (mean age 70 years, 80% male, mean AHI 42.2/h). AHI was not statistically different between OL-HDF versus HF-HD (55.6/h vs. 48.3/h, p = 0.134); however, when sleep apnoea was stratified into obstructive and central apnoea, patients had less obstructive episodes after treated by OL-HDF (23.2/h vs. 18.6/h, p = 0.178); a sensitivity analysis was performed excluding outliers, and the treatment effect for obstructive episodes was found to be statistically significant (11.1 vs. 18.2/h, p = 0.019). Pro-inflammatory biomarkers and patient-reported outcomes were similar between OL-HDF and HF-HD.

CONCLUSION

Patient recruitment was a major challenge in this feasibility study. OL-HDF may reduce obstructive sleep apnoea; however, the result needs to be confirmed by larger studies.

High-Flux Dialysis: Clinical, Biochemical, and Proteomic Comparison with Low-Flux Dialysis and On-Line Hemodiafiltration

Hemodiafiltration on-line (on-line HDF) is a more efficient treatment than low-flux hemodialysis (HD). Unfortunately, it cannot be proposed to all patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficiency, and mechanisms of removal of toxins with high-flux HD vs. low-flux HD and on-line HDF. Randomized cross-over study designed to evaluate efficiency and tolerability of high-flux HD vs. low-flux HD in aged patients; to compare by means of biochemical and proteomic analyses the efficiency and mechanisms of removal of toxins with high-flux HD vs. on-line HDF. The removal of small toxins was similar with high-flux and low-flux HD. β2-microglobulin was removed only with high-flux HD, which had an excellent tolerability. The efficiency of high-flux HD was similar to on-line HDF. Proteomic analysis demonstrated that only high-flux membranes remove and adsorb small proteins. High-flux HD may be an efficient alternative to on-line HDF.

Pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide during high cut-off dialysis in a patient with multiple myeloma and renal failure

INTRODUCTION

High cut-off dialysis, increasingly used in multiple myeloma patients, is susceptible to influence anticancer drug elimination. We report about lenalidomide disposition in a patient on high cut-off dialysis for renal failure secondary to myeloma cast nephropathy.

METHODS

The patient received a higher dosage of lenalidomide (5 mg b.i.d.), owing to concerns about a potential decrease in lenalidomide exposure during dialysis sessions. A set of blood samples was taken in order to develop a pharmacokinetic model accounting for lenalidomide concentrations in this setting.

RESULTS

According to our model, the area under the curve was 3273 µg h/L, i.e., 60% higher than expected under usual dosage (25 mg q.d.) with normal renal function. Despite this, the patient did not develop major hematological toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenalidomide doses of 5 mg b.i.d. led to high exposure in a patient with renal failure undergoing high cut-off dialysis. Yet, the dosage of 5 mg q.d. recommended in conventional dialysis would probably be adequate in such patients.