Patient characteristics affect hip contact forces during gait

OBJECTIVE

To examine hip contact force (HCF), calculated through multibody modelling, in a large total hip replacement (THR) cohort stratified by patient characteristics such as body mass index (BMI), age and function.

METHOD

132 THR patients undertook one motion capture session of gait analysis at a self-selected walking speed. HCFs were then calculated using the AnyBody Modelling System. Patients were stratified into three BMI groups, five age groups, and finally three functional groups determined by their self-selected gait speed. By means of statistical parametric mapping (SPM), statistical analyses of the 1-dimensional time series were performed to separately evaluate the influence of age, BMI and functionality on HCF.

RESULTS

The mean predicted HCFs were comparable to HCFs measured with instrumented prostheses reported in the literature. The SPM analysis revealed a statistically significant positive linear correlation between BMI and HCF, indicating that obese patients are more likely to experience higher HCF during most of the stance phase, while a statistically significant negative correlation with age was found only during the late swing-phase. Patients with higher functional ability exhibited significantly increased peak HCF, while patients with lower functional ability demonstrated lower HCFs overall and a pathological flattening of the typical double hump force profile.

CONCLUSION

HCFs experienced at the bearing surface are highly dependent on patient characteristics. BMI and functional ability were determined to have the biggest influence on contact forces. Current preclinical testing standards do not reflect this.

No effect of femoral offset on bone implant micromotion in an experimental model

BACKGROUND

In total hip replacement (THR), the femoral offset (FO) is assessed preoperatively, and the surgeon must determine whether to restore, increase, or decrease the FO based on experience and the patient's clinical history. The FO is known to influence the abductor muscle strength, range of motion (ROM), gait, and hip pain after THR; however, the true effect of FO on bone implant micromotion is unclear. Therefore, we investigated to assess: (1) the muscle loading response during gait, (2) whether FO affects bone implant micromotion during gait.

HYPOTHESIS

A variation of ±10mm from the anatomical FO affects the muscle loading forces.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We modified a personalized musculoskeletal model of the lower extremity to determine the 3-dimensional contact forces at the hip joint in the presence of a stem with varying offsets during a gait cycle. A detailed finite element (FE) model was then constructed for increased, restored, and decreased FOs. The maximum load obtained during normal walking gait from the musculoskeletal model was applied to the respective FE models, and the resultant stem-bone micromotion and stress distribution were computed.

RESULTS

Increasing the FO to +10mm decreased the peak force generated by the abductor muscles during the cycle by 15.0% and decreasing the FO to -10mm increased the von Mises stress distribution at the distal bone by 77.5% (P<0.05). A variation of the offset within 10mm of the anatomical offset showed no significant differences in micromotion (P>0.05) and peak stresses (P>0.05).

DISCUSSION

Coupling the musculoskeletal model of the gait cycle with FE analysis provides a realistic model to understand how FO affects bone implant micromotion. We found that there was no effect of FO on bone implant micromotion; thus, a surgeon does not need to evaluate the implications of FO on micromotion and can determine a FO that best decreases the work load of abductor muscles, increases ROM, and reduces hip pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, biomechanical study.