Induced-membrane technique for lower limb reconstruction after malignant bone tumour resection in paediatric patients: Complication and re-operation rates

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the complication and re-operation rates, evaluate the risk of non-union, and describe the functional outcomes at last follow-up in children and adolescents after lower-limb malignant tumour resection and reconstruction using the induced-membrane technique.

HYPOTHESIS

Weight-bearing resumption 6 weeks after the second stage of the induced-membrane procedure promotes bone healing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 13 patients (9 with osteosarcoma, 3 with Ewing's sarcomas, and 1 with alveolar sarcoma) managed between 2000 and 2020 by oncological femoral or tibial resection followed, at a distance from adjuvant chemotherapy, by reconstruction using the induced-membrane technique. Non-union was the primary outcome measure and the MusculoSkeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) lower-limb functional score was the secondary outcome measure. Mean follow-up was 6.1 years (range, 2.0-12.7). At last follow-up, mean age was 18.1 years (range, 11.0-26.0) and the mean MSTS score was 66.6% (37.0-93.0%).

RESULTS

After the second reconstruction stage, 8 complications developed in 6 patients (46%). Either a complication or limb-length inequality required 12 re-operations in 8 patients (61.5%). Non-union occurred after reconstruction in 5 (38.5%) patients. Early resumption of 50% weight-bearing 6 weeks after reconstruction was associated with bone healing (p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

The non-union rate was 38.5%. Partial, 50% weight-bearing with two elbow crutches and an orthosis, if allowed by construct stability, may promote bone healing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Surgical treatment of critical size bone defects with Masquelet technique versus bone transport: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

INTRODUCTION

To date, the management of critical-sized bone defects lacks a universally accepted approach among orthopedic surgeons. Currently, the main options to treat severe bone loss include autologous grafting, free vascularized bone transfer, bone transport and induced-membrane technique. The purpose of this study is to critically compare the outcomes of Masquelet technique and bone transport to provide a higher level of evidence regarding the indexed techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The authors conducted a systematic search on several databases according to the PRISMA guidelines. English-written reports comparing outcomes of the Masquelet technique versus the bone transport technique in patients with critical-sized defects in lower extremities were included.

RESULTS

Six observational studies involving 364 patients were included. The systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled data showed no significant difference in most outcomes, except for ASAMI bone outcomes and residual deformity, which showed better results in the bone transport group. The 64% of patients treated with Masquelet technique obtained excellent/good bone ASAMI results compared to 82.8% with bone transport (p = 0.01). Post-operative residual deformity was 1.9% with the bone transport method versus 9.7% with the Masquelet technique (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the Masquelet technique and bone transport showed comparable results for the management of critical-sized bone defects of the lower limb. However, these findings must be carefully interpreted due to the high risk of bias. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are necessary to better clarify the strengths and limitations of these two techniques and to identify the variables affecting the outcomes.