Influence of implant length and insertion depth on primary stability of short dental implants: An in vitro study of a novel mandibular artificial bone model

Background/purpose

Dental implants are a mainstream solution for missing teeth. For the improvement of dental implant surface treatment and design, short dental implants have become an alternative to various complex bone augmentation procedures, especially those performed at the posterior region of both the maxilla and mandible. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of various insertion methods on the primary stability of short dental implants.

Materials and methods

Commercial dental implants were inserted into artificial mandibular bone specimens using various insertion methods (equicrestal position, subcrestal position 1.5 mm, and lateral cortical anchorage) in accordance with an implant surgical guide. Insertion torque value (ITV) curves were recorded while implant procedures were performed. Both maximum ITVs (MITVs) and final ITVs (FITVs) were evaluated. Subsequently, Periotest values (PTVs) and implant stability quotients (ISQs) were measured for all specimens. A Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to analyze the results for four primary stability parameters, and the Dunn test was used for a post hoc pairwise comparison when a difference was identified.

Results

For all groups, their mean MITVs ranged from 33.6 to 59.4 N cm, whereas their mean FITVs ranged from 17.5 to 43.5 N cm. Insertion torque value, ISQ, and PTV decreased significantly when implants were inserted into subcrestal positions. When implants were inserted in the lateral bicortical position, the four aforementioned parameters yielded greater values.

Conclusion

When 6-mm short implants were inserted in a lateral cortical anchorage position, high primary stability was yielded.

The reliability of Anycheck device related to healing abutment diameter

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to examine the reliability of the Anycheck device and the effect of the healing abutment diameter on the Anycheck values (implant stability test, IST).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty implants were placed into three artificial bone blocks with 10 Ncm, 15 Ncm, and 35 Ncm insertion torque value (ITV), respectively (n = 10). (1) The implant stability was measured with three different kinds of devices (Periotest M, Osstell ISQ Mentor, and Anycheck). (2) Five different diameters (4.0, 4.5, 4.8, 5.5, and 6.0 mm) of healing abutments of the same height were connected to the implants and the implant stability was measured four times in different directions with Anycheck. The measured mean values were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient between the mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) and IST value was 0.981 (P<.01) and the correlation coefficient between the meant periotest value (PTV) and IST value was −0.931 (P<.01). There were no statistically significant differences among the IST values with different healing abutment diameters.

CONCLUSION

There was a strong correlation between the Periotest M and Anycheck values and between the ISQ and IST. The diameter of the healing abutment had no effect on the Anycheck values.