Pelvic insufficiency fractures after intensity modulated radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy for cervix carcinoma: Incidence and impact of bone mineral density

Background and Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and predictive factors of Pelvic Insufficiency Fractures (PIFs) occurring after Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (CC).

Material and methods

Medical records of patients receiving radio-chemotherapy with IMRT between 2010 and 2020 for advanced CC were reviewed. PIFs were detected during follow-up on pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computed Tomography (CT). The cumulative incidence rate of PIFs and its confidence interval were calculated at 2 and 5 years of follow-up. Pre-therapeutic Bone Mineral Density (BMD) (g/cm³) was evaluated on CT simulation for sacrum and the fourth lumbar (L4) vertebrae. Sacrum dosimetric parameters (V30Gy, V40Gy, D50%, Dmean) were analyzed.

Results

136 patients were included. The median follow-up was 4.4 years. Median dose of D50% and V40Gy sacrum were 35.2 Gy (20.6-46.4) and 32.2% (7.2-73.4) respectively. The 2-year and 5-year cumulative incidence rates were 15.7% (95% CI: 9.88-22.71) and 22% (95% CI: 14.58-30.45) respectively. Median time interval between RT completion and PIFs' detection was 11.5 months (IQR: 7.4-22.3). Univariate analysis showed that older age (p < 0.01), postmenopausal status at baseline (p < 0.01), and lower sacral and spinal BMD at baseline (respectively p < 0.001 and p < 0.01) were significantly associated to all sites of PIFs, and lower sacral BMD with sacral fractures (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Post-IMRT PIFs were detected in 18.4% of patients with locally advanced CC. Individual predisposing factors as older age, postmenopausal status, decreased bone density on the CT simulation were mainly predictive.

Efficacy and safety of intensity Modulated Radiation therapy combined with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancer

Objective

To evaluate the clinical value of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of recurrent cervical cancer.

Methods

This was a retrospective study. Eighty patients with recurrent cervical cancer were recruited and randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group, with 40 cases in each group at The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from April, 2017 to April, 2022. Patients in the control group were only given IMRT, while those in the experimental group were given concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin based on IMRT. All patients were evaluated for clinical efficacy, adverse drug reactions, and differences in the levels of SCC-Ag, CEA and CA724 and other tumor markers before and after treatment.

Results

The total effective rate in the experimental group was significantly better than in the control group (p=0.02). The incidence of adverse reactions was 40% in the experimental group and 32.5% in the control group, with no statistically significant difference (p=0.48). After treatment, the levels of tumor markers in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (p=0.00). The three years survival rate was 80% in the experimental group and 55% in the control group (p=0.03). The five years survival rate was 65% in the experimental group and 42.5% in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (p=0.04).

Conclusion

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a safe and effective regimen for recurrent cervical cancer, boasting significant clinical efficacy, reduced tumor markers, no significant increase in adverse reactions, and significantly improved three-years and five years survival rate.

Cost-effectiveness of hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: An ancillary study of the PROstate fractionated irradiation trial - PROFIT

PURPOSE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of moderate Hypofractionated Radiotherapy (H-RT) compared to Conventional Radiotherapy (C-RT) for intermediate-risk prostate caner (PCa).

METHODS

A prospective randomized clinical trial including 222 patients from six French cancer centers was conducted as an ancillary study of the international PROstate Fractionated Irradiation Trial (PROFIT). We carried-out a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from the payer's perspective, with a time horizon of 48 months. Patients assigned to the H-RT arm received 6000 cGy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks, or 7800 cGy in 39 fractions over 7 to 8 weeks in the C-RT arm. Patients completed quality of life (QoL) questionnaire: Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) at baseline, 24 and 48 months, which were mapped to obtain a EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) equivalent to generate Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY). We assessed differences in QALYs and costs between the two arms with Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). Costs, estimated in euro (€) 2020, were combined with QALYs to estimate the Incremental Cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with non-parametric bootstrap.

RESULTS

Total costs per patien were lower in the H-RT arm compared to the C-RT arm €3,062 (95 % CI: 2,368 to 3,754) versus €4,285 (95 % CI: 3,355 to 5,215), (p < 0.05). QALY were marginally higher in the H-RT arm, however this difference was not significant: 0.044 (95 % CI: - 0.016 to 0.099).

CONCLUSIONS

Treating localized prostate cancer with moderate H-RT could reduce national health insurance spending. Adopting such a treatment with an updated reimbursement tariff would result in improving resource allocation in RT management.

Single Institution Experience of Proton and Photon-based Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non-small-cell lung cancer remains controversial with studies showing no overall survival (OS) benefit in the setting of excessive cardiopulmonary toxicity. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially reduce toxicity with improved organ-at-risk sparing. We evaluated outcomes of PORT patients treated with PBT and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 136 PORT patients (61 PBT, 75 IMRT) treated from 2003 to 2016. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess oncologic outcomes. A Cox regression was conducted to identify associated factors. Total toxicity burden (TTB) was defined as grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis, cardiac, or esophageal toxicity.

RESULTS

Median OS was 76 and 46 months for PBT and IMRT with corresponding 1- and 5-year OS of 85.3%, 50.9% and 89.3%, 37.2% (P = .38), respectively. V30 Gy heart (odds ratio [OR], 144.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91-7214; P = .013) and V5 Gy lung (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 1.22-202.7; P = .03) were predictive of OS. Organ-at-risk sparing was improved with PBT versus IMRT; mean heart 2.0 versus 7.4 Gy (P < .01), V30 Gy heart 2.6% versus 10.7% (P < .01), mean lung 7.9 versus 10.4 Gy (P = .042), V5 Gy lung 23.4% versus 42.1% (P < .01), and V10 Gy lung 20.4% versus 29.6% (P < .01). TTB was reduced with PBT (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.83; P = .017). Rates of cardiac toxicity were 14.7% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .09). Rates of ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis were 17.0% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .104).

CONCLUSION

PBT improved cardiac and lung sparing and reduced toxicity compared with IMRT. Considering the impact of cardiopulmonary toxicity on PORT outcomes, PBT warrants prospective evaluation.

Head and neck target delineation using a novel PET automatic segmentation algorithm

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and impact of using a novel advanced PET auto-segmentation method in Head and Neck (H&N) radiotherapy treatment (RT) planning.

METHODS

ATLAAS, Automatic decision Tree-based Learning Algorithm for Advanced Segmentation, previously developed and validated on pre-clinical data, was applied to ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT scans of 20 H&N patients undergoing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Primary Gross Tumour Volumes (GTVs) manually delineated on CT/MRI scans (GTVp_CT/MRI), together with ATLAAS-generated contours (GTVp_ATLAAS) were used to derive the RT planning GTV (GTVp_final). ATLAAS outlines were compared to CT/MRI and final GTVs qualitatively and quantitatively using a conformity metric.

RESULTS

The ATLAAS contours were found to be reliable and useful. The volume of GTVp_ATLAAS was smaller than GTVp_CT/MRI in 70% of the cases, with an average conformity index of 0.70. The information provided by ATLAAS was used to grow the GTVp_CT/MRI in 10 cases (up to 10.6mL) and to shrink the GTVp_CT/MRI in 7 cases (up to 12.3mL). ATLAAS provided complementary information to CT/MRI and GTVp_ATLAAS contributed to up to 33% of the final GTV volume across the patient cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

ATLAAS can deliver operator independent PET segmentation to augment clinical outlining using CT and MRI and could have utility in future clinical studies.

Planned versus 'delivered' bladder dose reconstructed using solid and hollow organ models during prostate cancer IMRT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

All studies to date have evaluated the dosimetric effect of bladder deformation using an organ model that includes the dose to the urine. This research reconstructed bladder dose using both hollow and solid organ models, to determine if dose/volume differences exist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

35 prostate IMRT patients were selected, who had received 78Gy in 39 fractions and full bladder instructions. Biomechanical modelling and finite element analysis were used to reconstruct bladder dose (solid and hollow organ model) using every third CBCT throughout the treatment course.

RESULTS

Reconstructed dose (ReconDose) was 11.3Gy greater than planned dose (planDose) with a hollow bladder model (p<0.001) and 12.3Gy greater with a solid bladder model (p<0.0001). Median reconstructed volumes within the 30Gy, 65Gy and 78Gy isodoses were 3-4 times larger with the solid organ model (p<0.0001). The difference between planning bladder volume and median treatment volume was associated with the difference between the planDose and reconDose below 78Gy (R(2)>0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial differences exist between planned and reconstructed bladder dose, associated with the differences in bladder filling between planning and treatment. Dose reconstructed using a solid bladder model over-reports the volume of bladder within key isodose levels and overestimates the differences between planned and reconstructed dose. Dose reconstruction with a hollow organ model is recommended if the goal is to associate that dose with toxicity.