A comparison between intraosseous and intravenous access in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The optimal vascular access for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains controversial. Increasing evidence supports intraosseous (IO) access due to faster medication administration and higher first-attempt success rates compared to intravenous (IV) access. However, the impact on patient outcomes has been inconclusive.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study in Taoyuan City, Taiwan, from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022, included patients aged ≥18 years with non-traumatic OHCA resuscitated by emergency medical technician paramedics (EMT-Ps) with either IVs or IOs for final vascular access. The exclusion criteria were cardiac arrest en route to the hospital and resuscitation during the coronavirus pandemic (from May 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022). The primary and secondary outcomes were sustained ROSC (≥2 h) and cerebral performance category (CPC) 1-2, respectively. Univariate logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the primary analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was employed, with variables selected based on a p-value of <0.05 in the univariate analysis. The survival benefits of different insertion sites and subgroups like general ambulance teams (with a composition that includes fewer EMT-Ps and limited experience in using IO access) were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 2003 patients were enrolled; 1602 received IV access and 401 IO access. The median patient age was 70 years, and most were male (66.6%). Compared to patients receiving IV access, the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for primary and secondary outcomes in patients with IOs were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.11; p = 0.20) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.39-2.40; p = 0.93), respectively. Different insertion sites showed no outcome differences. In the subgroups of females and patients resuscitated by general ambulance teams, the aORs for sustained ROSC were 0.55 (95% CI, 0.33-0.92; p = 0.02) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.41-0.94; p = 0.02), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with OHCA resuscitated by EMT-Ps, IO access was comparable to IV access regarding patient outcomes. However, in females and patients resuscitated by general ambulance teams, IV access might be favorable.

Epinephrine administration in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A comparison between intraosseous and intravenous route

INTRODUCTION

The benefits and risks of the intraosseous (IO) route for vascular access in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remain controversial. This study compares the success rates of establishing the access route, epinephrine administration rates, and time-to-epinephrine between adult patients with OHCA with IO access and those with intravenous (IV) access established by paramedics in the prehospital setting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted by the San-Min station of Taoyuan Fire Department. Data for IV access were collected between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. Data for IO access were collected between January 1, 2021, and March 10, 2021. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with OHCA who received on-scene resuscitation attempts and in whom either IV or IO route access was established by paramedics. Exclusion criteria were missing data, return of spontaneous circulation before establishing vascular access, cardiac arrest en route to hospital, patients not resuscitated, and OHCA unidentified by the dispatcher. Exposure was defined as IV route vs. IO route (EZ-IO®). The outcome measurements were per-patient based success rates of route establishment (successes/attempts), administration rates of epinephrine (epinephrine administered per case/enrolled OHCAs), and odds ratios of IV versus IO on epinephrine administration. We used nonparametric Mann-Whitney rank sum tests for the analysis in continuous variables and Fisher's exact tests for the analysis of categorical variables and the outcomes. Firth logistic regression method was used for sparse data. Factors associated with epinephrine administration other than vascular access were also analyzed. Time-to-epinephrine (defined as time from paramedic arrival to epinephrine injection) was reviewed and calculated by two independent observers and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the two access routes.

RESULTS

A total of 112 adult patients were enrolled in the analysis, including 71 men and 41 women, with an average age of 67 years. There were 90 IV access cases and 22 IO access cases. The groups were compared for median success rates of route establishment (33% vs. 100%, P < 0.001) and administration rates of epinephrine (52% vs. 100%, P < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio of IO versus IV was 32.445, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.844-570.861. Time-to-epinephrine was significantly shorter in the cumulative time-event analysis by the Kaplan-Meier method (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The IO route was significantly associated with higher success rates of route establishment, epinephrine administration, and shorter time-to-epinephrine in the prehospital resuscitation of adult patients with OHCA.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of terbutaline in humans: a systematic review

Terbutaline is used for the management of bronchospasm associated with asthma, bronchitis, emphysema, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A systematic review would be beneficial to assess the impact of routes of administration, stereoisomerism, disease states, smoking, age, exercise, and chronobiology on pharmacokinetics (PK) of terbutaline in humans. PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched to screen all the relevant articles consisting of at least one of the PK parameters after administration of oral, inhaled, and intravenous (IV) terbutaline in humans. Oral studies of terbutaline depicted a linear relationship between plasma concentration (C_p) and the administered dose. The IV studies demonstrated multi-exponential behavior for disposition and renal clearance. Higher systemic availability was observed with inhaled as compared to oral route, and chrono-pharmacokinetic behavior was notable. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (T_max) was prolonged, and maximum plasma concentration (C_max) was lowered after exercise. The primary route of excretion in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is reported to be nonrenal. In pregnant women, the C_p of terbutaline is lowered and clearance is increased. The addition of theophylline to terbutaline did not affect the PK of terbutaline; hence, both can be used without dose adjustment. This review summarizes all the available PK parameters of terbutaline, and it may be helpful for researchers in the development and evaluation of PK models as well as in designing optimal dosage regimens in different clinical conditions.

Biopredictive tools for the development of injectable drug products

INTRODUCTION

Biopredictive release tests are commonly used in the evaluation of oral medicines. They support decision-making in formulation development and allow predictions of the expected in-vivo performances. So far, there is limited experience in the application of these methodologies to injectable drug products.

AREAS COVERED

Parenteral drug products cover a variety of dosage forms and administration sites including subcutaneous, intramuscular, and intravenous injections. In this area, developing biopredictive and biorelevant methodologies often confronts us with unique challenges and knowledge gaps. Here, we provide a formulation-centric approach and explain the key considerations and workflow when designing biopredictive assays. Also, we outline the key role of computational methods in achieving clinical relevance and put all considerations into context using liposomal nanomedicines as an example.

EXPERT OPINION

Biopredictive tools are the need of the hour to exploit the tremendous opportunities of injectable drug products. A growing number of biopharmaceuticals such as peptides, proteins, and nucleic acids require different strategies and a better understanding of the influences on drug absorption. Here, our design strategy must maintain the balance of robustness and complexity required for effective formulation development.

A real-world single-centre analysis of alemtuzumab and cladribine for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Highly active MS may warrant higher efficacy treatments for disease control. However, these often confer more risk and have not been compared in head-to-head clinical trials, making relative efficacy and safety difficult to interpret. Alemtuzumab and cladribine are two high-efficacy treatments given as discrete courses separated by one year, followed by a durable response that potentially does not require ongoing treatment. Before the approval of oral cladribine, our centre had been treating patients with a bioequivalent intravenous (IV) regimen since 2010. The objective of this study is to report the safety and efficacy data of alemtuzumab and cladribine in a real-world, single centre setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated with alemtuzumab or cladribine at the Ottawa Hospital MS Clinic with 2 or more years of follow-up. Information on baseline demographic variables, previous treatment, and prior disease activity was collected. Outcomes investigated were "no evidence of disease activity" (NEDA) and its constituents: new clinical relapse, new MRI activity, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression; as well as any adverse events or treatment discontinuation. We performed univariate and multiple logistic regression to determine differences in 2-year NEDA and time-to-event analyses with Cox regression models to determine factors associated with each outcome through the study period.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were treated with alemtuzumab and 65 with cladribine of whom 51 (78%) received the intravenous regimen, followed for a total of 420.1 person-years. The cladribine group was older (p=.0002), with higher baseline EDSS (p=.0015), and more likely secondary progressive (p<.0001). Alemtuzumab had a higher rate of 2-year NEDA than cladribine (OR 4.78, 95%CI: 1.57-14.50, p=.006), but beyond 2 years the difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.50, 95%CI: 0.25-1. 30, p=.061). More prior treatments were associated with lower likelihood of retaining NEDA (HR 1.26, 95%CI: 1.03-1.54, p=.027). Alemtuzumab had more infusion reactions (80% vs. 17%, p<.0001), shingles (22% vs. 2%, p=.005), and secondary autoimmunity (52% vs. 3%, p<.0001) than cladribine, but there was no difference in grade 3 or higher adverse events (21.7% vs. 18.5%, p=1.0).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort alemtuzumab and cladribine achieved similar rates of NEDA in long-term follow-up, with overall less adverse events with cladribine. Patient registries would allow more robust comparisons, detection of adverse events, and assessment of a durable response.

Molecular epidemiology and clinical features of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) in epidemic areas of Interior Sindh, Pakistan

Objective:

Highly variable genome of HCV and high prevalence in many geographical areas made it necessary to conduct local population studies. This study has been conducted to show HCV parameters along with clinical features in the local population of interior Sindh, province of Pakistan.

Methods:

Present study was conducted in from August 2010 to November 2015 in the rural areas of Sindh, Pakistan. All the 31560 screened samples selected for the study were tested by second Generation Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA Biokit 480&96).

Results:

Total 31560 people were screened for HCV and out of these 13.67% (n= 4314) HCV infected patients. When 4314 samples of patients were examined; the anti-HCV was significantly higher in males 2814 (14.98%) than in females 1500 (11.74%) with P value = 0.06. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 65 years. Out of 4314 HCV samples, 3020 (70%) were of Genotype 3a, 237(5.5%) of Genotype 2a, 108 (2.5%) of Genotype- 1a, 216 (5%) of Genotype 1b, 237 (5.5%) of Genotype 3b and 43 (1%) of Genotype 4. Additionally, 108 (2.5%) had co-infection and 345 (8%) samples showed no result –designated as untypable by the genotyping.

Conclusion:

This study showed that HCV is most frequently reported disease with genotype 3a being the most prevalent genotype.

Comparative Analysis of Length of Stay and Inpatient Costs for Orthopedic Surgery Patients Treated with IV Acetaminophen and IV Opioids vs. IV Opioids Alone for Post-Operative Pain

Introduction

Recovery from orthopedic surgery is oriented towards restoring functional health outcomes while reducing hospital length of stay (LOS) and medical expenditures. Optimal pain management is a key to reaching these objectives. We sought to compare orthopedic surgery patients who received combination intravenous (IV) acetaminophen and IV opioid analgesia to those who received IV opioids alone and compared the two groups on LOS and hospitalization costs.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of the Premier Database (Premier, Inc.; between January 2009 and June 2015) comparing orthopedic surgery patients who received post-operative pain management with combination IV acetaminophen and IV opioids to those who received only IV opioids starting on the day of surgery and continuing up to the second post-operative day. The quarterly rate of IV acetaminophen use for all hospitalizations by hospital served as the instrumental variable in two-stage least squares regressions controlling for patient and hospital covariates to compare the LOS and hospitalization costs of IV acetaminophen recipients to opioid monotherapy patients.

Results

We identified 4,85,895 orthopedic surgery patients with 1,74,805 (36%) who had received IV acetaminophen. Study subjects averaged 64 years of age and were predominantly non-Hispanic Caucasians (78%) and female (58%). The mean unadjusted LOS for IV acetaminophen patients was 3.2 days [standard deviation (SD) 2.6] compared to 3.9 days (SD 3.9) with only IV opioids (P < 0.0001). Average unadjusted hospitalization costs were $19,024.9 (SD $13,113.7) for IV acetaminophen patients and $19,927.6 (SD $19,578.8) for IV opioid patients (P < 0.0001). These differences remained statistically significant in our instrumental variable models, with IV acetaminophen associated with 0.51 days shorter hospitalization [95% confidence interval (CI) −0.58 to −0.44, P < 0.0001] and $634.8 lower hospitalization costs (95% CI −$1032.5 to −$237.1, P = 0.0018).

Conclusion

Compared to opioids alone, managing post-orthopedic surgery pain with the addition of IV acetaminophen is associated with shorter LOS and decreased hospitalization costs.

Funding

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals.